Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2012
In recent years, a growing number of linguists have reported constructions that fulfil all or most criteria for being called a passive but one: morphological or periphrastic marking in the verb phrase. In the constructions in question, passive semantics is conveyed through argument remapping, sometimes without the possibility for an oblique Actor by-phrase. The intransitive use of a transitive verb triggers a reversal of voice orientation: of the two participants of the active transitive verb, the Undergoer is linked to the one and only argument position, the subject. The Actor is either demoted to an oblique participant or not encoded at all, depending on the language. An example of such a zero-coded passive from the Mande language Jalonke is given in (2), which is the passive, intransitive equivalent of the transitive active clause in (1):
The construction of English passives is formed by placing the noun which denotes the subject of the action in the sentence to the object position and then making the object of the sentence dislocate to the subject position. Other transformations include the change of the auxiliary verb and the inflection of the main verb. The focus of this study however is on Yoruba passives, a topic that is very passive in the Yoruba grammar literature. The study’s primary aim then is to investigate the passives in Yoruba. No study to the best of my knowledge has lay claim of the existence of passives in Yoruba, a Kwa language under the Niger-Congo language family which is spoken mostly in the Western part of Nigeria. This study provides evidence to argue for the existence of (forms of) passives in the language. In the realization of Yoruba passives, the subject in the active verb is physically dislocated to become an agent phrase of the passive sentence or deleted. However, the object’s position in particular differs strikingly from the English passive as the object of the active verb does not move to the subject position. The pronoun a occupies the subject position, and it is in [Spec, TP] as the object makes no movement. In Yoruba, the auxiliary of the passive is not a consistent form in that auxiliaries change based on the sentence they are used in. Similarly, the Yoruba verbs are not morphologically inflected. Hence, the verb of the active sentence retains its form in the passive. I speculate that object DP cannot fulfil the requirement of T’s EPP, hence its inability to move. The analysis of the study will be done in comparison to English passive constructions and selected languages that have peculiar cases of passives and analyses will be represented in tree diagrams. The paper is cast within the Minimalist Program of syntax.
In: Hetty Geerdink-Verkoren & Aone van Engelenhoven (eds) Searching the invariant: semiotactic explorations into meaning (pp. 105-132), Munich: Lincom Europe, 2011
Bantu Languages. Analyses, Description and Theory, 2010
Bemba employs two passive constructions: an older one with verbal extension -w-and a more recent construction involving the class 2 subject marker ba-. We argue that ba-is ambiguous between an ordinary, referential class 2 marker, and an underspecified passive marker, and is disambiguated by the overt encoding of a class 2 subject, or an oblique semantic agent phrase. Under the passive interpretation, the semantic patient displays both subject-like and object-like properties, posing a problem for the analysis of argument structure in these constructions, and of subjects and objects in Bantu. In contrast, the -w-passive extension is increasingly used in contexts where the agent cannot be expressed, but also in combination with the neutro-passive extension -ik-, that is, with predicates with reduced valency, where it licenses the expression of an agent oblique phrase. We argue that the ba-passive is used in more typical passive contexts, while the -wpassive becomes increasingly restricted to more marginal grammatical contexts. The paper shows that both passive constructions are taking part in a wider grammaticalization process, in which two main functions of the passive, change of argument structure and encoding of agency, are becoming dissociated. * We are grateful to Herman Batibo, Jekura Kavari, Jochen Zeller and the audience at the Second Bantu Conference in Gothenburg for helpful comments and suggestions. Financial support from the British Academy for a UK-Africa network project in which parts of this research were presented is hereby gratefully acknowledged.
The 53rd Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS53), 2023
A subset of Austronesian languages known as the Indonesian-type have long been considered typologically unusual wherein an ergative-aligned object voice construction co-occurs with Indo-European-style passive voice and an accusative-aligned active voice construction. We demonstrate instead that one of these languages—Javanese—is not as typologically rare as previously thought. Previously overlooked aspects of Javanese syntax indicate that the language is best viewed as exhibiting a run-of-the-mill accusative case system wherein the so-called “active vs. object voice alternation” indexes subject vs. nonsubject topicalization. We then present independent evidence that Javanese’s so-called “passive construction” is essentially an object voice construction that contains a third-person subject/initiator, according to which Javanese does not exhibit an Indo-European-type passive. We conclude that Javanese exhibits a reduced Philippine-style voice system where voice alternation is an Ā-phenomenon associated with topicalization and not argument structure alternation, similar to the “voice” system of Tagalog (Shibatani 1988; Richards 2000; Chen 2017), Malagasy (Pearson 2005), and Puyuma (Chen 2017) and the Nilotic language Dinka (van Urk 2015). This new analysis has important broader implications for our understanding of the syntactic typology of voice. Not only does it reveal a new locus of variation within languages traditionally considered to have a “hybrid” voice system where Indo-European-type voice co-occur with Austronesian-type voice, but it also reveals previously unknown variation within a cline of constructions traditionally termed the Indonesian-type passives, many of which have been claimed to be structurally equivalent to Indo-European-type passives (e.g. Indonesian: Aldridge 2008; Acehese: Legate 2012, 2014).
