Modernizing Government: Mapping Global Public Policy Networks
2011, Governance
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Abstract
Public sector reform is a key policy area, driven by global public policy networks. Research on these networks has been inductive, highlighting organizations like the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). This article examines "virtual policy networks" (VPNs) on the Web. Using IssueCrawler, we conduct a hyperlink analysis that permits us to map seven VPNs. The first network mapped the hyperlinks of 91 organizations identified through inductive methods. The hypothesis that the virtual network would include all actors identified in the inductive approach was refuted. The other six networks focused on: market mechanisms, open government, performance, public employment, reform, and restructuring. Among the findings, the U.S. government is prominent in the first three, while international organizations dominate the others. VPN rankings show that the World Bank dominates the OECD. When the inductive research is blended with the VPN research, the OECD's prominence increases, and we see the importance of market mechanisms and reform VPNs as pillars of globalization.
Related papers
Survey-Based Measurement of Public Management and Policy Networks
Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2012
Networks have become a central concept in the policy and public management literature; however, theoretical development is hindered by a lack of attention to the empirical properties of network measurement methods. This paper compares three survey-based methods for measuring organizational networks: the roster, the free-recall name generator, and a hybrid name generator that combines these two classic approaches. Results indicate that the roster and free-recall name generator methods both suffer from important limitations. The roster method tends to measure many linkages among a limited set of network actors, whereas the name generator tends to measure fewer linkages among a larger set of network actors. Using survey data on policy networks within California regional planning processes (N = 752), we find that the hybrid method strikes an effective balance between these techniques. The hybrid approach performs well in terms of identifying a large number of network actors and interconnections between them. Although no survey-based measurement technique is perfect, this study suggests that the hybrid name generator is an excellent alternative for the measurement of complex networks with large or shifting boundaries that encompass a diverse set of actors. C 2012 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management.
NETWORKS AND HIERARCHIES: NOTES ON GOVERNMENT ACTION IN THE ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC POLICY NETWORKS AND GOVERNANCE NETWORKS
2018
Government intervention in the public sphere has undergone a great transformation throughout its history. The concept of " governance networks " encompasses one of the latest efforts from political sciences to understand the process of creating and implementing public policies. This document aims to clarify the theoretical and practical implications of the concept of " governance networks " in regards to future research agendas around it. The conceptual debate suggests the need to analyze its democratic implications.
The Formation of Policy Networks: Preferences, Institutions and Actors' Choice of Information and Exchange Relations
Journal of Theoretical Politics, 1998
This article attempts to explain why actors form policy networks of information and exchange contacts, and how the institutional settings of public decision-making affect policy network formation. In their empirical analysis of the formation of four different policy networks in the German labourpolicy domain, the authors examine actors' choice of mutual contacts resting on similarity of preferences on political events and test the importance of either formal procedural settings or common sector membership for information and exchange network formation. The choice of policy network contacts is shown to be primarily determined by the similarity of actors' preferences. However, this is qualified by institutional settings.
Gordian Knot or Integrated Theory? Critical Conceptual Considerations for Governance Network Analysis1
2009
In recent decades, theorists and researchers have begun to shift emphasis away from the analysis and descriptions of government roles and responsibilities to processes of governance unfolding amidst complex networks of individuals, organizations and institutions. Observing this trend, George Frederickson observes that the current status of theory development of network governance is "neither theoretically tidy nor parsimonious," and "at this point there isn't a single theory that puts its arms around third party governance" (Frederickson, 2007, p. 11). Despite efforts to define critical characteristics of "policy subsystems," "policy networks," "public management networks," and "governance networks," we are left to conclude that the development of a theoretical framework through which to describe, evaluate and analyze governance networks is a particularly ambitious undertaking, possessing several kinds of "Gordian knot" dilemmas. In this chapter, the authors frame these challenges in terms of questions concerning the differentiation of macro-level forms (markets, hierarchies and networks), accounting for the possibilities of mixed administrative authorities (combinations of vertical and horizontal relations), multi-sector relationships, and multiple policy functions, and challenges associated with mixed social scales. The current ambiguities around these questions are explored and related propositions for addressing each is offered.
