Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2013, Economic and Financial Review
…
32 pages
1 file
The paper examines the impact of capital flows and capital controls on exchange rate regimes, highlighting the contrasting views on liberalizing capital accounts, especially in developing countries. It discusses the resurgence of capital controls as a response to financial crises, arguing that these measures can help stabilize economies by preventing macroeconomic volatilities triggered by unchecked capital mobility. The analysis also reflects on the consequences of capital flow surges for macroeconomic management, the risks of sharp reversals, and the implications for emerging markets' competitiveness and financial stability.
Oxford Handbooks Online, 2011
Public Finance Quarterly, 2011
Journal of Development Economics, 1987
International Review of Applied Economics
First, we examine the nature of capital controls and their impact on selected countries. We provide a critique of IMF policy and an examination of its results in practice. We then show how the warning signs of the 1970s were ignored and the consequences became apparent during the ensuing period of neoliberal hegemony. We present a summary of the neo-classical arguments concerning the role of increased capital mobility in promoting growth and development. Our objectives are first, to show that, in practice, it may be that promoting increased capital mobility is counterproductive as it reduces macroeconomic 'policy space' and restricts the state's ability to use fiscal and monetary policy to enhance welfare. Second, we introduce and use a development of the international policy 'trilemma' in the form of a variant of the idea of the 'quadrilemma' 1 in order to underpin our policy suggestions. We suggest that, in most cases, the key policy driver in the promotion of economic growth is fiscal policy but it may be that its unconstrained use (and that of monetary policy) is not possible either under fixed exchange rates or when free capital mobility exists; in fact, a nation may face a 'demiquadrilemma. We contend that, in practice, a country can only adopt 'two from four'; if it chooses to retain free use of monetary and fiscal policy it must sacrifice both fixed exchange rates and capital mobility. We hope to demonstrate that a nation facing the 'demi-quadrilemma' should discard both the use of fixed exchange rates and the acceptance of free capital mobility in order to allow the retention of requisite monetary and fiscal policy space and that a multinational approach to the design of capital control policy would be an effective contributor to a strategy designed to enhance growth and development.
Review of International Economics, 2001
This introduction to a special edition of Review of International Economics summarizes a collection of articles that originated in a conference on "Is Globalization of Capital Markets a Boost or a Hindrance to Development?" that was sponsored by the Program in Economic Policy Management (PEPM) at Columbia University during 16-17 April 1999.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Rajat Kathuria · Prateek Kukreja Editors 20 Years of G20 From Global Cooperation to Building Consensus, 2019
Publicación oficial de la V Cumbre de las Américas de la ACI, 2018
Bretton Woods Revisited, 1972
Journal of Comparative Economics, 2000
Economic and Political Weekly, 2004
The World Bank Research Observer, 1996
Asian Economic and Financial Review
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2003
The Economic Journal, 1995
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas CLAE …, 2001
2007
OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 2012
International Journal of Political Economy, 2003
Financial Crises in Emerging Markets, 2001