Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2011
AI
This paper addresses solutions to inequalities within the theory of operators, particularly focusing on the operator inequations involving bounded linear operators on a Hilbert space. The author presents a series of theorems regarding the necessary conditions for solutions to these inequations, discusses self-adjointness in relation to these conditions, and offers proofs and additional formations of these inequations. The results obtained provide insights into the characteristics and restrictions of such operator inequations.
Inequations frequently appear in the recent developments o f theory o f operators whose solution lead to important conclusions, P.K. Mishra \2\ has obtained some important results on the operator inequations having following formations : 1. 0 < AX + XA* < I < A*X+XA 2. 0 < XA + AX* < I < X*A+AX 3. 0 < AX + X*A* < 1 < A’X’+XA where A e B(H) the elgebra of bounded linear operators on the Hilbert space H. Our study is based on the following formations of inequations. 4. 0 < AX* + X*A* < I < X’A+A’X’ 5. 0 < AX + XA* < I < A*X+X*A
Journal of Inequalities and Applications, 2012
,B ∈ B(B(H)) denote either the generalized derivation δ A,B = L A -R B or the elementary operator A,B = L A R B -I, where L A and R B are the left and right multiplication operators defined on B(H) by L A = AX and R B = XB respectively. This article concerns some spectral properties of k-quasi- * -class A operators in a Hilbert space, as the property of being hereditarily polaroid. We also establish Weyl-type theorems for T and d A,B , where T is a k-quasi- * -class A operator and A, B * are also k-quasi- * -class A operators. MSC: Primary 47B47; 47A30; 47B20; secondary 47B10
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society, 1971
Comptes Rendus Mathematique, 2012
Given self-adjoint operators A, B ∈ B(H) it is said A ≤ u B whenever A ≤ U * BU for some unitary operator U. We show that A ≤ u B if and only if f (g(A) r) ≤ u f (g(B) r) for any increasing operator convex function f , any operator monotone function g and any positive number r. We present some sufficient conditions under which if B ≤ A ≤ U * BU , then B = A = U * BU. Finally we prove that if A n ≤ U * A n U for all n ∈ N, then A = U * AU. A ≤ u B ⇒ e A ≤ u e B. (1) Okayasu and Ueta [7] gave a sufficient condition for a triple of operators (A, B, U) with A, B ∈ B h (H) and U ∈ U(H) under which B ≤ A ≤ U * BU implies B = A = U * BU. In this note we use their idea and prove a similar result. In fact we present some sufficient conditions on an operator U ∈ U(H) for which B ≤ A ≤ U * BU ensures B = A = U * BU when A, B ∈ B h (H). It is known that ≤ u satisfies the reflexive and transitive laws but not the antisymmetric law in general; cf. [7]. The antisymmetric law states that A ≤ u B and B ≤ u A ⇒ A, B are unitarily equivalent. We, among other things, study some cases in which the antisymmetric law holds for the relation ≤ u. We refer the reader to [4] for general information on operators acting on
Integral Equations and Operator Theory, 2002
Mathematical Physics, Analysis and Geometry
Let $H:\text {dom}(H)\subseteq \mathfrak {F}\to \mathfrak {F}$ H : dom ( H ) ⊆ F → F be self-adjoint and let $A:\text {dom}(H)\to \mathfrak {F}$ A : dom ( H ) → F (playing the role of the annihilation operator) be H-bounded. Assuming some additional hypotheses on A (so that the creation operator A∗ is a singular perturbation of H), by a twofold application of a resolvent Kreı̆n-type formula, we build self-adjoint realizations $\widehat H$ H ̂ of the formal Hamiltonian H + A∗ + A with $\text {dom}(H)\cap \text {dom}(\widehat H)=\{0\}$ dom ( H ) ∩ dom ( H ̂ ) = { 0 } . We give an explicit characterization of $\text {dom}(\widehat H)$ dom ( H ̂ ) and provide a formula for the resolvent difference $(-\widehat H+z)^{-1}-(-H+z)^{-1}$ ( − H ̂ + z ) − 1 − ( − H + z ) − 1 . Moreover, we consider the problem of the description of $\widehat H$ H ̂ as a (norm resolvent) limit of sequences of the kind $H+A^{*}_{n}+A_{n}+E_{n}$ H + A n ∗ + A n + E n , where the An’s are regularized operators appr...