The Politics of Connections: Assessing the Determinants of Social Structure in Policy Networks
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2012
This article investigates the role of resource dependence in explaining the social structure of policy networks while controlling for the effects of microstructure, such as the tendency for networks to display reciprocity and/or transitive closure. While previous studies have analyzed resource dependence as a factor in decision making in policy networks, surprisingly little is known about the effects of these social factors on the structure of policy networks due, in part, to the statistical challenges in modeling them precisely. However, the recent development of the exponential random graph model technique, a stochastic method for studying social structure, has made it possible to overcome the statistical hurdles. This study draws on longitudinal data collected from an adult basic education policy network during 1998 and 2005 in a state to which we gave the pseudonym "Newstatia. " The findings suggest that decreased resource munificence may cause network segmentation and change the composition and nature of relationships among policy network members. These findings confirm our prior expectation that policy network activity and structure is animated by a desire to control resources. In addition, the observed policy network structure is greatly influenced by balancing operations undertaken by resource holders (e.g., legislators and state agencies) and resource seekers (e.g., service providers) and the generic social pressures for reciprocity and transitivity. INTroDuCTIoN For decades, scholars have recognized that public organizations with an enduring interest in a particular substantive policy area and their senior public managers are enmeshed in informal webs of relationships. More recently termed "policy networks," these webs are an alternate forum for policy deliberation and policy making. Policy networks provide a structure within which senior public managers play a role in guiding decision processes. Numerous studies on policy networks have suggested that resource We would like to acknowledge the contribution of Deneen M. Hatmaker (University of Connecticut) to the original collection and collation of the data used for this study. An abridged, early version of the paper was published in the 2009 Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings. We also would like to thank the anonymous reviewers and the editors of JPART for their invaluable comments.
Public Management in Intergovernmental Networks: Matching Structural Networks and Managerial Networking
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2004
on various aspects of this research program. Needless to say, this article is the responsibility of the authors only.
Governance Networks, Bureaucracy, and Democracy
Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 2022
Are bureaucratic and network forms of organization compatible with democracy? Two observations made in the literature inspire this question: Liberal democracies around the world have been challenged by populist authoritarian movements and leaders, and multicentric forms of governance (i.e., governance networks) are utilized increasingly in public policymaking and service delivery in many of these democracies. Based on these observations, we propose that a conceptual investigation of the possible links between three ideal types of democracy (i.e., liberal, deliberative/discursive, and practice-based democracy) and two ideal types of social organization (bureaucracy and governance networks) can help us to better understand the challenges in public policy making and administration in the early 21st century. In doing so, we adopt Max Weber’s conceptual analytical method of using ideal typical abstractions and understanding their historical contexts. With our conceptual analysis, we demo...
Internationalized Policy Environments and Policy Network Analysis
Political Studies, 1999
The importance of horizontal coordinating governance arrangements in the internationalized policy domains that occur more frequently in the present globalizing era justi®es building further on middle-level theories that draw on the policy community/ policy network concepts. This reconceptualization, however, requires an explicit integration of policy paradigms and political ideas into policy community theory and careful attention to the dierential impact of varying governance patterns in internationalized policy domains. This article pursues these objectives beginning with a review of existing literature on policy communities and policy networks. Next, drawing on recent research on policy paradigms and political ideas, it suggests how policy community concepts might be adapted for the study of policy change. Four types of internationalized policy environments are then identi®ed and their implications for policy communities and policy networks are assessed. The article concludes by introducing the concept of policy community mediators and discussing how they might shape the relationships among multiple policy communities.
Virtual Policy Networks: Where all Roads Lead to Rome
Public sector websites are heavily invested in influencing policy outcomes through information provisioning and dissemination. Traditionally e-government research has focused on the internal functions of e-government studying service delivery, horizontal information processing integration and levels of implementation maturity. This paper shifts the analytical focus to external facing e-government to consider the macro presentation of state-sponsored sites on the Web. To evaluate the external face of Canadian e-government this project measures the web-based impact of public sector websites in virtual policy networks. Virtual policy networks are web-based issues networks containing content on a specific policy topic and connected through hyperlinks. It is argued that government’s online nodality in these networks is an indicator of public sector websites’ authority and influence on the Web.
