Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2021, Re-imagining Doctoral Writing
It has been a privilege to work on this edited collection despite the fact that much of the work has taken place during a pandemic when, for many of us, our lives have been turned inside out. The series editors Terry Zawacki, Joan Mullin, Magnus Gustafsson, and Federico Navarro have been exceptionally helpful, as has been founding editor and publisher Mike Palmquist. Terry, in particular, has guided us with gentle encouragement and thoughtful suggestions throughout the process. We also thank the contributors for their work on chapters and for their collegial approach to this project. It has been a pleasure to work with you all, and we look forward to many years of collaborations in the future. We would also like to thank all the readers who read earlier drafts of pieces of this collection. We are grateful for your careful work. Cecile: I would like to acknowledge the support from Memorial University for assistance in the preparation of this manuscript and in particular for the Publications Subventions Program grant. I also want to thank my co-editors, Britt and Jamie, for a most enjoyable journey. Our virtual meetings became a highlight for me. I'm also extremely grateful to both of them for carrying the load when I became ill. They conveyed their compassion and care in multiple ways. Britt: As I type this on my phone (with one hand, while feeding my new baby), I am astounded at what can be accomplished when academics come together to carefully collaborate. As authors and editors, we have been through births, deaths, sickness (hello Covid-19!), health, layoffs, new jobs, as well as dissertation endings (congrats!), beginnings, and somewhere in between. I am grateful to my co-editors who have sustained me in more ways than I could possibly detail. I am grateful to the authors, who gracefully took on rounds of editing and review in order to push this piece further. I am grateful to the Algonquin Nation whose territory includes the Ottawa River watershed, which nurtures and sustains my life and the lives of my kin. Finally, I am grateful to my human, Sean Botti, whose countless hours of visible and invisible labour has contributed to making this project a reality. Jamie: I am grateful to so many people who have been a part of bringing this collection together. I would like to thank my co-editors, Britt and Cecile, for their rigour, generosity, and care. The fact that we have edited this book from different corners of the world has frequently opened up interesting juxtapositions in time and season and in terms of how we think about doctoral education and writing. I am grateful to chapter authors for working with us RE-IMAGINING DOCTORAL WRITING
Re-imagining Doctoral Writing, 2021
It has been a privilege to work on this edited collection despite the fact that much of the work has taken place during a pandemic when, for many of us, our lives have been turned inside out. The series editors Terry Zawacki, Joan Mullin, Magnus Gustafsson, and Federico Navarro have been exceptionally helpful, as has been founding editor and publisher Mike Palmquist. Terry, in particular, has guided us with gentle encouragement and thoughtful suggestions throughout the process. We also thank the contributors for their work on chapters and for their collegial approach to this project. It has been a pleasure to work with you all, and we look forward to many years of collaborations in the future. We would also like to thank all the readers who read earlier drafts of pieces of this collection. We are grateful for your careful work. Cecile: I would like to acknowledge the support from Memorial University for assistance in the preparation of this manuscript and in particular for the Publications Subventions Program grant. I also want to thank my co-editors, Britt and Jamie, for a most enjoyable journey. Our virtual meetings became a highlight for me. I'm also extremely grateful to both of them for carrying the load when I became ill. They conveyed their compassion and care in multiple ways. Britt: As I type this on my phone (with one hand, while feeding my new baby), I am astounded at what can be accomplished when academics come together to carefully collaborate. As authors and editors, we have been through births, deaths, sickness (hello Covid-19!), health, layoffs, new jobs, as well as dissertation endings (congrats!), beginnings, and somewhere in between. I am grateful to my co-editors who have sustained me in more ways than I could possibly detail. I am grateful to the authors, who gracefully took on rounds of editing and review in order to push this piece further. I am grateful to the Algonquin Nation whose territory includes the Ottawa River watershed, which nurtures and sustains my life and the lives of my kin. Finally, I am grateful to my human, Sean Botti, whose countless hours of visible and invisible labour has contributed to making this project a reality. Jamie: I am grateful to so many people who have been a part of bringing this collection together. I would like to thank my co-editors, Britt and Cecile, for their rigour, generosity, and care. The fact that we have edited this book from different corners of the world has frequently opened up interesting juxtapositions in time and season and in terms of how we think about doctoral education and writing. I am grateful to chapter authors for working with us RE-IMAGINING DOCTORAL WRITING
