Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2009
A good sealant provides a durable barrier against whatever environment is being contained or excluded, such as water or fuel. The barrier requires good wetting of and bonding to the substrate and low permeability of the environment into the sealant. Depending on the application, other desirable properties could include corrosion inhibition, adhesion strength, and electrical or thermal conductivity. Laboratory-based prognostic tests that can evaluate the performance of sealants are needed to differentiate between sealants in order to qualify materials and select an appropriate sealant that will meet specific requirements (e.g., sealing performance, lifetime, corrosion protection, appearance, conductivity, or cost). This is especially true because environmental concerns have encouraged or required sealants with low volatile organic compound (VOC) emission or nonchromate corrosion inhibitors. Failure to differentiate between sealants and to predict performance could result in placing sealants in service that are not suitable for a given application. Inadequate screening could lead to leaks or significant increases in corrosion or required maintenance to prevent premature corrosion. Alternatively, an expensive sealant could be chosen when a less expensive material would be satisfactory.
Clinical Oral Investigations, 2012
The hypotheses tested were: survival rate of fully and partially retained glass-carbomer sealants is higher than those of high-viscosity glass-ionomer, with and without energy supplied, and that of resin composite; survival rate of fully and partially retained sealants of high-viscosity glass-ionomer with energy supplied is higher than those without energy supplied. The randomized clinical trial covered 407 children, with a mean age of 8 years. The evaluation took place after 0.5, 1 and 2 years. Survival of sealant material in occlusal and in smooth surfaces, using the traditional categorization (fully and partially retained versus completely lost sealants) and the modified categorization (fully and more than 2/3 of the sealant retained versus completely lost sealants), were dependent variables. The Kaplan-Meier survival method was used. According to both categorizations of partially retained sealants, the survival of completely and partially retained resin composite sealants in occlusal and in smooth tooth surfaces was statistically significantly higher, and those of glasscarbomer sealants lower, than those of sealants of the other three groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the survival rates of completely and partially retained high-viscosity glass-ionomer sealants with and without energy supplied in occlusal and in smooth surfaces. After 2 years, glass-carbomer sealant retention was the poorest, adding energy to high-viscosity glass-ionomer sealant did not increase the retention rate and resin composite sealants were retained the longest. We suggest the use of the modified categorization of partially retained sealants in future studies. It seems not necessary to cure high-viscosity glass-ionomer sealants. The use of glasscarbomer sealants cannot be recommended yet.
Hot-poured bituminous sealants are typically selected on the basis of empirical standard tests such as penetration, resilience, flow, and bond to cement concrete briquettes (ASTM D3405). Yet there is no indication of the pertinence of these standard tests to predict field performance. To bridge the gap between sealant fundamental properties and field performance, performance-based guidelines for selection of hot-poured crack sealants are currently being developed. A procedure to measure sealant viscosity is proposed as part of that effort. Using a sealant with an appropriate consistency at the recommended installation temperature would provide a better crack filling and would ensure appropriate bond strength. Therefore, to ensure that sealant-crack wall adhesion is achieved and that the sealant penetrates hot-mix asphalt during installation, a testing procedure for bituminous-based crack sealant viscosity at installation temperature is suggested. This paper proposes use of a rotational viscometer to measure viscosity of hot-poured crack sealant materials. From results of this study, the measured viscosity of hot-poured crack sealant using a SC4-27 spindle at 60 rpm at the recommended installation temperature is reasonably representative of sealant viscosity at shear rates resembling field application. To ensure measurement consistency and stability, a 20-min melting time and 30-s waiting time before data collection are recommended. Repeatability of measurements was acceptable, with an average coefficient of variation of less than 5%. Variability between operators and variability between sealant samples were acceptable.
2003
This report summarizes a manual which is a significantly updated version of the 1984 Texas Department of Transportation Manual: "Seal Coat and Surface Treatment." The new manual incorporates: (1) input from seal coat experts; (2) new materials, equipment, and methods; and (3) "best practice" ideas recommended by Texas Tech University in research project 0-1787, "Seal Coat Constructability Review." The following topics are covered: (1) guidelines for treatment selection, materials selection; (2) plan preparation; (3) determining binder and aggregate application rates; (4) duties of inspectors or crew chiefs; (5) pre-seal coat activities; (6) equipment inspection; (7) seal coat application process; and (8) public perception and complaints. The updated manual is intended for use by inspectors, engineers, contractors, maintenance, and special jobs personnel.
Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, 2020
In recent times, carious infection of the tooth is considered as a major worldwide concern, significantly impacting the health, safety and quality of life of the patients affected by it. The required routine oral hygiene procedure along with fluoride use ensures prevention against dental caries. Apart from these, another important prophylactic measure can be followed against the caries by sealing the pit and fissures of a tooth that is more prone to caries occurrence. The main purpose of this article is to present a general overview of the sealing of pits and fissures, materials typically used to seal the occlusal surfaces along with the implications and side effects. This article also presents a detailed review of safe, effective use and costeffectiveness of pit and fissure sealants as a preventive measure for caries. The finding drawn from this is that primary, as well as permanent teeth, sealed pit and fissures are an efficient and appropriate approach for preventing and arresting dental caries. But conducting a proper regular dental checkup is necessary to ensure that there is no advanced tooth decay caused due to any leakage in the sealing.
Brazilian Oral Research
The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of polyhexamethylene guanidine hydrochloride (PHMGH) in the physicochemical properties and antibacterial activity of an experimental resin sealant. An experimental resin sealant was formulated with 60 wt.% of bisphenol A glycol dimethacrylate and 40 wt.% of triethylene glycol dimethacrylate with a photoinitiator/co-initiator system. PHMGH was added at 0.5 (G 0.5%), 1 (G 1%), and 2 (G 2%) wt.% and one group remained without PHMGH, used as control (G CTRL). The resin sealants were analyzed for degree of conversion (DC), Knoop hardness (KHN), and softening in solvent (ΔKHN), ultimate tensile strength (UTS), contact angle (θ) with water or α-bromonaphthalene, surface free energy (SFE), and antibacterial activity against Streptococcus mutans for biofilm formation and planktonic bacteria. There was no significant difference for DC (p > 0.05). The initial Knoop hardness ranged from 17.30 (±0.50) to 19.50 (± 0.45), with lower value for G CTRL (p < 0.05). All groups presented lower KHN after immersion in solvent (p < 0.05). The ΔKHN ranged from 47.22 (± 4.30) to 57.22 (± 5.42)%, without significant difference (p > 0.05). The UTS ranged from 54.72 (± 11.05) MPa to 60.46 (± 6.50) MPa, with lower value for G 2% (p < 0.05). PHMGH groups presented no significant difference compared to G CTRL in θ (p > 0.05). G 2% showed no difference in SFE compared to G CTRL (p > 0.05). The groups with PHMGH presented antibacterial activity against biofilm and planktonic bacteria, with higher antibacterial activity for higher PHMGH incorporation (p < 0.05). PHMGH provided antibacterial activity for all resin sealant groups and the addition up to 1 wt.% showed reliable physico-chemical properties, maintaining the caries-protective effect of the resin sealant over time.
International Endodontic Journal, 2011
Flores DSH, Rached-Jú nior FJA, Versiani MA, Guedes DFC, Sousa-Neto MD, Pé cora JD. Evaluation of physicochemical properties of four root canal sealers. International Endodontic Journal.
The long-term performance of pavements depends in good part on the quality and frequency of maintenance. Appropriate maintenance protects the pavement from deterioration, corrects deficiencies, and ensures safe and smooth riding. Crack sealing is practiced on a routine basis as preventive maintenance and as part of corrective maintenance prior to an overlay or a greater rehabilitation project. A timely and properly installed sealant adds several years of service life to the pavement at a relatively low cost. As a consequence, the selection of an appropriate sealant in a maintenance project becomes an important issue. Current sealant selection is based on ASTM standards that consist of quality control tests, not of performance indicators. These standards do not consider the changes in mechanical properties due to aging or the differences in local service temperatures. The main purpose of this study was to develop a systematic process to help users to select appropriate bituminous hot-poured sealants for pavement cracks and joints. The tests include in this paper covering a summary of four years research project including an accelerated aging test, a viscosity test performed at installation temperatures, a dynamic shear rheometer (DSR) tests to assess tracking resistance in summer temperature, a crack sealant bending beam rheometer (CSBBR) and a crack sealant direct tension test (CSDTT) for cohesive properties at sub-zero temperature, and a blister test for adhesive properties.
Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 2012
Development of a novel test rig for the evaluation of aircraft fuel tank sealant.
2016
Sealants are commonly used to insulate cracks and joints preventing water from entering the underlying structure. However, extended exposure of sealants to water has shown to negatively impact sealants properties causing gradual degradation of sealant performance. While there have been many studies on characterizing sealant performance in dry conditions, there has been no comprehensive experimental tests to evaluate crack sealants water susceptibility based on a fundamental material property. This study introduces five laboratory tests to investigate the effect of water exposure on different crack sealants commonly used in cold, moderate and hot climates. Sealants were acquired in collaboration with University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Experimental plan includes several thermo-mechanical and surface characterization tests. Crack sealants' rheological properties and relaxation time was measured using a Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR). Sealants' creep compliance was measured using an extended Bending Beam Rheometer (BBR). In addition, a direct adhesion test was incorporated using a Direct Adhesion Test (DAT) machine to determine the load required to bring sealant specimen to adhesion failure. Surface tension was measured using a Goniometer. A higher reduction in surface tension indicates sealant has more susceptibility to water. Chemical structure and formation of any new functional groups was tracked using Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The extent of change in aforementioned sealant properties before and after water conditioning was used as indicators of sealant susceptibility to water. The experiments results were compared against sealants' field performance data obtained through the Pooled-Fund Crack Sealant Consortium led by the
American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 2011
Problem statement: Crack sealing and filling is the most widely used maintenance activity for in-service pavements. If an appropriate sealant material is selected and properly installed at the appropriate time of the pavement life, it retards pavement deterioration and increases its service life at a relatively low cost. However, in some cases it is reported that sealants failed prematurely, mainly due to environmental factors and water exposure. While there have been several studies on environmental factors, water related factors has not received appropriate attention. Nevertheless, various sealants have different water resistance property; hence, they perform differently when exposed to large amount of rain and humidity. Approach: Currently, there is no standard test method to evaluate sealant water resistance. Therefore, there is a need for a standard test method to precisely predict sealant performance when exposed to water. Such a test method can help examine various sealants in terms of their water resistance. This study introduces water conditioning procedure and a test method to measure bond strength of sealant under dry and wet condition. The effect of water on the Interfacial Fracture Energy (IFE) of bituminous sealants was measured by means of a blister test. This test allows the calculations of two fundamental parameters: tensile modulus and the Interfacial Fracture Energy (IFE). Results: Experimental results showed water exposure caused a significant drop in adhesion strength. However, no significant difference was observed between adhesion strength of specimens conditioned for 8 and 12 h of conditioning. Conclusion/Recommendations: The proposed approach and testing method can be used by the sealant manufacturers to improve their sealants' adhesion properties at the presence of water. However, further research works are needed to examine how sealant adhesion strength varies with water exposure duration. Also, the effect of water pH on sealant adhesion strength can be studied.
https://www.ijrrjournal.com/IJRR_Vol.8_Issue.1_Jan2021/IJRR-Abstract063.html, 2021
Dental sealants were introduced in 1960's to prevent occlusal dental caries. They arrest the growth of caries causing bacteria, preventing their progression and subsequently avoiding early caries. Dental sealants act as caries preventing agents only till the time they remain bonded to the tooth. The intent of this review is to focus on dental sealant materials, discussing their effectiveness in preventing caries, caries risk assessment between sealant protective and no sealant tooth, compare different types of sealants-on the basis of their effectiveness, newer advances in sealant placement and elucidate upon the harmful effect of bisphenol A, a regular component of dental sealants.
degradation, even at recommended installation temperatures." The absence of field studies, however, may have prevented the widespread recognition of possible sealant degradation during installation.
