Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2021, Restorative justice from a children's rights perspective
This book addresses the relationship between restorative justice and children's rights, an issue of increasing relevance to restorative justice theory and practice that has thus far received relatively little attention. Readers will find useful reviews of international human rights documents and of legislation, policy and practices in countries in Europe, Africa, Asia, South America, North America, and Oceania. Each of the chapters demonstrates the compatibility between children's rights and restorative justice. Adopting a rights-based approach is an important means for countries that are interested in further developing restorative justice practices, as it helps restorative processes that are new to the juvenile justice system to gain credibility as well as safeguard young participants' rights in these processes. In countries where restorative justice has been developed, a rights approach can stimulate innovation and applications beyond the child justice system. The book focuses on both needs and rights of children and young people who caused harm or suffered harm. Some chapters also adopt a critical point of view to explore the tensions between rights and restorative justice in relation to colonisation, welfare models, and professional privilege.
RJ4All Publications, 2018
Human rights and restorative justice are rarely brought under the same spotlight despite their normative similarities. In fact, this gap becomes even more apparent when put in the context of policy and practice internationally. Firstly, there is a developing gap between public perception and evidence-based depiction of crime. Secondly, scholarly debates are rarely reflected in criminal justice policy and legislation. This failure has an impact on recidivism, the spiralling costs of penal interventions, but most importantly on how we view our interpersonal and inter-communal relationships. This unique collection of papers brings together international leading experts in human rights and restorative justice to address a gap in the literature. From reconstructing and restorative human rights for restorative justice to addressing issues such as the standardisation of restorative justice, this edited volume is a must read for researchers, practitioners and campaigners. ————————————- Table of content Introduction & Acknowledgements Dr. Theo Gavrielides Living in a relational and moral universe Prof. Daniel Van Ness, Executive Director of the Centre for Justice and Reconciliation, Prison Fellowship International, Adjunct Professor at Pepperdine University School of Law, USA Reconstructing and restoring human rights Prof. Colin Harvey, School of Law, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland Bridging restorative justice and human rights for youth justice Dr. Theo Gavrielides, Founder and Director of The IARS International Institute and the Restorative Justice for All institute; Adjunct Professor at the Centre for Restorative Justice of Simon Fraser University; Visiting Professor at Buckinghamshire New University. Justice, education and human rights: partnerships, policies and progress in the UK Prof. Richard Grimes, Faculty of Law, Charles University, Prague (Czech Republic), and Access to Justice consultant Human rights-based restorative justice for violence against young women: looking at Greece and the UK Dr. Theo Gavrielides and Prof. Vaso Artinopoulou, Professor of Criminology and Vice-Rector, Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences, Greece The position of juvenile offenders in Hungary: policy and practice on restorative justice and human rights Dr. Tunde Andrea Barabas, Head of Department, National Institute of Criminology, Hungary An approach to empathy building and reconciliation: the case of Turkish, Greek and Cypriot youth Prof. Maria Hadjipavlou, Department of Social and Political Science, University of Cyprus, Cyprus Restorative justice and human rights in a democratic society Prof. Lode Walgrave, Professor of Criminology at Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium, and chair of the International Network for Research in Restorative Justice for Juveniles The standardisation of restorative justice Prof. Gerry Johnstone, Professor of Law, University of Hull, Director, MA in Restorative Justice Research Director, University of Hull Law School.
The authors' aim is to promote compliance with international legal standards by articulating intersections between young people's human rights and restorative justice principles -for legal theorists through transdisciplinary thinking and for practitioners by introducing the Rights Based Restorative Practice Evaluation ToolKit developed through this conceptual framework (Moore, 2008). This comprehensive approach was developed within the Canadian legal, social policy and youth justice contexts. Notwithstanding potential bias stemming from cultural or political milieu, the authors argue that rights-based restorative justice could contribute to the advancement of ethical practice in many UN-member states attempting to adopt these common frameworks.
2015
With financial support from the Justice Programme of the European Union This publication has been produced with the financial support of the Justice Programme of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the International Juvenile Justice Observatory and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. The research was conducted by a team of experts in the field of restorative justice. Tim Chapman, Course Director of the Restorative Practices Masters at Ulster University, coordinated the overall project. Maija Sisko Gellin, Finnish Forum for Mediation, who has extensive experience of mediation with young people both in a schools and criminal justice system and Monique Anderson, an academic from Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
Romanian Journal of Sociological Studies, 2023
This article outlines the outcomes, present state, and strategies for progressing toward a more restorative society as demonstrated by the i-RESTORE projects. Within the justice system, restorative justice has been found to decrease re-offending rates by as much as 27%, and it often leaves victims feeling content with the process. In educational settings, restorative practices promote respect among students, facilitate conflict resolution, and address issues like bullying and school violence. In the community, mediation services serve as a valuable resource, illustrating how individuals can independently resolve their conflicts with the guidance of skilled professionals. The i-RESTORE 2.0 project, executed between 2022 and 2024, extends the work initiated during the first phase of the i-RESTORE project, which took place from 2019 to 2021. Phase I concentrated on encouraging the adoption of restorative justice in cases involving child victims of crime and enhancing the skills of justice professionals. Building upon the achievements of the initial project, i-RESTORE 2.0 was developed with the aim of advancing even further, striving to establish accessible and high-quality restorative justice procedures for children who come into contact with the justice system. Up to this point, the two projects have influenced more than 8,000 individuals, heightening their understanding of restorative justice processes. Furthermore, through project initiatives, over 500 justice professionals and policymakers have improved their competencies and expertise in the realm of restorative justice, while over 80 children and young people have been empowered to actively contribute to the promotion of restorative solutions.
