Grasping reveals visual misjudgements of shape

Experimental Brain Research, 2008

We investigated the effect of visual context (i.e., a visual illusion) on the planning of a sequential object manipulation task. Participants (n = 13) had to grasp a rod embedded in a “rod-and-frame” illusion and insert the rod-end into a tight hole in a pre-defined way. The grip type (defined by start posture, either pronated or supinated; and end posture, either comfortable or uncomfortable) used to grasp the rod was registered as a macroscopic variable of motor planning. Different rod orientations forced the participants to switch between grip types. As expected, most participants switched between pronated and supinated start postures, such that they ended the movement with a comfortable end posture. As it has been argued that planning is dependent on visual context information, we hypothesized that the visual illusion would affect the specific rod orientation at which participants would switch into a different grip type. This hypothesis was confirmed. More specifically, the illusion affected the critical spatial information that is used for action planning. Collectively, these findings are the first to show an effect of an illusion on motor planning in a sequential object manipulation task.

Experimental Brain Research, 1993

This study assessed the reach to grasp movement and its adaptive response to a perturbation of object size. In blocked trials, subjects (n = 12) were instructed to reach 35 cm to grasp and lift a small- (0.7 cm) or large-diameter (8 cm) cylinder. Under an unconstrained condition (condition 1), no instructions as to the type of grasp to adopt were given. Subjects thus naturally used a precision grip (PG) for the small cylinder and whole hand prehension (WHP) for the large cylinder. Under condition 2, subjects were instructed to utilize a PG for grasps of both the large and small cylinders. For condition 3, the instruction was to use WHP irrespective of object size. Kinematic organization was determined with analysis of the recordings of active markers placed on the wrist, thumb, and three fingers. For condition 1 the results showed a temporal arrangement of both components (transport and manipulation) which differed from that of conditions 2 and 3. In perturbed trials, illumination shifted from the small to large cylinder or vice versa. With condition 1, subjects automatically switched from one grasp to another with no or little increase of movement duration. This was generally achieved by an earlier temporal setting of peak wrist deceleration. For conditions 2 and 3, where a change of aperture was required, movement duration was prolonged without adaptation of earlier transport component parameters. It is concluded that the adaptive responses to a change of distal patterning also affect the organization of the proximal component. Assessment of grasps constrained by instructions may lead to interpretations of central control of the reach to grasp movement which differ from those obtained by assessing more natural prehensile patterns.

Experimental brain …, 2005

PLOS ONE, 2016

We use visual information to guide our grasping movements. When grasping an object with a precision grip, the two digits need to reach two different positions more or less simultaneously, but the eyes can only be directed to one position at a time. Several studies that have examined eye movements in grasping have found that people tend to direct their gaze near where their index finger will contact the object. Here we aimed at better understanding why people do so by asking participants to lift an object off a horizontal surface. They were to grasp the object with a precision grip while movements of their hand, eye and head were recorded. We confirmed that people tend to look closer to positions that a digit needs to reach more accurately. Moreover, we show that where they look as they reach for the object depends on where they were looking before, presumably because they try to minimize the time during which the eyes are moving so fast that no new visual information is acquired. Most importantly, we confirmed that people have a bias to direct gaze towards the index finger's contact point rather than towards that of the thumb. In our study, this cannot be explained by the index finger contacting the object before the thumb. Instead, it appears to be because the index finger moves to a position that is hidden behind the object that is grasped, probably making this the place at which one is most likely to encounter unexpected problems that would benefit from visual guidance. However, this cannot explain the bias that was found in previous studies, where neither contact point was hidden, so it cannot be the only explanation for the bias.

Journal of Experimental Psychology-human Perception and Performance, 2011

We examined whether the apparent size of an object is scaled to the morphology of the relevant body part with which one intends to act on it. To be specific, we tested if the visually perceived size of graspable objects is scaled to the extent of apparent grasping ability for the individual. Previous research has shown that right-handed individuals perceive their right hand as larger and capable of grasping larger objects than their left. In the first 2 experiments, we found that objects looked smaller when placed in or judged relative to their right hand compared to their left. In the third experiment, we directly manipulated apparent hand size by magnifying the participants' hands. Participants perceived objects to be smaller when their hand was magnified than when their hand was unmagnified. We interpret these results as demonstrating that perceivers use the extent of their hands' grasping abilities as "perceptual rulers" to scale the apparent size of graspable objects. Furthermore, hand size manipulations did not affect the perceived size of objects too big to be grasped, which suggests that hand size is only used as a scaling mechanism when the object affords the relevant action, in this case, grasping.

