Emergency Treatment of Transverse Colon Cancer

Medicina

Background and Objectives: Complete mesocolon excision and high vascular ligation have become a standard procedure in the treatment of colon cancer. The transverse colon has certain embryological and anatomical particularities which require special attention in case of oncological surgeries. Proximal transverse colon cancer (TCC) can metastasize to the lymph nodes in the gastrocolic ligament. The aim of this study is to assess the tumor involvement of these lymph nodes and to determine the applicability of gastrocolic ligament lymph nodes dissection as the standard approach for proximal transverse colon cancer. Materials and Methods: this study analyzes the cases of patients admitted to the Surgery Department, diagnosed with proximal transverse colon cancer, with tumor invasion ≥ T2 and for which complete mesocolon excision with high vascular ligation and lymphadenectomy of the gastrocolic ligament (No. 204, 206, 214v) were performed. Results: A total of 43 cases operated during 201...

2010

Guidelenines in the management of obstructing cancer of the left colon: consensus conference of the world society of emergency surgery (WSES) and peritoneum and surgery (PnS) society Abstract Background: Obstructive left colon carcinoma (OLCC) is a challenging matter in terms of obstruction release as well of oncological issues. Several options are available and no guidelines are established. The paper aims to generate evidenced based recommendations on management of OLCC.

CHIRURGIA, 2021

The case study "Multivisceral Resection for Advanced Transverse Colon Tumor" presents the surgical management of a 43-year-old patient with locally advanced transverse colon adenocarcinoma involving the stomach and terminal ileum. The patient underwent extended right hemicolectomy and antrectomy, with digestive tract reconstruction via ileo-ileo and gastro-jejunal anastomoses. The case highlights the complexity of multivisceral resections in emergency settings and the importance of oncologic targeting for optimal outcomes. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 8.

Surgical Endoscopy, 2007

Background: The large randomized trials reporting on laparoscopic versus open colon surgery for cancer have all excluded patients with transverse colon cancer lesions. This study was undertaken to review our experience with surgery for curable transverse colon cancer. Methods: A database of 938 laparoscopic colon resections performed between April 1991 and September 2004 was reviewed. Of 514 procedures for cancer, stage IV disease, mid to low rectal cancers, and total colectomies were excluded. On an intent-to-treat basis, outcomes of surgery for transverse colon lesions (TC) were compared with outcomes of segmental colon resections for other lesions (OC). Results: A total of 22 TC were resected compared with 285 OC. Patients with TC were similar to patients with OC in age, gender, weight, and body mass index (BMI). Cancer stage was equivalent between patients with TC (9 Stage I, 7 Stage II, 6 Stage III) and OC (66 Stage I, 126 Stage II, 93 Stage III, p = 0.170) as was tumor size. Patients with TC underwent 9 transverse colectomies, 12 extended right hemicolectomies, and 1 extended left hemicolectomy. Patients with OC underwent 126 right hemicolectomies, 24 left hemicolectomies, and 135 sigmoid colectomies or anterior resections. There were no differences in conversion rate (18.2% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.752) or in intraoperative (9% vs. 8%, p = 0.814) or postoperative (41% vs. 30%, p = 0.418) complications. Operating time was longer with TC (209 ± 63 min vs. 176 ± 60 min, p = 0.042) and lymph node harvest was higher (15.3 ± 11.6 vs. 10.8 ± 7.6, p = 0.011). At a median followup of 17.2 months and 17.1 months, respectively, there were two (9%) recurrences after resection of TC and 17 (6%) recurrences after resection of OC. Conclusions: Laparoscopic resection of transverse colon cancers is technically feasible and not associated with a significantly higher rate of complications or conversions or with impaired oncologic outcomes compared with patients having segmental laparoscopic resections for other colon cancers. Operating time is longer.

Surgical Endoscopy, 2014

Background Previous large randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic (LR) and open resection (OR) for colon cancer have not specifically analyzed the outcomes in patients with transverse colon cancer. The aims of this study were to evaluate the feasibility and safety of LR transverse colon cancer resection and to compare our findings with the results available in the literature. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing LR or OR for histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the transverse colon. Results A total of 123 patients were included in this study: 66 LR and 57 OR. Median operating time was similar in the two groups. Median blood loss was higher in the OR group, even though the difference was not statistically significant. The rate of conversion from LR to OR was 16.7 %. Return of bowel function occurred significantly earlier in the LR group. The incidence and severity of 30-day postoperative complications and mortality rates were similar in the two groups. The median hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LR group. There was a trend toward a greater number of lymph nodes harvested in the OR group than in the LR group, although the difference was not statistically significant. The time to first flatus and bowel movement was significantly earlier in the LR group.

