The Convergence of Nanotechnology, Policy, and Ethics
Erik Fisher2007, Advances in Computers
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Abstract
This chapter reviews the role ethical and societal issues associated with nanotechnology have played in the development of national, and particularly US nanotechnology policies. The prominence of nanotechnology as a matter of national policy is significant, as is the attention being afforded to ethical and societal considerations. Notably, there is an emphasis on the early anticipation of societal dimensions of nanotechnology and of collaborative socio-technical integration during research and development activities. While these policies are fairly unprecedented and pose considerable challenges to the societal and technical researchers to whom the tasks of early integration may fall, there is reason to believe that continued efforts aimed at their implementation are likely. The chapter provides a brief history and explanation of the US nanotechnology "ethics policy" in reference to the discourse and concerns motivating policy makers. It then surveys some of the growing body of literature emerging around what has been termed nanoethics. This literature includes a similar emphasis on early and collaborative anticipation of the ethical and societal implications surrounding nanotechnology. Finally, the chapter identifies a list of fundamental tasks that would be necessary to address for the sake of developing the capacity of social and technical researchers to effectively engage in socio-technical integration. These tasks include defining the scope of nanoscale science and engineering subject to the ethics policy, and the interactions, responsibility, participation, and regulation envisioned or implied by the ethics policy under consideration. A few emerging cases of socio-technical collaborations are noted, and key statements made by congressional witnesses and others are cited. Throughout the chapter, an attempt is made to frame the statements within conceptual considerations drawn from the diverse contexts of nanotechnology, policy, and ethics.
Related papers
Nanotechnology: The Social and Ethical Issues
Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, Woodrow Wilson Center, 2009
Recent action in Congress to reauthorize the U.S. federal nanotechnology research program offers the chance to address the social and ethical issues concerning the emerging scientific field, experts say. “It is crucial to address social and ethical issues now as we consider both the substantial potential risks of nanotechnology and its possible significant contributions to our well-being and environmental sustainability,” says Ronald Sandler, Northeastern University philosophy professor and author of a new report funded by the Project and the National Science Foundation. The report emphasizes ways in which such topics intersect with governmental functions and responsibilities, including science and technology policy, as well as research funding, regulation and work on public engagement.
Integrating and Enacting ‘Social and Ethical Issues’ in Nanotechnology Practices
NanoEthics, 2012
The integration of nanotechnology's 'social and ethical issues' (SEI) at the research and development stage is one of the defining features of nanotechnology governance in the United States. Mandated by law, integration extends the field of nanotechnology to include a role for the "social", the "public" and the social sciences and humanities in research and development (R&D) practices and agendas. Drawing from interviews with scientists, engineers and policymakers who took part in an oral history of the "Future of Nanotechnology" symposium at the Cornell NanoScale Facility, this article examines how nanotechnology's 'social and ethical issues' are brought to life by these practitioners. From our analysis, three modes of enactment emerge: enacting SEI as obligations and problems-to-be-solved, enacting SEI by 'not doing it' in the laboratory, and enacting SEI as part of scientific practice. Together they paint a complex picture where SEI are variously defined, made visible or invisible, included and excluded, with participants showing their skill at both boundary-work (Gieryn Am Sociol Rev 48:781-795, 1983 and at integration. We conclude by reflecting on what this may mean for the design and implementation of SEI integration policies, suggesting that we need to transform SEI from obligations into 'matters of care' (Puig de la Bellacasa Soc Stud Sci 41(1):85-106, 2011) that tend to existing relationalities between science and society and implicate practitioners themselves.
Social and ethical dimensions of nanoscale science and engineering research
Science and Engineering Ethics, 2006
Continuing advances in human ability to manipulate matter at the atomic and molecular levels (i.e. nanoscale science and engineering) offer many previously unimagined possibilities for scientific discovery and technological development. Paralleling these advances in the various science and engineering subdisciplines is the increasing realization that a number of associated social, ethical, environmental, economic and legal dimensions also need to be explored. (2002)(2003)(2004), here I present for discussion (i) details of a "nanotechnology ethics" seminar series developed specifically for students participating in the program, and (ii) an analysis of students' and participating research faculty's perspectives concerning social and ethical issues associated with nanotechnology research. I conclude with a brief discussion of implications presented by these issues for general scientific literacy and public science education policy.
