Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2007, Max Weber Studies
The aim of this essay is to compare the theories of Max Weber and Georges Bataille on the construction of the erotic sphere in the cultural imagination. Weber and Bataille share several basic premises, especially in their recognition of the connection between religious ecstasy and erotic union. They differ, however, in a crucial factor. Although Bataille acknowledges symbol-making as a basis of erotic expression, he resists the systematic rationalization of mystical states of ecstasy and relies on a kind of naïve naturalism in his theory of eroticism. Weber, on the other hand, argues that all forms of so-called inner experience derive from the same irrational source and must be transformed intellectually, through a creative power, to appear natural and pure. This transformation produces what Weber calls the 'erotic sacrament', which, paradoxically, allows lovers to believe in an erotic union 'eternally inaccessible to rational endeavor'.
The aim of this essay is to compare the theories of Max Weber and Georges Bataille on the construction of the erotic sphere in the cultural imagination. Weber and Bataille share several basic premises, especially in their recognition of the connection between religious ecstasy and erotic union. They differ, however, in a crucial factor. Although Bataille acknowledges symbol-making as a basis of erotic expression, he resists the systematic rationalization of mystical states of ecstasy and relies on a kind of naïve naturalism in his theory of eroticism. Weber, on the other hand, argues that all forms of so-called inner experience derive from the same irrational source and must be transformed intellectually, through a creative power, to appear natural and pure. This transformation produces what Weber calls the 'erotic sacrament', which, paradoxically, allows lovers to believe in an erotic union 'eternally inaccessible to rational endeavor'.
The figure of Eros is permeated with a logic of lack and fulfillment. As a figure of desire that seeks to be filled, that craves the ineffable, Eros is appropriately described by Plato as the child of poverty and abundance. It is a form of desire that seeks to take what lies outside, to possess the unpossessed and to devour what is desirable. Is it possible, however, to conceive of Eros—and eroticism—as something that is not working according to the traditional logic of desire? Such seems to be the task of Georges Bataille’s philosophy. Refusing the vision of Eros as a quest for pleasure, he developed a thought of eroticism as sovereignty through evil. This article aims at exploring what this evil entails; what a transgression of moral norms, seriousness, and selfhood means. Bataille is famously considered to be a thinker fascinated by evil, and it seems that such a consideration is too easily a reason to avoid him. I would like to show that his thoughts concern freedom, sovereignty and community. Through erotic transgressions, Bataille saw the possibility for true human freedom and communication. Evil as liberation and not Eros as pleasure. I take on a new approach regarding Eros through an exploration of Bataille’s notions of continuity, morality, transgression, death and holiness. The first part of the article will set down the basis of Bataille’s thought. The second will deal in detail with transgression and death, and finally I will deal with holiness, thus making the final step on the path to sovereignty.
Parrhesia 24 · 2015 · 312-335 , 2015
In this article I consider how the erotics of the real, of Bataille, might contribute to the ethics of the real, of Lacan, and also to the genealogy of morals disclosed by Nietzsche. Bataille was a key intellectual figure in twentieth-century Paris, closely associated with the initial inspiration of French Nietzscheanism and personally connected with Lacan, the “French Freud.” Bataille’s work can even be viewed as a unique synthesis of the Dionysian wisdom of Nietzsche’s philosophy and the growing awareness of the sexual real made possible by the pioneering works of Freud. Combining Bataille’s anthropological understanding of a taboo-transgression correlation with Lacan’s analytic episteme of the real, symbolic, and imaginary, I trace a recessive loss of the erotic function of religion, ethics, and the sacred through the Platonic, Christian, and Modern Science epochs that Nietzsche’s revaluations of the Good also tend to centre on. I suggest that an ethics of the real, of unconscious desire as a configuration of the drives, can be better served by restoring a living openness to the originary erotics observable in the culture of pre-Platonic Greeks. This erotics manifests most famously perhaps in their polymorphous libidinal structures, their stories of the gods, and the festivals of Dionysos to host the works of their greatest tragic poets. What emerges from this extended genealogical analysis is an understanding of why the brothels of Paris, for instance, can become for Bataille true churches again.
