Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2020
AI
This session explores the role of sound as a fundamental component in understanding and designing ambiances and atmospheres in urban and domestic life. It emphasizes sound's unique capacity as both a qualitative and quantitative medium, fostering interdisciplinary approaches to analyze the environment. Through initiatives like Cartophonies.fr, the importance of sound recordings is highlighted as valuable resources for capturing urban experiences and informing future developments in sound design, while questioning current practices and envisioning deeper aesthetic engagements with the sonic environment.
Pinch and Bijsterveld's edited publication is a significant book contributing to the discussion on sound within science, technology and society studies (STS). The contribution that this edited book makes lies in its focus on sound: sound as a material, product, object, as well as a social concept. The book examines such topics as listening as a practice within medicine, sounds within design, the production and consumption of sound and embodied listening, and filters the extensive data that surrounds technology and society, questions the way that sound has constructed and/or shaped technology and explores the impact of sound within the empirical sciences. The book and its approach to sound are situated firmly within the socio technological, drawing upon the fields of social constructivism and social shaping theories on technology. This approach reflects the increasing awareness of sound within society, as integral to certain disciplines such as urban and industrial design, ecological and anthropological studies and music and art theory. Pinch and Bijsterveld suggest this interest echoes the increased presence of audio monitoring technologies, within western cultures, as in schools or industry.
In twenty essays on subjects such as noise, acoustics, music, and silence, Keywords in Sound presents a definitive resource for sound studies and a compelling argument for why studying sound matters. Each contributor details their keyword's intellectual history; outlines its role in cultural, social, and political discourses; and suggests possibilities for further research. Keywords in Sound charts the philosophical debates and core problems in defining, classifying, and conceptualizing sound and sets new challenges for the development of sound studies. Contributors. Andrew Eisenberg, Veit Erlmann, Patrick Feaster, Steven Feld, Daniel Fisher, Stefan Helmreich, Charles Hirschkind, Deborah Kapchan, Mara Mills, John Mowitt, David Novak, Ana Mária Ochoa Gautier, Thomas Porcello, Tom Rice, Tara Rodgers, Matt Sakakeeny, David Samuels, Mark M. Smith, Benjamin Steege, Jonathan Sterne, Amanda Weidman
HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe), 2010
The ancient media formations attendant upon sound, orality and aurality comprise one of the foundational communicative practice of human sociality and culture. Yet, despite the deep anthropological and historical centrality of sound to the human sensorium and cultural creativity, it has only been in the last twenty years or so that "sound studies" has emerged as a distinctive field within (and alongside) media and communication studies. This course will explore the contours of this exciting emergent field, as well as the core concepts that orient the bearing of its scholars towards the critical analysis of sound as phenomenon, cultural event, and social practice.
Sound, 2015
Sounds are the products of a vibrating body, often happening outside of ourselves and entering the body not only through the ears. Sound is a carrier of information and plays an essential role in language and spoken communication. This object of hearing touches various fields: environmental sciences, engineering, physiology, psychoacoustics and the arts. Until recently, a new philosophy on sound and perception emerged with the intention to investigate the nature of sound and the auditory experience. Are sounds happening outside of the sounding object, are they an event, a secondary object or an event? To analyze the nature of sound, one must look for similarities and differences between sounds by using, for example, a sound classification system. Before the invention of the electronic medium it was difficult to research the materialities, propagation because of its temporal character. Although there have been many advancements, the essential problem in analyzing sound is that there is a gap between theory and practice, between sounds measures and sounds perceived.
Presentation of some “tactile sonic sculptures” and “tactile sonic interventions” in the (semi) public space and the use of a www.soundmap during community sound art - projects. Introduction of my ongoing artistic research about what I call “the multi sensorial hearing perspective” and raising some questions about the multi modal aspects of hearing and a hearing perspective. Example of community sound art - project.
SoundEffects - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Sound and Sound Experience
ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 2005
This special issue of ACM Transactions on Applied Perception is intended to commemorate the tenth International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD) and to serve as an introduction and overview of the field of auditory displays. This paper discusses the goals of the issue and describes the paper selection process. The selected papers are also introduced, with their connections to each other, their place in ICAD, and their relevance to other fields briefly highlighted.
