Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2020
The objective of this research was to understand the identity construction process of the middle managers (MMs) of a Colombian multilatina. From the research question, i.e., what are the components involved in the identity construction process of MMs?, it was established that MMs are those individuals whose level in the organization is below top managers and above first-level supervisors. The theoretical framework used was organizational identity (OI). To this end, literature review focused on the discussion of research works whose epistemological basis considered OI as a process, not as an invariant or static element. The case study used a qualitative approach. Identity construction processes are made up of three categories: recognition, transcendence and security. The research was conducted under the case study method and targeted a relatively new organization that is in an unfinished and immature process of adopting a specific OI. The components explain the process and make it p...
IAEME PUBLICATION, 2020
This paper highlights the origin of organizational identity. Most studies tackle the issues of identity during organizational change. This paper particularly focuses on the formation of organization identity. A dynamic view of organizational identity is presented in the paper, wherein, the labels of organizational identity could be static but the interpretation of the meaning of organizational identity as a collective negotiated exercise of the stakeholders. Thus, this paper posits the idea that organizational identity as both a sense making and a sense giving process.
This paper presents the results of a data research on the issue of organizational identity, the aim of which was to explore the current state of the discussion on organizational identity based on the analysis of papers published in 10 of the world's leading organizational and management journals between 2000 and 2011, in order to identify paradigms, subjects, and trends. After a first selection of 5509 papers, 92 articles dealing with the specific issue of organizational identity were classified for analysis. Identity is not only an important perspective of study within the organizational field, but it has also become a relevant reference to bear in mind in order to understand phenomena related to organizations. The concept of identity is not new in the human and social sciences. Philosophy has approached it from different perspectives and in different historical contexts. Identity seems to be the result of a certain line of reasoning that reduces what is real to what is identical, that is, to sacrifice the multiplicity of identity in order to explain it and to use it as a base for any theorization on the human condition. Additionally, during the last century, psychology and psychoanalysis gave identity a crucial role in the study of individual processes, and it became a key element in understanding the development of personality. Anthropology has had to produce a body of theory regarding the issue of social identity. Of course, it is also important to consider the contributions of other disciplines such as sociology, political science, and linguistics. Identity has played an important role in the theorizing of the social and human sciences, which contribute to and have an effect on organizational studies (Corley et al., 2006), the field of knowledge of this paper. Notwithstanding the academic interest the term arouses, its study in the organizational field is relatively recent (Hatch & Schultz, 2004). The conceptualization proposed by Albert and Whetten (1985), who claimed that organizational identity (OI) implied organizational aspects meeting the criteria of centrality, distinctive character, and continuity in time, has given way to new approaches. This influential work has inspired a wave of research and theorizing continuing to the present. Nevertheless, a little more than a quarter of century after its conceptualization, the definition of the term OI is not complete, and the discussion on its scope and proposed models is far from finished. Within the organizational field, definitions have abounded, ranging from the individual level to perceptions of what an organization actually is, based on institutionalist or essentialist perspectives aimed at identifying the features
Analele Ştiinţifice ale Universităţii "Alexandru Ioan Cuza" din Iaşi, Secţiunea Sociologie și Asistenţă Socială, 2011
The article presents the process of grounding a theory on Romanian managers' identity. It is about personal identity (or individual identity), about that identity given by the definitions of someone about him or herself, by self identification. There are presented the qualitative research stages: the specific methods and techniques of data collection that were used, data analysis methods and techniques that were applied and the process of grounding theory. The research subjects work in the private economic sector (and have leading positions). 20 of them work in Brasov County (I selected them by using theoretical sampling). The other 25 are managers and entrepreneurs recognized at national level. The last ones were interviewed by reporters of " Money Express " Review and on the documents resulted I applied a secondary analysis. It was grounded a theory about the identity characteristics of managers. These are referring at the life circumstances they lived in: childhood and adolescence circumstances – physical environment, relational environment, school environment, family environment, material circumstances; maturity circumstances – professional and relational circumstances. The grounded theory also refers to the self-identification characteristics of managers: general traits, inter-relational characteristics, specific traits corresponding to the leading position, individual and collective identification; to the self-processes: self-image and self esteem.
