Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2006
…
11 pages
1 file
The need to know the force exerted by moving body on ground of intriguing interplay between geometry and dynamics gives a possible introducing of gravitomagnetic (GM) field as an analogous to the magnetic field. The existence of such a field has straightforwardly been presented in two approaches based on special relativity (SR) only and SR plus gravitational time dilation (semi SR) for different cases. We treat these two approaches for when the cases are switched, using appropriate key points. Hence, we demonstrate that the strength of GM field in semi SR approach is twice SR approach. Then, we also discuss that the full linearized general relativity should give the same strength for GM field as semi SR, and hence, through an exact analogy with the electrodynamic equations, we present an argument for the best potential definition amongst those used in this issue. PACS number: 03.30. + p; 04.20. − q
1991
The numerous ways of introducing spatial gravitational forces are fit together in a single framework enabling their interrelationships to be clarified. This framework is then used to treat the “acceleration equals force” equation and gyroscope precession, both of which are then discussed in the post-Newtonian approximation, followed by a brief examination of the Einstein equations themselves in that approximation. 1
OAlib, 2022
We introduce the concept of equivalent electromagnetic (EEM) field, on the basis of which we describe the gravitational field (G-field). We determine this EEM field based on the principle of equivalence (PE), i.e. by direct application of PE in the field equations and in the equations of motion, by introducing the EEM field potential. In this way, we introduce the mathematical formalism of the electromagnetic (EM) field into the G-field equations. This procedure of describing the G-field has a limitation and can be applied to static, stationary and quasi-stationary fields. Obtained equations and solutions are compared with the General Theory of Relativity and the differences are analyzed.
2010
Classical gravitation is so similar to the electrostatic that the possible unification has been investigated for many years. Although electromagnetism is formulated now successfully by quantum field theory, this paper proposes a simple approach to describe the electromagnetism from the macroscopic perspective of general relativity. The hypothesis is based on two charged particles that cause disturbance energy sufficient to disrupt the space-time and explain approximately Maxwell's equations. Therefore, with such this simple idea, we suggest the possibility that the geometric relationship between electromagnetism and gravitation is not yet fully exhausted.
International Journal of Modern Physics: Conference Series
In 1918, Joseph Lense and Hans Thirring discovered the gravitomagnetic (GM) effect of Einstein field equations in weak field and slow motion approximation. They showed that Einstein equations in this approximation can be written as in the same form as Maxwell’s equation for electromagnetism. In these equations the charge and electric current are replaced by the mass density and the mass current. Thus, the gravitomagnetism formalism in astrophysical system is used with the mass assuming the role of the charge. In this work, we present the deduction of gravitoelectromagnetic equations and the analogue of the Lorentz force in the gravitomagnetism. We also discuss the problem of Mercury’s perihelion advance orbit, we propose solutions using GM formalism using a dipole-dipole potential for the Sun-Planet interaction.
1999
Due to the resemblance between Maxwell and the gravitomagnetic equations obtained in the weak field and slow motion limit of General Relativity, one can ask if it is possible to amplify a seed intrinsic rotation or spin motion by a gravitomagetic dynamo, in analogy with the well-known dynamo effect. Using the Galilean limits of the gravitomagnetic equations, the answer to this question is negative, due to the fact that a "magnetic" Galilean limit for the gravitomagnetic equations is physically inconsistent. Also, we prove that, in spite of some claims, a gravitational Meissner effect does not exists.
Journal of Dynamics and Differential Equations, 2013
A mathematical derivation of Maxwell's equations for gravitation, based on a mathematical proof of Faraday's Law, is presented. The theory provides a linear, relativistic Lagrangian field theory of gravity in a weak field, and paves the way to a better understanding of the structure of the energy-momentum tensor in the Einstein Field Equations. Hence it is directly relevant to problems in modern cosmology. The derivation, independent of the perturbation theory of Einstein's equations, puts the gravitational and electromagnetic fields on an equal footing for weak fields, contrary to generally held views. The historical objections to a linear Lorentz invariant field theory of gravity are refuted.
Brazilian Journal of Physics, 2005
We discuss the gravitomagnetism in the context of scalar-tensor theories of gravity. We obtain the equation of motion of a particle in terms of gravitoelectric and gravitomagnetic fields. We discuss the gravitomagnetic time delay and the Lense-Thirring effect in the context of scalar-tensor theories of gravity. In the particular case of Brans-Dicke Theory, we compare the results obtained with those predicted by general relativity and show that within the accuracy of experiments designed to measure these effects, both theories predict essentially the same results.
2006
Experimental discovery of the gravitomagnetic fields generated by translational and/or rotational currents of matter is one of primary goals of modern gravitational physics. The rotational (intrinsic) gravitomagnetic field of the Earth is currently measured by the Gravity Probe B. The present paper makes use of a parametrized post-Newtonian (PN) expansion of the Einstein equations to demonstrate how the extrinsic gravitomagnetic field generated by the translational current of matter can be measured by observing the relativistic time delay caused by a moving gravitational lens. We prove that measuring the extrinsic gravitomagnetic field is equivalent to testing the relativistic effect of the aberration of gravity caused by the Lorentz transformation of the gravitational field. We show that the recent Jovian deflection experiment is a null-type experiment testing the Lorentz invariance of the gravitational field (aberration of gravity), thus, confirming existence of the extrinsic gravitomagnetic field associated with the orbital motion of Jupiter with accuracy 20%. We comment on physically inadequate interpretations of the Jovian deflection experiment given by a number of researchers who are not experts in modern VLBI techniques and the subtleties of JPL ephemeris. We propose to measure the aberration of gravity effect more accurately by observing the gravitational deflection of light by the Sun and processing VLBI observations in the geocentric frame with respect to which the Sun is moving with velocity ∼ 30 km/s.
viXra, 2017
Ever since Oliver Heaviside's suggestion of the possible existence of a set of equations, analogous to Maxwell's equations for the electromagnetic field, to describe the gravitational field, others have considered and built on the original notion. However, if such equations do exist and really are analogous to Maxwell's electromagnetic equations, new problems could arise related to presently accepted notions concerning special relativity. This note, as well as offering a translation of a highly relevant paper by Carstoiu, addresses these concerns in the same manner as similar concerns regarding Maxwell's equations were.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
arXiv: General Physics, 2019
arXiv:1610.08357 [gr-qc]
Journal of Physical Mathematics, 2016
International Journal of Modern Physics D, 2001
Journal of Modern Physics, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3802903, 2021
General Relativity and Gravitation, 1983