Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2002, Swiss medical weekly
…
10 pages
1 file
Invasive fungal infections have emerged as important causes of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. In response to this challenge, the field of antifungal chemotherapy has considerably expanded. Fluconazole and itraconazole, introduced in the late 1980s, were the first durably useful alternatives to amphotericin B deoxycholate. The clinical development of the lipid formulations of amphotericin B, and, more recently, that of novel echinocandin derivatives and improved antifungal triazoles each represent milestones in antifungal drug research that have further amplified our therapeutic options. Major progress has been made in harmonising disease definitions, in defining the paradigms of antifungal intervention, and in designing and implementing clinical trials. Standardised methods for in vitro susceptibility testing of yeasts and filamentous fungi have become available, and pharmacodynamic concepts have entered preclinical and clinical drug development. This article...
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2005
For many years, amphotericin B and flucytosine have been the only antifungal agents for invasive fungal infections. Amphotericin B was the standard of care for most of these infections. However, its use was often associated with low efficacy and poor tolerance. Fortunately, the antifungal armamentarium has increased during the past two decades with the addition of several new agents. In addition to itraconazole and fluconazole, lipid formulations of amphotericin B, voriconazole, caspofungin and micafungin have arrived on the market. Other agents are expected to be licensed shortly (anidulafungin, posaconazole). These various antifungal agents differ in their spectrum, pharmacokinetic profile, route of administration, efficacy in clinical trials, safety profile, drug-drug interactions and, importantly, their cost. There is no longer a unique standard agent for all or nearly all invasive fungal infections but a real choice among several agents. The characteristics of these new agents are reviewed to help clinicians in their decision to select an antifungal agent for their patients.
Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2011
The introduction of new antifungal agents (eg, echinocandins, second-generation triazoles) in the past decade has transformed the management of invasive mycoses to the point that drug toxicity is no longer the major limiting factor in treatment. Yet, many of these newer antifungal agents have important limitations in their spectrum of activity, pharmacokinetics, and unique predisposition for pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions and unusual toxicities associated with long-term use. This article reviews key pharmacological aspects of systemic antifungal agents as well as evolving strategies, such as pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic optimization and therapeutic drug monitoring, to improve the safety and efficacy of systemic antifungal therapy.
Drugs, 2004
including those of a new class and a new generation of an existing class. Caspofungin, the first available echinocandin, has greatly expanded the antifungal armamentarium by providing a cell wall-active agent with candidacidal activity as well as demonstrated clinical efficacy in the therapy of aspergillosis refractory to available therapy. In addition, in clinical trials, caspofungin had comparable efficacy to amphotericin B for candidaemia and invasive Candida infections. Caspofungin and two more recently introduced echinocandins, micafungin and anidulafungin, are available as intravenous formulations only and characterised by potent anti-candidal activity, as well as few adverse events and drug interactions.
Infectious Disease Clinics of North America, 2003
Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2006
The incidence of fungal infections has increased globally, and the introduction of the newer triazoles and echinocandin antifungals is a more-than-welcome and long overdue development. In this report, we review the clinical trials evaluating the therapeutic efficacy of these new antifungal agents and examine possible gaps in coverage. Voriconazole has become the primary treatment for most forms of invasive aspergillosis in a number of centers, posaconazole offers a broad antifungal spectrum, and echinocandins are fungicidal against most Candida species. Moreover, the new agents are active against some fungi that are resistant to amphotericin B, may have a role in the management of fever and neutropenia, and provide exciting options for combination antifungal therapy. However, significant questions remain, including the management of breakthrough infections and treatment failures and the efficacy of the new antifungal agents against less common fungi.
Seminars in Pediatric Infectious Diseases, 2001
Invasive fungal infections are increasing in prevalence because of modern support for immunocompromised patients allowing longer survivial times. The risk of fungal infection has also increased because of the use of broad spectrum of antibiotics in this patient population, and the intensity and duration of immunosuppression. The list of antifungal options has expanded with renewed interest in these infections with high morbidity and mortality. Amphotericin B deoxycholate has been and continues to be the mainstay of antifungal agents. Lipid formulations of amphotericin that improve the serum and the tissue level of amphotericin B while decreasing toxicity are being increasingly used. Imidazoles, including fluconazole and itraconazole, have reduced toxicities in comparison with amphotericin B deoxycholate, but their spectrum activity is limited. Echinocandins, including caspofungin and new investigational agents with unique mechanisms of action, offer great promise as antifungal agents either alone or in a combination agent with amphotericin B. Antifungal strategies and antifungal resistance in relationship to clinical outcomes are also discussed.