Albert and Whetten defined organizational identity (OI) as the central, distinctive and enduring characteristics of an organization. Scholars found OI to be a difficult construct to apply to organizations and, over time, they defined it from functionalist, social constructionist, postmodernist and psychodynamic perspectives. All of these perspectives made great theoretical contributions to the field, but they were largely unable to integrate practice and theory in a way that could benefit organizations. Hatch and Schultz's work is exceptional in this regard: they provided a theory that has the promise of practical implications for organizations in regard to organizational continuity. They perceived organizational continuity as existing in the balanced/responsible behavior of an organization's members, among themselves and with key external stakeholders. They provided an effective model in this regard, but they overlooked how individuals' political interests overshadow balanced behavior. Politics that arise as a result of individuals' identity are generally considered to be psychological in origin and link OI to organizational learning (OL) as a co-evolving process. The present research hence operationalizes Hatch and Schultz's model by reference to a Winnicottian framework to understand how OI is socially constructed and psychologically understood in the political interests of the management and employees, among themselves and with key external stakeholders. In doing so it explores the political implications of OI for OL, as perceived in an organization's continuity. The context of the research is the Pakistani police.
he study investigates the identity of the organization in conjunction with the image of the organization. In a meta-analytic approach clarifies that the social reality of the organization is subject to internal and external evaluation concern. When internal community members look to the organization, they take into account the identity of the organization. When external audiences relate to the organization, he takes into account the organization's image. Results that the identity of the organization consists of the vision, mission, values, logo, staff organization and organizational culture (myths, beliefs, history, specialized language, symbols, ceremonies, rituals).
Sa Journal of Industrial Psychology, 2006
During the past two decades a steady increase in scholarly contributions in the area of organisation identity have been observed-to the point that the phenomenon is now the subject of a sustainable discourse in several disciplines. Many theoretical and conceptual dilemmas however remain, largely as a result of the low incidence of empirical research in the area. This study reports the results of an exploratory investigation that adapted Schley and Wagenfield's (1979) concept of identity for use in an organisational setting. Interviews were conducted with 152 top managers representing 10 companies. The results indicate that organisational responses to the question "who am I?" elicit distinctive organisational self-descriptions and some awareness of identity issues.
Montenegrin Journal of Economics
Organizational identity is mentioned in different contexts, linked to organizational behavior and culture, company mission, image and communication and as a result, there emerge some problems in terms of definition of its concept and boundaries. Purpose of the article: highlighting of the research fields in organizational identity and creation of a model and methodological base for the conduct of the component empirical research in organizational identity. Research methodology: Two surveys of customers and employees, dealing with them, which enable the assessment of the model relevance for empirical research and the expression of organizational identity components in the selected company. The developed evaluation model of the components for organizational identity unites not only separate components, but also two methodological levels of evaluation, distinguishing the evaluation of identity under employees' level in an organization and the evaluation of identity under the client's level in an organization. The developed evaluation model for the components if organizational identity is relevant to the empirical research.
The Oxford Handbook of Identities in Organizations, 2020
Conceived as the meanings that individuals attach to their selves, a substantial stockpile of identities-related theorizing, accumulated across the arts, social sciences and humanities over many decades, continues to nourish contemporary research on self-identities in organizations. Moreover, in times which are more reflexive, narcissistic and liquid the identities of participants in organizations are increasingly less fixed, less secure and less certain, making identities issues both more salient and more interesting. Particular attention has focused on processes of identity construction (often styled ‘identity work’), how, why and when such processes occur, and their implications for organizing and individual, group and organizational outcomes. Seemingly intractable debates centred on the nature of identities – their relative stability/fluidity, whether they are best regarded as coherent or fractured, positive (or not) and how they are fabricated within relations of power – combined with other conceptual issues, continue to invigorate the field, but have led also to some scepticism regarding the future potential of identities research. As the chapters in this handbook demonstrate, however, there are considerable grounds for optimism that identity, as root metaphor, nexus concept and means to bridge levels of analysis, has significant generative utility for multiple streams of theorizing in organization and management studies.
International Journal of Management Reviews, 2013
The notion of organizational identity was introduced in management studies in 1985. In the following 25 years, a vibrant debate about how to conceptualize organizational identities and related themes (multiple identities, identity change, interrelations between identity, image and culture) does not seem to have corresponded to explicit reflections about specific methodological issues. In this paper, the authors inductively review research methods adopted by studies of organizational identity published in top-level journals, with the purpose of deriving insights about the current status of research practices, uncovering their often tacit ontological and epistemological assumptions, and stimulating discussion about their possible evolution.
