Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Research and Teaching on Law Faculties: An Empirical Exploration

1998, Chicago Kent Law Review

Abstract

CHICAGO-KENT LAW REVIEW Almost all had tenure. 8 I included the entire population in the study, rather than sampling population members. 9 These professors have established their scholarly reputations and teaching credentials, allowing examination of any relationship between these two academic tasks. Yet the population is junior enough to represent new trends in the legal academy. Probing the relationship between teaching and research in this junior population also allowed me to search for any negative association in a context where it might be most visible; previous scholars have hypothesized that any negative correlation between teaching and research would be most pronounced during the early years, when professors are learning to balance those two tasks. 10 B. Dependent Variables: Primary Measures of Teaching and Research Excellent teaching and research take many forms, and many of those forms are difficult to quantify. For this study, I did not attempt to analyze all aspects of excellent instruction or scholarship. Instead, I selected three measures of scholarship and two of teaching that indicate different types of success in those endeavors. By analyzing associations among these variables, as well as among these primary nal citations in both Shepard's Law Review Citations and the Social Science Citation Index. See id. at 786. For a full description of their method, see id. at 786-92. The top-20 journals, according to the Lindgren and Seltzer list, are the