Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
1999
AI
This thesis explores the nature of knowledge-intensive firms (KIFs) which provide tailored services to corporate clients and depend on the problem-solving abilities of their employees. It evaluates the structural and design perspectives of these firms and combines them with a processual/contextual understanding, also investigating the influence of early Irish monasticism on contemporary practices. Through case studies, the research concludes that KIFs exhibit 'plural forms' of organization, utilizing various internal and external control mechanisms while challenging the notion of a singular new management paradigm.
Journal of Management & Governance, 2006
Architectures of Knowledge is a fascinating book attempting to provide a coherent framework within which to analyze such concepts as knowledge, knowing, capabilities, communities, and firms. Amin and Cohendet scrutinize these concepts using an intriguing format. As reported in the Introduction, the book emerges from an ongoing and evolving dialogue between a geographer (i.e. Ash Amin)-interested in the spatial dimension of learning and convinced of the importance of practised knowledge-and an economist (i.e. Patrick Cohendet)-educated within the paradigm that sees firms as information-processing units and therefore considers knowledge as akin to information. This evolving dialogue reflects the historical evolution of the conceptualization of knowledge within organized and organizing contexts (be that firms, communities, territorial systems-such as regions).
We frequently say that people are an organization's most important resource, yet we seldom understand this truism in terms of the communities through which individ uals develop and share the capacity to create and use knowledge. Even when people work for large organizations, they learn through their participation in smaller com munities made up of people with whom they interact on a regular basis. At Siemens, a group of committed knowledge management staff regularly discussed the latest developments in the knowledge management field and helped to find solutions for each other's most difficult challenges. This group formed a Community of Practice for Knowledge Management, sharing a common background, practice and identity, and engaging in a common enterprise. In 1998, this Community of Practice request ed central support from Siemens. This "bottom-up movement" led to the creation of a new corporate office for Knowledge Management, the Corporate Knowledge Management Office (CKM). In this case study the phenomenon of Communities of Practice is examined as a driving force for effective Knowledge Management in a company. The challenges facing its set-up and successful implementation are explored. As a forum for sharing knowledge and a knowledge community, and as a testing laboratory for integral knowledge management systems, its strengths and critical aspects are discussed. Thereafter, the factors that contributed to its successful creation are examined. In particular, the question of how this Community of Practice in Siemens a non-centrally organized and heterogeneous company was able to develop and attract sufficient attention to bring into being a new corporate office is examined together with its aim to co-ordinate and support the knowledge management activities of Siemens.
Knowledge Horizons. The Present and the Promise of …, 2000
… at the CMS Conference July 11-13th, 2001
Interest in Knowledge Management (herein 'KM') has soared in the last few years. Despite what might be said about the feasibility or robustness of the idea, undoubtedly one of its astounding 'successes' is its heated diffusion among both academic and practitioner communities. This diffusion, together with its popularity among major consultancies suggest that it has the hallmarks of a management fashion, and is likely to disappear as quickly as it arrived. Indeed, the data we present in this paper indicate that this is likely to be the case. As such KM could be dismissed as not worthy of any serious investigation because its effects (if indeed there are any) will be short-lived. However, management fashions are arguably worthy of investigation in their own right. Fashions have symbolic or sign value-flagging up some organizational concerns as being more pressing or worthy of management attention at certain times than others. They also draw attention to, and legitimate the status and expertise of, those who are seen as being able to deal with those pressing problems. We argue therefore that the fashionization of ideas needs to be understood in relational terms. That is it comprises multiple professional networks (encompassing practitioners and suppliers) that seek to compete for and defend their claims to knowledge in relation to other professional groups in ways that relate to the activities and practices they are actually involved with in organizations. Ironically, a consequence of the colonization by professional groups is that 'KM', when applied in organizations, could become an example of the very problems that it seeks to address. Thus, adopting a broad perspective on knowledge as socially constructed 'KM' itself is found to be an interesting example of the social construction of knowledge with the result here being that knowledge relevant to 'KM' is both dispersed and disintegrated.
