Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Old Testament exegesis: Reflections on methodology

2007, HTS Theological Studies/Teologiese Studies

Abstract
sparkles

AI

The paper explores methodologies for interpreting the Old Testament, emphasizing its historical complexity and the various hands involved in its textual evolution. It critiques fundamentalist approaches that create divisions between faith and science, advocating for an understanding of biblical texts as historical documents shaped by specific contexts. The discussion highlights the importance of integrating scientific knowledge into biblical interpretation to bridge gaps and promote a more nuanced understanding of the scripture.

Key takeaways

  • Exegetes should approach an OT text in a similar manner, should they endeavour to do justice to the text.
  • What holds for all fields of study of the Hebrew Bible/Old Testament, holds no less for the interpretation of the Psalms: in recent decades traditional hypotheses and methods have undergone such a process of refinement that they have practically disintegrated (Berges 1999:118-138;Berges 2000:167-198;Zenger 1994:37-54).
  • It may be that some scholars try to find a way out of the dilemma of modern historical-critical exegesis (with its masses of hypotheses) by falling back upon an (only) unhistorical synchronic reading of the "given" text, which has the danger of falling into the trap of a fundamentalistic reading of the text.
  • They interpret the text without taking note of the historical authors' intentions, or even the question of how the text could have developed historically.
  • Given the discussion so far, the difference between diachronic and synchronic analyses of the Pentateuch can be summarised as follows: exegetes who work diachronically are looking for a text behind the text and a truth in these texts behind the given text.