Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2000, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing
AI
The paper examines the evolution of the history of computing, highlighting the shift from a focus on technological advancements and individual achievements to a broader, more complex understanding of computing's impact on society. It emphasizes the importance of incorporating diverse perspectives, particularly those of users and marginalized voices, into historical narratives. The author advocates for a deeper exploration of community and social dynamics surrounding computing, arguing that the future of this field relies on understanding the interplay between technology and the human experience.
The history of information technology is not the history of how wires got into boxes. Technological developments are intertwined in the social fabric, and their story includes the direct experience of individuals and the impacts felt by communities. Computers were once thought to be relevant only to specialists, but people today are more aware of the reach of computers into their lives. Similarly, the history of computing has traditionally been the focus of specialists in technology, but a greater variety of scholarly researchers is now studying archival collections about computing. The Social Issues in Computing Collection at the University of Minnesota's Charles Babbage Institute seeks to collect a wider array of perspectives on the industry and even to change the way people think about computing and archives.
IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, 2008
Preprints zur Kulturgeschichte der Technik, 2019
The historicization of the computer in the second half of the 20th century can be understood as the effect of the inevitable changes in both its technological and narrative development. What interests us is how past futures and therefore history were stabilized. The development, operation, and implementation of machines and programs gave rise to a historicity of the field of computing. Whenever actors have been grouped into communities – for example, into industrial and academic developer communities – new orderings have been constructed historically. Such orderings depend on the ability to refer to archival and published documents and to develop new narratives based on them. Professional historians are particularly at home in these waters – and nevertheless can disappear into the whirlpool of digital prehistory. Toward the end of the 1980s, the first critical review of the literature on the history of computers thus offered several programmatic suggestions. It is one of the peculiar coincidences of history that the future should rear its head again just when the history of computers was flourishing as a result of massive methodological and conceptual input. The emergence of the World Wide Web in the 1990s, which caught historians totally by surprise, led to an ahistorical, anthropological, aesthetic-medial approach to digitization. The program for investigating the prehistory of the digital age was rewritten in favor of explaining the development of communication networks. Computer systems and their concepts dropped out of history. This poses a problem for the history of computers, insofar as the success of the history of technology is tied to the stability of its objects. It seems more promising to us to not attribute the problem to the object called computer or to the “disciplinary” field, but rather to focus entirely on substantive issues. An issue-oriented technological history of the 21st century should be able to do this by treating the history of computers as a refreshing source of productive friction.
Technology and Culture, 2014
In this course you will develop a critical understanding of the many historical, socio-cultural, political economic, and techno-scientific dimensions of contemporary global computational cultures. Instead of taking a strictly chronological approach, we will traverse the history of computing by crisscrossing the official “timeline” of shrinking sizes or increasing functionalities of computers with non-linear genealogies of human-machine relations. Examining a wide range of “revolutionary” technologies and discourses associated with modern computing from the late 19th century to the present, we will ask: a) what or who has been envisioned and operated as a “computer” at different moments, and how did it/they work? b) why is the study and development of computing (still) largely centered on the modern West? c) how have new computational inventions and innovations emerged alongside various social and political shifts in the world in roughly the last hundred years? d) how can we reimagine the futures of computing in the here and now? Instead of treating computers and society as two separate domains, students will learn how to approach the interdisciplinary and intersectional histories and socio-technical relations of mechanical and electronic computing, colonialism, cybernetics, cold war, software programming, labor, race, caste, gender, climate change, digital media and infrastructure, algorithms, and artificial intelligence.
2017
The social and organizational history of humanity is intricately entangled with the history of technology in general and the technology of information in particular. Advances in this area have often been closely involved in social and political transformations. While the contemporary period is often referred to by such names as the Computing and Information Age, this is the culmination of a series of historical transformations that have been centuries in the making. This course will provide a venue for students to learn about history through the evolution of number systems and arithmetic, calculating and computing machines, and advanced communication technology via the Internet. Students who take this course will attain a degree of technological literacy while studying core historical concepts. Students who complete this course will learn the key vocabulary of the computing discipline, which is playing a significant role in modern human thought and new media communications. The Hist...
Technology & Culture, 2012
IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, 2007
Vorüberlegungen für einen internationalen Workshop über die Schaffung, Verbindung und Nutzung großer interdisziplinärer Quellenbanken in den historischen Wissenschaften [1986].
What other political, social, and existential changes the age of the computer will also bring we do not know. What seems certain, however, is that the problem of technological determinism-that is, of the impact of machines on historywill remain germane until there is forged a degree of public control over technology far greater than anything that now exists.
2017
»Über die Notwendigkeit einer Theorie für History Computing«. The early phases of computer supported research in history have been characterized by enthusiasm about the many possibilities opened. Possibilities, which go beyond just one methodological paradigm as the recent discussions about the relative importance of quantitative studies within computer applications in history show. A deeper discussion about these developments is necessary, necessary for pure intellectual reasons as well as for ones within the politics of academia. This requires a theory of historical computing, which starts from an analysis of the differences between computing in history and computers' applications to other disciplines. To illustrate that, a number of examples are given, which show that the information presented by historical sources is inherently different from the one processed by information systems directed at current times.