The central thesis of my paper is that Georges Bataille’s account of eroticism is gendered and refers specifically to the male subject and his experiences; as such it does not necessarily apply to the female subject. The feminist I use to develop my reading of Bataille is Luce Irigaray, who is concerned with creating a society and philosophy that can account for sexual difference and dialogue between two, rather than the suppression of one under another. Bataille claims that eroticism was born at the same moment that human society came into being. This is because when man negated his animality and created a boundary between himself and nature, the possibility for transgression of this boundary was also created. Eroticism is a form of transgression that opens onto a realm of otherness outside humanity; of nature transformed into the sacred. My claim is that there is no otherness and difference in the erotic experience Bataille describes, but rather that transgression ultimately fails and its powerful potential to open up new perspectives on the global economy, society and subjectivity is never realised. Bataille discusses death, decay and dissolution (all equated with the feminine, a category in and of the patriarchal subject) but at no point does he face sexual difference or admit an irreducible other into the economy of his thought. My paper will discuss the groundwork for Bataille’s theory of transgression, and the emergence of patriarchal society from the economy of the gift and the taboo of incest; I will examine the exclusion of women in this process. I will also discuss the relation Bataille posits between sacrifice and sex, and argue that the account I have given reveals a deeper violence even than that which he acknowledges when he states that the active sexual partner sacrifices the passive partner. Finally, by way of conclusion, I will suggest some of the new questions my paper has raised and how feminist scholars might wish to develop this work toward thinking a female eroticism.
Scottish Journal of Theology, Volume 65, Issue 4, pp. 477-9, 2012
All eroticism has a sacramental character,' French philosopher Georges Bataille said in his work Eroticism (1957). For Bataille, eroticism resembles religious and ritual sacrifice because of the rapture and violence associated with orgasm.
Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture
Philosophy as Experimentation, Dissidence and Heterogeneity, 2021
According to Bataille, facing the same reality, we can have two completely different approaches. One of them, privileged by science, gives account of the objective and neutral side of reality. However, while not depreciating it, in this way it translates a third-person view, a view of nowhere, in which the experiential, not the experimental, is denied. On the contrary, the inner experience translates a mode of observation of the phenomena in which the concern is to translate the way they are lived. Inner experience is not to be confused with consciousness, although it is present in it. Now, according to Bataille, the most intense experience coincides with eroticism, not so much of bodies or souls, but of sacred eroticism. In strict terms, it is a pleonasm, insofar as eroticism and the sacred are the same.
A Modern Jew in Search of a Soul by J. Marvin Spiegelman, Abraham Jacobson (Eds.). Tempe, AZ: New Falcon Publications., 1986
The story which I have been asked to share here is about my experiences as a Jewish woman who went far from her roots, and who is engaged in a process of return. The point of view is that of a woman who is interested particularly in the body and in spiritual life, and who did not find these interests addressed in her early experiences of Judaism. Therefore I travelled elsewhere: to dance; to seven years immersion in Buddhism; and to years studying psychology; anthropology, Jungian analysis, and the goddess religions.
Between the 1860’s and 1890’s, starting with realist Orientalism and moving to post-modernism and symbolism, the reoccurring trend of exoticism is repeatedly depicted. The Public Prayer in the Mosque of Amr and La Orana Maria are two works of exoticism that portray a distortion of reality, skewed and biased with non-Western subject matter being seen through the European mindsets. The following essay will look at the works of Gérôme and Gauguin, distinguishing their similarities in subject matter, material, and process, and differences in style, color and technique.
