Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2009
Let a ∈ C n. Denote L a the bunch of complex lines containing a. It is easy to construct a real-analytic, and even polynomial, function f on the unit complex sphere ∂B n in C n such that f is the boundary value of no holomorphic function in the ball B n , but nevertheless, for any complex line L ∈ L a the restriction f | L∩∂B n continuously extends in L ∩ B n as a function, holomorphic in L ∩ B n. We prove that, however, two bunches of complex lines are sufficient for testing global holomorphic extendibility of real-analytic functions: if a and b are two distinct points in the closed unit ball and f ∈ C ω (∂B n) admits the one-dimensional holomorphic extension in any complex line L ∈ L a ∪ L b then f is the boundary value of a holomorphic function in the unit ball B n .
2009
Let a ∈ Cn. Denote La the bunch of complex lines containing a. It is easy to construct a real-analytic, and even polynomial, function f on the unit complex sphere ∂Bn in Cn such that f is the boundary value of no holomorphic function in the ball Bn, but nevertheless, for any complex line L ∈ La the restriction f |L∩∂Bn continuously extends in L ∩ Bn as a function, holomorphic in L ∩ Bn. We prove that, however, two bunches of complex lines are sufficient for testing global holomorphic extendibility of real-analytic functions: if a and b are two distinct points in the closed unit ball and f ∈ Cω(∂Bn) admits the one-dimensional holomorphic extension in any complex line L ∈ La ∪ Lb then f is the boundary value of a holomorphic function in the unit ball Bn.
Let a ∈ C n. Denote L a the bunch of complex lines containing a. It is easy to construct a real-analytic, and even polynomial, function f on the unit complex sphere ∂B n in C n such that f is the boundary value of no holomorphic function in the ball B n , but nevertheless, for any complex line L ∈ L a the restriction f | L∩∂B n continuously extends in L ∩ B n as a function, holomorphic in L ∩ B n. We prove that, however, two bunches of complex lines are sufficient for testing global holomorphic extendibility of real-analytic functions: if a and b are two distinct points in the closed unit ball and f ∈ C ω (∂B n) admits the one-dimensional holomorphic extension in any complex line L ∈ L a ∪ L b then f is the boundary value of a holomorphic function in the unit ball B n .
Journal d'Analyse Mathématique, 2011
Let f ∈ C ω (∂B n), where B n is the unit ball of C n. We prove that if a, b ∈ B n , a = b, for every complex line L passing through one of a or b, the restricted function f | L∩∂B n has a holomorphic extention to the cross-section L∩B n , then f is the boundary value of a holomorphic function in B n .
Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 1982
The following extension theorem is proved. Let O C C be an open set containing A, the open unit disc in C, and the point 1. Suppose that / is holomorphic on B, the open unit ball of CN, let x £ dB and assume that for all y G dB in a neighborhood of x the function c-» f(cy), holomorphic on A, continues analytically into Q. Then / continues analytically into a neighborhood of x.
Advances in Applied Clifford Algebras, 2001
Analytic continuations to C '~ of solutions to elliptic differential equations defined over domains in R ~ have been studied in a general context by Kiselman [5]. For the ease where the elliptic operator is the Laplacian a detailed analysis of these analytic continuations have been given by Lelong [6], Siciak [10] and Jarnicki [4]. Related results have also been described by Hayman [2]. In this paper we consider some of the properties of analytic continuations to C 2 of analytic functions defined over domains in the complex plane. The main result proved is: Theorem 1. Suppose that ~ is a domain lying in the complex plane. Then there exist two unbounded domains ~1 and ~2 lying in C 2 and containing ~, such that for each analytic function f (z) defined on ~ there are two holomorphic functions
J Anal Math, 2011
Let f ∈ C ω (∂B n), where B n is the unit ball of C n. We prove that if a, b ∈ B n , a = b, for every complex line L passing through one of a or b, the restricted function f | L∩∂B n has a holomorphic extention to the cross-section L∩B n , then f is the boundary value of a holomorphic function in B n .
Annales Polonici Mathematici, 2019
We study the notions of extendability and domain of holomorphy in the infinite-dimensional case. In this setting it is also true that the notions of domain of holomorphy and weak domain of holomorphy are equivalent. We also prove that the set of non-extendable functions belonging to some classes X(B) ⊂ H(B), B being the open unit ball in a separable complex Banach space, is a lineable and dense G δ. Moreover, when Ω is H b-holomorphically convex (defined in the text), it is shown that the set of non-extendable holomorphic functions on Ω is a lineable and dense G δ set.
Annales Polonici Mathematici, 2003
This note is an attempt to describe a part of the historical development of the research on separately holomorphic functions.
Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 1990
This paper studies the extensions of harmonic and analytic functions defined on the unit disk to continuous functions defined on a certain compactification of the disk.
