Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
1991, Computer Standards & Interfaces
…
8 pages
1 file
The Data Base Systems Study Group of Accredited Standards Committee X3 has initiated efforts that will lead to an eventual international standard in object-oriented data base systems. This work will require the coordination of current X3 committees H2 Data Languages and H4 Information Resource Management Dictionary within X3 as well as coordination with other standards development committees outside X3 but included in the ANSI interface with ISO through the JTC1 TAG.
Computer Standards & Interfaces, 1991
An object system provides a single and complete architectural paradigm for application systems. For maximum benefit, object-oriented DBMS standardization should be addressed from this total system perspective. Descriptions are given of the standardization aspects, of objects and objects systems, that should be considered in order to promote both interoperability between object systems and the portability of objects and their definitions between object systems.
Computer Standards & Interfaces, 1991
Guzenda, L. and A.E. Wade, A taxonomy of standards, Computer Standards & Interfaces 13 (1991) 65-70.
1994
The SQL standardization community is hard at work adding object technology to the SQL relational database langu age. Arethese experts merely engaged in a Quixotic waste of their organizations’ resources, or are they breaking important new ground that will produce the database language for the introduction of the 21st century? By examining the motivations behind the work, reviewing some of the history behind it, and inspecting in some detail the technical aspects, the reader can form his or her own opinions.
Information Systems, 1978
A Global Perspective, 2000
2013
We present in this paper ScalaLife's proposed data standards and best practices for Molecular Dynamics data management. Our proposed data standard is divided in two layers: the XML UMM format and the embedded TNG file. TNG is a high-compressed and robust file format that allows nonsequential access to trajectory information. TNG will be adopted by GROMACS from the next major release. UMM is implemented in XSD and sets the common definition of high-level simulation information. We also implemented UMM-MoDEL, a database software bundle to manage MD simulation data using UMM/TNG standards. ScalaLife is working for the adoption of the standards developing open I/O APIs, converters and interfaces for Life Sciences community.
1998
This paper discusses data interchange standards. It introduces a reference model in which the relevant issues are studied on several levels and in a layered manner: 1) the atom level, 2) the elementary level, 3) the structural level and 4) the application level. Each of these levels is specific and is subject to a variety of standards. The heterogeneous nature of the media (text, graphics, sound, video, animation, etc.) involves a multitude of corresponding formats that bring out the need to establish and apply appropriate standards in order to facilitate data interchange. WWW demands a standard that will guarantee format stability and data compatibility.
2012 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2012
Computer Standards & Interfaces, 1992
Kilov, H., Two approaches to information modelling standardization: Managed objects for the OSI management information service and Object data management reference model, Computer Standards & Interfaces 14 (1992) 231-238. This paper compares two approaches to information modeling standardization: managed objects for the OSI Management Information Service (MIS) and general object modeling. Although the former define the concepts within the framework of a particular ('domain-specific') application area, whereas the latter exists within a generic framework, both approaches have the same goal and are based on common concepts. They do not have fundamental incompatibilities: both strive to provide abstract and precise specifications in a concise manner. The paper concentrates, however, on the differences between these two efforts, most importantly, on the shortcomings in the specification of behavior and inter-object relationships for managed objects. It proposes ways of rectifying these shortcomings and, therefore, of reconciling these standardization efforts by means of abstract and formal specification of behavioral properties including relationships and their components. Finally, it discusses the ongoing efforts of managed relationship specification within this framework.
OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology, 2006
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 2001
Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 2015
The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, 2021
Volume 2: 31st Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Parts A and B, 2011
Computer Standards & Interfaces, 1994
Journal of ICT Standardization, 2018
Software Quality Management VI, 1998
ACM SIGMOD Record, 1982
PROTEOMICS, 2010
Computing Research Repository, 2011
International Journal of Digital Curation, 2015