The Low-Carbon Transition and Financial System Stability
Carolin Schellhorn2016, SSRN Electronic Journal
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Abstract
The agreement of the climate-negotiating parties in Paris in December 2015 (COP21) signaled the world's intent to decarbonize over the coming decades in order to keep the earth's average temperature increase below 2 degrees Celsius by mid-century. A timely and smooth transition to a low-carbon economy may be accomplished if businesses routinely disclose and manage carbon dioxide emissions subject to science-based targets along with climate-related financial risks and financial performance. Existing capital budgeting techniques can help create value sustainably by focusing on the opportunity costs of both financial capital and carbon dioxide thus improving the allocations of both financial and atmospheric capital. Business efforts in this area will be most effective if guided by supportive government policy. If the voluntary responses from businesses, consumers, investors and local policy-makers fail to meet the science-based deadline for carbon dioxide emission reduction, aggressive and globally enforced carbon pricing mechanisms and emissions restrictions may become necessary. To the extent the business community is unprepared for broad-based climate policy intervention individual firm balance sheets may become impaired. In this case the greater likelihood of financial insolvencies in carbon-intensive and related industries will challenge the stability of the global financial system. It is therefore imperative that the problem of financial institutions that are "too big to fail" be addressed expeditiously by reducing financial firms' holdings of high-carbon assets.
Related papers
Mainstreaming Climate Change into Financial Governance - Rationale and Entry Points
Climate Change and Law Collection
• Today, the financial sector is exposed to the physical risks associated with climate change and the impact of climate policies. Securing global financial and economic stability and scaling up low-carbon, climate-resilient investments are not conflicting, but rather mutually reinforcing, objectives. • Although crucial, classic climate policies-such as carbon pricing, emission standards and technology objectives-do not appear sufficient to address the challenges from climate change that the financial sector is facing. Policies affecting the demand side and supply side of finance, as well as instruments matching supply and demand, need to be aligned with climate objectives to efficiently shift investments toward a low-carbon, climate-resilient economy. • The financial sector and its governance bodies have an interest in integrating climate change issues into their risk and stability assessment frameworks, but seemingly differing mandates and the lack of institutional and intellectual links are hindering a timely and well-informed discussion. • Once the link between climate change and the mandates of international financial sector governance and regulatory institutions is understood, the existing tool kits and processes of these institutions-common standards, principles and guidelines with various levels of legal force, country surveillance and technical assistance-present entry points to mainstream climate-related risks and opportunities into their core operations. 1 This brief is based on two longer working papers published by the authors (see Morel et al. 2015).
Climate change challenges for central banks and financial regulators
Nature Climate Change, 2018
The academic and policy debate regarding the role of central banks and financial regulators in addressing climate-related financial risks has rapidly expanded in recent years. This Perspective presents the key controversies and discusses potential research and policy avenues for the future. Developing a comprehensive analytical framework to assess the potential impact of climate change and the low-carbon transition on financial stability appears to be the first crucial challenge. These enhanced risk measures could then be incorporated in setting financial regulations and implementing central banks' policies. [Main text] Achieving the objectives of the Paris Agreement will require a large-scale shift towards low-carbon technologies. However, socio-technological transitions often involve disruptive adjustments, even when they are ultimately beneficial to human welfare. 1,2 This process of 'creative destruction' is likely to take place also during the low-carbon transition, with potentially significant repercussions on economic dynamics and financial stability. 3,4 Societies thus face the challenging task of achieving a rapid structural shift to a low-carbon economy, while concurrently avoiding excessive economic losses and safeguarding the stability of the financial system (see Table 1).