Experimental Brain Research, 2000

have proposed that visuomotor and perceptual processes are mediated by discrete visual systems that reflect the functional independence of action and perception. The visuomotor system is proposed to be insensitive to pictorial illusions of object size, whereas the perceptual system is reliably "tricked" by such figures. and demonstrated that grasp preshaping, but not grasping force, is immune to the Ponzo visual illusion, suggesting that not all visuomotor processes operate independently of the perceptual system. The present study investigated the effect of illusory object size on prehension kinematics and grasping dynamics (i.e., grip force and load force) as well as perceptual judgements of object size. Unlike previous investigations, object mass was held constant independent of changes in size. The Ponzo figure reliably affected perceptual estimates of object size, but this effect was restricted to one form of the illusion. Some aspects of the prehension movement were sensitive to veridical but not illusory object size (peak grip aperture, peak grip force, peak vertical wrist acceleration), whereas other movement parameters demonstrated illusory size effects (movement time, peak wrist velocity). Still other movement parameters were not sensitive to veridical or illusory object size (peak load force). Together the data suggest that certain prehension components are immune to pictorial illusions of object size, whereas others are not. Complex interactions between the perceptual and visuomotor systems appear to underlie the anticipatory scaling of grasping forces in prehension.

Reach-to-Grasp Behavior

Experimental Brain Research, 2001

Five normal subjects were tested in a simulated grasping task. A cylindrical container filled with water was placed on the center of a horizontal monitor screen. Subjects used a precision grip formed by the thumb and index finger of their right hand. After a preliminary run during which the container was present, it was replaced by an image of the upper surface of the cylinder appearing on the horizontal computer screen on which the real cylinder was placed during the preliminary run. In each trial the image was marked with two contact points which defined an opposition axis in various orientations with respect to the frontal plane. The subjects' task consisted, once shown a stimulus, of judging as quickly as possible whether the previously experienced action of grasping the container full of water and pouring the water out would be easy, difficult or impossible with the fingers placed according to the opposition axis indicated on the circle. Response times were found to be longer for the grasps judged to be more difficult due to the orientation and position of the opposition axis. In a control experiment, three subjects actually performed the grasps with different orientations and positions of the opposition axis. The effects of these parameters on response time followed the same trends as during simulated movements. This result shows that simulated hand movements take into account the same biomechanical limitations as actually performed movements.

Experimental Brain Research, 2006

Previous research has shown that the task irrelevant size of familiar objects facilitates compatible precision and power grip responses. The present study examined whether the task irrelevant size of novel objects produces the same compatibility effect. However, the main objective of the study was to investigate whether visually primed precision and power grips are manually asymmetric. Experiment 1 showed that the size of a novel prime object does facilitate compatible precision and power grips, even when both the object itself and the grasp type are irrelevant to the current task. However, this effect was only found when the precision grip was made with the right hand (RH) and the power grip was made with the left hand (LH). When these grips were made with the opposite hands, the effect was absent. Experiment 2 replicated the LH bias for large objects and the RH bias for small objects when power and precision grip responses were replaced with simple LH and RH button-press responses. It appears that the two hemispheres are specialised with regard to precision and power compatible objects.

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1999

The discovery that the prehension component of an open-loop, two-fingered reach is largely immune to certain salient pictorial illusions has been used to suggest that humans possess 2 distinct visual systems, 1 that subserves perceptual judgment and 1 that mediates visually controlled action. In this article, the authors present evidence that suggests that the critical distinction is not that of reaching and judgment but of relative and absolute perception. Experiment 1 extends the findings of S. Aglioti, J. F. X. DeSouza, and M. A. Goodale (1995) and suggests that the manual prehension component of open-loop reaching is affected by the horizontal-vertical illusion to a much smaller degree than perceptual size judgments. In Experiments 2 and 3, however, when perceptual size judgment is directed at a single element of the display, this difference vanishes. Experiment 4 demonstrates that grip scaling is strongly affected by the illusion when a single reach is scaled to both the horizontal and vertical components of a triangular figure.