Related topics
Related papers
Beyond Multilateralism: Global Public Policy Networks *
2017
I n recent years, the failures and insufficiencies of traditional multilateralism have become ever more obvious: Governments and international organizations alone are no longer able to address ever more complex global policy issues. The corporate sector and civil society 1 are significant players in almost all global policy domains. Their active engagement is a critical if not imperative component in delivering policy outcomes that are timely, effective and legitimate. Creative institutional innovations are needed that connect governments, international organizations, civil society, and the corporate sector in order to better address the growing number of global public policy challenges. In this article, we argue that global public policy networks are one promising answer to the growing organizational vacuum at the global level. In these trisectoral networks, states, international organizations, civil society actors and the private sector are collaborating to achieve what none of the single actors is able to achieve on its own. With no early guarantee of success, many of them started as innovative »experiments« responding to an ever more complex global policy environment and in particular the inability of governmental or intergovernmental structures to manage the consequences of increased socio-economic integration and rapid technological change. Trisectoral networks are coalitions of and for change -they are both a result of a changing external environment and they help to shape it. Networks have emerged in vastly different areas ranging from the development and provision of vaccines, the construction of dams to the establishment of environmental standards. How and why do global public policy networks develop? What makes them work? What are their capabilities and limitations? What roles do and should states and international organizations play in these networks. * This article presents some results of the UN Vision Project on Global Public Policy Networks. The project commissioned a series of case studies on networks from various issue areas, and analyzed the role of the United Nations in these trisectoral networks. A complete report of the research project, entitled »Critical Choices: The United Nations, networks, and the future of global governance« (hereinafter: Reinicke / Deng et al., forthcoming) will be published in spring 2000. More information on the project and the case studies can be accessed at www.globalpublicpolicy.net. We gratefully acknowledge funding by the U.N. Foundation, the Fritz Thyssen Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Hoechst Foundation. For further information see also Reinicke, 1999a; 1999b; 1998; 1997; Benner / Reinicke, 1999; Reinicke/ Witte, forthcoming; Reinicke / Witte 1999. 1. For the purposes of this article, the term »civil society« includes NGOs, churches, the media, professional groups, as well as the public at large.
Public policy networks and 'wicked problems': a nascent solution?
Public …, 2011
The last two decades have seen a shift in public services organizations from hierarchies to networks. Network forms are seen as particularly suited to handling 'wicked problems'. We make an assessment of the nature and impact of this shift. Using recent evidence from the United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service (NHS), we explore the nature and functioning of eight different public policy networks. We are also interested in whether there has been a radical transition -or notfrom hierarchical to network forms.
Managing by proxy: Organizational networks as institutional levers in evolving public good markets
Journal of Business Research
Global Public Policies: New Tools for Governance
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2019
The globalization process creates new framework of multilevel policy-making, implies new actors, such as public and private actors and redefines the concept of public policy within an international and international policy regimes. Therefore, a difference in the policy process under globalization would appear to be that "policy transfer" and the global policy networks are on the increase. In this sense, on the one hand the paper describes and analysis the concept and process of policymaking develop under globalization driving forces in order to reveal the policy-making changes imposed by internal and external context, and on the other hand assets the importance of global public policy networks for solving global problems through global policies. From a methodological standpoint, and taking into consideration the theoretical framework, the study adopts a review conceptual approach to advance its arguments.
Moving Towards an Integrated Theory of Policy Networks: A Multi-Theoretical Approach for Examining State-Level Policy Change in U.S. Subsystems
Employing a policy network approach within a multiple theories framework, this paper explicates a unifying analytical framework for examining state-level policy change in educational subsystems. In the politically fluid context of current educational domains, policy networks have strong potential for conceptualizing the contemporary nature of policy-making, in which a loose coordination of private and public actors work together across issues. Likewise, the complex and dynamic nature of state policy-making may not conform to a single theory of the policy process, requiring concepts to be synthesized across theories. This theoretical model addresses these issues by linking subsystem attributes to network characteristics, which I show may then be empirically linked to a number of policy outcomes in educational contexts.
