Fiscal Decentralisation and Inequality in Indonesia
Economy of Region
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Abstract
The study examined the effect of fiscal decentralisation on both vertical and horizontal inequality in 32 provinces of Indonesia in the period from 2005 to 2014 using several fixed effects (FE) estimations. Moreover, we assessed the mediating role of institutional quality in explaining the nexus between fiscal decentralisation and inequality. To complement the econometrics results, we conducted several semi-structured interviews (SSIs) based on expert judgement and focus group discussions (FGDs) among relevant stakeholders. This analysis focussed on the intergovernmental transfer policy designed and implemented at the sub-national government level. Such qualitative analysis started in the last week of March 2019 and ended in the first week of July 2019. The quantitative findings showed that there was a robust, positive, and significant relationship between fiscal decentralisation and vertical inequality when democracy was taken into account. Meanwhile, fiscal decentralisation was negatively correlated with horizontal inequality when the estimation included social capital. In addition, fiscal decentralisation appears to have a marginal impact on horizontal inequality when both democracy and the crime rate are considered in the full sample analysis. However, when we excluded provinces located in Java Island, the impact of fiscal decentralisation on horizontal inequality became clear. Regarding the qualitative aspect, the fieldwork results were consistent with the quantitative findings.
Related papers
Analysis of Fiscal Decentralization, Income Inequality and Poverty Rate in Indonesia
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), 2022
This study aims to determine and analyze the effect of fiscal decentralization (balancing funds, local revenue, and infrastructure budget) on poverty levels through investment, economic growth, and income inequality. This study uses an explanatory design. The type of data used is panel data which is a combination of data from 34 provinces in Indonesia from 2015 to 2019. The analytical model used in this study is the Structural Equation Model (SEM) which is operated through the Analysis of Moment Structure (AMOS) program.
Fiscal Decentralization, Governance, and Development: the Case of Indonesia
Fiscal decentralization is one aspect of public financial management reform which is intended to improve governance. Meanwhile, governance is widely believed as one of key factors to improve development; thus fiscal decentralization is deemed to be able to improve development indirectly. This paper tries to assess the effect of fiscal decentralization, which Indonesia has embarked upon since 2001, on Indonesia's development. The development is measured through economic, education, and health indicators. Basic descriptive statistics as well as correlation analysis on fiscal decentralization by using panel data is used to see the correlation between fiscal decentralization and the above-mentioned development indicators. The result shows fiscal decentralization is positively correlated with development in Indonesia. However, it is also found that there is no guarantee that merely higher transfer fund from central government will result higher development; what matter more seems to be the pro-development budget allocation and the spending quality. Other key success factors of fiscal decentralization for development in Indonesia could be possible future research area.
Fiscal Decentralization and Regional Inequality in Indonesia 2001 – 2004
The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning, 2008
This paper tries to investigate empirically the impact of fiscal decentralization on regional inequality in Indonesia. The Conventional view states that fiscal decentralization increases regional inequality because the pressure of the central government for income redistribution among regions becomes lower after fiscal decentralization. On the other hand, fiscal decentralization may reduce regional inequality because hard budget constraints faced by decentralized governments will enable them to create an incentive for increasing regional income by their own efforts, not depending on the grants from the central government. By using the panel data set from 2001 to 2004 by provincial base, the positive effect of fiscal decentralization on regional inequality is found to be statistically significant in Indonesia. The result presents new empirical evidence that fiscal decentralization may increase regional inequality. It suggests that fiscal decentralization that has been fully implemented since 2001 seems to have failed to improve the regional inequality in Indonesia. Unfortunately, the results are not adequate to reveal the real relationship between fiscal decentralization and regional inequality. There is some doubt about the results because this research only incorporates a limited period of data (4 years).
