Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2020
…
262 pages
1 file
This book, translated from the French, offers a synthesis of modern research devoted to Simplicius's life and to three of his five commentaries: On Epictetus' Handbook, On Aristotle's De anima, On Aristotle's Categories. Its biographical part brings to light the historical role played by this Neoplatonic philosopher. Born in Cilicia, Asia Minor, he studied in Alexandria and Athens and apparently ended his life teaching in Syria on the frontier between the Byzantine and Sassanide Empires. His role was that of a mediator between the Greco-Roman world and philosophy and Syriac philosophy, which would feed Arabic philosophy at its beginning. The second part of the book, devoted to doctrinal and authorship issues, also deals with the underlying pedagogical curriculum and methods proper to Neoplatonic commentaries, which modern interpretation all too often tends to neglect in studies on Simplicius and other Neoplatonists.
B. Strobel (hrsg.), Die Kunst der philosophischen Exegese bei den spätantiken Platon- und Aristoteles-Kommentatoren. Akten der Tagung der Karl und Gertrud Abel-Stiftung vom 4. bis 6. Oktober 2012 in Trier, 2018
2004
The last few decades have witnessed a strong renewal of interest in the history of the ancient and medieval commentary. The imposing series of translations of the ancient commentaries on Aristotle inaugurated and directed by R. Sorabji is a clear indication of this2. Villejuif, France, was the scene in 1999 of an International Colloquium on “The Commentary between tradition and innovation”, the acts of which were published under the direction of M.-O. Goulet-Cazé. At Bochum, Germany, a “Graduiertenkolleg” under the direction of W. Geerlings worked for six years on “Der Kommentar in Antike und Mittelalter”, and a collection of contributions to this workshop was edited by W. Geerlings and Chr. Schultze in 2002 (Leiden-Boston-Köln). In these publications, three articles3 were devoted specifically to the tradition of the Neoplatonic commentaries. None of them deals with the beginning of
A. Falcon (ed.), Brill's Companion to the Reception of Aristotle in Antiquity, Leiden, 2016
2022
BMCR 2022.12.10: Simplicius the Neoplatonist in light of contemporary research: a critical review -- Ilsetraut Hadot, Simplicius the Neoplatonist in light of contemporary research: a critical review. Academia Philosophical Studies, 67. Baden-Baden: Academia Verlag, 2020. Pp. 260. ISBN 9783896658944. €54,00.
Simplicius is well regarded today as an insightful, comprehensive, detailed, sometimes repetitive, but generally useful and reliable interpreter of Aristotle. How he reads other authors though – with the possible exception of the Presocratics – is less well studied. In this chapter I examine Simplicius’ interpretation of Plato. By this I mean not Simplicius’ views regarding Platonism (though these of course influenced his interpretation), but rather the ways in which Simplicius read the particular dialogues written by Plato, as well as the history that had accumulated by his time regarding Plato’s life and thought. While something of a picaresque task, given that Simplicius’ extant commentaries all center on texts of either Aristotle or the Stoic Epictetus – the Physics, De Caelo, Categories, and, disputedly, the De Anima, as well as the Enchiridion – nevertheless, his frequent references, allusions, and discussions of Plato’s works in his writing provide ample evidence for gathering a good working picture of how Simplicius read him.
International Journal of the Platonic Tradition, 2009
Mediterranea. International Journal on the Transfer of Knowledge, 2017
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Journal of Hellenic Studies 130, 2010
The Classical Review / Volume 64 / Issue 01 / April 2014, pp 103 - 105, 2014
Phronesis, 2010
Peitho. Examina antiqua, 2014
Aestimatio : Critical Reviews in the History of Science, 2015
in Kaldellis/Siniossoglou, The Cambridge Intellectual History of Byzantium (forthcoming), 2017
The Classical Quarterly, 2021
Studia graeco-arabica 7 (2017), pp. 171- 192, 2017
Cambridge Intellectual History of ByzantiumThe Cambridge Intellectual History of Byzantium, 2017
Intellectual History of the Islamicate World 9.1-2, 2021
Aestimatio: Critical Reviews in the History of Science, 2015
The International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 13 (2019) 1-3, 2019
Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Aristotle in Antiquity (ed. Andrea Falcon), 2016
Aestimatio : Critical Reviews in the History of Science, 2017