Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2010
…
26 pages
1 file
The views expressed in this publication cannot in any circumstances be regarded as the official position of the European Union
2010
The views expressed in this publication cannot in any circumstances be regarded as the official position of the European Union
Welcome to the ninth issue of EU-27 Watch. Due to the new treaty provisions of the Lisbon Treaty and the economic crises the enlarged EU of 27 member states is on the search for a new modus operandi while also continuing membership talks with candidate countries. The EU-27 Watch project is mapping out discourses on these and more issues in European policies all over Europe. Research institutes from all 27 member states and the four candidate countries give overviews on the discourses in their respective countries. Topics discussed in EU-27 Watch, No. 9 / March 2010 · Implementation of the Lisbon Treaty · Enlargement and European Neighbourhood Policy · European economic policy and the financial and economic crisis · Climate and energy policy · Current issues and discourses in your country The reports focus on a reporting period from December 2009 until May 2010. This survey was conducted on the basis of a questionnaire that has been elaborated in March and April 2010. Most of the 31 reports were delivered in May 2010. The EU-27 Watch No. 9 receives significant funding from the Otto Wolff-Foundation, Cologne, in the framework of the “Dialog Europa der Otto Wolff-Stiftung”, and financial support from the European Commission. The European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.
RePEc: Research Papers in Economics, 2016
This publication is a Science for Policy Report by the Joint Research Centre, the European Commission's in-house science service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policy-making process. This publication, or any statements expressed therein, do not imply nor prejudge policy positions of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of this publication.
COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Country Report Romania 2017 Accompanying the document COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK AND THE EUROGROUP 2017 European Semester: Assessment of progress on structural reforms, prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbalances, and results of in-depth reviews under Regulation (EU) No 1176/2011 {COM(2017) 90 final} {SWD(2017) 67 final to SWD(2017) 93 final} This report assesses Romania's economy in the light of the European Commission's Annual Growth Survey published on 16 November 2016. In the survey the Commission calls on EU Member States to double their efforts on the three elements of the virtuous triangle of economic policy – boosting investment, pursuing structural reforms and ensuring responsible fiscal policies. In doing so, Member States should focus on enhancing social fairness to deliver more inclusive growth
Papeles del Este: Transiciones poscomunistas, 2001
2009
In the process of European integration, switching in 1999 to the third stageof Economic and Monetary Union, has intensified the need to coordinate economic andsectoral policies of the Member States. The process of coordination is necessary toharmonize national economic policy objectives in order to minimize the negative impactof economic policy measures taken by some member countries to other member countriesand
2009
General guidelines and specific contributions of Romania's Foreign Policy and Security Policy and the European Security and Defense of the EU in terms of the sustainable development
Management Strategies, ISSN: 2392-8123, 2017
The paper deals to the idea that Balkan EU economies have to improve their position in the context of the new challenges for the EU. The analysis is focused on five representative indicators: GDP growth rate, gross fixed capital formation, unemployment rate, inflation rate and governmental gross debt and covers 2012-2018. The analysis is realized on three steps: a comparative analysis between the five indicators, a regression analysis in order to quantify the present and future regional disparities and a cluster analysis able to give a scientific approach to the regional development. One of the paper's main conclusions is that the Balkan EU economies have to be analyzed using two cluster structures. In order to check this, the analysis uses clusters approach in 2016 and 2018. The second conclusion is that Romania presents the better economic performance during 2016-2018 and can become a regional economic leader. The analysis in the paper is based on the latest official statistic data, on pertinent tables and diagrams. The modeling procedures in the paper were supported by dedicated software IBM-SPSS.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Transylvanian review of administrative sciences, 2011
Theoretical and Applied Economics, 2007
CICCRE (Comunicazione e Cultura nella Romania europea), 2022
Annals of the University of Petrosani, …, 2009
Lucrări Științifice Management Agricol, 2021
The America-Eurasia Center’s European Program,, 2022
Romanian Journal of European Affairs, 2003
Europolity: Continuity and Change in European Governance, 2014
Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty: Law, 2021