The Impact of Fiscal Decentralization toward Regional Inequalities in Eastern Region of Indonesia
Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 2013
This research aims to reveal whether fiscal decentralization is able to reduce regional inequality at Eastern Region of Indonesia. This research also endeavors to detect other variables (such as population growth, education participation level, open-unemployment rate, and investment rate) as the control variables that may affect regional inequality. The estimation result using panel data from 16 provinces during 2001-2010 in Eastern Region of Indonesia confirms that (1) fiscal decentralization is not able to reduce regional inequality, (2) population growth, education participation level, and investment rate have an effect to reduce regional inequality, and (3) in long term, economic performance tend to be better in the Eastern Region of Indonesia due to the change on the economic structure from traditional pattern to modern pattern. This condition is reflected on the Kuznets' Inverted-U hypothesis confirmation.
Fiscal Decentralization and its Effect on Poverty Alleviation: Case Study of Indonesia
Bulletin of Islamic Economics
This research provides empirical evidence of the effect of fiscal decentralization on poverty alleviation and used data from 505 districts/cities in Indonesia from 2010 to 2019. The poverty rate is used as an indicator to measure the social condition of the area with the parameter of the percentage of the total population below the poverty line, while the fiscal decentralization indicator uses approach to the size of the ratio of PAD to total regional income and expenditure. The estimated results used the fixed effect model shows that fiscal decentralization have significant role to reduce the level of poverty in districts/cities nationally. From this estimation result, the recommended policy formulation is pro-poor fiscal decentralization through strengthening regional financial capacity, both optimizing Original Local Government Revenue (PAD), allocating Transfer Funds to Regions that are specific grants, improving the quality of spending and regional financial management, as well...
The impact of fiscal decentralization on economic growth in Indonesia
Economic Journal of Emerging Markets
Fiscal decentralization was firstly implemented in 2001 and has brought a new era of local autonomy in Indonesia. The objective of fiscal decentralization to local government is to increase the economic growth and public service. This research uses a panel data regression and quadrant analysis method with the data of cluster districts and cities in Indonesia from 2013 to 2018. Findings/Originality: The panel regression estimation shows that fiscal decentralization has a positive and significant effect on economic growth in all clusters. However, the quadrant analysis results show that on average 86.7% of all clusters districts and cities were in quadrant IV which reflects low fiscal decentralization and low economic growth. The implication of the result is that the government should increases the allocation of capital expenditure in local budget to accelerate local economic growth of the districts/cities in all clusters.
Fiscal Decentralization in Indonesia: Current Status and Future Challenges
Using 214 out of 440 data set in 2004, it is found that most of local governments in Indonesia showed poor performance in generating local own revenues. The methods used here are the Quadrant and Index Methods. Some reasons can explain this poor situation. Beside the weak local taxation power, the dominant role of central government in revenue-generating has led to the poor performance. Furthermore, the Indonesian decentralization is in process toward the more ideal form. Nonetheless, it is widely-known that the "bigbang" decentralization approach has changed Indonesia as one of the most centralized countries into one of the more decentralized ones without any significant interruption.
Link of Fiscal Decentralization to Poverty Reduction: Indonesian Context
Jurnal Economia, 2013
Abstract: Link of Fiscal Decentralization to Poverty Reduction: Indonesian Context. It is identified from the literature studies that there are links between fiscal decentralization and poverty reduction. However, the links occurs in different ways among countries and local governments. This is a preliminary study which aims at observing the potential link pattern of fiscal decentralization to poverty reduction in Indonesian provinces before and in the period of fiscal decentralization implementation. This descriptive study shows that there is no clear link pattern of fiscal decentralization to poverty reduction in Indonesian context. Three links patterns, namely positive link, negative link, and no link appears differently among provinces. Elaboration at the level of each province using various variables is needed in order to see the clearer link of fiscal decentralization to poverty reduction in Indonesian context. Keywords: Poverty Reduction, Fiscal Decentralization Abstrak: ...