Introduction: The Ethical Challenges of Nanotechnologies
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 2009
Nanotechnologies are expected to have a substantial impact on our lives in the future. However, the nanotechnology field is characterised by many uncertainties and debates surrounding the characterisation of technologies, the nature of the applications, the potential benefits and the likely risks. Given the rapid development of nanotechnologies, it is timely to consider what, if any, novel ethical challenges are posed by developments and how best to address these given the attendant uncertainties. The three articles which comprise this symposium consider the philosophical, regulatory and risk perception and communication questions that arise from this arena.
Calibrating the balance: The ethics of regulating the production and use of nanotechnology applications
• Vlerick, M. (In Press). Calibrating the balance: The ethics of regulating the production and use of nanotechnology applications In Jeswani, G., Van de Voorde, M. (eds). Handbook of Nanoethics. De Gruyter. , 2021
Nanotechnology (henceforth NT) is a rapidly advancing field with the potential of revolutionizing diverse areas such as electronics, health care, transport, and energy production. NT products and applications come with (potential) benefits and (potential) harms. The presence of potential harms calls for regulation. Both underregulation and overregulation-I argueare morally undesirable. In the case of underregulation, stakeholders fall victim to the harmful effects of the technology. In the case of overregulation, stakeholders are deprived of the benefits of the technology. In this chapter, I identify the biases and factors that lead to underregulation and overregulation and offer solutions in response. More precisely, I argue that a lack of specific regulation, the presence of conflicts of interest and short-term economic incentives could lead to the underregulation of NT products and applications. Conversely, I argue that a negativity bias, harm aversion, the fear of opening "Pandora's box," and the intuition that what is natural is good and what is artificial (human-made) is bad could lead to overregulation. To avoid these pitfalls and the woes of underregulation and overregulation following in their wake, we need to set up a processwhich I describein which policymakers and independent scientists closely collaborate.
The Promises and Perils of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology: Exploring Emerging Social and Ethical Issues
Bulletin of Science, …, 2003
Rapid advances in nanoscience and nanotechnology are profoundly influencing the ways in which we conceptualize the world of the future, and human ability to manipulate matter at the atomic and molecular levels offers previously unimagined possibilities for scientific discovery and technological applications. The convergence of nanotechnology with biotechnology, information technology, cognitive science, and engineering may hold promise for the improvement of human performance at a number of levels. Based on a National Science Foundation-funded Research Experiences for Undergraduates Program in nanoscience and nanotechnology at the University of Central Florida (summer 2002), a variety of social and ethical issues associated with these advances is discussed. Implications for the future of science-technology-society studies and K-16 science education also are presented.
Moral Arguments in the Debate over Nanotechnologies: Are We Talking Past Each Other?