JMS SKIMS

Lymph node dissection in colon cancer is without a doubt necessary, it is just the extent of that dissection that is still under debate. As the individual steps of an oncologic operation cannot be separated from each other, analysis of the significance of lymph node dissection alone is difficult. It has been proven that the T category is directly related to the number and central spread of lymph node metastases. Micrometastases and isolated tumor cells may be detected in lymph nodes by using special staining techniques; their presence may worsen prognosis significantly and approximate it to UICC stage III. The numbers of dissected lymph nodes and the ratio of involved versus dissected lymph nodes have been used as markers for quality of surgery and histopathological evaluation. JMS 2018: 21 (2):109-113

Acta Chirurgica Belgica, 2019

Background: Transverse colon cancers show behavioral differences in terms of the involvement of extramesocolic lymph nodes since they are closely related to all three embryological planes. These tumors have also been observed in the gastroepiploic-omental (GEOM) region, outside their usual regional areas. We will evaluate this new metastatic route in our own cases. Methods: Thirty-four patients (16 female, 18 male) that presented to our clinic with hepatic flexure, transverse colon, and splenic flexure cancer between October 2011 and May 2017 were included in the study. Type of surgery, histopathology, and factors causing metastasis, morbidity, and mortality were evaluated. Results: Cancer was located in the transverse colon in 20 patients (58.8%), hepatic flexure in 10 (29.4%), and splenic flexure in four (11.7%). Lymph node positivity in the GEOM region was present in four patients: in the infrapyloric region and pancreatic head, close to the hepatic flexure in three patients; and the midline of GEOM, close to the inferior body of the pancreas in one patient. Perineural invasion (p < .05) and N stage (p < .05) were associated with GEOM region metastasis. Tumor localization and age significantly increased pleural effusion. Conclusions: In transverse colon and both flexural tumors, we recommend planning the surgery according to the localization of the tumor and including the GEOM, infrapyloric and infrapancreatic areas. It is possible to discuss whether to perform extended excision for all or only selected patients. The best approach seems to be to evaluate the co-factors to manage these patients.

Clinical and Translational …, 2003

Iris publishers, 2020

Colon cancer (CC) is one of the most prevalent neoplasms in the world. In Brazil, it is the fourth most common cancer. In 2018 the estimate of new cases was 36.360 (17.380 men/18.980women) [1]. Notwithstanding the high mortality, it is a curable disease when localized and restricted to the intestine [2]. The best therapeutic results are achieved through standard treatment, colectomy associated with lymphadenectomy (radical surgery). Cure occurs in up to 50% of patients when considering all stages of the disease. Nevertheless, relapse is still a major problem, contributing to the increase in deaths [3-5]. The prognosis and survival of each patient depend on correct staging, with TNM being the most used system. In this, the classification of “N” is given by the absolute number of metastatic lymph nodes (LN), where N1 will be considered from one to three lymph nodes and N2 above this value [6]. The presence of this lymph vascular invasion can distinguish stages II and III and alter the proposed treatment. According to current clinical evidence, adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of stage II-CC does not show an increase in survival, whereas, in stage III, its performance is indicated [4]. From this perspective, there would be impaired patient care if there were errors in lymph node count or histopathological positivity for malignancy [7].

Surgical oncology, 2016

Classic colon cancer surgery refers to a wide resection of the tumor-bearing segment and the lymphatics draining along the named artery. The concept of TME has been applied to colon cancer and complete mesocolic excision (CME) in conjuction with central vascular ligation (CVL) has been introduced as the surgical treatment for colon cancer. Here, we discuss appropriate CME procedure with regard to the oncologic backgrounds, essential components, applied anatomy, laparoscopic technique, short-term, and oncologic outcomes. The introduction of CME has improved oncologic outcomes greatly in patients with colon cancer. The improved outcomes with CME can be attributed to underlying sound oncologic principles such as dissection through the proper plane of mesocolic excision, central vascular ligation, and sufficient length of proximal and distal margins. Thereby, CME technique can achieve en bloc removal of the diseased lesion with the increased amount of the colonic mesentery even though t...