The Impact of Fiscal Decentralization on Welfare in Selected Provinces in Indonesia
Jurnal Bina Praja, 2020
One of the many ways to promote public welfare is fiscal decentralization. In this article, we focused on human development and poverty alleviation to indicate public welfare. Human resources have a pivotal role in a country because it determines the economic growth and development. In commercial terms, factors of production include labor, land, and capital. Therefore, the quality of human resources matters to determine the economic growth and development of a country. Since the emergence of the ASEAN Economic Community in 2015, growing a spirit of competition among countries, human development has been attractive. Furthermore, poverty was also considered as an interesting issue in Indonesia because it remained a problem since the country's independence 74 years ago. In 2016, Indonesia recorded the second-largest number of poor people in ASEAN. This paper aimed to analyze the impacts of fiscal decentralization on human development and poverty alleviation. The data used in this study were balanced panel data of six provinces and 112 regencies and cities in Java Island taken from 2011 until 2018. We used local governments' expenditures, revenues, and fiscal balances to measure fiscal decentralization in selected provinces in Indonesia, i.e., West Java, Central Java, East Java, Special Capital Region of Jakarta, Special Region of Yogyakarta, and Banten. The data were processed using the Ordinary Least Square method with EViews program. We found that decentralization policies statistically significantly affected human development and poverty alleviation. Therefore, this finding could be useful to develop targeted interventions aimed to increase local governments' revenues and reduce unnecessary local governments' expenditures to escalate fiscal space. The fiscal space could be used to fund programs that promote human development and alleviate poverty.
Impact of Fiscal Decentralisation on Economic Growth and Poverty Reduction in Aceh Province, Indonesia
International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 2021
This study analyses the impact of fiscal decentralisation policy on economic development and poverty reduction. It focuses on the practice of intergovernmental fiscal transfer and on special autonomy policy in Aceh province, Indonesia, using data from 23 districts gathered from 2008 to 2018. Undertaking a panel data analysis, it will analyse the impact of intergovernmental fiscal transfer from central to local government on local government expenditure. The impact of local government expenditures and fiscal decentralisation practices on local gross domestic product (GDP) and poverty is also measured. The results show that several intergovernmental fiscal transfer policies in Aceh positively enhance the local expenditure. Further, the local government spending and fiscal decentralisation practices in Aceh improve the local GDP and reduce poverty levels in the region.
Related topics
Related papers
The Effect of Fiscal Decentralization on Economic Development Performance in Indonesia
Jurnal Ekonomi & Studi Pembangunan, 2022
This study aims to test and analyze the effect of fiscal decentralization on Indonesia's development performance using a structural equation model. This type of data uses panel data from thirty-four provinces and five-year series (2015-2019), bringing the number of observations to 180. Data is sourced from the Directorate General of Fiscal Balance and the Central Bureau of Statistics (BPS). Data analysis uses a structural equation modeling-partial least square (SEM-PLS) with Smart-PLS 3. The evaluation results of the external model conclude that all indicators of fiscal decentralization variables and economic development performance variables are valid. The most powerful indicators that reflect the latent variables of budgetary decentralization are regional income ratios, and economic development performance indicators are economic growth. The results of the evaluation model found that there was a positive and significant effect of fiscal decentralization on economic development performance. Inequality of fiscal decentralization among the provinces in Indonesia caused the ratio of original regional income in research to have the lowest effect compared to the proportion of provincial revenues and expenditures.
Poverty alleviation in the contex of fiscal decentralization in Indonesia
Economics & Sociology
Acceleration of poverty reduction in Indonesia is largely determined by the role of regional governments in implementing fiscal decentralization. Three indicators of fiscal decentralization were used to measure their effects on poverty reduction, i.e., regional government expenditures, regional government revenues, and intergovernmental transfers. This study investigated the panel data regression models for 33 provinces in Indonesia during 2010-2016. The results show that regional government revenues and intergovernmental transfers had a statistically significant effect on reducing poverty while regional government expenditures did not. This study confirms that in the context of fiscal decentralization in Indonesia, the increase of regional government revenues both from own source revenues and intergovernmental transfers appear to be more effective in encouraging poverty reduction than the increase of the total regional government expenditures. Therefore, it is very important for policymakers at the regional level to encourage the increase of regional revenues in order to create enough fiscal space to fund poverty alleviation programs on the one hand. On the other hand, it is necessary to increase the proportion of regional government expenditures to priority programs for poverty alleviation more than regional government operational expenditures.
POTENTIAL LINK PATTERNS OF FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION TO POVERTY REDUCTION IN INDONESIA
Fiscal decentralization is considered to give positive as well as negative impacts for development policy such as poverty reduction. The implementation of fiscal decentralization in Indonesia has changed the patterns of local governments' budget allocation for poverty reduction. Local governments have wider discretion to allocate their budget for poverty reduction strategy. This study aims at observing the potential link patterns of fiscal decentralization to poverty reduction in Indonesian provinces before and in the period of fiscal decentralization implementation. This study applies a descriptive analysis as a method for identifying the potential link patterns of fiscal decentralization to poverty reduction in Indonesia. Firstly, this study identifies the trend of several poverty indicators in Indonesia, namely 1) the percentage rate of poverty; 2) poverty gap index (P1) and poverty severity index (P2); and 3) Human Development Index (HDI). Secondly, the link of fiscal decentralization to poverty reduction in Indonesia is elaborated using the share of government budget expenditure on relevant sector to total expenditure and the percentage rate of poverty. This study shows that there is no clear link pattern of fiscal decentralization to poverty reduction in Indonesia. Three link patterns, namely positive link, negative link, and no link appear differently among provinces and regions. Several factors that support the conditions need to be elaborated more.
Fiscal Decentralisation, Local Institutions and Public Goods Provision: Evidence from Indonesia
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2014
Using data from the Indonesian Family Life Surveys, this paper studies the impact of fiscal decentralisation in Indonesia on local public spending across communities with different types of local institutions. Our results provide evidence of heterogeneity in access to public goods across communities in the period prior to fiscal decentralisation; with significantly greater spending on schools and health centres in communities which observe traditional adat laws (which promote an ethic of mutual cooperation), and less spending on roads, public transport, communications etc. in communities which have a democratic electoral system. Fiscal decentralisation led to an increase in the share of spending on physical infrastructure, as well as a convergence in spending across communities with different types of local institutions. We develop a theoretical model to argue that communities which enjoy a higher level of mutual cooperation would benefit less from investment in public goods which facilitate communication and exchange with outsiders-as these improve the outside options of community members and therefore makes it more difficult to sustain intra-community cooperation. Surprisingly, investment in communications and transport infrastructure in these communities were more restrained during the period of centralised fiscal control.
ADBI Working Paper Series DOES FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION HELP INDONESIA AVOID THE MIDDLE-INCOME TRAP?
2017
This paper focuses on the impact of fiscal decentralization on the efficiency of fiscal resources at the regional level that will improve the probability of Indonesia avoiding the middle-income trap. From a development standpoint, the implementation of decentralization is not only aimed at increasing fiscal capacity and efficiency, but also at enhancing institutional quality at the local level to support economic growth. A nonparametric method of data envelopment analysis (DEA) is utilized to measure the fiscal efficiency scores of state governments. In the second stage of empirical analysis, a Tobit panel model is constructed to find key factors that affect state fiscal efficiency in Indonesia. The finding of this study confirms that the degree of fiscal decentralization is the key determinant of state fiscal efficiency. Hence, despite the positive impact of fiscal decentralization in Indonesia, the expansion of the state’s fiscal spending has caused some degree of inefficiency due...