Carbon Finance: Its Implication Against the Untoward Effect of Climate Change Due to Industrialization and Urbanization
Journal of economics and sustainable development, 2014
Climate change has become the most important issue across the globe now-a-days. It creates a major risk to the global economy, affecting the wealth of societies, the availability of resources, the price of energy, and the value of financial sectors. It has become one of the most financially significant environmental concerns that the present world is facing. Carbon finance is a new branch of environmental finance which explores the financial propositions of carbon controlled world. Emissions of green house gases due to industrialization and urbanization bring a significant impact in the environmental issues and environmental consciousness is taking its shape in various dimensions in today’s complex business world. Realizing the importance and extent of carbon finance in the present world, in this study, we focused on the mechanisms that help the countries meet their emission reduction obligations in the context of environmental risk mitigation, likely, clean development mechanism, r...
From transformational climate finance to transforming the financial system for climate
H2020 COP21:RIPPLES, 2019
The report is a deliverable to Horizon2020 Project COP21 RIPPLES. It departs from the novelty of Paris Agreement’s article 2.1.c and its goal of shifting all financial flows towards climate alignment in terms of both mitigation and adaptation. Such a new and all-encompassing goal created the commitment among signatory countries to build individual strategies for bringing their financial sectors under compliance. In order to achieve so and following the remaining bottom-up approach brought by the Agreement (e.g. with the NDCs), finance must be understood in its multiplicity and dynamism across different theoretical and governance traditions, grounding a more polycentric framework that enables tailored – and often more effective locally and nationally – financial solutions in terms of climate alignment. Based on this, the report goes on to dive into six different financial sector-specific theories, policy and governance approaches, bringing them under the light of the climate urgency. After discussing them in some detail, we have built an exploratory framework to compare how different countries/regions have been approaching their national financial sector against the responsibility brought by the need of a total shift towards climate alignment. Finally, we use the framework to pilot the comparison between two important current approaches: (i) the Action Plan on Sustainable Finance, by the European Union, and (ii) the Guidelines for Establishing the Green Financial System, by China.
Carbon Certificates (CC) Real wealth justifying the creation of carbon assets CC green loans Emission reduction control CC green loans
This year, Europe is confronted with a critical double challenge: addressing the climate change issue and pulling itself out of a persistent low growth trap. Today these two challenges are addressed separately. On the one hand, climate negotiations must reach a historical agreement in the Paris conference in December 2015. On the other hand, the Juncker Plan of 315 billion euros of investment, and above all the ECB announcement of a massive purchase of assets for an amount of around 1100 billion euros, must help to avoid a deflationary spiral and stimulate a new flow of investments. Regarding climate policies, public regulators have essentially focused on a carbon price, which remains today at an insufficient level to trigger spontaneously the financing of the low-carbon transition". The potential of the banking and saving channels (targets of the asset purchase program of the ECB) to scale up climate finance is however neglected. This Note d'analyse proposes to make private low-carbon assets eligible for the ECB asset purchase program. The carbon impact of these assets would benefit from a public guarantee that would value their carbon externality at a level sufficient to compensate the absence of an adequate carbon price. This mechanism would immediately impact the investment decisions of private actors with a positive effect on growth. It would also strongly incite governments to progressively implement carbon pricing tools to ensure that the public backing of the value of the carbon assets remains neutral with respect to public budgets. A financial intermediation mechanism backed on a carbon value A proposal to finance low carbon investment in Europe
Financialisation, Climate Finance, and the Calculative Challenges of Managing Environmental Change
Antipode, 2019
If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections.
Carbon emissions trading: managing climate change financial markets
On 18 January 2007 the Financial Times reported a loophole in the Kyoto Protocol. The newspaper gave details about how carbon traders are able to exploit the emissions market to make big profi ts. This is done by encouraging Chinese factories to install end-of-pipe equipment -so-called scrubbers -to reduce emissions of HFC-23 gases, a very potent greenhouse gas (GHG). The technology is not new and relatively cheap to install, while it helps reducing HFC emissions that have a 12,000 times higher global warming potential than carbon dioxide (CO2) over a time period of 100 years. In other words, by only making a modest capital investment, carbon traders are able to generate huge amounts of carbon credits that can be sold at a large profi t in the European Union emissions trading scheme (EU ETS).