Re-imagining Doctoral Writing, 2021
It has been a privilege to work on this edited collection despite the fact that much of the work has taken place during a pandemic when, for many of us, our lives have been turned inside out. The series editors Terry Zawacki, Joan Mullin, Magnus Gustafsson, and Federico Navarro have been exceptionally helpful, as has been founding editor and publisher Mike Palmquist. Terry, in particular, has guided us with gentle encouragement and thoughtful suggestions throughout the process. We also thank the contributors for their work on chapters and for their collegial approach to this project. It has been a pleasure to work with you all, and we look forward to many years of collaborations in the future. We would also like to thank all the readers who read earlier drafts of pieces of this collection. We are grateful for your careful work. Cecile: I would like to acknowledge the support from Memorial University for assistance in the preparation of this manuscript and in particular for the Publications Subventions Program grant. I also want to thank my co-editors, Britt and Jamie, for a most enjoyable journey. Our virtual meetings became a highlight for me. I'm also extremely grateful to both of them for carrying the load when I became ill. They conveyed their compassion and care in multiple ways. Britt: As I type this on my phone (with one hand, while feeding my new baby), I am astounded at what can be accomplished when academics come together to carefully collaborate. As authors and editors, we have been through births, deaths, sickness (hello Covid-19!), health, layoffs, new jobs, as well as dissertation endings (congrats!), beginnings, and somewhere in between. I am grateful to my co-editors who have sustained me in more ways than I could possibly detail. I am grateful to the authors, who gracefully took on rounds of editing and review in order to push this piece further. I am grateful to the Algonquin Nation whose territory includes the Ottawa River watershed, which nurtures and sustains my life and the lives of my kin. Finally, I am grateful to my human, Sean Botti, whose countless hours of visible and invisible labour has contributed to making this project a reality. Jamie: I am grateful to so many people who have been a part of bringing this collection together. I would like to thank my co-editors, Britt and Cecile, for their rigour, generosity, and care. The fact that we have edited this book from different corners of the world has frequently opened up interesting juxtapositions in time and season and in terms of how we think about doctoral education and writing. I am grateful to chapter authors for working with us RE-IMAGINING DOCTORAL WRITING
Knowledge Production Research Work in Interesting Times, 2007
2020
Kinship of many kinds has brought me to this moment. My academic kin are numerous, but I will be brief. Ms. Jones and Mr. Arnerich: thank you for helping me love literature, not just books, and believing in my ability as a writer. Dr. Continothank you for making that very first paper bleed red. You helped me learn that our writing, too, must descend to ascend. Thank you, also, for teaching me how much the text matters. That advice has never steered me wrong. Dr. Julianne Smithyour many hours of attention to my words and the doors you opened for me into the Victorian past and the scholarly present have been invaluable. Thank you. The PepStep faculty: Damien, Stella, Carrie B., and Carrie W.thank you for ensuring we learned theory and praxis. It stood me well. To Waves near and far, but especially Catherine, Cassandra and Daniyour support at all hours of the day has been deeply meaningfulfriends for all seasons. To my many undergraduate researchers, you have been pearls without price. The OG crew who collected the website data: Kat, Kynedi, Michelle, and Abbymy gratitude knows no bounds. The citations crew: I see you. Paige and Ixchelyour amazing work at the final hour will not be forgotten. My GGSE valiant last-minute editors-Emily and Tanishathank you for your keen eyes. Without the material help of Khirsten Scott and Lou Maraj in the form of DBLAC, there are whole quarters worth of work that might not have gotten done. Jacqueline Jones Royster and Asao Inoue have, through their presence in the field and the fire that is their scholarship, profoundly shaped this dissertation and me. Thank you, Anne Charity Hudley, for the hours of mentorship. Vilna Bashi-Treitler, you inspire me every day, showing me what it looks like to claim your beauty and be a mom while also producing excellent scholarship. Dorothy Chunyour words about my writing have been a defense against imposter syndrome. Trish Fancher, Ellen O'Connell-Whittet, and Kara Mae Brown, you have all been a wonderful sisterhood of Writing Studies scholars and I am beyond grateful. Karen Lunsfordwhen I walked, pregnant, into your office all those years ago, you saw a woman ready to compose herself into a scholar. Thank you for helping me do just that. After a global pandemic altered many of my plans for completing this dissertation, most especially the structures