Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Reprints and permission

2016

No sponsorships or competing interests have been disclosed for this article. Objectives. (1) To conduct an adequately powered rando-mized controlled trial investigating the safety and efficacy of mitomycin C–enhanced revision endoscopic dacryocystorhi-nostomy (DCR) and (2) to analyze causes of failure after primary endoscopic DCR. Study Design. A randomized controlled study. Setting. General hospital. Subjects and Methods. Seventy-six revision endoscopic DCRs were randomized into 2 groups: endoscopic DCR with mito-mycin (group I), where 0.5 mg/mL mitomycin C was applied for 10 minutes, and endoscopic DCR without mitomycin (group II). Follow-up settings were done to document the patient’s subjective improvement, to judge ostium patency on irrigation, and to record any complications. Results. Causes of failure in the original 92 patients included canalicular obstruction (14%), small misplaced bony window (43%), very small nasolacrimal stoma due to development of synechia (23%), and co...