Sound Unseen: Acousmatic Sound in Theory and Practice, by Brian Kane, Oxford; New York, Oxford University Press, 2014, 336 pp., £44.99 (hardback), ISBN 9780199347841 / 2016, 336 pp., £18.99 (paperback), ISBN: 9780190632212 The Order of Sounds: A Sonorous Archipelago, by François J. Bonnet, Falmouth, Urbanomic, 2016, 364 pp., £14.99 (paperback) ISBN: 9780993045875
Cinema Journal, 2008
Nominating "sound studies" as a field of scholarship does several interesting, yet potentially controversial, things. It can imply a move toward fragmentation-breaking into established fields like music, film, and television study and positing yet another cultish research niche, taking away from a more integrated focus on sound as part of a medium-centered totality. Some have accused visual culture studies of doing this, of poaching on parts of barely established fields and rearticulating them to more accepted areas of study such as the visual arts and material culture, doing considerable violence along the way to the modes in which visual expression is actually produced and experienced. 1 Yet, as visual culture scholars have argued, such tactics can also draw parallels and establish continuities between disciplines separated more by historic accident than logical coherence, and reach out to embrace fields that might not have been even considered under the old paradigms. I believe sound studies holds much promise along these lines. If any one characteristic marks the field currently referred to as media studies-or cinema and media studies-it is the convergence of sound and screen, across institutions, venues, texts, forms, and reception situations. While most sound scholars would agree that the visual, screen-based aspects of contemporary media have received the bulk of academic and cultural attention, not even the most adamant visualist would argue that sound in all its aspects has not played an equally important, though less studied, role in media expression and production, even during the days of silent film. The essays in this section span a wide spectrum of sound-based work, though they do not encompass all the approaches that can be brought to the study of sound in cultural expression and everyday life. For instance, a vibrant field has grown up around the study of "soundscapes," or acoustic ecology, in the past twenty years,
The Global South, 2022
Iluminace, 2021
Michel Chion, Audio-Vision: Sound on Screen. Second Edition, trans. Claudia Gorbman (New York: Columbia University Press, 2019).
What is our sense of sound? It is important to realise that sound is a physical change in the environment (change in air pressure) that stimulates a cascade of processes in the ear. It is still a mystery how humans have evolved to adapt a sense of sound and be able to hear a large range of sounds, from 20 Hz to 20kHz (20'000Hz). Even on this world, organisms from the Chiroptera family (bats) have the ability to hear higher frequencies (ultrasonic) in relation to Homo sapiens. Elephants also use infrasonic wavelengths to communicate to their herd across large distances. But in order to be able to communicate with another organism, for example; a teacher in a class room or the man at the till, there must be a way of receiving that information of changing air pressure due to the vibrations caused by muscular contractions of muscle fibres in the larynx. Primarily, exploring the journey sound goes through is complicated enough! The source of sound will come from changes to an object that cause the molecules to vibrate, transferring some of that kinetic energy across to the air molecules it surrounds where elastic collisions from the compressions and rarefactions of the air travels until the energy is absorbed by objects around you or has spread out so far that it becomes inaudible to the human ear at last. However, organisms, such as us, can perceive sound. Some sounds interfere beautifully to make hit singles or classical concerto's and some sounds produced by a novice on the violin are not so pleasing. The stimulus of sound triggers sensory neurones that send action potentials (electrical charges) to our temporal lobe positioned in a bilateral placement, aligned with our ears. In order to understand the nature, mechanics and perception, it is important to use the disciplines of biology, chemistry, physics and mathematics to gain an understanding of the human ear and how it detects sound.
2019
RE:SOUND is part of the Media Art Histories conference series, which has brought together leading researchers, artists, and scientists on a series of interdisciplinary topics for over 14 years. This edition of Media Art Histories, under the name RE:SOUND 2019, focused on sound and the sonic domain as intrinsic dimensions in the development of art and media technologies. Although sonic experiments and sound expressions abound in the histories of art, the occurrence of sound in art and media remains heavily undertheorized and decontextualized. RE:SOUND aimed at filling this gap in understanding sound by addressing the technoresonance, trans-mediality, and cultural and social reverberation of media art, art exhibitions, and archives. RE:SOUND 2019 featured keynotes by renowned scholars and artists, including Jamie Allen, Samson Young, Salomé Voegelin, Marie Højlund, and Christoph Cox. Additionally, a special panel with curators presented a conversation on topics related to exhibiting sound and included contributions by Barbara London, Arnau Horta, Voegelin, and Morten Søndergaard. The conference was divided into nine tracks that explored different aspects of sound and its relationship to art, institutions, philosophies, politics, and power.
in Spatial Senses Philosophy of Perception in an Age of Science, 1st Edition Edited by Tony Cheng, Ophelia Deroy, Charles Spence. New York: Routledge, 2019
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.