Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2014, Brain Research Bulletin
…
9 pages
1 file
We review recent work on extinction learning with emphasis on its modulation. Extinction is the learned inhibition of responding to previously acquired tasks. Like other forms of learning, it can be modulated by a variety of neurotransmitter systems and behavioral procedures. This bears on its use in the treatment of fear memories, particularly in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), for which it is the treatment of choice, often under the name of exposure therapy. There have not been many laboratories interested in the modulation of extinction, but the available data, although not very abundant, are quite conclusive. Most studies on the nature of extinction and on its modulation have been carried out on fear motivated behaviors, possibly because of their applicability to the therapy of PTSD. A role for d-serine and the glycine site of NMDA receptors has been ascertained in two forms of extinction in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, basolateral amygdala and dorsal hippocampus. The serine analog, d-cycloserine, has received clinical trials as an enhancer of extinction. The brain histaminergic system acting via H2 receptors, and the endocannabinoid system using CB1 receptors in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, hippocampus and basolateral amygdala enhance extinction. Dopaminergic D1 and -noradrenergic receptors also modulate extinction by actions on these three structures. Isolated findings suggest roles for on serotonin-1A, dopaminergic-D2 and ␣and -noradrenergic receptors in extinction modulation. Importantly, behavioral tagging and capture mechanisms in the hippocampus have been shown to play a major modulatory role in extinction. In addition, extinction of at least one aversive task (inhibitory avoidance) can be made state dependent on peripheral epinephrine.
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 2014
We investigate whether the extinction of inhibitory avoidance (IA) learning can be subjected to endogenous state-dependence with systemic injections of epinephrine (E), and whether endogenous norepinephrine (NE) and the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) ? locus coeruleus ? hippocampus/amygdala (HIPP/BLA) pathway participate in this. Rats trained in IA were submitted to two sessions of extinction 24 h apart: In the first, the animals were submitted to a training session of extinction, and in the second they were tested for the retention of extinction. Saline or E were given i.p. immediately after the extinction training (post-extinction training injections) and/or 6 min before the extinction test (pre-extinction test). Post-extinction training E (50 or 100 lg/kg) induced a poor retrieval of extinction in the test session of this task unless an additional E injection (50 lg/kg) was given prior to the extinction test. This suggested state-dependence. Muscimol (0.01 lg/side) microinfused into the NTS prior to the extinction test session blocked E-induced state-dependence. Norepinephrine (NE, 1 lg/side) infused bilaterally into NTS restores the extinction impairment caused by post-extinction training i.p. E. In animals with bilateral NTS blockade induced by muscimol, NE (1 lg/side) given prior to the extinction test into the CA1 region of the dorsal hippocampus or into the basolateral amygdala restored the normal extinction levels that had been impaired by muscimol. These results suggest a role for the NTS ? locus coeruleus ? HIPP/BLA pathway in the retrieval of extinction, as it has been shown to have in the consolidation of inhibitory avoidance and of object recognition learning.
Current Neuropharmacology, 2003
Retrieval procedures, if carried out without reinforcement, initiate memory extinction. The extinction of onetrial avoidance learning requires glutamate NMDA receptors, calcium-calmodulin dependent protein kinase II, cAMPdependent protein kinase and mitogen-activated protein kinases, and, importantly, protein synthesis and gene expression in the hippocampus. The extinction of fear-potentiated startle requires NMDA receptors and mitogen-activated protein kinases in the basolateral amygdala. The extinction of conditioned taste aversion requires protein synthesis in the insular cortex. Thus, extinction is an active process that involves a variety of molecular events and -at least for the one task in which it was studied-both gene expression and protein synthesis. Insofar as in each of the tasks mentioned, the treatments were studied in a different brain region, therefore, it is still not known whether extinction in general uses those brain areas in parallel, or whether the extinction of each task is metabolically different. A role of endogenous cannabinoids in extinction has been postulated; some evidence indicate that they act on the amygdala, but indirect findings suggest that they may also exert their action in the hippocampus. When carried out using methods that enhance perception that the reinforcement is absent, extinction can be quite profound, and the animals require "de novo" gene expression and protein synthesis in the hippocampus in order to reinstall the original learning. This might be of value in the design of "exposure" therapies for the treatment of phobias and of post-traumatic stress disorders.
Neuropsychopharmacology, 2007
Emotional learning is necessary for individuals to survive and prosper. Once acquired, however, emotional associations are not always expressed. Indeed, the regulation of emotional expression under varying environmental conditions is essential for mental health. The simplest form of emotional regulation is extinction, in which conditioned responding to a stimulus decreases when the reinforcer is omitted. Two decades of research on the neural mechanisms of fear conditioning have laid the groundwork for understanding extinction. In this review, we summarize recent work on the neural mechanisms of extinction learning. Like other forms of learning, extinction occurs in three phases: acquisition, consolidation, and retrieval, each of which depends on specific structures (amygdala, prefrontal cortex, hippocampus) and molecular mechanisms (receptors and signaling pathways). Pharmacological methods to facilitate consolidation and retrieval of extinction, for both aversive and appetitive conditioning, are setting the stage for novel treatments for anxiety disorders and addictions.