Climate change and the financial system: a note
Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 2020
Climate Change in the Theory of Finance
Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 2020
Finance scholars are only recently attempting to bridge the gap in climate finance. This paper is essentially a literature review of the interaction of climate change and finance through the lens of financial theory. The demand for financing climate-resilient infrastructures such as clean energy projects, energy-efficient buildings, low-carbon transportation, water, waste management systems, and the supply side of financing these infrastructures was reviewed. Financial theories and frameworks such as the Modigliani and Miller theorem, capital asset pricing model (CAPM), option pricing, efficient market hypothesis, and agency theory were also amenable to analyzing climate change and finance problems. Specifically, the factors to consider when financing and funding climateresilient infrastructure include the financing profile of the investment; potential for cost recovery from users; the extent to which quality is contractible; the level of uncertainty and complexity of the project and policy frameworks; financial market conditions; and optimal allocation of risks. As data collection improves, climate finance research can continue on a great ride with enormous benefits to the global community.
Related topics
Related papers
Network for Greening the Financial System First comprehensive report A call for action Climate change as a source of financial risk
NGFS CALL FOR ACTION REPORT 1 W e collectively face the effects of climate change, as it reaches beyond economies, borders, cultures, and languages. In 2017, air pollution was a cause of almost 5 million deaths worldwide while 62 million people in 2018 were affected by natural hazards, with 2 million needing to move elsewhere due to climate events. A transition to a green and low-carbon economy is not a niche nor is it a "nice to have" for the happy few. It is crucial for our own survival. There is no alternative. Therefore, we need to come together and take action to create a bright, sustainable future. Understanding what the magnitude of climate change heralds for financial stability, at the initiative of Banque de France, eight central banks and supervisors established a Network of Central Banks and Supervisors for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) at the Paris "One Planet Summit" in December 2017. Since then, the NGFS has grown to 34 Members and 5 Observers from all over the globe.
The Low-Carbon Transition, Climate Commitments and Firm Credit Risk
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2021
This paper explores how the need to transition to a low-carbon economy influences firm credit risk. It develops a novel dataset which augments data on firms’ greenhouse gas emissions over time with information on climate disclosure practices and forwardlooking emission reduction targets, thereby providing a rich picture of firms’ climate-related transition risk alongside their strategies to manage such risks. It then assesses how such climate-related metrics influence two key measures of firms’ credit risk: credit ratings and the market-implied distance-to-default. High emissions tend to be associated with higher credit risk. But disclosing emissions and setting a forward-looking target to cut emissions are both associated with lower credit risk, with the effect of climate commitments tending to be stronger for more ambitious targets. After the Paris agreement, firms most exposed to climate transition risk also saw their ratings deteriorate whereas other comparable firms did not, wi...
Financial Markets and the Transition to a Low-Carbon Economy
2018
Financial markets play a major role in contributing to the transition to a low-carbon economy. Although many initiatives and developments are taking place, this is just the beginning. In this article, we argue for a theory of change-a theory rooted in logics that will help financial markets play a key role in the transition to a low-carbon economy. We argue that the current dominant logics in finance-short-termism, predictability of the future based on ex-post data, price efficiency, and risk-adjusted returns-impede the effective integration of climate considerations in financial markets. We suggest four alternative logics that can enable and foster a change toward the low-carbon economy: long-termism, systems interconnectedness, carbon price dynamics, and active ownership.
