Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2020
A signed edge domination function (or SEDF) of a simple graph $G=(V,E)$ is a function $f: E\rightarrow \{1,-1\}$ such that $\sum_{e'\in N[e]}f(e')\ge 1$ holds for each edge $e\in E$, where $N[e]$ is the set of edges in $G$ which have at least one common end with $e$. Let $\gamma_s'(G)$ denote the minimum value of $f(G)$ among all SEDFs $f$, where $f(G)=\sum_{e\in E}f(e)$. In 2005, Xu conjectured that $\gamma_s'(G)\le n-1$. This conjecture has been proved for the two cases $v_{odd}(G)=0$ and $v_{even}(G)=0$, where $v_{odd}(G)$ (resp. $v_{even}(G)$) is the number of odd (resp. even) vertices in $G$. This article proves Xu's conjecture for $v_{even}(G)\in \{1, 2\}$. We also show that for any simple graph $G$ of order $n$, $\gamma_s'(G)\le n+v_{odd}(G)/2$ and $\gamma_s'(G)\le n-2+v_{even}(G)$ when $v_{even}(G)>0$, and thus $\gamma_s'(G)\le (4n-2)/3$. Our result improves the known results $\gamma_s'(G)\le 11n/6-1$ and $\gamma_s'(G)\le \lceil 3n/...
Graphs and Combinatorics, 2008
The closed neighborhood N G [e] of an edge e in a graph G is the set consisting of e and of all edges having an end-vertex in common with e. Let f be a function on E(G), the edge set of G, into the set {−1, 1}. If $\sum_{x\in N[e]}f(x) \geq 1$ for each e ∈ E(G), then f is called a signed edge dominating function of G. The signed edge domination number γ s ′(G) of G is defined as $\gamma_s^\prime(G) = {\text{min}}\{\sum_{e\in E(G)}f(e)\mid f \,\text{is an SEDF of} G\}$ . Recently, Xu proved that γ s ′(G) ≥ |V(G)| − |E(G)| for all graphs G without isolated vertices. In this paper we first characterize all simple connected graphs G for which γ s ′(G) = |V(G)| − |E(G)|. This answers Problem 4.2 of [4]. Then we classify all simple connected graphs G with precisely k cycles and γ s ′(G) = 1 − k, 2 − k.
Discrete Mathematics, 2009
Let γ ′ s (G) be the signed edge domination number of G. In 2006, Xu conjectured that: for any 2-connected graph G of order n(n ≥ 2), γ ′ s (G) ≥ 1. In this article we show that this conjecture is not true. More precisely, we show that for any positive integer m, there exists an m-connected graph G such that γ ′ s (G) ≤ − m 6 |V (G)|. Also for every two natural numbers m and n, we determine γ ′ s (K m,n ), where K m,n is the complete bipartite graph with part sizes m and n. *
Discrete Mathematics, 2009
A set S of vertices in a graph G is a dominating set of G if every vertex of V (G)\S is adjacent to some vertex in S. The minimum cardinality of a dominating set of G is the domination number of G, denoted as γ (G). Let P n and C n denote a path and a cycle, respectively, on n vertices. Let k 1 (F) and k 2 (F) denote the number of components of a graph F that are isomorphic to a graph in the family {P 3 , P 4 , P 5 , C 5 } and {P 1 , P 2 }, respectively. Let L be the set of vertices of G of degree more than 2, and let G − L be the graph obtained from G by deleting the vertices in L and all edges incident with L. McCuaig and Shepherd [W. McCuaig, B. Shepherd, Domination in graphs with minimum degree two, J. Graph Theory 13 (1989) 749-762] showed that if G is a connected graph of order n ≥ 8 with δ(G) ≥ 2, then γ (G) ≤ 2n/5, while Reed [B.A. Reed, Paths, stars and the number three, Combin. Probab. Comput. 5 (1996) 277-295] showed that if G is a graph of order n with δ(G) ≥ 3, then γ (G) ≤ 3n/8. As an application of Reed's result, we show that if G is a graph of order n ≥ 14 with δ(G) ≥ 2, then γ (G) ≤ 3 8 n + 1 8 k 1 (G − L) + 1 4 k 2 (G − L).
Journal of Graph Theory, 2009
A balloon in a graph G is a maximal 2-edge-connected subgraph incident to exactly one cut-edge of G. Let b(G) be the number of balloons, let c(G) be the number of cut-edges, and let α ′ (G) be the maximum size of a matching. Let F n,r be the family of connected (2r + 1)-regular graphs with n vertices, and let b = max{b(G) : G ∈ F n,r }. For G ∈ F n,r , we prove the sharp inequalities c(G) ≤ r(n−2)−2 2r 2 +2r−1 − 1 and α ′ (G) ≥ n 2 − rb 2r+1. Using b ≤ (2r−1)n+2 4r 2 +4r−2 , we obtain a simple proof of the bound α ′ (G) ≥ n 2 − r 2 (2r−1)n+2 (2r+1)(2r 2 +2r−1) proved by Henning and Yeo. For each of these bounds and each r, the approach using balloons allows us to determine the infinite family where equality holds. For the total domination number γ t (G) of a cubic graph, we prove γ t (G) ≤ n 2 − b(G) 2 (except that γ t (G) may be n/2 − 1 when b(G) = 3 and the balloons cover all but one vertex). With α ′ (G) ≥ n 2 − b(G) 3 for cubic graphs, this improves the known inequality γ t (G) ≤ α ′ (G).
