Molecular Biology of Axon Guidance

Cell, 1995

The guidance of axons to their targets represents a key stage in the assembly of the nervous system, linking the early inductive interactions that establish neuronal identity to the later steps of synapse formation. Neurons are required to extend axons through a variety of cellular environments, and the task of perceiving, integrating, and responding to the myriad signals present in the immediate vicinity of the axon falls to the growth cone, a sensory and motor apparatus located at the distal tip of the developing axon. Attempts to unravel the mechanisms of axonal guidance have centered on four main issues: the cellular strategies used to influence the rate of extension and the orientation of growth cones; the nature of molecules in the local environment of the axon that control growth cone behavior; the identity of receptors on the surface of growth cones that respond to these guidance cues; and the intracellular machinery that integrates multiple extracellular signals to produce the coordinated and directed response of growth cone navigation.

F1000 biology reports, 2009

One of the challenges to understanding nervous system development is to establish how a fairly limited number of axon guidance cues can set up the patterning of very complex nervous systems. Most of the recent insights relevant to guidance mechanisms have come from cell biologists focusing on processes and molecular machinery controlling the guidance responses in the growth cone.

Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 2006

The intricate connections of the nervous system are established, in part, by elongating axonal fibers that are directed by complex guidance systems to home in on their specific targets. The growth cone, the major motile apparatus at the tip of axons, explores its surroundings and steers the axon along a defined path to its appropriate target. Significant progress has been made in identifying the guidance molecules and receptors that regulate growth cone pathfinding, the signaling cascades underlying distinct growth cone behaviors, and the cytoskeletal components that give rise to the directional motility of the growth cone. Recent studies have also shed light on the sophisticated mechanisms and new players utilized by the growth cone during pathfinding. It is clear that axon pathfinding requires a growth cone to sample and integrate various signals both in space and in time, and subsequently to coordinate the dynamics of its membrane, cytoskeleton and adhesion to generate specific responses.

Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 2002

Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 2007

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2000

It is generally assumed that gradients of chemotropic molecules are instrumental to the wiring of the nervous system. Recently, two members of the secreted class III semaphorin protein family have been implicated as repulsive (Sema3A) and attractive (Sema3C) guidance molecules for cortical axons (). Here, we show that stabilized gradients of increasing semaphorin concentrations elicit stereotyped responses from cortical growth cones, independent of the absolute concentration and the slope of these gradients. In contrast, neither repulsive effects of Sema3A nor attractive effects of Sema3C were observed when axons were growing toward decreasing semaphorin concentrations. Thus, growth cone guidance by gradients of chemotropic molecules is robust and reproducible, because it is primarily independent of the exact dimensions of the gradients.

Seminars in Neuroscience, 1991

The potential importance of contact inhibition for neural development and regeneration has only recently been recognised. Growth cones have been shown to undergo abrupt collapse following contact with various cell types in vitro, including other neurons, and the collapse phenomenon is now being exploited to isolate and characterise the relevant molecules. Identifying the underlying mechanisms, which may involve ligand-receptor interactions, will be necessary for a full understanding of both axon guidance and the failure of axons to regenerate in the CNS of higher vertebrates. Key words : contact inhibition / glycoconjugates / growth cone / nerve regeneration / neural development CONTACT inhibition of cell movement has been a familiar phenomenon since its original description in fibroblast cultures by Abercrombie and Heaysman in 1954. 1 Only more recently, however, have neurobiologists begun seriously to consider the possibility that contact inhibition at nerve endings may play an important role in shaping the developing and mature nervous system. 2 It is easy to suggest (as we do below) that developmental processes such as axon guidance, synapse formation and synapse elimination may involve inhibitory as well as adhesive interactions. It is also possible that the failure of regeneration in the mature CNS of higher vertebrates results, at least in part, from inhibitory interactions between axons and their immediate environment. Our purpose here is to show that there is now strong evidence that inhibitory or repulsive interactions are implicated in neural development and regeneration, that this is apparent in several different experimental systems, and that the way is now open for a detailed understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved .

Developmental Biology, 1998

Axonal interactions, which are mediated by cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) as well as other types of membrane proteins, are important for sensory axon pathfinding in the developing chick hindlimb. We have previously shown that injection of antibodies that block the function of either G4/L1 or N-cadherin into the limb, starting when the first sensory axons reach the plexus, alters the segmental pattern of projections along cutaneous nerves. Specific removal of polysialic acid from NCAM using the enzyme endoneuraminidase N (Endo N) also resulted in significant changes in cutaneous projection patterns, while injection of antibodies against NCAM itself had no obvious effect (M. G. Honig and U. S. Rutishauser, 1996, Dev. Biol. 175, 325-337). To help understand the cellular basis for these findings, we developed a tissue culture system in which the axons from dorsal root ganglion explants grow within defined laminin lanes and examined whether the same treatments increased or decreased a growth cone's tendency to be closely associated with neighboring axons. After 2 days in culture, images of the cultures were recorded, antibodies or Endo N was added, and images of the same fields were recaptured an hour later. To quantify the results, growth cones located in defined regions of the laminin lanes were classified, before and after the perturbation, as "free" (i.e., growing primarily on the laminin substratum), "fasciculated" (i.e., growing tightly along other neurites), or "intermediate" (i.e., growing both on the laminin substratum and in contact with other neurites). We found that anti-G4/L1 and anti-N-cadherin, but not anti-NCAM, caused an increase in defasciculated growth cones, whereas Endo N resulted in an increase in fasciculated growth cones. These changes in fasciculation are consistent with the changes in cutaneous projections seen in our previous in ovo perturbations. The results from these tissue culture experiments thus provide strong support for the idea that one mechanism by which CAMs affect sensory axon pathfinding in vivo is by regulating the affinity of sensory growth cones for neighboring axons, which in turn can modulate the growth cone's ability to navigate through the surrounding environment.

Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences, 2010

Guidance of axons by molecular gradients is crucial for wiring up the developing nervous system. It often is assumed that the unique signature of such guidance is immediate and biased turning of the axon tip toward or away from the gradient. However, here we show that such turning is not required for guidance. Rather, by a combination of experimental and computational analyses, we demonstrate that growth-rate modulation is an alternative mechanism for guidance. Furthermore we show that, although both mechanisms may operate simultaneously, biased turning dominates in steep gradients, whereas growth-rate modulation may dominate in shallow gradients. These results suggest that biased axon turning is not the only method by which guidance can occur. chemotaxis | growth cone | nerve growth factor | neural development | computational neuroscience 5202

Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 1990