Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2020
…
6 pages
1 file
Consider a cadlag local martingale $M$ with square brackets $[M]$. In this paper, we provide lower and upper bounds for expectations of the type $E [M]^{q/2}_{\tau}$, for any stopping time $\tau$ and $q\ge 2$. This result is a Burkholder-Davis-Gundy-type inequality as it relates the expectation of the running maximum $|M^*|^q$ to the expectation of the dual previsible projections of the relevant powers of the associated jumps of $M$. The case of convex moderate functions is also treated.
arXiv (Cornell University), 2020
For a continuous L2-bounded Martingale with no intervals of constancy, starting at 0 and having final variance σ 2 , the expected local time at x ∈ R is at most √ σ 2 + x 2 − |x|. This sharp bound is attained by Standard Brownian Motion stopped at the first exit time from the interval (x− √ σ 2 + x 2 , x+ √ σ 2 + x 2). Sharp bounds for the expected maximum, maximal absolute value, maximal diameter and maximal number of upcrossings of intervals, have been established by Dubins and Schwarz (1988), Dubins, Gilat and Meilijson (2009) and by the authors (2017).
Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 1986
2000
Let (t )a nd(t) be nonnegative convex functions, and let ' and be the right continuous derivatives of and ; respectively. In this paper, we prove the equivalence of the following three conditions: (i)kfk ckfk; (ii) L H and (iii) Rt s0 '(s) s ds c (ct); 8 t>s 0; where L and H are the Orlicz martingale spaces. As
matematica.ciens.ucv.ve
Given a probability space (Ω,F,P) and a filtration {Fn}n≥1 of F, let us consider X = {Xn}n≥1 be {F n }- martingale and Y = {Yn}n≥1 a sequence of L1-bounded random variables, {Fn}-adapted, that we will call a multiplier sequence. Suppose that X = {Xn}n≥1 is a ...
Probability Theory and Related Fields, 1990
Let (f,) be a martingale. We establish a relationship between exponential bounds for the probabilities of the type P(I f.I > 2']1 T(f,)II ~) and the size of the constant Cp appearing in the inequality ]] f* Imp < c, iF T* (f)lip, for some quasi-linear operators acting on martingales.
2012
We present a unified approach to Doob's $L^p$ maximal inequalities for $1\leq p<\infty$. The novelty of our method is that these martingale inequalities are obtained as consequences of elementary \emph{deterministic} counterparts. The latter have a natural interpretation in terms of robust hedging. Moreover our deterministic inequalities lead to new versions of Doob's maximal inequalities. These are best possible in the
The Annals of Probability
The following conditions are necessary and sufficient for an arbitrary càdlàg local martingale to be a uniformly integrable martingale: (A) The weak tail of the supremum of its modulus is zero; (B) its jumps at the first-exit times from compact intervals converge to zero in L 1 , on the events that those times are finite; and (C) its almost sure limit is an integrable random variable.
Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1997
On the tails of the supremum and the quadratic variation of strictly local martingales
Electronic Communications in Probability, 2022
The paper contains the study of sharp extensions of weak-type estimates for a martingale maximal function. Given 1 < p < ∞ and a pair (x, y) of nonnegative numbers satisfying x p ≤ y, we identify the optimal upper bounds for | sup n fn| p,∞, for nonnegative martingales f = (fn) n≥0 satisfying f 1 = x and f p p = y.
Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 1994
Let ( f n ) ({f_n}) and ( g n ) ({g_n}) be two martingales with respect to the same filtration ( F n ) ({\mathcal {F}_n}) such that their difference sequences ( d n ) ({d_n}) and ( e n ) ({e_n}) satisfy \[ P ( d n ≥ λ | F n − 1 ) = P ( e n ≥ λ | F n − 1 ) P({d_n} \geq \lambda |{\mathcal {F}_{n - 1}}) = P({e_n} \geq \lambda |{\mathcal {F}_{n - 1}}) \] for all real λ \lambda ’s and n ≥ 1 n \geq 1 . It is known that \[ ‖ f ∗ ‖ p ≤ K p ‖ g ∗ ‖ p , 1 ≤ p > ∞ , {\left \| {{f^ \ast }} \right \|_p} \leq {K_p}{\left \| {{g^ \ast }} \right \|_p},\quad 1 \leq p > \infty , \] for some constant K p {K_p} depending only on p. We show that K p = O ( p ) {K_p} = O(p) . This will be obtained via a new version of Rosenthal’s inequality which generalizes a result of Pinelis and which may be of independent interest.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Lithuanian Mathematical Journal, 1976
Advances in Applied Probability, 1977
arXiv (Cornell University), 2018
Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 1985
Strategies for Sequential Search and Selection in Real Time, 1992
Statistics & Probability Letters, 2003
Proceedings - Mathematical Sciences, 2014
Indiana University Mathematics Journal, 2012
Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 1986
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2000
Mathematical Transactions of the Academy of Sciences of the Lithuanian SSR, 1973
Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 2001
Statistics & Probability Letters, 2002
Stochastic Analysis and Applications, 2007
Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 1986
Zeitschrift f�r Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verwandte Gebiete, 1981
arXiv (Cornell University), 2022
Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, 2005
The Annals of Probability, 1999
Electronic Communications in Probability, 2017
Lithuanian Mathematical Journal, 1982