Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2006
…
220 pages
1 file
The function of planning in a predominantly market-driven economy has to be symptomatic, co-coordinative and authoritarian. That provides the good reason for India's Planning Commission to engage in preparing development plans for the economy periodically even after liberalisation. However as it can't control investment in the private sector so such planning can at best be at least indicative. So the five year plans are now seek to provide an indicative path of development by setting out the imperatives for alternative growth scenarios in terms of macro-variables. It is still be necessary for planning commission to integrate and coordinate the plans of different ministries and undertakings of the central government, and bring them in line with the medium and long-term goals while keeping within the budget constraint. At the same time, the system of transfers from the centre needs to be reformed. There should be some rethinking on the relative roles of the planning commission and the finance commission. In this paper an attempt has been made to analyze the inter relation between economic development and directive roles of planning process in India.
The economic development of India during planning era is impressive. The performance of Agriculture sector, Industrial sector and territory sector contributes a lot towards overall development of the country. The development of infrastructure during planning era is laudable. The entire credit goes to the planning commission which is unfortunately abolished by the new government at the centre. In this scenario, an attempt has been made to evaluate and discuss the economic development of India during planning era. This study concentrates on development of country sector wise like agriculture, industry, retail, energy, infrastructure and communications etc, finally offer recommendations for effective economic development of the country.
2010
The function of planning in a predominantly market-driven economy has to be symptomatic, co-coordinative and authoritarian. That provides the good reason for India's Planning Commission to engage in preparing development plans for the economy periodically even after liberalisation. However as it can't control investment in the private sector so such planning can at best be at least indicative. So the five year plans are now seek to provide an indicative path of development by setting out the imperatives for alternative growth scenarios in terms of macro-variables. It is still be necessary for planning commission to integrate and coordinate the plans of different ministries and undertakings of the central government, and bring them in line with the medium and long-term goals while keeping within the budget constraint. At the same time, the system of transfers from the centre needs to be reformed. There should be some rethinking on the relative roles of the planning commission and the finance commission. In this paper an attempt has been made to analyze the inter relation between economic development and directive roles of planning process in India.
Economic planning is considered as the most systematic technique for redressing all economic defects. Various countries of the world have already experienced the successful implementation of economic planning in the mean time. In India the first systematic attempt of economic planning was made in 1934 when M. Visvesyaryya published his book ‘Planned Economy for India’. Again in 1937, Indian National Congress set up the National Planning Committee with Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru as Chairman. First economic plan came in existence in 1951 and currently 12th plan is in progress. Indian Economy has undergone several transition stages. At this point of time it is the necessity of the hour to understand and realize the importance of economic planning in India.
Journal of Comparative Economics, 1990
This paper traces the evolution of planning procedures in India, from the wartime controls to the system of centralized command-type planning which was extended to the private sector through industrial licensing. It was found that although the planners and policymakers in India initially understood the need for the use of a variety of instruments and controls for indicative-type planning in a mixed economy, there has always been a mismatch between planning intentions and the use of instruments in their more appropriate form. A quantitative evaluation of planned performance over the seven Five Year Plans has also been provided.
Policy-Making for Indian Planning, ed. Sameer Kochar, Skoch Foundation, New Delhi,, 2012
A short history of the orientationnof planning in India provides a basis for defining the role of planning in a liberalised economy
International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 2023
Abstract The Indian Constitution, the wealth of knowledge from our civilizational history, and the current socio-cultural-economic contexts must form the basis upon which the institutions of governance and policy must adapt to new challenges if they are to reflect the spirit and altered dynamics of the new India. To achieve India's and its people's aspirations, institutional reforms in governance and dynamic policy modifications that may seed and foster remarkable transformation are required. The government of India has formed NITI Aayog (National Institute for Transforming India) in place of the Planning Commission in order to adapt to current times and suit the needs and aspirations of the Indian people. This article examines the contributions of the National Planning Commission and the National Institution for Transforming India (NITI) Aayog to the development of the Indian economy.
Journal of Comparative Economics, 1990
This paper argues that planning as practiced in India has in many respects failed to achieve national development objectives over the long term. Four different s,ets of factors can be identified as probably having contributed to this failure: (1) faulty premises and development strategies. (2) problematic and counterproductive implementation mechanisms, (3) the emergence of powerful interest groups that appropriate public resources and blocked needed policy reforms, and (4) the slowness to learn from experience and consequent lack of flexibility and adaptation. These forces were not mutually independent. and hence their relative importance is difficult to gauge precisely. J. Co/n/~ L'conorn., December 1990. 14(4),
The main process or stages of planning are as under: 1. Formulation of Plan: The formulation of the development plan is the first stage of the economic planning. At the top, the Planning Commission formulates a draft plan in consultation with the various ministries or economic councils. Similarly, at the bottom, individual perspective plan on the basis of past experience and future requirements is prepared. The Planning Commission assesses the balances of technical possibilities, recommendations, suggestions and requirements in the light of reports given by two agencies—one from the top and the other from the bottom. The final draft is comprehensive, coherent and well knit document. First of all, Planning Commission lays down tentatively certain general goals for the long time, i.e., for fifteen or twenty years, after making a careful analysis of technical possibilities, the basic and non-basic needs of the economy and various methods of development.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
International journal of business and social research, 2012
Administración & Desarrollo, 2017
In book: Indian Economy after Liberalisation: Performance and Challenges, Edition: First, Chapter: 2, Publisher: SSDN Publication, New Delhi, Editors: Dilip Saikia, pp.47-80, 2012
In book: Dweep-Deepika: the Souvenir of Majuli College Golden Jubilee, Edition: First, Publisher: Majuli College, Jorhat, Assam, Editors: Debajit Saikia, pp.123-129, 2013
Journal of Comparative Economics, 1990
Cambridge University Press, 2022
Economic Planning: Theory and Practice, 2022