Cincinnati Romance Review, 2017
Nancy LaGreca's new critical volume, Erotic Mysticism: Subversion and Transcendence in Latin American Modernista Prose (2016), provides a new interpretive lens for the mystical imagery and themes present in many modernist and, particularly, decadentist texts of Latin America. LaGreca's ability to tie such works into larger literary, existential, and scientific trends of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries helps craft a stimulating analysis that reveals the Modernistas as important players in rewriting ideas surrounding sexuality, faith, death, and artistic production by using the imagery of erotic mysticism. In tracing the separation between modernist mystic and erotic tropes and those traditionally found in Catholic works throughout the introduction to her book, LaGreca aims to present " non-theistic mysticism " (16) as borne of Modernism's " fetishization of sensual beauty in all its permutations " (15). Here, LaGreca proposes that the separation of erotic mysticism from both religious and scientific developments proffered political commentary in three ways: 1) a critique of positivism through the exploration of sensuality and the metaphysical sublime, 2) a break with Catholic discourse to instead explore other existentialist and mystic philosophies, and 3) a rebuke of the requirement of a belief in God to seek immortality and a connection with natural forces (20). Such an approach to the erotic and, in Max Nordeau's view, " degenerate " elements of Modernismo dialogues with the continually evolving interpretation of the movement's social and political critiques, as LaGreca details (34). Erotic Mysticism's analysis thus promises a fresh assessment of some of the thornier aspects of mysticism and the decadent aesthetic. Following the introduction, LaGreca's study takes readers on a journey through the often subtle mystical images present in some modernist Latin American prose works in five chapters analyzing different approaches to erotic mysticism utilized by both canonical and non-canonical authors. The chapters feel well-organized and are subdivided to facilitate comparison between the different authors and texts discussed.
2012
It is diLcult to write about eroticism; it is at once too personal and too common. Phenomenology is supposed to start out from experience, making the task even more diLcult. We can try to hide under the cover of eidos or under what is general, without giving away our own relation to this burning question, but this risks only to show the blindness of our own speci@city, our own personal desires, as one of (at least) two sexes. In the phenomenological attempts to address this issue – such as in the work of Levinas, Marion and Sartre – one could argue that this endeavor has been carried out by a certain kind of (French) man.1 Their speci@city might be more pronounced here than when they broach other subjects. They are, so to say, caught with their pants down, where we often gain an insight into how their own sexual life is structured. All their intellectualism tends to be seen as a facade, behind which lay a male-centric, heterosexist, patriarchal variant of sexuality, the kind of whic...
In the context of the Catholic Reformation serious concerns were expressed about the affective potency of naturalistic depictions of beautiful, sensuous figures in religious art. In theological discourse similar anxieties had long been articulated about potential contiguities between elevating, licit desire for an extraordinarily beautiful divinity and base, illicit feeling. In the later fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries, in the decades preceding the Council of Trent, a handful of writers, thinkers and artists asserted a positive connection between spirituality and sexuality. Leonardo da Vinci, and a group of painters working under his aegis in Lombardy, were keenly aware of painting’s capacity to evoke feeling in a viewer. Pictures they produced for domestic devotion featured knowingly sensuous and unusually epicene beauties. This article suggests that this iconography daringly advocated the value of pleasurable sensation to religiosity. Its popularity allows us to envisage beholders who were neither mired in sin, nor seeking to divorce themselves from the physical realm, but engaging afresh with age-old dialectics of body and soul, sexuality and spirituality.
All eroticism has a sacramental character,' French philosopher Georges Bataille said in his 1957 work Eroticism. For Bataille, eroticism resembles religious and ritual sacrifice because of the rapture and violence associated with orgasm.
Scottish Journal of Theology, 2023
In this article I propose an erotic theosis as a fruitful possibility for conceptualising our final participation in union with God in the beatific vision and for imaging said participation on earth. Particularly, I propose a synthesis of recent work from Oliver Crisp on theosis with that of Sarah Coakley on sexual desire as an especially helpful way in which to conceive of our ever-deepening participation in God's love. Further, this synthesis uses contributions from Erin Dufault-Hunter on the intersections of sexual desire and ethics as a catalyst for its recommendations.