arXiv (Cornell University), 2020
We show that a densely defined closable operator A such that the resolvent set of A 2 is not empty, is necessarily closed. This result is then extended to the case of a polynomial p(A). We also generalize a recent result by Sebestyén-Tarcsay concerning the converse of a result by J. von Neumann. Other interesting consequences are also given, one of them being a proof that if T is a quasinormal (unbounded) operator such that T n is normal for some n ≥ 2, then T is normal. By a recent result by Pietrzycki-Stochel, we infer that a closed subnormal operator such that T n is normal, must be normal. Another remarkable result is the fact that a hyponormal operator A, bounded or not, such that A p and A q are self-adjoint for some co-prime numbers p and q, is self-adjoint. It is also shown that an invertible operator (bounded or not) A for which A p and A q are normal for some co-prime numbers p and q, is normal. These two results are shown using Bézout's theorem in arithmetic. Notation First, we assume that readers have some familiarity with the standard notions and results in operator theory (see e.g. [17] and [25] for some background). We do recall most of the needed notions though. First, note that in this paper all operators are linear. Let H be a complex Hilbert space and let B(H) be the algebra of all bounded linear operators defined from H into H. If S and T are two linear operators with domains D(S) ⊂ H and D(T) ⊂ H respectively, then T is said to be an extension of S, written S ⊂ T , when D(S) ⊂ D(T) and S and T coincide on D(S). The product ST and the sum S + T of two operators S and T are defined in the usual fashion on the natural domains: D(ST) = {x ∈ D(T) : T x ∈ D(S)} and D(S + T) = D(S) ∩ D(T).
Integral Equations and Operator Theory, 1986
arXiv: Functional Analysis, 2020
In this survey, we shall present characterizations of some distinguished classes of Hilbertian bounded linear operators (namely, normal operators, selfadjoint operators, and unitary operators) in terms of operator inequalities related to the arithmetic-geometric mean inequality. For the class of all normal operators, we shall present new general characterizations.
Linear and Multilinear Algebra, 2011
Let BðH Þ, IðH Þ and UðH Þ be the C Ã-algebra of all bounded linear operators acting on a complex Hilbert space H, the set of all invertible elements in BðH Þ and the class of all unitary operators in BðH Þ, respectively. In this note, we shall show that if S 2 IðH Þ, then the injective norm of S S À1 þ S À1 S in the tensor product space BðH Þ BðH Þ attains its minimal value 2 if and only if S is normal and satisfies the condition j þ j 2 for every , in the spectrum (S) of S. Finally, it is shown that if S 2 IðH Þ, then the inequality kSXS À1 þ S À1 XSk 2kXk holds for all X in BðH Þ if and only if S 2 R Ã UðH Þ.
Linear Algebra and its Applications, 2006
Let T be a bounded linear operator on a complex Hilbert space H. In this paper we introduce the class, denoted QA, of operators satisfying T * |T 2 |T T * |T | 2 T and we prove basic structural properties of these operators. Using these results, we also prove that if E is the Riesz idempotent for a non-zero isolated point λ 0 of the spectrum of T ∈ QA, then E is self-adjoint, and we give a necessary and sufficient condition for T ⊗ S to be in QA when T and S are both non-zero operators.
Linear Algebra and its Applications, 2004
Let B(H) be the C *-algebra of all bounded linear operators on a complex Hilbert space H, S be an invertible and selfadjoint operator in B(H) and let (I,. I) denote a norm ideal of B(H). In this note, we shall show the following inequality:
Filomat, 2019
We prove several numerical radius inequalities for products of two Hilbert space operators. Some of our inequalities improve well-known ones. More precisely, we prove that, if A,B ? B(H) such that A is self-adjoint with ?1 = min ?i ? ?(A) (the spectrum of A) and ?2 = max ?i ? ?(A). Then ?(AB) ?||A||?(B) + (||A|| - |?1 + ?2|/2)DB where DB = inf ??C ||B - ?I||. In particular, if A > 0 and ?(A) ? [k||A||,||A||], then ?(AB) ? (2 - k)||A|| ?(B).
