The University Library: The Center of a University Education?
Patricia Washburn2006, portal: Libraries and the Academy
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Abstract
AI
AI
The study investigates the significance of university libraries in the educational experience, highlighting the Harold B. Lee Library's role at Brigham Young University. Through analysis of usage data and student services, the research assesses library utilization trends and the perceived value among the student body, addressing challenges and future needs in academic library services.
Related papers
Faculty & Student Perspectives on the Role of the Library
Against the Grain
The Future of the Library
2016
The somewhat daunting task posed by the Provost was to consider the future of the academic library, both in the national sense and, more specifically, at the University of Florida. Her interest in these issues was sparked by the rapid changes occurring in libraries over recent years, changes that present challenges and opportunities. Given the importance of libraries in the academic community, are the UF libraries responding accordingly or poised to respond? She asked the committee to consider the next decade: what critical issues should Central Administration focus upon for maximum benefit to the library? And of more immediate moment, the impending retirements of the library directors in both the Smathers and Health Center libraries mean new leadership, with potentially new directions. Our charge was to prepare a report with recommendations. The committee began by educating itself on the current status of academic libraries by reading the latest literature, gaining input from knowledgeable faculty, staff, and students, and consulting with outside experts. From that study, five issues surfaced for detailed consideration. The body of this report offers details, data, and rationales that flesh out the following notes: Comparative Analysis-detailed comparisons of UF libraries with relevant peers indicate UF's spending lags theirs by roughly a third, illustrating a need for increased operating funds, as well as certain types of new space. Librarians and Library Services-the increasingly more complex job duties of librarians calls for hiring those trained as experts in new technology, the recognition of this professionalism, and the introduction of programs to gain full use of such talents. Collection Balances-the inevitable shift toward digital acquisitions should not mask the need for continued attention to printed materials, particularly in the humanities. Role in the Capital Campaign-using as models the library targets in other academic capital campaigns, UF should assume an appropriate funding goal (suggested $25 million) that recognizes the central importance of the library. Integration of the UF Libraries-after a comparison of many important issues, advantages and disadvantages, the current separate system is favored. Visualization Environment) and the NAVE (New Automated Virtual Environment) Lab of UF's Digital World's Institute in the College of Fine Arts. The "library of the 21 st century" is thus a time-honored site enabled by a diverse set of technologies that expresses and facilitates humanity's need to order and understand its world by recovering, analyzing, archiving, producing, and transmitting knowledge in both local and global contexts. I. Institutional Comparisons In considering what the future holds for UF libraries, it was first important to determine where we now stand, establishing a baseline for recommendations in this report. Traditionally, academic libraries have been ranked by the Association of Research Libraries (ARL). Currently, the ARL bases its rankings on five measures: volumes held, volumes added, current serial titles, total operating expenditures, and number of professional and support staff. As examples, the 2003-2004 rankings show Michigan State ranked as 39, Florida 38, Arizona 30, Ohio State 21, Wisconsin 11, Berkeley 4, and Harvard 1. Libraries with top ARL rankings are usually at large institutions and have histories of stable and adequate funding. In this report we compare the University of Florida's library funding, both total and by major category, to that at other libraries. We choose two comparison groups. The first is ARL libraries at five large land-grant institutions(a "peer" group) with medical and law schools, and the second is all American universities that report data to ARL. Universities in the first group are close to us in size and mission, so that unadjusted expenditure comparisons are meaningful. That is not the case with the second group, which contains over eighty universities with more widely varying size and missions. To make comparisons meaningful, statistical methods are used to adjust expenditures for the number of students, the number of faculty, the presence of law and medical schools, and U.S. News & World Report rankings. For both comparisons, the latest statistics available represent the 2003-2004 academic year.
Phase III University of Iowa Libraries Faculty and Staff Study
2011
The Faculty and Staff Study is the third phase of a three-part research project by the University of Iowa Libraries. The study was designed to assess faculty and staff satisfaction with library-wide services and resources. The purpose of this study is to obtain objective, quantifiable information from the faculty and staff at the University of Iowa regarding library services and resources. The objectives of the Faculty and Staff Study were: to ascertain and understand how faculty and staff access library resources and services; to ascertain what library services, resources, collections and facilities faculty and staff use for study, teaching and research; to ascertain faculty and staff perceptions of library resources and services; to ascertain how satisfied faculty and staff are with library resources and services; to identify unmet needs and areas for improvement.
College and University Libraries/Departmental Libraries; Association of College and Research Libraries; American Library Association/Policy Statements
College & Research Libraries, 1994
There is a long history of debate and controversy surrounding the existence of academic branch libraries. Although the reasons for reviewing branch libraries are numerous and varied, there is a need for consistency in the review process. Using recent ACRL guidelines and standards as a foundation, the authors propose a model methodology for reviewing academic branch libraries which may be utilized by any institution undertaking such a process. Disciplines Library and Information Science Comments This article is form College & Research Libraries 55 (1994): 342-354.