European Journal of Neuroscience, 2010
Fear extinction is a form of inhibitory learning that allows for the adaptive control of conditioned fear responses. Although fear extinction is an active learning process that eventually leads to the formation of a consolidated extinction memory, it is a fragile behavioural state. Fear responses can recover spontaneously or subsequent to environmental influences, such as context changes or stress. Understanding the neuronal substrates of fear extinction is of tremendous clinical relevance, as extinction is the cornerstone of psychological therapy of several anxiety disorders and because the relapse of maladaptative fear and anxiety is a major clinical problem. Recent research has begun to shed light on the molecular and cellular processes underlying fear extinction. In particular, the acquisition, consolidation and expression of extinction memories are thought to be mediated by highly specific neuronal circuits embedded in a large-scale brain network including the amygdala, prefrontal cortex, hippocampus and brain stem. Moreover, recent findings indicate that the neuronal circuitry of extinction is developmentally regulated. Here, we review emerging concepts of the neuronal circuitry of fear extinction, and highlight novel findings suggesting that the fragile phenomenon of extinction can be converted into a permanent erasure of fear memories. Finally, we discuss how research on genetic animal models of impaired extinction can further our understanding of the molecular and genetic bases of human anxiety disorders.
Translational psychiatry, 2011
Exposure therapy for anxiety disorders relies on the principle of confronting a patient with the triggers of his fears, allowing him to make the unexpected safety experience that his fears are unfounded and resulting in the extinction of fear responses. In the laboratory, fear extinction is modeled by repeatedly presenting a fear-conditioned stimulus (CS) in the absence of the aversive unconditioned stimulus (UCS) to which it had previously been associated. Classical associative learning theory considers extinction to be driven by an aversive prediction error signal that expresses the expectation violation when not receiving an expected UCS and establishes a prediction of CS non-occurrence. Insufficiencies of this account in explaining various extinction-related phenomena could be resolved by assuming that extinction is an opponent appetitive-like learning process that would be mediated by the mesostriatal dopamine (DA) system. In accordance with this idea, we find that a functional...
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 2006
Evidence from previous studies indicates that the noradrenergic and GABAergic inXuences within the basolateral amygdala (BLA) modulate the consolidation of memory for fear conditioning. The present experiments investigated whether the same modulatory inXuences are involved in regulating the extinction of fear-based learning. To investigate this issue, male Sprague Dawley rats implanted with unilateral or bilateral cannula aimed at the BLA were trained on a contextual fear conditioning (CFC) task and 24 and 48 h later were given extinction training. Immediately following each extinction session they received intra-BLA infusions of the GABAergic antagonist bicuculline (50 ng), the-adrenocepter antagonist propranolol (500 ng), bicuculline with propranolol, norepinephrine (NE) (0.3, 1.0, and 3.0 g), the GABAergic agonist muscimol (125 ng), NE with muscimol or a control solution. To investigate the involvement of the dorsal hippocampus (DH) as a possible target of BLA activation during extinction, other animals were given infusions of muscimol (500 ng) via an ipsilateral cannula implanted in the DH. Bilateral BLA infusions of bicuculline signiWcantly enhanced extinction, as did infusions into the right, but not left BLA. Propranolol infused into the right BLA together with bicuculline blocked the bicuculline-induced memory enhancement. Norepinephrine infused into the right BLA also enhanced extinction, and this eVect was not blocked by co-infusions of muscimol. Additionally, muscimol infused into the DH did not attenuate the memory enhancing eVects of norepinephrine infused into the BLA. These Wndings provide evidence that, as with original CFC learning, noradrenergic activation within the BLA modulates the consolidation of CFC extinction. The Wndings also suggest that the BLA inXuence on extinction is not mediated by an interaction with the dorsal hippocampus.
Psychopharmacology, 2019
Extinction within the reconsolidation window, or 'retrieval-extinction', has received much research interest as a possible technique for targeting the reconsolidation of maladaptive memories with a behavioural intervention. However, it remains to be determined whether the retrieval-extinction effect-a long-term reduction in fear behaviour, which appears resistant to spontaneous recovery, renewal and reinstatement-depends specifically on destabilisation of the original memory (the 'reconsolidationupdate' account) or represents facilitation of an extinction memory (the 'extinction-facilitation' account). We propose that comparing the neurotransmitter systems, receptors and intracellular signalling pathways recruited by reconsolidation, extinction and retrieval-extinction will provide a way of distinguishing between these accounts.