Social science research can play a valuable role in enabling people to understand how their personal predicaments relate to the broader structures and historical circumstances in which they arise. This was argued by Wright Mills (1970, originally 1959) with his concept of the sociological imagination, a notion of considerable relevance to the identity issues which arise in relation to organizational involvement. Using a rare combination of ethnographic, autobiographical and interview research material, a close examination is made of two managers' identity work and the part played in this by their involvement in one specifi c organization in particular structural and historical circumstances. In the course of carrying out this study the concept of 'identity work' has been developed and refi ned. This incorporates a clear analytical distinction between internal personal 'self-identities' and external discursive 'social-identities' with socialidentities being seen as a link or bridge between socially available discourses and self-identities. 'Managerial identities' take their place among the multiplicity of social-identities to which any particular manager may relate in both their 'inward facing' and their 'outward facing' identity work.
2005
The problems relating to unsuccessful organisational identity creation can affect both the individual's and the organisation's chances of attaining successful or satisfactory outcomes. Both the individual and the organisation benefit from the individual being able to carry out appropriate identity work and construct a stable identity that can be incorporated into the pre-existing contents of their “identity portfolio”.
New Horizons in Managerial and Organizational Cognition, 2022
Although the organizational identity (OI) construct (Albert & Whetten, 1985) is now in its fourth decade, research in the field has been somewhat uneven, particularly with respect to an essentialist view and hypothetico- deductive type of studies. Believing that this stems in large part from insufficient construct clarity (Suddaby, 2010), this theory-development initiative presents an expanded conceptual framework. The authors exploit several key elements of individual identity and make the case for using these as the basis for conceptualizing an organizational-level equivalent. Starting with the premise that an individual’s identity is the product of comparisons, two dimensions are identified: the type of comparison (similarity, difference), referred to as the “identity conundrum,” and the object of comparison (self–other, self–self), referred to as the “identity perspective.” The authors then propose a four-cell distinctive conceptual domain for OI and explore its implications for scholarship. Keywords: Organizational identity; individual identity; construct clarity; identity construct; identity conundrum; CREAD framework
International Journal of Social Inquiry, 2014
The article presents the process of grounding a theory about Romanian managers' identity. It shows the manner in which the stages of data collection, data analysis and sampling have been conceived and implemented. It also describes in detail the decisions taken in each of these stages (the choice of methods and techniques, their combining and so on), the procedures followed and the difficulties encountered. The research was done in 2008 having as subjects 20 Romanian managers; it aimed at identifying identity aspects which are typical to managers. The article is based on the idea that describing the way in which the findings were reached is as important as expressing the conclusions themselves. It shows that qualitative research is suitable in understanding managerial aspects.
International Journal of Humanities, Philosophy and Language
In the last few years, the word identity seems to have become a difficult and ambiguous concept. Its difficulty lies in its changeability and transience. Certainly, Identity, be it social, cultural, religious or whatsoever, can be quickly shaped and changed by socio-political, economic, ideological and most importantly cultural forces. Nowadays, it is generally acknowledged that the construction of identity is dramatically increasing in almost every part of the world. Therefore, identity should be dealt with from different perspectives, both locally and globally. The present paper tends to question the concept of identity in the world of business in general, and inside call centers, which are located in Morocco in particular. Definitely, call centers are an increasingly important part of today’s business world; they create new work opportunities for millions of agents across the globe and they serve as a primary customer-facing channel for firms in different countries. Their main ai...
Sustainability
In this study, the effect of transformational leadership and procedural justice on manager trust and sustainable organizational identity is analyzed, also including the role of mediation on manager trust. First, we analyzed what the effect of transformational leadership and procedural justice on trust in the organization and sustainable organizational identity is. Secondly, we examined the mediator effect on organizational trust, in addition to the effects of transformational leadership and procedural justice on sustainable organizational identity. The sample of the study consists of 558 subjects from Turkey, 106 subjects from Azerbaijan, and 95 subjects from Kyrgyzstan—a total of 759 subjects. To analyze the collected data, we used correlation analysis, regression analyses, and ANOVA testing. For these analyses, we used the SPSS statistical software. The results indicate that transformational leadership and procedural justice positively and significantly affect manager trust. Moreo...