1999
The majority of world’s languages do not have passive, and the function passive fulfills can be fulfilled by other morphosyntactic means. This situation seems to apply to the Chadic languages as well; even in Hausa, the passive construction seems to have a low functional load
Wacana, 2018
This corpus of the non-standard Kudus dialect of Javanese (JDK) passive voice construction was compiled in the course of fieldwork in Kudus and was annotated to draw attention to several syntactic/semantic features. An investigation was undertaken of the di-affix in the JDK which encodes the passive function in contrast to the Standard Javanese in a quantitative descriptive analysis. The results indicate the existence of an "abbreviated agentive passive" which occurs more frequently than the "agentive passive", but less frequently than the "agentless passive". The results also show that the passives in JDK are in fact likely to have inanimate subjects and have only animate demoted agents. However, human demoted agents appear more frequently than animal agents. Also, there is a tendency for the passive without di-to be most likely to be used as an agentless passive. The results suggest that the less colloquial the genre, the less likely the passive without di-is to occur. Keywords Standard Javanese; Javanese dialect of Kudus; passive voice.
The many faces of Austronesian …, 2005
The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics (2000), 2000
Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 2019
There is a growing body of literature that recognises the relationship between verbal argument alternations such as passives and anticausatives. However, alternation types in Bantu languages have been treated in a rather fragmented way. In addition, the relationship between passive and anticausative constructions with regard to the realisation of an implicit external argument poses a challenge to the study of argument alternations within and across languages. The present article examines the morphosyntactic and lexical-semantic properties of passive and anticausative constructions in Kiwoso (Bantu), invoking different combinations of Voice, vCAUS and Root, as assumed in the syntactic decomposition approach. The properties of change of state verbs in licensing the anticausative and passive alternations form an integral part of this article. This article argues that the passive and anticausative in Kiwoso are distinguished on the basis of a Voice functional head, which determines the nature of events expressed by passive and anticausative verb constructions. The distinction between the (non-) occurrence of na-and ko-phrases in Kiwoso provides diagnostic evidence for this property.
2018
By submitting this research assignment electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification.
Senri Ethnological Studies, 2012
This paper focuses on the optionality of ergative marking pronouns in Austronesian languages, and discusses some morphosyntactic developments that took place in association with the optional ergative marking. First, it will point out that, in a system which is commonly found in western Austronesian languages, a transitive sentence occurs in which the use of an ergative pronoun is obligatory, even when the agent of the event need not be expressed. It is assumed that such was also the system of their commonly shared ancestral language, Proto-Extra Formosan. Several developments have taken place in some of the daughter languages that are considered to result from this situation, including the emergence of optional ergative marking. These developments are examined. The second half of the paper deals with optional ergative marking and related morphosyntactic developments. In some Austronesian languages, it is found that an ergative clitic pronoun indicating the agent of a transitive sentence optionally alternates with a verb formative which marks passive. A diachronic examination of such interaction between ergative and passive sheds light on the conditions whereby optional ergative marking emerges and how the phenomenon is formalized to develop into a new sentence structure. Mechanisms of the change and possible motivations for each stage of the change are provided, as well as examples from some of the languages in which optional ergative clitic pronouns are observed.
Journal of African Languages and Linguistics, 2020
This study investigates how the focus on a TAM and polarity value, known in the literature as operator (Dik 1989, Watters 2010) or auxiliary focus (Hyman & Watters 1984), is manifested in natural speech in Kakabe, a Mande language. I show that the opposition between the two perfective auxiliaries attested in Kakabe is best analyzed in terms of operator focus and therefore extend this notion to Mande languages for the first time. This study analyzes the operator focus on the perfective in natural speech. It leads to the discovery of new contexts relevant for the description of focused perfectives, such as performative speech acts and utterances with mental state predicates. Finally, I propose a new approach to the distribution of the inflectional markers in narratives, based on an account of the main story line as structured by one overarching Question Under Discussion.
Language Typology and Syntactic Description, 2007
While there is consensus that Proto-Indo-European (PIE) expressed "passive meaning" through middle morphology , the productivity and properties of the "middle" passive are debated, and it has been argued that 1. the passive use of middle morphology does not represent a canonical passive because of the rarity of overt demoted agents in the Indo-European (IE) daughter languages.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.