Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Comparative millet terminologies and archeology

Abstract

Language is not only a vehicle for the transmission of culture, but a culture medium of a sort on which culture thrives and is preserved simultaneously. The strength of language data is its amenability to analysis devoid of sentiments. If analysed with the right tool, it can "unearth" rich and refreshing cultural history in the "fashion" of archaeology. This paper will illustrate and review the methodology. The link between archaeology and linguistics in Nigeria is yet to reach the level that will be obvious to practitioners from both disciplines. However, there are positive developments that we need to be aware. Recent findings from archaeology in Nigeria and elsewhere are closing up the gap scholars have hoped for. Historical linguistics attempts to locate probable homelands for speakers of languages that are represented by genetic family trees. Archaeology is expected to follow up on such a lead to find historical evidence of the material culture of the peoples who inhabited the probable homelands. The use of the simple technique of floatation in archaeology for processing soil samples from excavation sites is a breakthrough. The analysis of such samples from Southern Kaduna in the cradle of the Nok complex has yielded an array of seeds of ancient crops. The existence of bulrush millet from the Nok archaeological finds and elsewhere has the potential of confirming or refuting claims of historical linguistics.