Usage pattern of Library Resources and Services by the Students and Faculty Members of B.Ed Colleges Affiliated to Kuvempu University
2021
This study explores user perception, the use of an academic library, and the correlation between user perception and library use. The findings indicate that the B.Ed College library is a preferred place to study and spend time during non-class times on campus. The frequent user activities in the library included individual study, reading, computer use, finding information, group study, using reference and information services, and meeting and socializing. The correlation between library use and each of the user activities was examined. The findings suggest that users perceive the B.Ed College library primarily as a place for learning and information seeking. The study shows how users perceive and use the library, and provides insights into how libraries can strengthen their place and advance their role in the academic community
Report to the Provost: Task Group on the Future of the Library
2007
The Provost's task group met Spring Quarter 2007 to examine the role of the library in support of the academic mission of Cal Poly. The areas of study and related recommendations are:
Library Resources of a Metropolitan University-Assessment by Users (Research Note)
College & Research Libraries
Attitudes of Presidents and Provosts on the University Library
College & Research Libraries, 2007
This study replicates an investigation conducted by Deborah Grimes in 1992–1993 and published in her 1998 book, Academic Library Centrality. This paper reports the results of interviews conducted in 2004 with the presidents and provosts of six universities and compares them with Grimes’ findings. The analysis shows that major changes have occurred in the attitudes of university leaders toward their libraries during the last decade. These new findings provide direction for library leaders as they seek out new models of library service and reshape old models to fit the current environment of American higher education. The findings also point to the emergence of new competencies, skills, and knowledge as essential components of the job of the library director. The results of this study call into question the applicability of the centrality concept to libraries in universities and indicate the need for research that offers a relevant model for use in those settings.
The Development of Collections in American University Libraries
College & Research Libraries
Quality and Utility of Library Services – From the Perception of College Students.pdf
Library is an essential aspect of any academic quality. NAAC and UGC has emphasized the need for a quality library with effective services. The 21 st generation technologies have dampened the use of it by the students. However it is imperative for the college to enhance the quality of library to attract students. This paper is an outcome of a study conducted with 60 college youth from UG and PG and form both the gender.
The Status of Academic Libraries in the United States: Results from the 1996 Academic Library Survey with Historical Comparisons. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics
Education Statistics Quarterly, 2001
Library Use Patterns Among Full- and Part-Time Faculty and Students
College & Research Libraries, 1983
nia, and other academic libraries, demonstrate that declining library use may be a future trend. Declining use will further erode administrative support for library budgets. Libraries must become more effective in identifying and meeting the information needs of new nontraditional students. User surveys establishing service priorities can be an effective tool in planning library service for future student and faculty populations.
Academic library performance measures and undergraduates' library use and educational outcomes* 1
Library & information science research, 2002
A New Vision for University Libraries: Towards 2015
vala.org.au
Abstract: At UTS, plans for a new library building to open in 2015 are fuelling a re-imagining of our library. We are moving towards a new sustainable, client focussed and innovative library that will find its physical expression in a new library building, but is envisioned as being ...
University investment in the library: What's the return?
A Case Study at the, 2008
In the spring of 2006, colleagues at Elsevier and I started noticing a theme arising in our individual conversations with customers. Librarians told us that their administrations were asking for research performance measurement, cost justification, and return on investment. Carol Tenopir had recently completed research that demonstrated the positive impact of electronic access on productivity. Both librarians and publishers had a hunch that such gains could subsequently have a positive impact on university funding. We collectively discussed the need for a return on investment (ROI) model that could apply to academic libraries, something that would articulate value in terms that would speak to the university administration. The model would need to encompass the value of all library content and not be limited to a single publisher's product.
Influence of Library Value on University Education: Students' Perception Survey by Luke Obasuyi and Evelyn Omoluabi Idiodi
Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 2015
This) study) investigates) the) influence) of) library) value) on) students') education.) Library) physical) infrastructures,) library) information) resources,) library) personnel,) library) information)services)were)independent)variables)related)to)the)overall)library)value)to) students')education.)Descriptive)survey)design)method)was)employed)in)this)study)and) the) population) was) the) regular) students) of) a) federal) university) in) Nigeria.) Simple) random)and)equal)allocation)sampling)methods)were)used)to)select)500)students)from) 10) faculties) in) the) university.) PreQtested) questionnaire) with) a) reliability) coefficient) of) .95)alpha)was)used)to)collect)data)from)the)students)in)their)faculty)libraries)during)the) 2013/2014) academic) session.) Data) collected) were) subjected) to) descriptive) and) inferential) statistics) using) SPSS17.0.) Results) indicate) that) the) students') perceived) the) library) to) be) of) great) value) to) their) education) and) it) impacted) on) their) academic) pursuits) and) studies,) academic) performances,) productivity,) and) career.) All) the) independent) variables) significantly) influenced) the) overall) value) of) the) library) individually) and) collectively.) While) the) relative) contributions) of) the) library) physical) infrastructures,) library) personnel) and) library) information) services) to) the) value) of) the) library) value) were) significant) library) information) resources) was) not.) Recommendations)for)improvement)were)also)provided.))
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.