Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
28 pages
1 file
This research focuses on Vātsya Varadaguru's interpretation of the Akhaṇḍavākyārtha theory within Advaita Vedānta. It explores the textual analysis of key arguments presented in Varadaguru's work, particularly the intricate relationship between attributes and the singular essence of Brahman. The study emphasizes how Varadaguru addresses potential objections regarding the compatibility of language with the concept of an attributeless reality and examines the implications for understanding Brahman in the context of Advaita.
A famous and important debate within the classical brahminical, exegetical traditions concerns the issue of whether action (karma) according to injunctions (codana) over ritual (and indirectly, virtuous) (dharma) is the means to the final good (śreyasa) that is liberation (moks . a), or whether it is right cognition (jñāna) of the nature of self (ātman) that is the means (and, indeed, the content) of liberation. The Mīmām . sakas (the pūrva or earlier -mīmām . sakas or exegetes) hold the former view, the Advaitins (the uttara -or later -mīmām . sakas) the latter.
Religious Studies Review, 2006
智山学報(Journal of Chisan Studies), 2002
Recently اwe اengaged اa اHindu اfollower اof اthe اAdvaita اVedanta اtheological اschool 1 اin اa ا discussion, اfrom اwhich اmany اof اhis اbeliefs اwere اpresented اto اus. اBelow اis اthe اpresentation اof such اbeliefs, اalong اwith اour اresponses 2 :
Journal of Indian Philosophy, 2000
A famous and important debate within the classical brahminical, exegetical traditions concerns the issue of whether action (karma) according to injunctions (codana) over ritual (and indirectly, virtuous) (dharma) is the means to the final good (śreyasa) that is liberation (moks . a), or whether it is right cognition (jñāna) of the nature of self (ātman) that is the means (and, indeed, the content) of liberation. The Mīmām . sakas (the pūrva or earlier -mīmām . sakas or exegetes) hold the former view, the Advaitins (the uttara -or later -mīmām . sakas) the latter.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Reasons and Lives in Buddhist Traditions: Studies in Honor of Matthew Kapstein, 2019
Revue d’Études Tibétaines, 2011
Cracow Indological Studies, 2003
Reading Religion, 2022
Itay Shani, Susanne Kathrin Beiweis (eds.) (2023), Cross-Cultural Approaches to Consciousness. Mind, Nature, and Ultimate Reality. London, New York, Dublin: Bloomsbury.
Cāruśrī. H.Naganarajaiah and J.Soni (eds.), Sapna Book House, Bangalore, 2019
Philosophy East and West, 2007
Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies (Indogaku Bukkyogaku Kenkyu), 2009
Journal of Indian Philosophy, 2016
International Journal of Social Science And Human Research, 2022
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 1996
Avicennian Philosophy Journal, 2019
Dissertation in Buddhist Studies submitted at Hamburg (Sanskrit/Tibetan), 2022