NanoEthics, 2011
How are we to understand the fact that the philosophical debate over nanotechnologies has been reduced to a clash of seemingly preprogrammed arguments and counterarguments that paralyzes all rational discussion of the ultimate ethical question of social acceptability in matters of nanotechnological development? With this issue as its starting point, the study reported on here, intended to further comprehension of the issues rather than provide a cause-andeffect explanation, seeks to achieve a rational grasp of what is being said through the appeals made to this or that principle in the range of arguments put forward in publications on the subject. We present the results of the study's analyses in two parts. In the first, we lay out the seven categories of argument that emerged from an analysis of the literature: the arguments based on nature, dignity, the good life, utility, equity, autonomy, and rights. In the second part, we present the background moral stances that support each category of argument. Identifying the different categories of argument and the moral stance that underlies each category will enable a better grasp of the reasons for the multiplicity of the arguments that figure in discussions of the acceptability of nanotechnologies and will ultimately contribute to overcoming the tendency towards talking past each other that all too often disfigures the exchange. Clarifying the implications of the moral arguments deployed in the debate over nanotechnologies may make it possible to reduce the confusion observable in these exchanges and contribute to a better grasp of the reasons for their current unproductiveness. Keywords Acceptability. Debate on nanotechnology. Dialogue. Interdisciplinarity. Moral arguments. Nanoethics. Philosophy and nanotechnology. Social acceptability and nanotechnology As has been pointed out by Jean-Pierre Dupuy ([4]: 238), philosophical debate over the ethical foundations of nanotechnology has become so routine that it would be easy to simply rhyme off the arguments regularly brought forward: 'The same arguments are always served up, and they are always answered with the same counter-arguments.' How are we to understand the fact that this philosophical debate has been reduced to a clash among seemingly preprogrammed arguments and counterarguments that are paralyzing
Nano-Technology, Ethics, and Risks
NanoEthics, 2011
Nanotechnology is developing far faster than our understanding of its effects. This lapping of our understanding by speedy development is typical of new technologies, and in the United States we let development occur, introducing new artifacts into the world, without any serious attempt to understand beforehand their effects, long-term or short-term. We have been willing to pay the price of pushing the technological envelope, but pushing the nanotechnological envelope has some special risks, requiring more caution.
Ethical Dimensions of Nanotechnology
2008
This brief paper introduces the subject of Nanotechnology and its ethical implications as an applied technology. It goes on to explore and present a blueprint for the theological, legal and ethical issues which Muslim scholars may need to address, as well as a framework through which scholars can determine relevant solutions.
Related topics
Related papers
Two Dimensions of the Ethical Problems Related to Nanotechnology
NanoEthics, 2009
The current literature on nanoethics focuses on a wide array of topics such as equity, privacy, military, environment, human enhancement, intellectual property, and security. The identification of those topics leads to the adoption of an ethical stance, which we call the in itself dimension. In this article we argue that even though it is correct to identify the areas where ethical problems are imperative to deal with (in itself dimension), it is a partial approach. This is because the in itself dimension pays no attention to another ethical stance; one that does not have anything to do with individual or collective responsibilities, but rather with the socio-economic system into which those responsibilities are embedded. We call this second issue the contextual dimension.
Nanotechnology and Ethics: Assessing the Unforeseeable
InTech eBooks, 2011
Introduction: nanotechnology, society, and ethics
2008
Nanoethics, or the study of nanotechnology's ethical and social implications, is an emerging but controversial field. Outside of the industry and academia, most people are first introduced to nanotechnology through fictional works that posit scenarios���which scientists largely reject���of self-replicating ���nanobots��� running amok like a pandemic virus (Crichton, 2002).
What is nanotechnology and why does it matter?: from science to ethics
2010
Ongoing research in nanotechnology promises both innovations and risks, potentially and profoundly changing the world. This book helps to promote a balanced understanding of this important emerging technology, offering an informed and impartial look at the technology, its science, and its social impact and ethics.