A guide to the theory, policy and practice of restorative justice with children and young people for Europe.
Restorative justice has become a global phenomenon in criminal justice systems. Resonating with, and in some cases drawing from, indigenous conceptions of justice, it offers both an alternative understanding of crime and new ways of responding to it. Restorative processes include victim-offender mediation, conferencing and circles; restorative outcomes include apology, amends to the victim and amends to the community. Restorative interventions are being used by police, prosecutors, judges, prison officials and probation and parole authorities. Restorative interventions have developed somewhat differently from region to region, but in many cases, countries have found it useful to adopt appropriate legislation. Human rights and other objections or critiques of restorative justice have been raised. Due in part to this, the UN has endorsed the Declaration of Basic Principles on the Use of Restorative Justice Programmes in Criminal Matters. An overview of restorative justice around the world 1 We brought the needle to sew the torn social fabric, not the knife to cut it.
de Sitter Publications, 2012
Rights & Restoration within Youth Justice unites the principles and practices of human rights and restorative justice. Leading international experts challenge current thinking on evidence-based youth justice policy. Through international case studies, a framework emerges for connecting human rights and restorative justice approaches to criminal justice policy and practice. Reviews “This timely collection enriches human rights and restorative justice worldwide.” ~ John Braithwaite, Australian National University and Australian Research Council Federation Fellow and Founder of RegNet “Rights & Restoration demonstrates that restorative processes are effective in producing a just response, repairing harm to victims, holding offenders accountable, and teaching values while recognizing the importance of relationships.” ~ Daniel Van Ness, Executive Director of the Centre for Justice and Reconciliation, Prison Fellowship International, and Adjunct Professor at Pepperdine University “The relationship between restorative justice and human rights has long been ignored by policy and practice, and this book bridges this gap without any geographical limitations.” ~ Brenda Morrison, Co-Director Centre for Restorative Justice, Simon Fraser University. "If policymakers have the objective of bettering justice responses for young people, then Theo Gavrielides‟ (2012) edited volume, Rights & Restoration within Youth Justiceis a must read. It makes an important contribution to youth justice. 1) It bridges a growing divide between evidence-based research and practice; 2) It promotes a participatory framework for doing democracy that necessitates youth voice; 3) It allows for complex issues – serious crimes, like domestic violence – to be responded to in complex – imaginative yet careful – ways. Gavrielides does all this by judiciously connecting the disciplines of restorative justice and human rights. The key question of the book is: how can these two fields work collaboratively to accomplish the above goal? Contributors are a blend of scholars, policymakers, and practitioners." Judah Oudshoorn, Professor of Community & Criminal Justice, Conestoga College Institute of Technology & Advanced Learning, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada Professor of Community & Criminal Justice, Conestoga College Institute of Technology & Advanced Learning, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
2011
Whilst practicing as a children's rights lawyer and working with victimized children, Tali Gal was confronted with the limitations of court processes. Gal witnessed first-hand the frustration of child victims and their families who felt that they weren't taken seriously by professionals and that they were not given the opportunity to have their voices heard. Furthermore, her experience as a child advocate had shown Gal that children both want to and are often capable of contributing to the decision-making on matters that impact their lives. Spurred on by these shortcomings in the criminal justice process, and convinced of the under explored capacities of young people, Gal began to explore the alternatives. In doing so she identified that despite the upward trajectory in attention given to the rights of children and also to the rights of victims, children who are also victims are more likely to be considered as targets for protection rather than as holders of rights. The needs-rights model presented in Gal's book has a strong theoretical underpinning. It encompasses legal and psychosocial discourses in its consideration of both children's rights and needs. The model serves as a means through which the criminal justice systems can be analyzed, and also as a tool with which to facilitate the development of new, holistic inclusive and restorative responses to child victimization. Gal begins the book by discussing the victimization of children. Drawing on the developmental victimology work of David Finkelhor, she explains that victimization experiences are extremely common in children's lives. Indeed, children experience more victimization than any other group, yet their experiences are often considered less seriously than similar victimization experienced by adults. In the second chapter, Gal introduces the field of children's rights, leading the reader through the discourse in a comprehensive yet concise way. In doing so, she begins her argument for the relevance of a needs-rights model. As could be expected, attention is given to the 1989 UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. A particular focus is placed on the four guiding principles: nondiscrimination, the best interests of the child, life, survival and development, and participation. Attention is also given to the two provisions that are associated with victimization specifically. Article 19 is concerned with prevention of and protection from victimization by caregivers. Article 39 is concerned with the right to access rehabilitation. These four principles and two provisions are combined to form the 'web of children's rights' that lies at the core of the model. Within this discourse, there is already attention given to the interaction between children's rights and children's needs or, as Gal puts it, 'the interrelationship between an empirical investigation of children's needs, on the one hand, and a normative analysis of their basic rights, on the other' (55). The consideration of children's needs is extended in the third chapter. Chapter 3 sees a deeper exploration of childhood victimization and its impact. Empirical findings from psychosocial literature are examined in an attempt to understand the needs brought to you by CORE View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk
Reforming Juvenile Justice, Springer Publications, 2009
Restorative justice can be viewed as a victim-centred approach which conceptualises criminal behaviour in a very different manner from which it has been traditionally conceived within orthodox models of criminal justice. In recent years, it has come to exert an increasingly strong influence over juvenile justice systems as policymakers have become increasingly concerned about the capacity of the traditional criminal justice system to deliver participatory processes and fair outcomes that are capable of benefiting victims, offenders and society at large.