Electronic Notes in Discrete Mathematics, 2002
Let G = (V , E) be a simple graph on vertex set V and define a function f : V → {−1, 1}. The function f is a signed dominating function if for every vertex x ∈ V , the closed neighborhood of x contains more vertices with function value 1 than with −1. The signed domination number of G, γ s (G), is the minimum weight of a signed dominating function on G. We give a sharp lower bound on the signed domination number of a general graph with a given minimum and maximum degree, generalizing a number of previously known results. Using similar techniques we give upper and lower bounds for the signed domination number of some simple graph products: the grid P j × P k , C j × P k and C j × C k . For fixed width, these bounds differ by only a constant.
Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal, 2008
The open neighborhood N G (e) of an edge e in a graph G is the set consisting of all edges having a common end-vertex with e.
The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics, 2011
For a graph $G$, let $\gamma(G)$ denote the domination number of $G$ and let $\delta(G)$ denote the minimum degree among the vertices of $G$. A vertex $x$ is called a bad-cut-vertex of $G$ if $G-x$ contains a component, $C_x$, which is an induced $4$-cycle and $x$ is adjacent to at least one but at most three vertices on $C_x$. A cycle $C$ is called a special-cycle if $C$ is a $5$-cycle in $G$ such that if $u$ and $v$ are consecutive vertices on $C$, then at least one of $u$ and $v$ has degree $2$ in $G$. We let ${\rm bc}(G)$ denote the number of bad-cut-vertices in $G$, and ${\rm sc}(G)$ the maximum number of vertex disjoint special-cycles in $G$ that contain no bad-cut-vertices. We say that a graph is $(C_4,C_5)$-free if it has no induced $4$-cycle or $5$-cycle. Bruce Reed [Paths, stars and the number three. Combin. Probab. Comput. 5 (1996), 277–295] showed that if $G$ is a graph of order $n$ with $\delta(G) \ge 3$, then $\gamma(G) \le 3n/8$. In this paper, we relax the minimum de...
2008
Let G = (V,E) be a simple graph. A set S ⊆ V is a dominating set of graph G, if every vertex in V − S is adjacent to at least one vertex in S. The domination number γ(G) is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set in G. It is well known that if e ∈ E(G), then γ(G−e)−1 ≤ γ(G) ≤ γ(G−e). In this paper, as an application of this inequality, we obtain the domination number of some certain graphs.
Journal of Combinatorial Theory, 2001
Theory and Applications of Graphs, 2016
For any graph G = (V, E), a subset S ⊆ V dominates G if all vertices are contained in the closed neighborhood of S, that is N [S] = V. The minimum cardinality over all such S is called the domination number, written γ(G). In 1963, V.G. Vizing conjectured that γ(G H) ≥ γ(G)γ(H) where stands for the Cartesian product of graphs. In this note, we define classes of graphs An, for n ≥ 0, so that every graph belongs to some such class, and A0 corresponds to class A of Bartsalkin and German. We prove that for any graph G in class A1, γ(G H) ≥ γ(G) − γ(G) γ(H).
Electronic Journal of Graph Theory and Applications, 2016
A nonnegative signed dominating function (NNSDF) of a graph G is a function f from the vertex set V (G) to the set {−1, 1} such that u∈N [v] f (u) ≥ 0 for every vertex v ∈ V (G). The nonnegative signed domination number of G, denoted by γ N N s (G), is the minimum weight of a nonnegative signed dominating function on G. In this paper, we establish some sharp lower bounds on the nonnegative signed domination number of graphs in terms of their order, size and maximum and minimum degree.
International Journal of Computing Algorithm, 2014
A signed graph based on F is an ordinary graph F with each edge marked as positive or negative. Such a graph is called balanced if each of its cycles includes an even number of negative edges. We find the domination set on the vertices, on bipartite graphs and show that graphs has domination Number on signed graphs, such that a signed graph G may be converted into a balanced graph by changing the signs of d edges. We investigate the number D(F) defined as the largest d(G) such that G is a signed graph based on F. If F is the completebipartite graph with t vertices in each part, then D(f)≤ ½ t²-for some positive constant c.