1994
Some formulations used in the text are idiosyncratic adaptations and extensions of ideas found in an essay first written in collaboration with Gernot Böhme and published as a contribution to our collection: Gernot Böhme and Nico Stehr (eds.), The Knowledge Society. Dordrecht: D. Reidel 1986. I am grateful to Gernot Böhme for his kind permission to do so. My debt for the generous support by the University of Alberta, and the excellent working conditions at the university in the course of the past number of years while working on this study is considerable. I am also grateful to the Rockefeller Foundation for an intellectually challenging stay at the Rockefeller Study Center in Bellagio, Italy. Central parts of this study were completed while in residence at the Center. Work on this project was facilitated by research funds from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, Ottawa, Canada.
2014
This paper presents the British Council's knowledge management strategy. It outlines how, as part of this strategy, the organisation attempted to engender communities of practice among a strategically significant group spread across the 110 countries in which the organisation operates. Using a case study of this group, the paper explores "degenerative structures" which impact on the ability to engender communities of practice and, through consideration of issues of individualisation and risk, highlights a series of paradoxes which inhibited this organisations attempt to move from a "hub-and-spoke" structure to become a networked organisation in which communties of practice flourish.
Management & Organizational History, 2014
The paper considers the proposition that recognising the mental model that is held of knowledge by the individuals of an organisation may help us to understand whether or not knowledge building potential can be effectively developed. It is argued that the potential for effective knowledge utilisation will be dependent upon the epistemological perspective held by organisational members. Processual and structural perspectives of knowledge are described and utilised here to discuss two identifiable mental models that exist in organisations. The notion that a perspective of knowledge will affect its management is not new, but the idea that organisations need to actively identify the epistemological foundations they are working with and may need to change them, is.
Information Systems Journal, 2007
This paper presents the British Council's knowledge management strategy. It outlines how, as part of this strategy, the organization attempted to engender communities of practice among a strategically significant group spread across the 110 countries in which the organization operates. Using a case study of this group, the paper explores 'degenerative structures' that impact on the ability to engender communities of practice and, through consideration of issues of individualization and risk, highlights a series of paradoxes that inhibited this organization's attempt to move from a 'hub-and-spoke' structure to become a networked organization in which communities of practice flourish.
2003
In our work a new approach, the Distributed Knowledge Management (DKM) approach, is used and organizations are seen as constellations of communities, which \own" local knowledge and exchange it through meaning negotiation coordination processes. In order to reify communities within a DKM system, the concept of Knowledge Node (KN) is used and then applied in a case study: a complex Italian national firm, the Impresa Pizzarotti & C. S.p.A. All communities of practices are un-veiled and rei ed as KNs within a high level architecture of a DKM system. In this paper it is argued that, even if knowledge has to be organized and made useful to the whole organization, there are types of knowledge that must be managed in an autonomous way, and the DKM approach is a good system which to deal with coordination/negotiation processes.
In this paper it is argued that the terms, knowledge work, knowledge workers, and knowledge intensive firms point to emerging social structures and processes in organisations. This focus allows us to analyse organisations in ways that differ from the notions involving less dynamic forms of organisational configurations. It is further argued that the emphasis on knowledge in organisations raises a fundamental question of learning, i. e. how knowledge workers acquire relevant competencies. However, the answer to this depends on how organisational life and work are understood and conceptualised. Three foci are suggested, organisations viewed through their use of technology, the division of labour, and the social interactions in organisations. These three foci relate to different understandings of learning, namely learning as cognition, as situated, and as the reconstruction of experiences. To illustrate both the emphasis on knowledge and the different perspectives on learning, a case s...
