Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
In 2006, Yamanaka and Takahashi electrified the scientific community by discovering that mouse somatic cells can be converted into embryonic stem cell-like cells by retroviral transduction of four transcription factors: Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc (OSKM). The first generation of mouse induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells was incompletely reprogrammed, and failed to contribute to germline transmission. Nearly one year later, three groups, including Yamanaka's, improved the reprogramming methodology and generated iPS cells that were in many respects, indistinguishable from ES cells, and also contributed to chimera formation and germline transmission. Shortly thereafter, the successful reprogramming of human somatic cells opened the gate for the development of patient-specific iPS cells for biomedical research and clinical application. Though human iPS cells resemble human ES cells in many aspects, the current iPS cell technologies showed several limitations for clinical usage. First, the efficiency of iPS cell generation is still low and the reprogramming process takes at least two weeks. Second, the virus-delivery of reprogramming factors introduces inconceivable risks of insertional mutagenesis in the genome. Third, given the various strategies for direct reprogramming, it remains difficult to assess the quality of iPS cells generated in each lab and for each patient. These issues should be addressed properly before any iPS cells could be translated into clinic. Here, we review recent progress in human iPS cell technologies, with a focus on the virus-free and integration-free iPS cell generation, which may lead towards the eventual goal of clinical applications.
Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2012
In 1998, human embryonic stem cells were first generated and were expected to contribute greatly to regenerative medicine. However, when medical treatments were performed using human embryonic stem cells, there were problems, such as transplant rejection, as well as bioethical issues. Induced pluripotent stem cells were generated from mouse and human fibroblasts in 2006 and 2007 by introducing four transcription factors (Oct3/4, Sox2, c-Myc and Klf4). This process was defined as direct reprogramming, and induced pluripotent stem cells were better tolerated. Although induced pluripotent stem cells have contributed greatly to biomedical research and regenerative medicine, high tumorigenic potential is still a critical problem due to the introduction of the oncogene c-Myc and reprogramming with a virus vector. To address this, we reprogrammed somatic cells by transfection with microribonucleic acids to avoid using virus vectors for genomic integration into the host genome. We found that it was possible to reprogram mouse and human cells to pluripotency by direct transfection of three mature microribonucleic acids (mir-200c,-302s and-369s) with increased expression levels in embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells. The microribonucleic acid-induced pluripotent stem cells have a reduced risk of mutations and tumorigenesis. Our laboratory also introduced four transcription factors (Oct3/4, Sox2, c-Myc and Klf4) into cancer cells, generating induced pluripotent cancer cells that exhibited strikingly less malignant features, suggesting the possibility of a novel type of cancer therapy. However, the gene transduction method is not yet safe for clinical applications, due to a genomic integration that may cause tumor formation. We are currently investigating the reprogramming method using microribonucleic acids in cancer cells to develop a very safe, highly efficient and highly complete reprogramming for clinical applications.
Manual of Research Techniques in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2014
PLoS ONE, 2011
Direct reprogramming of human somatic cells into induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells by defined transcription factors (TFs) provides great potential for regenerative medicine and biomedical research. This procedure has many challenges, including low reprogramming efficiency, many partially reprogrammed colonies, somatic coding mutations in the genome, etc. Here, we describe a simple approach for generating fully reprogrammed human iPS cells by using a single polycistronic retroviral vector expressing four human TFs in a single open reading frame (ORF), combined with a cocktail containing three small molecules (Sodium butyrate, SB431542, and PD0325901). Our results demonstrate that human iPS cells generated by this approach express human ES cells markers and exhibit pluripotency demonstrated by their abilities to differentiate into the three germ layers in vitro and in vivo. Notably, this approach not only provides a much faster reprogramming process but also significantly diminishes partially reprogrammed iPS cell colonies, thus facilitating efficient isolation of desired fully reprogrammed iPS cell colonies.
Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, 2010
Biotechnology Journal, 2012
Various methods of iPS cell generation have been developed to improve the quality of iPS cells, the efficiency of reprogramming and the feasibility and safety of using iPS cells for clinical applica
Stem Cell Research, 2016
II is a healthy feeder-free and characterized human induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cell line. Cultured under xeno-free and defined conditions. The line is generated from healthy human fibroblasts with nonintegrating Sendai virus vectors encoding the four Yamanaka factors, OCT4, SOX2, KLF4 and cMYC. The generated iPS cells are free from reprogramming vectors and their purity, karyotypic stability and pluripotent capacity is confirmed.
2014
Undoubtedly, the focus of the field of stem cell research is predominantly aimed at the artificial reprogramming of human somatic cells for the production of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells. This relatively new technology may circumvent the ethical issues of using human embryonic stem (hES) cells for the potential applications in cell replacement therapy. Besides such ethical issues, iPS cell technology offers the advantage of obtaining patient-derived tissues and/or cells, which may be utilized for autologous transplantation and tissue regeneration, investigation of a variety of human illnesses and for the screening of new drugs. The field of stem cell research has placed a major emphasis in understanding the genetic and epigenetic codes for pluripotency, in order to control and optimize autologous transplantation techniques and avoid teratoma formation.
International Journal of Stem cell Research & Therapy, 2016
A decade has passed since Shinya Yamanaka published his landmarking publication on how to produce pluripotent stemcell-like cells and the term induced pluripotent stem cells, iPS cells, was coined. This past decade has been a decade devoted to pluripotent cells, scrutinizing molecular mechanisms in cell identity, and optimizing derivation methods, culture conditions and characterization methods to xenofree and chemically defined clinical-grade pluripotent stem cells. The early promises of autologous cell therapies are now replaced by creation of highly selected donor cell banks matched to provide cells for the majority of a target population. Several of the initial safety concerns with iPS cells have been addressed with the use of non-integrating derivation methods and chemically defined and xenofree culture conditions, but some remain and will not be fully resolved until conclusions from in vivo experiments in larger animal models can be made. Published studies on safety and proof of concept performed in nonhuman primates are few but show promising results for spinal cord injury and Parkinson's disease for example. But questions remain; on how to provide functional and long-term integrating grafts and whether these can fulfill the promises of recovery and potential cure?