Climate Finance at COP21 and After: Lessons Learnt
Finance has emerged in the last few years in and outside the Conference of the Parties (COP) process as a key ingredient of climate policy design. It also appears to be a key sector for structural reform in order to align it with the new low-carbon horizon. This policy brief draws lessons from a discussion platform launched jointly by CEPII and France Stratégie, which welcomed more than thirty contributions on climate finance issues from various experts and citizens in the four months leading to COP21. Both these contributions and the final text adopted by the Parties indicate that the financial question will remain essential in the near future in order to consolidate and nurture the Paris Agreement. In this brief, three directions for future debates are analyzed. First, the equity question remains open, through the financing schemes to guarantee a minimum of $100 billion in annual transfers to developing countries in the name of the principle of " common but differentiated responsibilities ". The question of an increasing ambition to implement the " Intended Nationally Determined Contributions " through specific financial instruments is also discussed. Finally, the necessary long-term objective of a net decarbonization of the world economy invites us to look for more structural reforms in the financial sector.
Financial risks and opportunities in the time of climate change
Policy briefs, 2016
Real economic imbalances can lead to financial crisis. The current unsustainable use of our environment is such an imbalance. Financial shocks can be triggered by either intensified environmental policies, cleantech breakthroughs (both resulting in the stranding of unsustainable assets), or the economic costs of crossing ecological boundaries (eg floods and droughts due to climate change). Financial supervisors and risk managers have so far paid little attention to this ecological dimension,...
Carbon emissions trading: managing climate change through financial markets
On 18 January 2007 the Financial Times reported a loophole in the Kyoto Protocol. The newspaper gave details about how carbon traders are able to exploit the emissions market to make big profi ts. This is done by encouraging Chinese factories to install end-of-pipe equipment -so-called scrubbers -to reduce emissions of HFC-23 gases, a very potent greenhouse gas (GHG). The technology is not new and relatively cheap to install, while it helps reducing HFC emissions that have a 12,000 times higher global warming potential than carbon dioxide (CO2) over a time period of 100 years. In other words, by only making a modest capital investment, carbon traders are able to generate huge amounts of carbon credits that can be sold at a large profi t in the European Union emissions trading scheme (EU ETS).
‘Climate value at risk’ of global financial assets
Nature Climate Change, 2016
Investors and financial regulators are increasingly aware of climate-change risks. So far, most of the attention has fallen on whether controls on carbon emissions will strand the assets of fossilfuel companies. 1,2 However, it is no less important to ask, what might be the impact of climate change itself on asset values? Here we show how a leading Integrated Assessment Model can be used to estimate the impact of 21 st century climate change on the present market value of global financial assets. We find that the expected 'climate value at risk' (climate VaR) of global financial assets today is 1.8% along a business-as-usual emissions path. Taking a representative estimate of global financial assets, this amounts to $2.5 trillion. However, much of the risk is in the tail. For example, the 99 th percentile climate VaR is 16.9%, or $24.2 trillion. These estimates would constitute a substantial write-down in the fundamental value of financial assets. Cutting emissions to limit warming to no more than 2°C reduces the climate VaR by an expected 0.6 percentage points, and the 99 th percentile reduction is 7.7 percentage points. Including mitigation costs, the present value of global financial assets is an expected 0.2% higher when warming is limited to no more than 2°C, compared with business as usual. The 99 th percentile is 9.1% higher. Limiting warming to no more than 2°C makes financial sense to risk-neutral investors-and even more so to the risk averse.
Climate change and finance: New business opportunities
2000
UBS integrates environmental aspects into its various banking activities (commercial banking, asset management and investment banking). For many of our clients, environmental considerations not only represent financial risks, they also mean new business opportunities. This paper highlights UBS' efforts to explore possible environmental market o#n-tunities resulting from the increasingly signaficant impact of global climate policies on the banking business. A careful analysis of the Kyoto Protocol-the international agreement to control global warming by reducing emissions of greenhouse gases-and its impact on thefinancial sector has led UBS to assess the new market potentialfor a climate value investment product. In this article, the authors describe thepremises behind such an investment vehicle as well as the most important steps and criteria needed for setting up the project portfolio. In addition, besides clatifiing the most significant operational modalities of such an investment poduct, this paper also explains the importance of being an early mover in the greenhouse gas reduction market.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.