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
Extinction-based exposure therapy is widely used for the treatment of anxiety disorders, such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). D-serine, an endogenous co-agonist at the glycine-binding site of the N-methyl-D-aspartate-type glutamate receptor (NMDAR), has been shown to be involved in extinction of fear memory. Recent findings suggest that the length of time between the initial learning and an extinction session is a determinant of neural mechanism involved in fear extinction. However, how D-serine is involved in extinction of fear memory at different timings remains unclear. In the present study, we investigated the role of D-serine in immediate, delayed and post-retrieval extinction (P-RE) of contextual fear memory using wild-type (WT) and serine racemase (SRR) knockout (KO) mice that exhibit 90% reduction in D-serine content in the hippocampus. We found that SRR disruption impairs P-RE, facilitates immediate extinction (IE), but has no effect on delayed extinction (DE) of contextual fear memories. The impaired P-RE of contextual fear memory in SRRKO mice was associated with increased expression of the GluA1 subunit of the α-amino-3-hydroxy-5methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid-type glutamate receptor (AMPAR) in the hippocampal synaptic membrane fraction after P-RE, and this increase of AMPAR and impaired P-RE were rescued by the administration of D-serine to SRRKO mice. Our findings suggest that D-serine is differentially involved in the regulation of contextual fear extinction depending on the timing of behavioral intervention, and that combining D-serine or other drugs, enhancing the NMDAR function, with P-RE may achieve optimal outcomes for the treatment of PTSD.
Behavioural Brain Research, 2001
The present investigation was aimed at elucidating the dose and time dependency of scopolamine-induced recovery of inhibitory avoidance after its extinction. Two experiments were conducted: in the first, we analyzed the effects of four doses (1, 2, 4, and 8 mg/kg) of the musacrinic receptor antagonist scopolamine, on the expression of this conditioned response once it had been extinguished. Independent groups of rats were trained in a one-trial, step-through inhibitory avoidance task and submitted to daily retention (extinction) tests. After extinction had occurred, animals were injected intraperitoneally 10 min before retention testing, either with saline or scopolamine. Results show that scopolamine produced a dose-dependent recovery of the avoidance response. The second experiment was carried out in the same animals, which were now tested for retention of inhibitory avoidance at 1, 2, 3, 6, and 9 months after completion of the first experiment. All rats received counterbalanced injections of saline or scopolamine 10 min before testing at each time interval. Reliable recovery of the avoidance response was observed at the 1-month interval with a clear dose dependency while, after the second month, only the groups treated with the two higher doses continued responding. The results indicate that recovery of the extinguished response produced by muscarinic blockade follows dose- and time-dependent curves, and can be achieved long after a single training session. These data suggest that the inhibitory avoidance memory trace is retained in the brain after behavioural extinction of this response, thus supporting the view of extinction as new learning that affects the retrieval of the original memory, but does not modify its storage.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012
The memory of fear extinction is context dependent: fear that is suppressed in one context readily renews in another. Understanding of the underlying neuronal circuits is, therefore, of considerable clinical relevance for anxiety disorders. Prefrontal cortical and hippocampal inputs to the amygdala have recently been shown to regulate the retrieval of fear memories, but the cellular organization of these projections remains unclear. By using anterograde tracing in a transgenic rat in which neurons express a dendriticallytargeted PSD-95:Venus fusion protein under the control of a c-fos promoter, we found that, during the retrieval of extinction memory, the dominant input to active neurons in the lateral amygdala was from the infralimbic cortex, whereas the retrieval of fear memory was associated with greater hippocampal and prelimbic inputs. This pattern of retrieval-related afferent input was absent in the central nucleus of the amygdala. Our data show functional anatomy of neural circuits regulating fear and extinction, providing a framework for therapeutic manipulations of these circuits. gene expression | hippocampus | prefrontal cortex | learning and memory T here is an increasing interest in the neural mechanisms underlying extinction of learned fear, in part because fear extinction is a useful model for exposure-based therapies for the treatment of human anxiety disorders, such as phobias and posttraumatic stress disorder (1). During fear extinction, a previously conditioned stimulus (CS) is repeatedly presented in the absence of the unconditioned stimulus (US), a procedure that induces a progressive decrease in the magnitude and probability of learned fear responses, including freezing behavior. However, extinction does not erase the original fear memory; rather, it promotes the formation of a new inhibitory memory that reduces fear to the CS (2). Extinguished fear is highly context dependent, insofar as CS presentation outside the extinction context results in the recovery of the previously conditioned fear response, a phenomenon known as fear renewal . The return of fear after extinction is a considerable challenge for the efficacy of exposure-based therapies (4). Therefore, identification of brain structures and neuronal circuits selectively implicated in extinction vs. renewal of fear is of great importance.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Biological Psychiatry, 2009
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, 2007
Neuropsychopharmacology, 2019
Biological Psychiatry, 2006
The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2018
Scientific Reports, 2017
Brain and Cognition, 2013
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2004
Journal of Neuroscience, 2008
Current Neurovascular …, 2004
Hippocampus, 2007
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 2014
Nature Communications, 2018
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory