Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
Before an interview for an internship position, a student imagines the conversation she is to have with the interviewer. She considers questions he may pose and prepares appropriate answers accordingly. In a different setting, a teenager may repeat a conversation he held with a classmate he admires, hoping to decode a love hint or fi nd a concealed message. Such examples, which occur across cultures on a daily basis, testify to the pervasiveness of a communication phenomenon we refer to as intrapersonal communication. In this chapter, we examine the following fundamental questions: “How can intrapersonal communication be operationalized into discrete variables that are manipulated and measured?” “How is intrapersonal communication linked with interpersonal communication and out- comes?” We briefly review some conceptualizations of intrapersonal communication followed by a discussion of the construct of imagined interactions. Imaginedinteractions have been used to operationalize the study of intrapersonal communication in terms of cognition and message processing. The importance of physiological correlates of intrapersonal communication variables is discussed as a method for refl ecting process. Finally, a study is proposed exploring the association between physiological variables and imagined interaction variables among intimate couples.
The present article analyzes imagined interactions in message selection and interpretation and in interpersonal relationships. Imagined interactions help develop cognitive structures. Distinctions between imagined interactions and fantasy are discussed as well as methodological procedures used to collect imagined interaction data.
Frontiers in Psychology, 2020
Communication Reports, 1990
In this chapter, I will discuss the assumption of imagined interaction theory, how communication is conceptualized in the theory, strengths and limitations of the theory, and directions for future research. The common acronym for imagined interactions is IIs. Individuals may become angry as they relive old conflicts in their minds as well as feel happiness while imagining positive encounters. Imagined interactions serve multiple functions including maintaining relationships and managing conflict. Our expectancies for interpersonal communication encounters emanates from imagined interactions through replaying images from the electronic media as well as conversations with parents, siblings, peers, or novels.
Social Behavior and Personality, 2004
Two experiments examined several variables that influence first impressions between previously unacquainted, opposite gender participants. The first experiment investigated the relationship among measures of extroversion, cheerfulness, and attractiveness during a first encounter. Results showed that measures of attractiveness did not correlate with measures of extroversion and cheerfulness. The second experiment examined galvanic skin response (GSR) from male and female couples engaged in conversation. The results showed a significant direct relationship between the electrical conductivity of the skin for 10 pairs of participants who were engaged in a simple conversation. The first impression is the perception of another that is formed during a first encounter. Several studies have indicated that attractiveness and extroversion are the most important predictors of the first impression (
Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 2000
Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior, 1977
This paper examines two distinct theoretical descriptions of dyadic communication, the distance-equilibrium and reciprocity formulations, and shows that they carry divergent implications for changes that can occur in interpersonal relations. A review of relevant studies reveals ample support of each model. Reciprocity effects, first identified in disclosure research, also obtain for nonverbal aspects of interaction. Similarly, compensation effects initially discovered for nonverbal research also apply to disclosure. Several suggestions are considered toward reconciling these theories by delimiting their spheres of applicability. These include (a) the mediating role of attraction, (b) the tempo and perception of control over distance change, and (c) initial differences in the level of verbal and nonverbal variables.
A review of dimensional research on the perception of behavior and personality, on nonverbal and verbal communication, as well as on feelings is undertaken which reveals a basic similarity in the three dimensions of affiliation, power, and activation. These parallels seem to be based on causal connections and they are interpreted as an evolutionary development for coordination needs between persons. They represent the fundamental dimensions of interaction and communication, as can be revealed from the logic of exchange theories as well as from symbolic interactionism. Thus, they form a universal socio-emotional space which guides individual orientation socialized in line with the surrounding culture. Based on this review, a broad array of proposals for future research is derived. Taking these parallels and all three dimensions seriously into account seems to be very promising for integrative theory building within and beyond social psychology.