Corporate Reputation Review, 2007
This paper proposes a preliminary framework outlining external and intra-organizational factors that contribute to the construction of organizational identity. Organizational identity is a critical organizational perception that guides organizational members ' interpretation of the issues facing the organization. Although much is written about organizational identity and its effects on organizations and organizational members, little is known about how organizational identity is formed. Previous literature suggests that organizational identity, while being durable, is also dynamic and flexible, which indicates the opportunity for organizations to construct a strong organiz ational identity, which will likely lead to competitive advantage.
Academy of Management Review, 2000
Identity and icJentification are powerful terms. Because they speak to the very definition of an entity-an organization, a group, a personthey have been a subtext of many strategy sessions, organization development initiatives, team-building exercises, and socialization efforts. Identity and identification, in short, are root constructs in organizational phenomena and have been a subtext of many organizational behaviors.
Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks, 2023
HOW THE HANDBOOK CAME ABOUT Handbooks, like other scientific publications, have their own history. Narrating the history of this Handbook, we want to share with you-the readers-the story behind its development. This includes information on how the idea for this Handbook came about and an illustration of the various decisions we had to make in the process of creating it. Handbooks, as we will explain later, are social creations and hence products of social interaction. Therefore, we believe it will be of value for you to gain some insight into why and how the Handbook came into being, how we came to identify as editors, and how we composed it together with the authors, the reviewers and the publisher. In this sense, the introduction provides information on the background, rationales, decisions we made, and also the obstacles we had to overcome. The motivation for the Handbook of Research Methods for Studying Identity In and Around Organizations emerged from a webinar entitled 'Identity inquiry: beyond the usual suspects', which was organized by the Special Interest Group (SIG) 'Identity' of the British Academy of Management (BAM). The event in June 2020 aimed to broaden the methodological focus of identity research in organizational contexts in accordance with the group's interdisciplinary focus. The webinar featured three speakers who introduced the repertory grid technique, characterization sketches and identity drawings, respectively, as innovative research methods for studying identity in and around organizations. After the webinar, the idea to deepen and broaden the discussion of research methods in identity studies gained momentum. In November 2020, the members of the SIG decided to develop an edited collection that would bring together some established and more innovative research methods that have been used to fruitfully study different levels and aspects of identity in and around organizations. Taking charge, Ingo Winkler formulated a call for papers that was distributed amongst the SIG members and the wider BAM community. The initial feedback was very positive, and various scholars indicated their interest in contributing to the collection. At that point, Rosalía Cascón-Pereira and Stefanie Reissner joined what would become the editorial team, enabling us to pool both our respective editorial experiences and methodological interests. We were very pleased to excite Francine O'Sullivan at Edward Elgar Publishing about our idea and contribute to their growing range of research methods handbooks. These were the initial steps of socially constructing this Handbook, and soon afterwards, authors, reviewers and editors contributed to co-creating it through their engagement with a wide range of research methods and approaches. Although you, the reader, now have the finished product in your hands or on screen, we hope the matter does not end here. Indeed, we hope that the Handbook contributes to the social construction of the field of identity research
Corporate Reputation Review, 2014
Purpose-This paper provides a comprehensive and integrative review of academic literature analyzing identity in business. The literature review proposed by the authors helps clearing up theoretical and practical understanding of this concept. Design/methodology/approach-A review of existing literature in organizational behavior and marketing fields is proposed to clarify the meaning of organizational and corporate identity. Based on this review, the authors also identify an integrative perspective proposed for managers to identify and effectively manage all dimensions of their business identities. Findings-Literature on the identity of businesses is extensive and blurred, failing to provide useful guidance for practitioners to manage this concept. A new approach proposes understanding this kind of identity as a global concept that integrates proposals from diverse research fields in order to take advantage of cross-fertilization. Practical implications-This research allows identity and communication managers to understand dimensions of business identity for a more effective management of this concept in their organizations. Originality/value-The line of research that proposes an integrative multidisciplinary approach to the study of identity in business is quite new and, as so, it still needs further contributions to clarify this nascent domain. In this paper, the authors also classify previous studies on business identity according to the theoretical approach they assume (Table 3) just as no other research has done before.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.