Quest for Ethical and Socially Responsible Nanoscience and Nanotechnology
Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity, 2020
The nanoscience and nanotechnology (N&N) normative framework is a field that attracts intense debate. Current scientific knowledge, wide interdisciplinarity, technological developments, new applications, and emerging markets outline a complex and constantly evolving environment, within which ethical and socially responsible N&N must be developed. Other equally important perspectives include information and communication with the public, scientists' sense of ethical obligation, health and environmental concerns, and risk assessment. In this context, specific ethical considerations are being raised, such as the difficulty to clarify and control the effects of N&N applications, the swift technological
Tiny Particles & Macro Challenges: Evaluating the Rational Debate of Social and Ethical Issues in Nanotechnology
—Nanotechnology has turned into the recent scientific lingo and swift innovation in this field are significantly impacting the courses in which we conceptualise the future and human capacity to control matter at the nuclear and atomic levels, by offering undreamt promises for scientific innovations. Since the merging of nanotechnology with biotechnology, data innovation, subjective science discipline has crafted and hold guarantee for the change of human enactment at various levels, hence 'social and ethical issues' turns into a repeating expression in the scientific group. Hence stakeholders paying consideration on nanotechnology innovation with a vital question: whether nanotechnology is demonstrating ethically and socially unique issues or the ethical and social issues are related to nanotechnology like other innovative technologies. The present article endeavours to comprehend the discussion over nanotechnology with respect to its potential advantages and the threat to the society. One view in this discussion is that nanotechnology has a progressive potential and will have huge financial advantages, while the another view is wary about its potential with regards to ethical and social issues and values, for example, equity and social justice. Finally, an attempt is made to find the variance in the societal and ethical issue in both, those who want to promote it and those who have fears about its potential. Thus this write-up adds the level headed discussions by investigating foundational issues about the relationship of ethics and nanotechnology.
Ethical considerations on nanotechnology
2018
Since a significant time ago, although time runs very fast, nanotechnology transformed from one of the most promising scientific hopes in uncountable human domains into a marvelous certainty. Innumerable scientific studies in several areas of knowledge were made since nanoscale emergence, carrying their contribution to the nanoscience development, leading to a great development of technical and scientific knowledge but also raising numerous problems in the ethical field. In this chapter, nanotechnology is discussed both in terms of ethics and in terms of borders that nanotechnology applications must satisfy and concluding notes are presented, highlighting the results of the analysis. Significant considerations are made on the close connection between ethics and the nanotechnology and the effects over the society and values.
Ten Years After: Ethical Legal and Social Impacts of Nanotechnology BAOJ Nanotechnology
In 2016 nanotechnology was proclaimed yet again as a "revolution" for science and industry. Costs and benefits of applying this novel technology have been debated in detail throughout the past decade before many legislatures. Ethical and social implications of those costs and benefits have reached the level of debate the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, United Nations agencies and the legislatures of every nation on the planet. Planning and implementation of laws regulating commercialization of nanotechnology and the introduction of nano-application products into daily life have proceeded briskly throughout the past decade. Scientists who wish to understand law and policy about nanotechnology therefore need a concise description of important laws that have emerged in the wake of this revolution. This article describes emerging laws and briefly outlines some ethical issues that are raised by these developments. This article concludes that although scientists must be vigilant against premature data evaluation because the law is changing rapidly, the time has come to become familiar with laws if they wish to understand or influence future nanotechnology law and policy.
Beyond conversation: some lessons for nanoethics
NanoEthics, 2010
One of the aims of the DEEPEN project was to deepen ethical understanding of issues related to emerging nanotechnologies through an interdisciplinary approach utilizing insights from philosophy, ethics, and the social sciences. Accordingly, part of its final report was dedicated to the question of what was accomplished with regards to this aim and what further research is required. It relates two insights: Nanotechnologies intensify the ambivalence of ongoing, long-term developments; and yet, our intuitions and received story-lines fail us as a guide to ethical and political matters concerning nanotechnologies.
Bioethical Issues of Nanotechnology at a Glance
Iranian journal of public health
Nanotechnology is considered as an industrial revolution of the third millennium. Advances have a remarkable impact on different fields such as medicine, engineering, economy and even politics. However, a wide range of ethical issues has been raised by this innovative science. Many authorities believe that these advancements could lead to irreversible disasters if not limited by ethical guidelines. Involvement of developing countries in new fields of science could be associated with substantial advantages. In this paper, we intend to review main ethical issues of nanotechnology, taking into account the surge of interests in this field and the ever-increasing advances of nanotechnology in Iran. The issue of safety, considering environmental and ecological impacts of nanoparticles (smart dust), and standards of customer awareness are important debates. The 'Grey-goo' scenario and the concerns about 'post-humanism' are also discussed by bioethicists. There are further concerns about justice, intellectual property rights, accountability, and the probability of military and security misuse.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.