Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2018, Integrated Behavioral Health in Primary Care
…
25 pages
1 file
Team-based values, methods, and relationships are now ubiquitous in conversation about primary care. Everyone values "team" and claims to be doing it in one form or another-or having done it all along-"nothing new for me." But what is the substance underlying the slogan? What are the benefits to adding a behavioral health (BH) clinician as a long-missing member of the primary care team? How can you deploy behavioral health clinicians to achieve these benefits? What are the properties of different models of integration? How can you be clear enough about this new role to effectively interview and hire for it? In other words, how can this role be truly integrated functionally, not just "anatomically"? CJP
Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM
To identify how organizations prepare clinicians to work together to integrate behavioral health and primary care. Observational cross-case comparison study of 19 U.S. practices, 11 participating in Advancing Care Together, and 8 from the Integration Workforce Study. Practices varied in size, ownership, geographic location, and experience delivering integrated care. Multidisciplinary teams collected data (field notes from direct practice observations, semistructured interviews, and online diaries as reported by practice leaders) and then analyzed the data using a grounded theory approach. Organizations had difficulty finding clinicians possessing the skills and experience necessary for working in an integrated practice. Practices newer to integration underestimated the time and resources needed to train and organizationally socialize (onboard) new clinicians. Through trial and error, practices learned that clinicians needed relevant training to work effectively as integrated care te...
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 2016
The expansion of integrated, collaborative, behavioral health services in primary care requires a trained behavioral health workforce with specific competencies to deliver effective, evidence-informed, team-based care. Most behavioral health providers do not have training or experience working as primary care behavioral health consultants (BHCs), and require structured training to function effectively in this role. This article discusses one such training program developed to meet the needs of a large healthcare system initiating widespread implementation of the primary care behavioral health model of service delivery. It details the Department of Defense's experience in developing its extensive BHC training program, including challenges of addressing personnel selection and hiring issues, selecting a model for training, developing and implementing a phased training curriculum, and improving the training over time to address identified gaps. Future directions for training improvements and lessons learned in a large healthcare system are discussed. Keywords Training Á Integrated primary care Á Collaborative primary care Á Primary care behavioral health Á Mental health The integration of behavioral health providers into primary care clinics to provide integrated healthcare services is expanding across the U.S., from small primary care clinics, to large private healthcare organizations, Federally Qualified Health Centers, and large government healthcare programs in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Department of Defense (DoD), and Indian Health Service (Kelly & Coons, 2012). With the expansion of integrated services has come a workforce shortage in behavioral health providers with appropriate training and experience to work effectively in primary care (Hall et al., 2015). The majority of traditionally trained behavioral health providers do not have the skill sets to effectively work in a fast-paced primary care environment using a population health approach to services. Leaders in the integrated primary care field have concluded that successful integrated care providers need training in clinical health psychology, teambased communication skills to function effectively as an interdisciplinary team member, and supervised experience in the specific integrated model of care. Training approaches such as day-long continuing education workshops or integrated primary care certificate programs, while useful, do not provide adequate depth or the on-site training
American Journal of Medical Quality, 2021
This report details ongoing efforts to improve integration in the 2 years following implementation of the Primary Care Behavioral Health model at a general internal medicine clinic of an urban academic medical center. Efforts were informed by a modified version of the validated Level of Integration Measure, sent to all faculty and staff annually. At baseline, results indicated that the domains of systems integration, training, and integrated clinical practices had the greatest need for improvement. Over the 2 years, the authors increased availability of behavioral medicine appointments, improved depression screening processes, offered behavioral health training for providers, disseminated clinical decision support tools, and provided updates about integration progress during clinic meetings. Follow-up survey results demonstrated that physicians and staff perceived improvements in integration overall and in targeted domains. However, the main ongoing barrier to integration was insufficient behavioral health staff to meet patient demand for behavioral health services.
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 2009
Training and education in integrated primary care is limited. We see a need for addressing the looming workforce shortage as behavioral health services in primary care become more widely implemented. Bringing mental health clinicians straight from specialty mental health settings into primary care often results in program failure due to poor skills fit, assumptions about services needed, and routines of practice these clinicians bring from their specialty settings. Health psychology graduate programs tend to prepare graduates for specialty research and practice in medical settings rather than preparing them for the pace, culture and broad spectrum of needs in primary care. Family medicine residency programs provide an underutilized resource for training primary care psychologists and family physicians together. Even if comprehensive graduate training programs in integrated primary care were developed, they could not begin to meet the need for behavioral health clinicians in primary care that the present expansion will require. In response to the demand for mental health providers in primary care, new initiatives have emerged which attempt to provide training for the preexisting mental health workforce to enable their successful integration into primary care settings.
Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 2005
Depression is one of the more common diagnoses encountered in primary care, and primary care in turn provides the majority of care for patients with depression. Many approaches have been tried in efforts to improve the outcomes of depression management. This article outlines the partnership between the University of Washington (UW) Neighborhood Clinics and the UW Department of Psychiatry in implementing a collaborative care approach to integrating the management of anxiety and depression in the ambulatory primary care setting. This program was built on the chronic care model, which utilizes a team approach to caring for the patient. In addition to the patient and the primary care provider (PCP), the team included a medical social worker (MSW) as care manager and a psychiatrist as team consultant. The MSW would manage a registry of patients with depression at a clinic with several PCPs, contacting the patients on a regular basis to assess their status, and consulting with the psychiatrist on a weekly basis to discuss patients who were not achieving the goals of care. Any recommendation (eg, a change in medication dose or class) made by the psychiatrist was communicated to the PCP, who in turn would work with the patient on the new recommendation. This collaborative care approach resulted in a significant improvement in the number of patients who achieved care plan goals. The authors believe this is an effective method for health systems to integrate mental health services into primary care.
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 2018
The Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH) model is a prominent approach to the integration of behavioral health services into primary care settings. Implementation of the PCBH model has grown over the past two decades, yet research and training efforts have been slowed by inconsistent terminology and lack of a concise, operationalized definition of the model and its key components. This article provides the first concise operationalized definition of the PCBH model, developed from examination of multiple published resources and consultation with nationally recognized PCBH model experts. The definition frames the model as a team-based approach to managing biopsychosocial issues that present in primary care, with the over-arching goal of improving primary care in general. The article provides a description of the key components and strategies used in the model, the rationale for those strategies, a brief comparison of this model to other integration approaches, a focused summary of PCBH model outcomes, and an overview of common challenges to implementing the model.
Integrated Behavioral Health in Primary Care, 2013
were largely theoretical, establishing the case for integrated care but not yet able to provide pragmatics and clinical how-tos, Hunter et al.'s book is the reverse. An understanding of the importance of integrating behavioral health into primary care is assumed by the authors, allowing for a focus instead on specific clinical strategies. The book represents a shift from a field that was flailing about in an attempt to deploy regular mental health approaches in primary care to
Families, Systems, & Health, 2014
Integrated behavioral health increases service utilization and treatment success, particularly with high-risk populations. This study assessed medical personnel's attitudes and perceptions of behavioral health clinicians (BHCs) in primary care using a brief self-report measure. A 6-item survey was given to medical providers (n ϭ 45) from a health care system that includes integrated behavioral health services. Survey items assessed providers' attitudes and perceptions about BHCs. Attitudes about behavioral health were largely favorable. For all items, 73.3% to 100% of participants endorsed strongly agree or agree. Chi-square analyses revealed that those who interacted more frequently with BHCs were more comfortable discussing behavioral health issues with their patients, 2 (6, n ϭ 45) ϭ 13.43, p Ͻ .05, and that physicians believe that BHCs help patients effectively address their behavioral health problems, 2 (2, n ϭ 45) ϭ 6.36, p Ͻ .05. Age, gender, and health center in which the providers worked were not significantly related to any survey items. Medical providers surveyed believe that BHCs are valuable members of integrated health care, improving their abilities to provide care and to address their patients' physical and behavioral health problems. Although these preliminary results are promising, the setting surveyed has well-integrated behavioral health care services and thus might not be representative of other settings without such integration. Future studies should address medical providers' opinions of BHCs in a variety of settings with larger samples.
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 2014
Background: Integrated primary care, a health care delivery model that combines medical and behavioral health services, provides better patient access to care at a lower cost, with better outcomes compared with usual nonintegrated care models. The perspectives of primary care providers (PCPs) and behavioral health care providers (BHPs) toward integration are especially valuable because their input and endorsement are key to successful and sustained integration. However, there is little research assessing or comparing PCP and BHP perspectives on integration, especially in rural areas. The objective of this study was to identify rural PCP and BHP perspectives on integration.
The Journal of ambulatory care management
Community health workers (CHWs) collaborating with health care teams improve health outcomes. The feasibility of employing CHWs to support behavioral health in primary care is unknown. We offered experienced CHWs a 48-hour behavioral health training and placed them at health centers. Supervisors received technical assistance to support integration. We interviewed team members to explore CHW interactions with patients and team members. There was evidence of CHW integration. Major CHW roles included care coordination, outreach, and screening. It may be feasible to integrate behavioral health-focused CHWs into primary care settings. Both CHWs and supervisors need ongoing training and support.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
RePEc: Research Papers in Economics, 2012
Family Medicine, 2019
Family Medicine, 2022
Behavioral Healthcare Tomorrow, 1996
Annals of Internal Medicine, 2014
Journal of Patient Experience
Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice, 2012
2009
Annals of Internal Medicine, 2020
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 2017
Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 2005
Academic Psychiatry, 2016