2018
Die Frage, wie Paare (im Alter von 19-26 Jahren) Kritik und Andeutungen moglicher Untreue in naturlichen Interaktionen genutzt haben mit dem Ziel, auf kreative und indirekte Weise Nahe herzustellen, war Gegenstand der hier vorgestellten diskursanalytischen Studie. Ausgangspunkt war das vermehrte Vorliegen von Forschungsarbeiten, denen zufolge vordergrundig strittige Interaktionen zwischen jungen Paaren weniger feindlich intendiert waren, sondern als spielerische Methoden, um Verbundenheit zum Ausdruck zu bringen. Im Beitrag zeige ich, dass Kritik oft relativ (geschlechts-) stereotyp formuliert und witzelnd beantwortet wurde z.B. durch die Nutzung von Ironie, Lachen, Umdeutungen, durch abrupte Gedankensprungen und Themenwechsel – allesamt Strategien, die halfen, mogliche feindseile Konnotation abzumildern. In ahnlicher Weise wurden Anspielungen auf Untreue oft in Interaktionspausen eingebracht, eine knappe und effektive Weise, der anderen Person zu signalisieren, dass dies in vora...
Communication is an essential process for human survival. Exchanging ideas, emotions, information and thoughts etc. between two or more people is called communication. Even though aforementioned, communication can happen individually. Here we are going to discuss those two types. The whole communication process, especially human communication can be classified into two parts. They are, Interpersonal communication Intrapersonal communication Those two types depend on participants who involve in the communication process. The communication which is happening within a person, him or herself individually, is called "Intrapersonal communication" (Intra = within). In that case, there is only one person as a participant. Forms of intrapersonal communication can be spoken, written or just random thoughts. It takes place in our minds. Through the intrapersonal communication process, we can solve only complex or simple problems in our head or plan our next step or analyze our thought process. Self-talking, visualization, the art of imagination, recall and other types of internal vocalization are included in this type. Rethinking and overthinking is also there. Apart from that, communicating ideas, thoughts and feelings etc. with two or more people is considered "Interpersonal communication" (Inter = between). There may be two or more participants and verbal or non-verbal. However, there are many differences between interpersonal and intrapersonal communication. Now we are going to discuss them.
Empirical research has revealed a variety of differences in the communication behavior of males and females. This study addresses whether males and females think differently about communication. Imagined interactions are cognitive representations of interactive behavior in which the actor experiences the self to be engaged in communication with another. Results of a study reveal that females have more frequent and pleasant imagined interactions, they imagine more self-words, and they are more likely to imagine and recall the scene of imagined interactions than males.
Research has revealed that individuals vay in their philosophy about marriage in terms of the amount of sharing and communication that is expected in the relationship. This study examined individual dzperences as a function of gender, marital status (engaged, married) and marital orientation (traditional, independent) on beliefs about talk based on afuncfionai approach and reports of various characteristics of imagined interactions (selftalk). A factor analysis was conducted on beliefs about thefunctions of talk with the relational partner and in social situations. There were 4 dimensions for talkfunctions: equality of power, talk about daily events, use of small talk to avoid discussion of conftict, and the enjoyment of serious discussion. Regression models were tested to predict relational satisfactionon the basis of talk functions and characteristics of internal dialogues that included thefrequency ofinternal dialogues, discrepancy, pleasantness, specificity, variety, compensation, and rehearsal. Results revealed differences as a consequence of gender, marital status, and orientation.
An initial program of research examining imagined interactions in everyday life is describe. Imagined interactions are a type of cognition in which individuals imagine themselves having dialogue with others. They reflect a type of imagery in which communicators experience various message strategies with others. A multidimensional instrument reflecting imagined interaction characteristics has resulted in eight dimensions of imagined interaction features. Imagined interactions may serve a variety of functions including rehearsal, increasing self-understanding, and catharsis in the form of tension relief from anxiety-producing situations. Therapeutic benefits also accrue from imagined interactions.
This study examines imagined interactions (IIs) among young adults in the United States, Thailand, and Japan. A comparison of means across cultures on II characteristics reveals that the Japanese participants have the widest variety of II partners, whereas the American participants are the most self-dominant in their IIs and demonstrate the most II frequency. As for II functions, Japanese and Thai participants keep conflict alive via their IIs more than the Americans, whereas the Thais utilize the II rehearsal and self-understanding functions the least. The Japanese participants use the II boldness function, which focuses on escaping from societal norms via one’s IIs, more than the Thais and Americans.