European Journal of Economic and Social Systems, 2000
In this article we present a relatively novel concept: the "ba". This concept was put forward by two authors, , who showed that the "ba" -a form of interaction "place" -was a foundation for the creation of knowledge in an organisation. We believe that this space plays a decisive role in the study and description of knowledge management in firms and that it can be used in many fields of research. Because it is a multi-organisational, multipurpose, etc. concept, its contribution is significant. Our presentation of this concept will be based on the works of Nonaka and Konno (1998), but we will also examine the main themes arising from the theoretical movements dealing with knowledge in organisations. Moreover, we are also putting forward a framework of study related to this concept, and a definition of the main possible forms of "ba".
2009
2007, xi + 277 pp., ISBN 1 0439 3407 9, £60.00.
Information Research, 2002
Examines critically the origins and basis of 'knowledge management', its components and its development as a field of consultancy practice. Problems in the distinction between 'knowledge' and 'information' are explored, as well as Polanyi's concept of 'tacit knowing'. The concept is examined in the journal literature, the Web sites of consultancy companies, and in the presentation of business schools. The conclusion is reached that 'knowledge management' is an umbrella term for a variety of organizational activities, none of which are concerned with the management of knowledge. Those activities that are not concerned with the management of information are concerned with the management of work practices, in the expectation that changes in such areas as communication practice will enable information sharing.
2003
In our work a new approach, the Distributed Knowledge Management (DKM) approach, is used and organizations are seen as constellations of communities, which "own" local knowledge and exchange it through meaning negotiation coordination processes. In order to reify communities within a DKM system, the concept of Knowledge Node (KN) is used and then applied in a case study: a complex Italian national firm, the Impresa Pizzarotti & C. S.p.A. All communities of practices are unveiled and reified as KNs within a high level architecture of a DKM system. In this paper it is argued that, even if knowledge has to be organized and made useful to the whole organization, there are types of knowledge that must be managed in an autonomous way, and the DKM approach is a good system which to deal with coordination/negotiation processes.
InImpact: The Journal of Innovation Impact, 2014
This paper reports a single case study of a knowledge transfer partnership in the construction industry, and suggests that the knowledge-based organisation has emerged as both a major contributing factor of the project's success and the product of the successful partnership. Components of the theoretical knowledge-based organisation are explored in light of the case observations; an example of the benefits of blending of theory and practice. Creating, capturing and sharing knowledge became a single process through the application of learning to learn, evidence-based management and communities of practice. Consequently, this study evaluates the efficacy of these educational interventions. The paper concludes that the tripartite Knowledge Transfer Partnership has evolved to a sustainable knowledge-based dyad.
Journal of Knowledge Management, 2014
Organization Studies, 2003
Alistair Mutch is Principal Lecturer in Information Management in Nottingham Business School at the Nottingham Trent University. He began academic life as a historian exploring rural life in Victorian England and then worked for British Telecommunications for ten years. He is interested in developing a critical realist perspective on the use of information, as well as in exploring the historical dimension of information use. He has published on, amongst other things, the current status and historical formation of welding, and the use of information by trades unions. He is currently working on a history of public house management in the United Kingdom, following a study of contemporary practices.
This paper explores the contribution of communal structures such as Communities of Practice (CoPs) on intraorganizational Knowledge Management (KM). First, we look at intra organizational knowledge management and explore the role that information systems can play. We introduce the idea of "Systèmes d'Aide à la Gestion des Connaissances" SAGC (Systems to aid the Management of Knowledge) and then establish our theoretical foundations concerning communal KM, especially as it relates to the structural and functional characteristics of CoPs. The results of an exploratory qualitative survey involving Chief Knowledge Officers (CKOs) of large French businesses are presented which examine the contribution that communal structures such as CoPs can make to intraorganizational KM. The results highlight some of 'success factors' for the communal management of knowledge. Two types of factors in particular appear to encourage the sharing of knowledge: those related to (1) the characteristics of a CoP (2) the organizational context. The work indicates that, perhaps contrary to what might be expected, many of the key success factors are the same 'management' issues that can found in almost any IS project while some of the issues that the literature indicates are important, appear to be less so in practice.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.