The thesis will examine the process of implementation of restorative justice for children in conflict with the law in different national contexts, by analysing the national discourse pertaining to restorative justice for children in conflict with the law, in order to make a set of general recommendations to States looking to implement restorative justice for children in conflict with the law. The thesis was conducted in the context of the development of the "Report on Restorative justice for Children" within the Office of the Special Representative of the United Nations Secretary-General on Violence against Children (VAC) in 2013.
Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum
The research purpose of this study is to determine the causes of children becoming victims of criminal acts and the legal protection of children as victims of justice-based crimes. approach method using normative juridical, research results which state that the protection of human rights for children who are victims of crimes is regulated in law as a legal protection for the State's obligations to the Indonesian people in ensuring the implementation of fundamental rights. The process of protecting and upholding human rights is carried out based on the state ideology, namely Pancasila which prioritizes human values, respecting the human rights of every citizen, both adults and children
National Commisssion on Restorative Justice, 2009
This report was commissioned by the National Commission on Restorative Justice. It aims to inform the Commission of relevant research relating to the concept and practice of restorative justice abroad, and contains an overview of main issues and concerns which commonly arise when restorative justice reforms are implemented. This report provides an international review and analysis of the current state of restorative justice theory and practice.
This article analyses the restorative justice procedures in the South African Child Justice Act, 75 of 2008. The aim is to evaluate to what extent victims are included, and, in line with earlier academic opinion, if they occupy a central position within a restorative justice approach, also adopted by the Act. In addition, the benefits of and criticism against improved victim involvement in criminal matters are investigated. Although it is found that victims of child offenders do not occupy a central position in this new legal paradigm, recommendations are made for optimal interpretation and application of restorative justice procedures provided for in the Act. In such a way it is possible that some of the therapeutic outcomes envisaged for victims may be realised.
Routledge, 2018
This up-to-date resource on restorative justice theory and practice is the literature’s most comprehensive and authoritative review of original research in new and contested areas. Bringing together contributors from across a range of jurisdictions, disciplines and legal traditions, this edited collection provides a concise, but critical review of existing theory and practice in restorative justice. Authors identify key developments, theoretical arguments and new empirical evidence, evaluating their merits and demerits, before turning the reader’s attention to further concerns informing and improving the future of restorative justice. Divided into four parts, the Handbook includes papers written by leading scholars on new theory, empirical evidence of implementation, critiques and the future of restorative justice. This companion is essential reading for scholars of restorative justice, criminology, social theory, psychology, law, human rights and criminal justice, as well as researchers, policymakers, practitioners and campaigners from around the world.
Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, 2018
Over the past few decades, a novel approach to crime and conflict resolution has been gaining ground around the world. 'Restorative justice' revolves around the notions that crime is primarily a violation human relationships; the chief aim of the justice process should be to reconcile those most directly affected by the offending behaviour while addressing the injuries they suffered; the resolution of crime-related conflicts demands a positive effort on the part of victims and offenders and the assumption of responsibility by the community. Restorative justice is not a new concept-It was a prevalent justice model in early civilizations in Europe and Asia and remains so among many indigenous communities around the world. This paper outlines the broad philosophy of restorative justice, comments on the differences between restorative justice and other prevailing conceptions of justice and identifies the constitutive elements necessary for a restorative justice practice. The paper then considers contemporary restorative justice practices, presenting information on guiding principles, procedures and goals and identifying concerns that need to be addressed in the design and implementation of such practices.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.