Annales Polonici Mathematici, 2003
Let D j ⊂ C k j be a pseudoconvex domain and let A j ⊂ D j be a locally pluripolar set, j = 1, . . . , N . Put
Transactions of the American Mathematical Society
Let $D_j\subset\Bbb C^{n_j}$ be a pseudoconvex domain and let $A_j\subset D_j$ be a locally pluriregular set, $j=1,...,N$. Put $$ X:=\bigcup_{j=1}^N A_1\times...\times A_{j-1}\times D_j\times A_{j+1}\times ...\times A_N\subset\Bbb C^{n_1}\times...\times\Bbb C^{n_N}=\Bbb C^n. $$ Let $U\subset\Bbb C^n$ be an open neighborhood of $X$ and let $M\subset U$ be a relatively closed subset of $U$. For $j\in\{1,...,N\}$ let $\Sigma_j$ be the set of all $(z',z'')\in(A_1\times...\times A_{j-1}) \times(A_{j+1}\times...\times A_N)$ for which the fiber $M_{(z',\cdot,z'')}:=\{z_j\in\Bbb C^{n_j}\: (z',z_j,z'')\in M\}$ is not pluripolar. Assume that $\Sigma_1,...,\Sigma_N$ are pluripolar. Put $$ X':=\bigcup_{j=1}^N\{(z',z_j,z'')\in(A_1\times...\times A_{j-1})\times D_j \times(A_{j+1}\times...\times A_N)\: (z',z'')\notin\Sigma_j\}. $$ Then there exists a relatively closed pluripolar subset $\hat M\subset\hat X$ of the `envelope of holomor...
Chinese Annals of Mathematics, Series B, 2017
The existence of a zero for a holomorphic functions on a ball or on a rectangle under some sign conditions on the boundary generalizing Bolzano's ones for real functions on an interval is deduced in a very simple way from Cauchy's theorem for holomorphic functions. A more complicated proof, using Cauchy's argument principle, provides uniqueness of the zero, when the sign conditions on the boundary are strict. Applications are given to corresponding Brouwer fixed point theorems for holomorphic functions. Extensions to holomorphic mappings from C n to C n are obtained using Brouwer degree.
Journal of Geometric Analysis, 2003
Let f : D → D ′ be a proper holomorphic mapping between bounded domains D, D ′ in C 2 . Let M, M ′ be open pieces on ∂D, ∂D ′ respectively that are smooth, real analytic and of finite type. Suppose that the cluster set of M under f is contained in M ′ . It is shown that f extends holomorphically across M . This can be viewed as a local version of the Diederich-Pinchuk extension result for proper mappings in C 2 .
2013
In the theory of one complex variable it is well known that for any domain G ⊂ C there is an f ∈ O(G) (i.e. f is a holomorphic function on G) that cannot be holomorphically extended beyond G. In many variables the situation becomes different. There are pairs of domains D1 $ D2 ⊂ C, n ≥ 2, such that the restriction mapping O(D2) −→ O(D1) is surjective. Domains which carry a non extendible holomorphic function are called domains of holomorphy. They can be characterized by being pseudoconvex, i.e. − log dist(·, ∂D) is a plurisubharmonic function. Moreover, in contrast to the case of real partial differentiability, a separately holomorphic (i.e. a partially complex differentiable) function f : D −→ C (write f ∈ Os(D)) — D ⊂ C, n ≥ 2, a domain — is already continuous (Theorem of Hartogs (1906)) and, therefore, using the Cauchy integral formula holomorphic on D. Recall that a function f : D −→ C is called separately holomorphic if for any a ∈ D and any j ∈ {1, . . . , n} the function of o...
Studia Mathematica, 2006
Let X be a Riemann domain over C k × C ℓ . If X is domain of holomorphy with respect to a family F ⊂ O(X), then there exists a pluripolar set P ⊂ C k such that every slice Xa of X with a / ∈ P is a domain of holomorphy with respect to the family {f | Xa : f ∈ F}.
Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 2010
We prove a new cross theorem for separately holomorphic functions. N j=1 A j × D j × A j. One may easily prove that X is connected. We say that a function f : X −→ C is separately holomorphic on X (we write f ∈ O s (X)) if for any j ∈ {1,. .. , N} and (a j , a j) ∈ A j × A j , the function D j z j −→ f (a j , z j , a j) ∈ C is holomorphic in D j .
Advances in Applied Clifford Algebras, 2010
The holomorphic functions of several complex variables are closely related to the continuously differentiable solutions f : R 2n → Cn of the so-
Proceedings - Mathematical Sciences, 2018
Let D, D be arbitrary domains in C n and C N respectively, 1 < n ≤ N , both possibly unbounded and M ⊆ ∂ D, M ⊆ ∂ D be open pieces of the boundaries. Suppose that ∂ D is smooth real-analytic and minimal in an open neighborhood ofM and ∂ D is smooth real-algebraic and minimal in an open neighborhood ofM. Let f : D → D be a holomorphic mapping such that the cluster set cl f (M) does not intersect D. It is proved that if the cluster set cl f (p) of some point p ∈ M contains some point q ∈ M and the graph of f extends as an analytic set to a neighborhood of (p, q) ∈ C n × C N , then f extends as a holomorphic map to a dense subset of some neighborhood of p. If in addition, M = ∂ D, M = ∂ D and M is compact, then f extends holomorphically across an open dense subset of ∂ D.
Bulletin of the Brazilian Mathematical Society, New Series, 2007
We consider the problem of identifying boundary values of holomorphic functions on bounded domains in C 2 . We use the quaternionic analysis techniques to extending the CR structure to a pure function theoretical nature. The advantage of our procedure lies in the fact that it also runs for domains with fractal boundary.
Indiana University Mathematics Journal, 1995
It is shown, that any proper holomorphic map f : D → D between bounded domains D, D C 2 with smooth real-analytic boundaries extends holomorphically to a neighborhood ofD.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.