Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Intrapersonal communication and imagined interaction

Abstract

Before an interview for an internship position, a student imagines the conversation she is to have with the interviewer. She considers questions he may pose and prepares appropriate answers accordingly. In a different setting, a teenager may repeat a conversation he held with a classmate he admires, hoping to decode a love hint or fi nd a concealed message. Such examples, which occur across cultures on a daily basis, testify to the pervasiveness of a communication phenomenon we refer to as intrapersonal communication. In this chapter, we examine the following fundamental questions: “How can intrapersonal communication be operationalized into discrete variables that are manipulated and measured?” “How is intrapersonal communication linked with interpersonal communication and out- comes?” We briefly review some conceptualizations of intrapersonal communication followed by a discussion of the construct of imagined interactions. Imaginedinteractions have been used to operationalize the study of intrapersonal communication in terms of cognition and message processing. The importance of physiological correlates of intrapersonal communication variables is discussed as a method for refl ecting process. Finally, a study is proposed exploring the association between physiological variables and imagined interaction variables among intimate couples.

Key takeaways

  • After literal processing takes place, listeners usually refl ect on what has been said, and if manifested as confl ict in the form of imagined interactions, it can lead to a concept called "mulling."
  • In terms of its axioms, the theory assumes that an interpersonal relationship is maintained and developed through thinking and dwelling on a relationship partner outside of actual conversations and that managing confl ict begins at the intrapersonal level of communication in terms of IIs.
  • Hence, the physiology of intrapersonal communication is addressed in terms of managing ongoing confl ict with intimates, rivals, work associates, or family members.
  • H 3 : There will be physiological correlates of imagined interaction and actual conversation.
  • The following dimensions of IIs are measured: rehearsal, discrepancy, catharsis, confl ict management, relational management.