Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Newborn screening programmes for cystic fibrosis

2003, Paediatric Respiratory Reviews

Abstract

Newborn screening tests have been available for cystic fibrosis (CF) for over three decades but few national programmes exist, most being based at a regional or local level. Reasons for this include uncertainty over the longterm benefits of implementing newborn CF screening (NCFS) and the lack of a definitive test. 1 Evidence of long-term benefit is now stronger and developments in DNA analysis have meant that a screening test with sufficient sensitivity and specificity is available when this is combined with an initial measurement of immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) on a heel-prick blood sample. 2 Previous papers have discussed these issues at length. The aim of this paper is to review the current situation with respect to NCFS worldwide and to assess the successes and difficulties that these schemes have encountered. Finally, we will reflect on the lessons that can be learnt from these experiences and highlight any issues or questions that remain unresolved. INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE To the best of our knowledge, the following section reflects the current state of NCFS around the world. We would value any further information on local screening programmes or discrepancies compared with the information provided. Australia Australia has comprehensive screening coverage. In 1998, Bridget Wilcken from Sydney reported that over 90% of Australian newborns were being screened for CF. 3 Four regions-Victoria (Melbourne), South Australia (Adelaide), New South Wales (Sydney) and Queensland-established programmes in the 1980s, initially employing an IRT/IRT protocol (P. Cooper, personal communication, 2003; T. Stewart, personal communication, 2003). 4-6 Following the identification of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene in 1989, all the programmes