Science China Life Sciences, 2011
Induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cell technology demonstrates that somatic cells can be reprogrammed to a pluripotent state by over-expressing four reprogramming factors. This technology has created an interest in deriving iPS cells from domesticated animals such as pigs, sheep and cattle. Moloney murine leukemia retrovirus vectors have been widely used to generate and study mouse iPS cells. However, this retrovirus system infects only mouse and rat cells, which limits its use in establishing iPS cells from other mammals. In our study, we demonstrate a novel retrovirus strategy to efficiently generate porcine iPS cells from embryonic fibroblasts. We transfected four human reprogramming factors (Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and Myc) into fibroblasts in one step by using a VSV-G envelope-coated pantropic retrovirus that was easily packaged by GP2-293 cells. We established six embryonic stem (ES)-like cell lines in human ES cell medium supplemented with bFGF. Colonies showed a similar morphology to human ES cells with a high nuclei-cytoplasm ratio and phase-bright flat colonies. Porcine iPS cells could form embryoid bodies in vitro and differentiate into the three germ layers in vivo by forming teratomas in immunodeficient mice. induced pluripotent stem cells, Moloney murine leukemia retrovirus vectors, embryoid body, teratoma
Nature Protocols, 2010
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells, 2012
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2011
Somatic cells have been reprogrammed into pluripotent stem cells by introducing a combination of several transcription factors, such as Oct3/4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc.
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2011
Direct reprogramming of somatic cells into induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells has emerged as an invaluable method for generating patient-specific stem cells of any lineage without the use of embryonic materials. Following the first reported generation of iPS cells from murine fibroblasts using retroviral transduction of a defined set of transcription factors, various new strategies have been developed to improve and refine the reprogramming technology. Recent developments provide optimism that the generation of safe iPS cells without any genomic modification could be derived in the near future for the use in clinical settings. This review summarizes current and evolving strategies in the generation of iPS cells, including types of somatic cells for reprogramming, variations of reprogramming genes, reprogramming methods, and how the advancement iPS cells technology can lead to the future success of reproductive medicine.
Embryonic Stem Cells - Differentiation and Pluripotent Alternatives, 2011
Regenerative Medicine, 2010
Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, 2012
Cellular reprogramming consists of the conversion of differentiated cells into pluripotent cells; the so-called induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. iPSC are amenable to in vitro manipulation and, in theory, direct production of any differentiated cell type. Furthermore, iPSC can be obtained from sick individuals and subsequently used for disease modeling, drug discovery and regenerative treatments. iPSC production was first achieved by transducing, with the use of retroviral vectors, four specific transcription factors: Oct4, Klf4, Sox2 and c-Myc (OKSM), into primary cells in culture Takahashi and Yamanaka, (Cell 126(4):663-676, 2006). Many alternative protocols have since been proposed: repeated transfections of expression plasmids containing the four pluripotencyassociated genes Okita et al.
Journal of stem cells & regenerative medicine, 2013
Cell therapy is one of the principal and most promising research areas of regenerative medicine. Nevertheless different ethical problems related with the use of embryonic stem cells arise from this technology. Thus the search for a feasible way of stem cells generation is in current investigation. Induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cell is one of the most encouraging emerging technologies that represent a solution to this problem. Different methods that change cell protein and gene profiles, as well as its morphology and function, driving the cell to the stem cell state have been developed. These include nuclear transfer, the usage of cell extracts and synthetic molecules, the forced expression of defined genes and cytoplasmatic level modifications. Even though favorable results have been achieved, there are still issues that require special attention. Advances with non-integration methods are now available but dedifferentiation efficiency is yet an area of opportunity. The main objecti...
Cell Stem Cell, 2009
Nature Methods, 2011
Table 8). Theoretically, iPSCs established from these two individuals match ~20% of all the combinations of 2,117 haplotypes in Japanese population. Indeed, pla-iPSC lines derived from lines DP74 and DP94 match 32 of 107 donors 11 at the three HLA loci (HLA-A, HLA-B and HLA-DR) with the two-digit specification (Supplementary Table 7). Others previously estimated that iPSC lines with 50 unique HLA homozygous haplotypes would match ~90% of the Japanese population at the HLA-A, HLA-B and HLA-DRB1 loci with two-digit specification 12. We performed a similar estimation with four-digit specification using the HLA Laboratory database and found that 50 unique HLA-homozygous donors would cover ~73% of the Japanese population (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Table 8). Approximately 75 and 140 unique donors would be needed to cover ~80% and 90%, respectively. It would be necessary to type ~37,000, ~64,000 and ~160,000 individuals, respectively, to identify these 50, 75 and 140 donors (Fig. 3b). Allografts using HLA-homozygous iPSCs may provide a therapeutic alternative to autologous grafts, for cases in which transplant is likely to be needed soon after injury; furthermore, they allow for the advance selection of safe clones 13. The beneficial effects of matching at major HLA loci are well documented in renal transplantation 14,15 , although recipients of allografts derived from HLA-homozygous iPSCs would still need immunosuppressants after transplantation because of other HLA antigens, non-HLA antigens and immunity by natural killer cells. We report a simple, non-integrative method for reprogramming human cells. The increased efficiency and the use of nontransforming Myc should be useful to generate iPSCs from many donors, such as individuals with disease. The approach may also prove beneficial for generating human iPSCs for use in autologous and allologous stem cell therapy. Accession codes.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.