I relied on for childcare, I found out quickly who my kin are. My neighborhood friends risked exposure to "the virwus," as Finn calls it, because of our bonds of affection and their desire to see me meet this goal. Thank you, Natalee, Else, Kristine, and Katie. Thank you Kim, Lena the birthday twin, and Marianne. Thank you Cheryl, for the peaceful retreat of your little farm in the middle of the suburbs. My in-laws watched my son for long afternoons and even longer Sundays so I could write. Their belief in me has been unwavering. Thank you Grammie and Grandpa (Joan and Rick). Alex, without your support during my Pepperdine years, I wouldn't have made it this far. My family in New Mexico stepped up, too, opening up their homes to me so I could have a room of my own. Thank you, Cash, for giving up your room. Thank you, Seth, for all your patience with Finn and for sharing your horses with us. Thank you, Anthony, for watching Finn like I watched you when I was seventeen. Thank you, Joe and Yvonne. There aren't enough words. Thank you, Mom. Your indispensable help in the final weeks of writing helped me quilt together this dissertation. Thank you, Dad. Any story I tell is because you taught me how. Thank you, David, for going where I go and staying where I stay, for all the little ways you supported me over the years of pursuing this degree and writing this dissertation. Of course, thank you to the One through whom all is made possible. v VITA OF MICHELLE NICOLE PETTY GRUE
Art/Research International: A Transdisciplinary Journal, 2018
Esther Fitzpatrick is a Senior Lecturer at the University of Auckland, where she specializes in education, postcolonial identities, arts-based research, decolonising methodologies, and culturally responsive pedagogy. She has published in journals such as Qualitative Inquiry, Educational Philosophy and Theory, Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, and The Ethnographic Edge. Mohamed Alansari Is a research fellow at the faculty of education and social work, University of Auckland. He is a member of the Quantitative Data Analysis and Research (Quant-DARE) unit where he is responsible for managing and performing secondary analyses on large-scale data sets and providing consultation services to staff and students on statistical matters. His research areas include the social psychology of higher education, and students' academic aspirations. Abstract: Using a series of poetry conversations, the authors give voice to their experiences of the doctoral process to illuminate the emotional and affective-political experience, and engage with the neo-liberal powers of the doctoral journey. They write poems to remember the body, and bring justice to the many bodies that have experienced the chill inside the "ivory tower."
Innovations in Education and Teaching International , 2011
Higher Education, 2019
Journal of Writing in Creative Practice, 2009
The paper reflects on modalities and typologies of writing practice within the fine art practice-based doctorate, exploring how looking at ways in which artists have engaged with writing as process, practice and visual/sonic form, can better inform the ways that doctoral writing itself may develop. Using tools developed through a close reading of Katie McLeod's work on typologies of doctoral writing, conducted in 1995, the paper generates a discussion about the relationship between art's methods and critical writing practice. It suggests that the practice-based doctoral project might be considered as a mutually constitutive one, combining both art making and poetics within an integrated whole, and arguing, with McLeod, that in the practice-based doctorate we are seeing the re-emergence of the artist as scholar, informed by practice and alive to art's investments in writing's digital, visual, performative and sonic forms in a period that theorists have dubbed 'the late age of print, an age in which the status, form and function of writing, and of print media, are being radically and productively challenged.
TEXT: Journal of Writing and Writing Courses, Special Issue (34): 1-12. ISSN 2380-7679, 2016
Waikato Journal of Education, 2014
Studies in the Education of Adults, 2014
Journal writing; Autoethnography; Adult learning autoethnography border country embodied knowledge research journals In this paper I reflect autoethnographically on my experiences of writing as part of a professional doctorate. I draw on the research journals that I kept during a particularly challenging time in the dissertation process and in particular on the method of journal writing that I used to help me through this time. This storied account offers an insight into the experience of being trína chéile, or all over the place, in the border country of adult learning. The discovery of negative capability and metaphoric sensibility emerge as significant supports on the journey. Encountering the work of Cixous during the dissertation and the work of Milner after its completion were key aspects of the thinking process. In this way writing is seen as a method of self-support in the border country of dissertation writing, one that supports emergent learning and that acts as an epistemological resource in using writing processes that are congruent with the discipline of adult education.