Operator Theory: Advances and Applications, 2005
Journal of the Egyptian Mathematical Society, 2012
Demonstratio Mathematica
In this paper we give a class of finite operators of the form A + K, where A € 2(H) and K is compact. These results are used to generalize the theorem of P.R.Halmos [2, Theorem 7 ] and the result given by J. P. Williams [7, Theorem 5] and we prove that Wo(5a,b) = co<t(6a,b)i where ZUo(5/i,b), co(t(6a,b) denote respectively the numerical range of &a,B an d the convex hull of o(6a b) (the spectrum of Sa,b
Linear and Multilinear Algebra, 2004
W 0 ðR A, B J j Þ where VðÁÞ is the joint spatial numerical range, W 0 ðÁÞ is the algebraic numerical range and J is a norm ideal of BðEÞ: We shall show that this inclusion becomes an equality when R A, B is taken to be a derivation. Also, we deduce that wðU A, B J j Þ ! 2ð ffiffi ffi 2 p À 1ÞwðAÞwðBÞ, for A, B 2 BðEÞ and J is a norm ideal of BðEÞ, where wðÁÞ is the numerical radius. On the other hand, in the particular case when E is a Hilbert space, we shall prove that the lower estimate bound kU A, B jJk ! 2ð ffiffi ffi 2 p À 1ÞkAkkBk holds, if one of the following two conditions is satisfied: (i) J is a standard operator algebra of BðEÞ and A, B 2 J: (ii) J is a norm ideal of BðEÞ and A, B 2 BðEÞ:
Linear Algebra and its Applications, 2005
2021
Basics A few simple examples J. von-Neumann's theorem and explicit constructions by H. Kosaki Matrices of (un)bounded operators Kato's problem and Mc-Intosh counterexample Naimark-Chernoff counterexample References La technique des matrices d'opérateurs non-bornés pour la construction de contre-exemples Laboratoire d'analyse mathématique et applications : LAMA. Département de mathématiques, Université Oran1 Mercredi 03 mars 2021 M. H. Mortad, Laboratoire d'analyse mathématique et applications : LAMA, Université Oran1 Basics A few simple examples J. von-Neumann's theorem and explicit constructions by H. Kosaki Matrices of (un)bounded operators Kato's problem and Mc-Intosh counterexample Naimark-Chernoff counterexample References Table of contents Basics A few simple examples J. von-Neumann's theorem and explicit constructions by H. Kosaki Matrices of (un)bounded operators Kato's problem and Mc-Intosh counterexample Naimark-Chernoff counterexample References M. H. Mortad, Laboratoire d'analyse mathématique et applications : LAMA, Université Oran1 Basics A few simple examples J. von-Neumann's theorem and explicit constructions by H. Kosaki Matrices of (un)bounded operators Kato's problem and Mc-Intosh counterexample Naimark-Chernoff counterexample References Basics M. H. Mortad, Laboratoire d'analyse mathématique et applications : LAMA, Université Oran1 Basics A few simple examples J. von-Neumann's theorem and explicit constructions by H. Kosaki Matrices of (un)bounded operators Kato's problem and Mc-Intosh counterexample Naimark-Chernoff counterexample References Throughout this talk, H designates a complex Hilbert space. Definition 1 Let A be a linear operator with a domain D(A) (which is a linear subspace of H). We say that A is bounded if ∃α ≥ 0, ∀x ∈ D(A) : Ax ≤ α x. Otherwise, we say that A is unbounded. 1. We say that a linear operator B is an extension of another linear operator A, and we write A ⊂ B, if D(A) ⊂ D(B) and ∀x ∈ D(A) : Ax = Bx. 2. If A and B are two operators with domains D(A) and D(B) respectively, then AB is defined by (AB)x := A(Bx). H. Mortad, Laboratoire d'analyse mathématique et applications : LAMA, Université Oran1 Basics A few simple examples J. von-Neumann's theorem and explicit constructions by H. Kosaki Matrices of (un)bounded operators Kato's problem and Mc-Intosh counterexample Naimark-Chernoff counterexample References for each x in the domain D(AB) = {x ∈ D(B) : Bx ∈ D(A)} = B −1 [D(A)]. Similarly, A + B is defined as (A + B)x := Ax + Bx for x in the domain D(A + B) = D(A) ∩ D(B). 3. Let A be a linear operator with a domain D(A) ⊂ H. We say that A is densely defined if D(A) = H. 4. We say that A is closed if its graph G (A) is closed in H × H. 5. Let A be an injective operator (not necessarily bounded) from D(A) into H. Then A −1 : ran(A) → D(A) is called the inverse of A with domain D(A −1) = ran(A).. H. Mortad, Laboratoire d'analyse mathématique et applications : LAMA, Université Oran1 Basics A few simple examples J. von-Neumann's theorem and explicit constructions by H. Kosaki Matrices of (un)bounded operators Kato's problem and Mc-Intosh counterexample Naimark-Chernoff counterexample References. H. Mortad, Laboratoire d'analyse mathématique et applications : LAMA, Université Oran1 Basics A few simple examples J. von-Neumann's theorem and explicit constructions by H. Kosaki Matrices of (un)bounded operators Kato's problem and Mc-Intosh counterexample Naimark-Chernoff counterexample References When A is densely defined, the previous is equivalent to A ⊂ A *. 9. Say that A is self-adjoint if A = A * , that is, if A is symmetric and D(A) = D(A *). 10. Let A be a symmetric operator with domain D(A) ⊂ H. We say that A is positive if < Ax, x >≥ 0, ∀x ∈ D(A). 11. Let A be a densely defined closed operator. The unique positive square root of A * A is called the absolute value of A and we write |A| = (A * A) 1 2. . H. Mortad, Laboratoire d'analyse mathématique et applications : LAMA, Université Oran1 Basics A few simple examples J. von-Neumann's theorem and explicit constructions by H. Kosaki Matrices of (un)bounded operators Kato's problem and Mc-Intosh counterexample Naimark-Chernoff counterexample References A few simple examples M. H. Mortad, Laboratoire d'analyse mathématique et applications : LAMA, Université Oran1 Basics A few simple examples J. von-Neumann's theorem and explicit constructions by H. Kosaki Matrices of (un)bounded operators Kato's problem and Mc-Intosh counterexample Naimark-Chernoff counterexample References
Journal of Functional Analysis, 2014
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.