Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Family therapy and family medicine

1983

Abstract

This book by Andolfi and his colleagues at the Rome Family Therapy Institute joins an emergent genre in family therapy literature, the integration of theoretical schools and therapeutic styles. This integration is often around a particular theme, and for Andolfi and the Rome group the focus is rigid or "monster" families such as those with schizophrenic and anorectic index patients. The process of seeing such families as a team for eight years is the crucible in which their viewpoint developed. Two themes run through the book. The first theme is the importance of the individual's attempts to define a personal identity and personal space within the context of a relational system. Emphasis on the individual is more pronounced here than in most family systems literature and reflects the group's roots in psychoanalysis. Their language is complex and sometimes stilted, making for difficult reading in places. In a recent conversation about the book, Anna Nicolò-Corigliano said to me, "This is a very dangerous book to read in beddangerous to the book." I'm sure she was referring to the first two theoretical chapters, which are probably best reread after finishing the rest of the volume. Its many clinical examples will make the opening section more understandable the second time around. The authors' second theme is their emphasis on a central metaphor for each family; this is the fulcrum around which the therapist operates. "It is precisely through countering the image furnished by the family with an alternative that the therapist is able to release the tension which sustains the therapeutic process" (p. 17). The authors emphasize that the metaphor emerges from the family and is reworked by the therapist to create an alternative image. The primary therapeutic goals of alternative metaphors are (a) to emphasize the centrality of the patient in maintaining the system, while (b) portraying the symptomatic behavior as voluntary rather than involuntary. This specificity of goals is, in itself, a major contribution to understanding the use of metaphors. The authors also emphasize the importance of making powerful therapeutic moves quickly, before the therapist's role can be neutralized by the system. On the other hand, they note that this may increase the risk of early termination; more discussion of this point would have been welcome. Chapters 4 and 5 are the heart of the book. They delineate the role of the strategic therapist in providing a homeostatic anchor that permits the family to start changing. These chapters also describe predictable stages in the middle sessions of strategic therapy requiring an initial restraint from change and a gradual disengagement from the therapist. The authors show the importance of a powerful relationship between the therapist and the family, and demonstrate the intensity of affect that flows from effective strategic intervention. This is doubly welcome in view of the customary emphasis on technique alone in publications on strategic therapy. This book is not for the beginner. It assumes a strong theoretical background and focuses on the most difficult treatment populations. Andolfi's therapeutic style and that of the group reflects the influence of Whitaker and of the more provocative, experiential therapists. They neglect to note, however, that their ideas may also be implemented in less flamboyant style. They also omit what would have been a useful discussion on applying their approach to less rigid families. In summary, this is a useful and thoughtful contribution to the emerging integrationist literature. It is worthy of both the reader's perseverence and of the eight years of team work that went into its creation.