From public policy analysis to complex governance networks studies (book chapter)
The main aim of this paper is to answer and discuss whether policy analysis is still relevant in the age of complex governance networks. This paper also proposes an ideal typical definition of policy analysis, which is that a government can solve society’s problems based on the good advice provided by expert policy analysts and can measure the impacts of its policies. This paper argues that policy analysis and policymaking processes are more complex than the ideal type suggested by policy analysis and that governance is a better term than policy to capture this complexity and better reflect the realities of our times. To make the case for these arguments, this article first traces the history of policy analysis then cites the observations of governance: that in today’s world governments are not unified actors that can make cohesive decisions, let alone their decisions being implemented as intended, and that governmental actors do not necessarily represent the “public interest” or the collective will of the society. This paper further argues that the primary role of governmental actors should be to enhance the capacities of governmental and non-governmental actors to self-organize in order to generate desired outcomes.
Development of a model for the analysis of public policy networks in a federalism and coalitional presidentialism context
Cadernos Ebape.br, 2020
This is a theoretical essay that proposes a model for analyzing Brazilian public policy networks. The model innovates by incorporating the aspects of federalism and coalitional presidentialism into network analysis, since they are crucial aspects of power relations in Brazil. The literature on networks points out that structural and operational factors, as well as the context in which networks are embedded, are relevant to comprehend their effectiveness. However, the underlying power relations are often neglected by Public Administration analyzes. Thus, in the proposed model, federalism and coalitional presidentialism were included in the contextual characteristics, in order to add elements of power to the analyses of public policy networks in Brazil.
Government Agency Network Discovery via Hyperlinks and Datalinks
2011
In order to improve government transparency and promote interagency coordination, interagency networks have been investigated by social science researchers using data collected using traditional manual mechanisms such as interview and survey. In this paper, we show that World Wide Web (WWW) and Linked Open Data (LOD) can be used to automatically generate interagency networks and thus promote interagency network analysis to a larger scale and more practical status.
Toward the Automatic Extraction of Policy Networks Using Web Links and Documents
IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2013
Policy networks are widely used by political scientists and economists to explain various financial and social phenomena, such as the development of partnerships between political entities or institutions from different levels of governance. The analysis of policy networks demands a series of arduous and time-consuming manual steps including interviews and questionnaires. In this paper, we estimate the strength of relations between actors in policy networks using features extracted from data harvested from the web. Features include webpage counts, outlinks, and lexical information extracted from web documents or web snippets. The proposed approach is automatic and does not require any external knowledge source, other than the specification of the word forms that correspond to the political actors. The features are evaluated both in isolation and jointly for both positive and negative (antagonistic) actor relations. The proposed algorithms are evaluated on two EU policy networks from the political science literature. Performance is measured in terms of correlation and mean square error between the human rated and the automatically extracted relations. Correlation of up to 0.74 is achieved for positive relations. The extracted networks are validated by political scientists and useful conclusions about the evolution of the networks over time are drawn.
Policymaking in the Age of Internet: Is the Internet Tending to Make Policy Networks More or Less Inclusive?
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2006
Although many policy and political scientists have studied the Internet's role in electoral and organizational processes, there is little work that examines the Internet's effect on policy processes. Has the Internet tended to make policy deliberations more inclusive? Has it affected patterns of influence reputation among network participants? Has the Internet helped to bring new organizations into policy debates? This study provides preliminary answers to these questions. Treating policy networks as a type of interorganizational network, a ''socialized'' resource dependence framework is developed. Deployment of the Internet is conceptualized as an exogenous shock, where the shock alters the material resource base of a policy network and allows actors inside and outside the network to challenge structural power holders. Structural power holders attempt to ''mold'' use of the Internet to protect their position and its perquisites. To test this framework data were collected from two policy networks in ''Newstatia''-one focused on adult basic education policy and the other on mental health policy. Both policy networks appear to have become more exclusive since the deployment of the Internet. Electronic central discussion networks (or ''cores'') were primarily populated by actors who were already entrenched in positions of structural power within the network and possessed very high influence ratings. Most Internet communication occurs between members of the electronic core. At least preliminarily, the Internet appears to reinforce existing patterns of authority and influence.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.