THE EFFECTS OF FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION, ECONOMIC GROWTH AND INCOME INEQUALITY ON POVERTY RATE OF INDONESIA'S 33 PROVINCES
This study aims to analyze the effect of fiscal decentralization, income inequality, and economic growth on poverty rate of 33 provinces in Indonesia. The population of this study consists of 33 provinces in Indonesia. This study utilizes secondary data released by Statistics Indonesia (Badan Pusat Statistik/BPS) from 2009 to 2012. The data were analyzed using panel data regression on Eviews 7 software. The analysis comes to several findings. First, in short term fiscal decentralization and economic growth do not have significant effect on poverty rate while income inequality has significantly negative effect on regional poverty rate. Second, fiscal decentralization and economic growth possess significant and negative effect on regional poverty rate. In long term, regional poverty rate is decreasing in several provinces with high economic growth and high regional income. Third, income inequality does not give significantly negative effect on regional poverty rate. Decreasing income inequality may improve regional poverty rate even though the effect is in minuscule scale. Nevertheless, equitable development will happen in most Indonesia provinces in long term.
Understand Fiscal Decentralization and the Potential Moral Hazard in Indonesia
Jurnal Ecodemica : Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen dan Bisnis
Fiscal decentralization as a product form of political economy policy is a determinant of a country's economic growth. However, the implementation of these policies is considered vulnerable due to a lack of transparency and accountability, so that abuse of authority at the local government level often occurs which causes moral hazard and triggers fiscal policy inefficiencies. We describe the search related to fiscal decentralization through this research and how the potential for moral hazard can occur in Indonesia. This type of research is a literature study using a descriptive qualitative approach. The data collected is in the form of results from literature reviews, journals, books, newspapers, and documentation that are considered relevant. After reviewing, criticizing, and synthesizing representative literature in such a way, we are able to find several facts indicating that fiscal decentralization can be a solution to overcome economic inequality, on the other hand it can ...
Does Fiscal Decentralization Affect Poverty? An Empirical Study
Economics Development Analysis Journal
The Poverty percentage in Central Java ranked two throughout Java Island after DI Yogyakarta Province. It surely causes gaps and inequality between regions in Central Java Province. This study attempted to analyze the effects of fiscal decentralization, fiscal balance fund, and economic growth on the poverty in 35 regencies/ cities in Central Java Province within 2016-2020. By using a quantitative approach, this study used a panel analysis with a Fixed Effect Model (FEM) method. Based on the results of panel data regression analysis results, fiscal decentralization and fiscal balance fund had no relationship with the poverty in Central Java. On the other hand, economic growth had positive and significant effects. High economic growth will reduce poverty rate when the economic activities carried out are padat karya which aims at absorbing workforce. High workforce absorption will reduce the poverty rate.
Fiscal decentralization in Indonesia: A new approach to an old idea
World Development, 1996
The system for financing and delivering local public services in Indonesia, as in many developing countries, is highly centralized. Growing awareness of the weaknesses of the present system has recently generated much interest in decentralization and numerous government policies and programs toward that end. In spite of these efforts, the role and capacity of local governments remain weak. In this paper, we outline the most critical obstacles to decentralization and examine a strategy to reduce their significance. Instead of centering our analysis on the definition of a normatively desirable decentralization outcome, we focus on the development of a process through which genuinely feasible outcomes could be defined and implemented, in this case an interministerial and intergovernmental process for evaluating local governments.
Implementation of Fiscal Decentralization in Indonesia: 2001-2009
Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan: Kajian Masalah Ekonomi dan Pembangunan
In Indonesia, the implementation of fiscal decentralization has entered the 9th year, however, so far many problems and obstacles which is faced during the implementation to stimulate economic growth and reduce poverty. This study aims to analyze: trend of government expenditure in decentralization era and regional autonomy during 2001-2009 and fiscal decentralization degree in Indonesia. This objective is achieved through descriptive analysis using secondary data for 2001-2009. The result shows central government expenditure tends to decreased and transfer expenditure increased significantly every year in absolutely, but annual growth rate fluctuated considerably. This indicates the allocation portion of the transfers was unstable. The largest component of transfers is fund balance and tends to increase every year significantly, fiscal decentralization degree at districts/city and province increased in 2007-2008. It is recommended to regional government to allocate public interest ...
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.