Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Madness, Meaning and Mind. Experiences and Expressions

Abstract

Madness and art have a lot in common. A look at the biographies of eminent artists like Vincent van Gogh, Robert Schumann or Virginia Woolf is suggestive of this link, but so are particular art forms and movements in modernist art such as Dada or Surrealism. These forms of art reveal an alternative look over the world and one's experience of it, different from the conventional way of perceiving reality and interacting with it. One particular phenomenon that gives this proximity between art and madness a new relevance is art brut, outsider art created beyond the limits of official culture, in particular art produced by people suffering from psychotic pathologies of different kinds. Paintings, texts and sculptures produced by insane asylum patients such as Adolf Wölfli or Ferdinand Cheval are admired as works of art and not as the mere expression of an abnormal inner life. This proximity between madness, in all its possible manifestations, and art raises the question of the significance of each in evolutionary terms. Art consumes a lot of energy and attention both in individuals' private life and in social existence, yet its immediate functional importance is not evident, nor is it clear in evolutionary terms what might have been the advantage of this particular form of cultural adaptation. Madness, on the other hand, is a cognitive dysfunction that evolutionary selective pressure has not eradicated, suggesting that there might also be an adaptive advantage in keeping it along the cognitive development of the species. In this paper we propose to explore the affinities between art (with a special focus on literature) and madness, and how this proximity is suggestive of a deeper connection in evolution, important for the development of human cognition as unique as we know it today.