TEXT
This article is co-authored by three writer-academics who have been collaborating as supervisors, doctoral candidates and co-authors over the past decade. Jen Webb supervised Jordan Williams during her creative PhD in digital poetry and Deleuze (awarded 2006); Jordan and Jen co-supervised Paul Collis’s creative PhD in fiction and Barkindji identity (awarded 2016); and he has long supervised both Jen and Jordan in their (informal) education in Indigenous epistemology. Over these years, the supervisor-candidate relationships have unfolded, developed, changed and folded back on themselves. We explore how this long-term relationship between three mature-aged writers and scholars, from three very different cultural backgrounds, has inflected our individual approaches to the preparation and writing of creative research, including the exegesis. We begin, therefore, with our own understandings of what the word ‘exegesis’ means to us, how it mobilised (or hindered) the generation of creative...
Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie
(2) to extend established academic writing scholarship by introducing critical realism as a conceptual framework for justifying plural, democratized, multimodal, diverse and inclusive forms of academic writing; and (3) to develop a philosophy of change that lays a foundation for diversifying writing pedagogies. (p.1) In this way, she hopes to decolonise, democratize, and make socially just the university and its practices: to truly welcome diverse students and challenge the neoliberal orthodoxy that dominates our times. The book is divided into five (large) chapters, opening with a "Letter to My Reader" and closing with a "Signing Off" and "Afterword". We provide a brief chapter by chapter synopsis to give readers an idea of the arguments put forward, before addressing the strengths and limitations of the book in our review. Chapter by Chapter Synopsis Letter to My Reader Molinari's critical take on academic writing is reinforced by her "Letter to my Reader." Here, she addresses the reader directly, acknowledging that a year of a pandemic, working from home, and teaching in loungewear or at the kitchen table may have impacted writing, and, yet and still: "this is a serious book, it is an academic book and what makes it academic is the knowledge it deals with, the references it draws on, the research that has gone into it and my identity, my right to be a writer who is present in her text" (p.1). And, in this very open and welcoming voice, Molinari draws on the history of academia, socio-semiotic research, integrational linguistics, and studies in multimodal and visual thinking, to argue that writings themselves be reconceptualised more broadly. That dialogues, chronicles, manifestos, blogs, and comics be recognised as multimodal academic artifacts able to harness a wide range of epistemic affordances.
Higher Education Research & Development, 2012
This paper is a co-written paper by five postgraduate students at the University of Northampton and one lecturer who is also a PhD student at the University of Cambridge. In it we discuss how as a group of students we broke down barriers between ourselves as individuals to create a community of practice rather than a class. All of us are currently engaged in research that involves comparing aspects of education in the UK with another nation. In the case of five of the writers this is with the nation in which we grew up. We deliberately chose areas of study that were intertwined and negotiated our thesis titles with each other to ensure that the research would be mutually supportive. It has been this method of collective writing and of reflective data collection that has been particularly innovative and that we will be presenting in this paper although the individual dissertations will be submitted separately. This approach has enabled us to build emotional resilience, and to generate work of a greater depth than would otherwise have been possible. In this way this paper fits with the conference theme ‘many paths, same goal’. The paper opens with an extended metaphor linking research to cricket and specifically to the great West Indian cricket captain Clive Lloyd. Metaphors can open up new ways of thinking as this one did for us.
This Forum issue discusses the centrality of the fieldwork in doctoral research. The inevitability of researchers' influence and of their values apparent during and after their fieldwork calls for a high degree of reflexivity. Since the standard methodology textbooks do not sufficiently guide on addressing such challenges, doctoral researchers go through stressful phases, at times revising various decisions they made before starting fieldwork. By drawing upon four case studies from varied contexts, this forum highlights some of these challenges including: going beyond signing the consent form and building rapport to elicit student voices; the ethical implications of White privilege of researchers turning consent into an obligatory contract with participants; unanticipated delays in the fieldwork opening up new possibilities; and tensions resulting from negotiating between insider and outsider identities while researching in two hostile contexts.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.