2014
The oral, narcissistic and perhaps depressed woman lover introduced in the first article of the same title by the present author in this issue of the Journal for Semitics is nothing but a shadow cast by her bright background. Her neediness and narcissism are due to her false self, which makes her available for projective identification with all the diverse religiosities carried by her but also allows her to dissolve in the feeling of being in an embracing love, her own projection. In this transcendental aspect the feminine resembles the divine. Contrary to the traditional or common reception of Song of Songs as either transcending the foreground sexuality through an allegorical interpretation where exclusive attention is given to its spirituality or, in contrast, a literal approach where a greater holding background is ignored respectively, the text can be read in its openness to sexuality as a pointer towards various religious subtexts. This is despite the fact that no explicit ref...
Gnosis, 2011
What is the relation between the horror of death and eroticism? Such a relation may seem initially unapparent, but 20 th century French philosopher Georges Bataille candidly describes the various ways in which eroticism and death interpenetrate in his Erotism: Death and Sensuality. Such interpenetration is elucidated through Bataille's consideration regarding how taboos are interrelated, namely that they give us a glimpse of our continuous nature. Bataille's project is rare insofar as it examines human nature in terms of its passions as opposed to stripping away the passions in order to see what is left (the latter being perhaps the more common methodology of many philosophers). This means that transgressions need to be addressed and examined instead of being ignored if we are to have an accurate understanding as to what makes us human. His exposition of eroticism is multi-faceted and provocative, albeit disturbing and controversial, utilizing anthropological, sociological, as well as philosophical approaches. Interestingly, his account of eroticism is pertinent to modernity because it involves the notion of individuality, and investigates how this phenomenon runs counter to eroticism and transgressions. Bataille's account of experiencing life as a discontinuous phenomenon (through work and other productive means) illuminates this point. He rethinks the relationship between death and transgression through three key tensions: 1) continuity and discontinuity, 2) taboo and transgression, and 3) productivity and unproductiveness. I want to explore how eroticism is to be distinguished from sex for the purpose of reproduction, how this dynamic transgression breaks down discontinuity, and why such a dynamic is absent in non-human animals. I also want to attempt to explain the power struggle between taboo and transgression within individuals (its allure and repugnancy), which will lead me to consider the soundness of his characterization of women, their bodies, and how he chiefly represents the distastefulness of sexual transgression through reference to females. Finally, I want to address the violent aspect of transgression and whether Bataille succeeds in making a case for the idea that the goal of transgressive violence is to return to a lost intimacy.
In November 2011, artists, professors, students and scholars from around the world gathered in Prague, Czech Republic, to attempt to define what could be considered the erotic. The conference sought submissions that addressed interactions of the erotic with history, art, literature, practices, performances, pedagogy, and sexuality, among many others. This wide focus brought together an intellectually rich meeting that interrogated the boundaries between eroticism, sex, and desire. This volume represents a sampling of papers presented at the conference, and the diverse focuses within these papers are indicative of the inter- and trans-disciplinary work that was presented. Each work within this collection brings a fresh and unique approach to the erotic and, in its own way, tries to answer the question, ‘What is erotic?’
Journal of Religious Ethics, 2011
Georges Bataille agrees with numerous Christian mystics that there is ethical and religious value in meditating upon, and having ecstatic episodes in response to, imagery of violent death. For Christians, the crucified Christ is the focus of contemplative efforts. Bataille employs photographic imagery of a more-recent victim of torture and execution. In this essay, while engaging with Amy Hollywood's interpretation of Bataille in Sensible Ecstasy, I show that, unlike the Christian mystics who influence him, Bataille strives to divorce himself from any moral authority external to the ecstatic episode itself. I argue that in his attempt to remove external authority he abandons the only resources that could possibly protect his mystical contemplation from engendering sadistic attitudes.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.