Discrete Mathematics, 2004
Let G = (V, E) be a simple graph on vertex set V and define a function f : V → {−1, 1}. The function f is a signed dominating function if for every vertex x ∈ V , the closed neighborhood of x contains more vertices with function value 1 than with −1. The signed domination number of G, γ s (G), is the minimum weight of a signed dominating function on G.
For any graph $G=(V,E)$, a subset $S\subseteq V$ $dominates$ $G$ if all vertices are contained in the closed neighborhood of $S$, that is $N[S]=V$. The minimum cardinality over all such $S$ is called the domination number, written $\gamma(G)$. In 1963, V.G. Vizing conjectured that $\gamma(G \square H) \geq \gamma(G)\gamma(H)$ where $\square$ stands for the Cartesian product of graphs. In this note, we prove that if $\left|G\right|\geq \gamma(G)\gamma(H)$ and $\left|H\right|\geq \gamma(G)\gamma(H)$, then the conjecture holds. This result quickly implies Vizing's conjecture for almost all pairs of graphs $G,H$ with $\left|G\right|\geq \left|H\right|$, satisfying $\left|G\right|\leq q^{\frac{\left|H\right|}{\log_q\left|H\right|}}$ for $q=\frac{1}{1-p}$ and $p$ the edge probability of the Erd\H{o}s-R\'enyi random graph.
2017
Let $kgeq 1$ be an integer, and $G=(V,E)$ be a finite and simplegraph. The closed neighborhood $N_G[e]$ of an edge $e$ in a graph$G$ is the set consisting of $e$ and all edges having a commonend-vertex with $e$. A signed Roman edge $k$-dominating function(SREkDF) on a graph $G$ is a function $f:E rightarrow{-1,1,2}$ satisfying the conditions that (i) for every edge $e$of $G$, $sum _{xin N[e]} f(x)geq k$ and (ii) every edge $e$for which $f(e)=-1$ is adjacent to at least one edge $e'$ forwhich $f(e')=2$. The minimum of the values $sum_{ein E}f(e)$,taken over all signed Roman edge $k$-dominating functions $f$ of$G$, is called the signed Roman edge $k$-domination number of $G$and is denoted by $gamma'_{sRk}(G)$. In this paper we establish some new bounds on the signed Roman edge $k$-domination number.
2011
In this paper, we determine the value of complementary signed domination number for some special class of graphs. We also determine bounds for this parameter and exhibit the sharpness of the bounds. We also characterize graphs attaining the bounds in some special classes.
2011
v∈V f(v). The complementary signed domination number of G is defined as γcs(G) = min {w(f) : f is a minimal complementary signed dominating function of G}. In this paper, we determine the value of complementary signed domination number for some special class of graphs. We also determine bounds for this parameter and exhibit the sharpness of the bounds. We also characterize graphs attaining the bounds in some special classes.
arXiv: Combinatorics, 2019
In a graph $G$, a vertex dominates itself and its neighbors. A subset $D \subseteq V(G)$ is a double dominating set of $G$ if $D$ dominates every vertex of $G$ at least twice. A signed graph $\Sigma = (G,\sigma)$ is a graph $G$ together with an assignment $\sigma$ of positive or negative signs to all its edges. A cycle in a signed graph is positive if the product of its edge signs is positive. A signed graph is balanced if all its cycles are positive. A subset $D \subseteq V(\Sigma)$ is a double dominating set of $\Sigma$ if it satisfies the following conditions: (i) $D$ is a double dominating set of $G$, and (ii) $\Sigma[D:V \setminus D]$ is balanced, where $\Sigma[D:V \setminus D]$ is the subgraph of $\Sigma$ induced by the edges of $\Sigma$ with one end point in $D$ and the other end point in $V \setminus D$. The cardinality of a minimum double dominating set of $\Sigma$ is the double domination number $\gamma_{\times 2}(\Sigma)$. In this paper, we give bounds for the double domi...
Opuscula Mathematica, 2016
Let G = (V, E) be a simple graph. A function f : V → {−1, 1} is called an inverse signed total dominating function if the sum of its function values over any open neighborhood is at most zero. The inverse signed total domination number of G, denoted by γ 0 st (G), equals to the maximum weight of an inverse signed total dominating function of G. In this paper, we establish upper bounds on the inverse signed total domination number of graphs in terms of their order, size and maximum and minimum degrees.
Let G be a graph with vertex set V(G). A function f:V(G)→{-1,1} is a signed dominating function of G if, for each vertex of G, the sum of the values of its neighbors and itself is positive. The signed domination number of a graph G, denoted γ s (G), is the minimum value of ∑ u∈V(G) f(v) over all the signed dominating functions f of G. The signed reinforcement number of G, denoted R s (G), is defined to be the minimum cardinality |S| of a set S of edges such that γ s (G+S)<γ s (G). In this paper, we initialize the study of signed reinforcement number and determine the exact values of R s (G) for several classes of graphs.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.