Drugs, 2004
including those of a new class and a new generation of an existing class. Caspofungin, the first available echinocandin, has greatly expanded the antifungal armamentarium by providing a cell wall-active agent with candidacidal activity as well as demonstrated clinical efficacy in the therapy of aspergillosis refractory to available therapy. In addition, in clinical trials, caspofungin had comparable efficacy to amphotericin B for candidaemia and invasive Candida infections. Caspofungin and two more recently introduced echinocandins, micafungin and anidulafungin, are available as intravenous formulations only and characterised by potent anti-candidal activity, as well as few adverse events and drug interactions. Voriconazole, the first available second-generation triazole, available in both intravenous and oral formulations, has added a new and improved therapeutic option for primary therapy of invasive aspergillosis and salvage therapy for yeasts and other moulds. In a randomised trial, voriconazole demonstrated superior efficacy and a survival benefit compared with amphotericin B followed by other licensed antifungal therapy. This and data from a noncomparative study led to voriconazole becoming a new standard of therapy for invasive aspergillosis. Voriconazole has several important safety issues, including visual adverse events, hepatic enzyme elevation and skin reactions, as well as a number of drug interactions. Posaconazole, only available orally and requiring dose administration four times daily, shows encouraging efficacy in difficult to treat infections due to zygomycetes. Ravuconazole, available in both intravenous and oral formulations, has broad-spectrum in vitro potency and in vivo efficacy against a wide range of fungal pathogens. Clinical studies are underway. Despite the advances offered with each of these drugs, the morbidity and mortality associated with invasive fungal infections remains unacceptable, especially for the most at-risk patients. For individuals with severe immunosuppression as a result of chemotherapy, graft-versus-host disease and its therapy, or transplantation, new drugs and strategies are greatly needed. Table I. Systemic antifungal agents Class/compound Mechanism of action Antifungal compounds targeting fungal cell membrane Polyene antifungals Amphotericin B Interaction with ergosterol, formation of aqueous channels, increased membrane Lipid formulations of amphotericin B permeability to univalent and divalent cations, cell death Antifungal triazoles Fluconazole Interaction with cytochrome P450; inhibition of C-14 demethylation of lanosterol, Itraconazole causing ergosterol depletion and accumulation of aberrant and toxic sterols in the Voriconazole cell membrane Posaconazole Ravuconazole Antifungal compounds targeting fungal cell wall Echinocandins Caspofungin Inhibition of fungal β-(1,3) glucan synthase complex, leading to depletion of cell-wall Micafungin glucan and osmotic instability Anidulafungin
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2006
Amphotericin B is the main therapeutic agent for the treatment of invasive fungal infections; however, it is associated with significant toxicities that limit its use. Other systemic antifungal agents have been developed to improve tolerability while maintaining the efficacy profile of conventional amphotericin B. Fifty-four studies involving 9,228 patients were assessed for the frequency of adverse effects of the main systemic antifungal agents. While the results suggest that liposomal amphotericin B is the least nephrotoxic of the lipid formulations (14.6%), that conventional amphotericin B is the most nephrotoxic (33.2%), and that itraconazole is the most hepatotoxic (31.5%), the lack of standard definitions of antifungalrelated adverse effects limits the validity of these results. Furthermore, heterogeneous patient pools and differing protocols make it difficult to draw direct comparisons between studies. With the advent of newer classes of systemic antifungal agents, future trials should conform to definitions that are universally applicable and clinically relevant to allow for such comparisons and to enable evidence-based decision-making.
Asian journal of pharmaceutical research and development, 2023
Nowadays, the majority of fungal infections, including candidiasis, can cause anything from a minor mucous membrane infection to fatal systemic mycoses. Due to the most rapid increase in populations with impaired hosts, such as those with HIV/AIDS, organ transplant recipients, and chemotherapy patients, candida infections present a serious clinical challenge internationally. In addition, a dramatic rise in the number of elderly people who are vulnerable to fungal infections is anticipated in the next decades. Due to the eukaryotic structure of the cells, developing antifungal medications for these issues is more challenging than developing antibacterial medications. Therefore, there are now only a limited number of antifungal medications available to treat the wide range of fungal infections. Additionally, the antifungal arsenal against fungal diseases has been constrained by the rise in antifungal resistance and unfavourable host effects.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Internal Medicine Journal, 2004
Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 2014
International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1999
Journal of Hospital Medicine, 2009
Clinical Drug Investigation, 2011
Journal of Chemotherapy, 2008
International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research, 2011
Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2006
Clinical Infectious Diseases, 1998
Revista española de quimioterapia : publicación oficial de la Sociedad Española de Quimioterapia, 2006
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1999
Current medicinal chemistry, 2006
2015
Pediatria i Medycyna Rodzinna, 2019
Anais brasileiros de dermatologia, 2018
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1988
Seminars in Hematology, 2009
Antimicrobial agents and …, 2000
Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry, 2007
The Medical Letter on Drugs and Therapeutics, 2000