Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Some caveats when using the IHS transformation

Abstract

Applied microeconomists often use the inverse hyperbolic sine (IHS) transformation to transform dependent variables in regression models when the data are highly skewed and include zero values. Although the estimates of elasticities obtained are similar to those obtained with a logarithmic transformation for large values of the pretransformed variable, the recommendation to re-scale the variable prior to IHS transformation can lead to unstable estimates when the variable includes more than a few zero values. Under these circumstances, analysts are advised to use appropriate corner solution models (e.g., Tobit or two-part models for continuous dependent variables or alternative Poisson models for discrete dependent variables).