The notion of "imagined interaction" is introduced as part ofthe social cognition process. Imagined interactions serve several functions including rehearsal for anticipated encounters. Results ofa study indicate that imagined interactions tend to occur before real interactions, are dominated by the self, and are equally pleasant and unpleasant. Topics and partners are primarily relational. Imagined interactions may be dysfunctional for lonely individuals. Findings are related to theories of interpersonal communication and cognitive structuring, and implications for future studies are evaluated.
Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 2001
Gottman's (1990, 1991; Gottman and Levenson, 1988) psychophysiologic model of marital interaction was tested in 60 married couples. Participants were classified as avoiders or initiators of relationship problem discussions by trained coders observing videotaped semistructured interviews. Blood pressure (BP) and heart rate reactivity was assessed during the cold pressor test, during a mental math test, while watching a marital argument on video, and during a conjoint interview. As hypothesized, avoiders had significantly greater systolic BP reactivity during the interview. Additionally, husbands who interacted with avoider wives had significantly greater diastolic and systolic BP reactivity than did husbands of initiator wives. Initiator husbands, in particular, who were married to avoider wives had greater systolic BP reactivity. These results both support Gottman's psychophysiologic model and suggest modifications of it.
Intrapersonal communication satisfaction was regressed on a type of intrapersonal communication known as imagined interactions (IIs) in which people daydream about talking with others who are important in their lives. This study examined the functions of IIs impacting intrapersonal communication satisfaction and measures of cultural patterns in America, Japan, and Thailand. Additionally, cultural patterns were examined. Horizontal individualism is a cultural pattern in which the self is independent but is equal in status with others. Vertical individualism is a pattern characterized by an autonomous self but there are differences in authority, based on status, low equality, and high freedom. Horizontal collectivism is a pattern in which the self is seen as equal in status with others. Vertical collectivism is a pattern characterized by the self being connected with other group members and inequality is accepted. Results revealed that intrapersonal communication satisfaction was predicted by imagined interactions that serve a self-understanding, catharsis, and boldness function. Horizontal collectivism also predicted communication satisfaction for Thai participants. Results are discussed in terms of the importance and functions of conflict-linkage and rumination.
Southern Communication Journal, 2015
Using data from 485 college student participants, this study investigated relations among mental representations of conversations and listening behaviors. Results showed low usage of Imagined Interactions (IIs) for rehearsal and self-understanding and high usage of IIs as compensation for interaction were associated with lower reported scores on active-empathic responding. In describing IIs, low levels of proactivity and variety were associated with low reported levels of AEL processing and responding behaviors, suggesting individuals who do not engage in IIs before conversations or imagine a variety of potential conversations to gain understanding do not report engaging in behaviors that act to acknowledge their partners in conversation. The primary contribution of these findings is to forward an empirical integration of intrapersonal and listening research and theory.
Psychological Reports, 1966
This report presents a set of stimulus materials for use in research on interpersonal exchange and self-disclosure. The naterip.ls include 671 statements about various aspects of the self which have been scaled for "intimacy" by Judges from two different populations. The stimuli are grouped according to thirteen topical categories e.g., religion, family, money, and property, etc. The item pool was developed in connection with a research program we are conducting on social penetration processes which occur in the development and dissolution of interpersonal relationships (see Altman and Haythorn, 1965; Frankfurt, 1965) Taylor, 1965;for a summary of the theoretical position and representative research studies). A general hypothesis of the approach is that Interpersonal relationships develop systematically
Communication Quarterly, 1992
Imagined interactions, internal dialogues experienced as conversations with significant others, are conceptualized as a form of social cognition. Imagined interactions have important affective components and mental imagery. Results of an investigation demonstrate that verbal imagery is associated with self-dominance, rehearsal and understanding while visual imagery is associated with more pleasantness. Pleasant imagined interactions are lower in self-dominance and more similar to actual communication than unpleasant imagined interactions. The results are explained in terms of information processing and relational communication; two categories of imagined interaction reflecting verbal and mixed imagery are also proposed.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.