It is difficult to evaluate effectively the low-temperature stiffness of bituminous hot-poured crack sealants with existing test methods. The standard bending beam rheometer (BBR) was found to be inappropriate for testing soft bituminous-based hot-poured crack sealant, even at a temperature of −40°C. To address this issue, the moment of inertia of the tested beam was increased by doubling its thickness (from 6.35 mm to 12.7 mm). For the new beam dimensions, only 4% of the beam center deflection is due to shear, a value deemed acceptable for sealant evaluation and comparison. On this basis, the BBR stiffness of hot-poured sealants was obtained at several discrete temperatures between −10°C and −40°C to assess the repeatability of the method for the evaluation of the low-temperature stiffness of bituminous sealants. Ten different sealants were tested at −40°C; three of these 10 were further tested at −35°C, −30°C, −28°C, −25°C, and −20°C; and the three "hard" sealants were tested at −10°C. A minimum of three replicates were used. The coefficient of variation on the measured stiffness after 60 s of loading was always lower than 18%, with almost 75% of the measurements having a coefficient of variation less than 10%. A pairwise comparison showed that the modified BBR could be used to classify sealant products according to their measured stiffness. As to the effect of temperature, it was found that the stiffness varies exponentially with temperature in the range of −40°C to −20°C. A statistical analysis of the results indicated that the modified BBR method could be used to classify sealants based on low-temperature stiffness.
The Review of scientific instruments, 2013
The design, fabrication, and implementation of a computer-controlled exposure and testing apparatus for building joint sealants are described in this paper. This apparatus is unique in its ability to independently control and monitor temperature, relative humidity, ultraviolet (UV) radiation, and mechanical deformation. Each of these environmental factors can be controlled precisely over a wide range of conditions during periods of a month or more. Moreover, as controlled mechanical deformations can be generated, in situ mechanical characterization tests can be performed without removing specimens from the chamber. Temperature and humidity were controlled during our experiments via a precision temperature regulator and proportional mixing of dry and moisture-saturated air; while highly uniform UV radiation was attained by attaching the chamber to an integrating sphere-based radiation source. A computer-controlled stepper motor and a transmission system were used to provide precise m...
Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 2000
A well-fitted root canal filling prevents percolation and microleakage of periapical exudate into the root canal space, prevents reinfection and creates a favorable biological environment for healing to take place. Several techniques using gutta-percha have been used in an attempt to achieve a void-free, homogeneous filling. Aim: Three different obturation techniques that are Thermafil obturation, cold lateral condensation and warm vertical condensation using rotary canal technique were compared.
International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 2019
Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the retention rate and pattern of different pit and fissure sealants placed on the occlusal surface of newly erupted first permanent molars after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Materials and methods: Seventy children were enrolled in this study. They divided into seven groups (m = 10) according to the type of the sealant. The four permanent first molars of each child were sealed. The sealant was applied according to the instructions from the manufacturer. A clinical evaluation was carried out at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The clinical observations were divided into three categories: total retention (TR), partial retention (PR), and total loss (TL). Results: The resin-based sealant performed better than the glass ionomer-based sealant except for the Ketac Molar Easymix. At 3 months, there was no significant difference among all the tested groups (p > 0.05), while at 6, 9, and 12 months, there was a highly significant difference (p < 0.001). The glass carbomer sealant showed the least retention rate at all intervals. Conclusion: With an exception of the Ketac Molar Easymix, resin-based sealers performed better than glass ionomer-based sealers. Clinical significance: A proper application of pit and fissure sealant will decrease the chance for caries development in newly erupted teeth.
Journal of Engineering Design, 2001
A design software, based on CAD and FEA tools, was set up for the parametric analysis of bolted joint connections with adesive sealants; this software can be used for a low cost evaluation of joint performances. To this aim the mechanical properties of two typical anaerobic and silicon based sealants were experimentally obtained by means of an optimized specimen. 2D and fully 3D FE models of bolted connections were developed for taking into acount bolt preload and position, flange thickness, internal pressure and mechanical properties of sealant material. Non linear contact analysis was employed for a realistic joint simulation. Results provide the tensile stress distribution in the sealant along the joint middle layer, for any user-specified configuration. A user friendly software tool was then developed for speedy evaluation of commonly used joint geometries.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.