At the very end of a famous standard textbook on the history of computing we can read: "By the time you read this, many more things will have happened in the world and a good proportion of them will have been made possible by computer technology. Yet, this may be a good place to end our story. At the start of the 2020s, the story of modern computing has reached the beginning of an end, as the last great story of modernist technological progress fractures belatedly into postmodern chaos. Computing is deeply intertwined with vital structural developments in global relations, economics, society, and culture. Barring apocalypse, those connections will only deepen." (Haigh and Ceruzzi 2021, 423) Barring apocalypse-for sure. The authors presume that the world will go on, as it did, more or less at least. But what if the big catastrophe will happen? What if climate change disrupts our societies? What if a nuclear war will-finally-come? What if the global economy crashes? That's why in several recent papers the possibilities of post-apocalyptic computing are discussed. "In this article we […] develop approaches to designing interactive technologies that acknowledge the many, dramatic, and complex phenomena associated with global change." (Silberman and Tomlinson 2010). Or: "Computing researchers and practitioners are often seen as inventing the future. As such, we are implicitly also in the business of predicting the future. […] In this article we explore the relationship between these potential futures and computing research. What hidden assumptions about the future are embedded in most computing research? What possible or even probable futures are we ignoring? What work should we be doing to respond to fundamental planetary limits, and to the ecological and energy constraints that global society faces over the coming years and decades? Confronting such limits is likely to present challenges that we-humanity-have never before faced." (Nardi et al. 2018, 86) This passage is really interesting. It shows awareness of the fact-intensely discussed e. g. by media studies (Ernst and Schröter 2021)-that technologies are always constructed, obviously, with a view on their uses in the future. So, every technology implies visions of the future and future users-often conflicting ones. Additionally, it is known from the very beginning that in the actual future the uses to which a given technology might be put, might differ from the implied futures, as do the real users from the implied users. One or more intended future(s) and its possible non-or other-realizations are already implied in a given technology. That means also, that the future is not just something coming as an unforeseeable event,
Social science concepts and techniques have been bound up with computing since its earliest days. This relationship is described in terms of three distinct ‘frameworks of computing‘, historically specific ways of understanding, working with and developing computer systems. Each framework has different understandings of the "real" and desirable relations between people and computers, and a concern that hardware and software should reflect these relations. They render some forms of computing thinkable and desirable, whilst ruling out others — to a considerable extent they govern the conduct of computing, in both basic R&D and in commercial and organisational development. The frameworks are not purely internal to the historical development of computing, but nor are they the direct effect of any single external factor. They also overlap with each other in different configurations within computing, and two such sites are described in more detail, HCI and CSCW. In conclusion, firstly some suggestions are offered for further research, in particular the possibility that new frameworks are being assembled as computing converges with the media industries; and secondly the form of analysis is presented as being complementary to many existing approaches, through occupying a middle ground between traditional scientific and historical methodologies, and the emergent focus on contextuality, difference and deconstruction.
Springer eBooks, 2016
This oral history interview was conducted between Hans Rutimann and Julianne Nyhan via Skype on 15 November 2012. Rutimann was provided with the core questions in advance of the interview. Here he recalls that his fi rst encounter with computing was at the Modern Languages Association (MLA), c.1968/9. Following a minor scandal at the organisation, which resulted in the dismissal of staff connected with the newly arrived IBM 360/20, Rutimann was persuaded to take on some of their duties. After training with IBM in operating and programming he set about transferring the membership list (about 30,000 contact details) from an addressograph machine to punched cards. After the computer's early use to support such administrative tasks the MLA began investigating the feasibility of making the research tool called the MLA International Bibliography (information about accessing the present-day version of the bibliography is available here: https://www.mla. org/bib_electronic) remotely accessible. Rutimann worked with Lockheed to achieve this. It was in Lockheed's information retrieval lab that the system known as Dialog, an online information retrieval system was developed (see Summit 1967). He vividly recalls how he travelled the 3000 miles to San Francisco to deliver the magnetic tape to Lockheed so that they could make the database available online. He "jumped for joy" when, once back in New York, the data was available to him via the newly acquired terminal of the MLA. While making clear that his roles in MLA, Mellon and the Engineering Information Foundation have primarily been enabling ones (and to this we can add advocacy, strategy and foresight) he also recalls the strong infl uence that Joseph Raben had on him and mentions some of the projects and conferences that he found particularly memorable.
2002
The academic communities directly associated with computing science have varied their scope across a significant part of their development. This article graphically explores the historical development of informatics using the trajectory of curricula recommendations in computing science. The usual description of informatics as an ever expanding field is challenged facing the disciplinary diversity found in the ACM computing curricula recommendations and related documents. Indeed, in a first period the disciplinary diversity fostered by the community was reduced. This reduction of diversity was accompanied by an increase in the depth of a few branches, structuring Informatics in areas such as computer engineering, computing science, and information systems. Later on, Informatics's footprint has increased, demanding a renewal of its disciplinary structure, which triggered the emergence of new related occupations. The graphic representations proposed here mediate a discussion of current professional tendencies, illustrating that Informatics' history is more rich than it is usually seen.
A review of the continuing battle to increase our computational abilities
IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 2012
This narrative on computing history reflects the experiences of the author and his involvement with computing history over a quarter century. The discussion portrays a transition from loathing history as a student to embracing computing history as a professional. The author shows how storytelling can produce interesting excursions on technical subjects and ways in which teaching computing with history can elevate student interest. He also provides examples showing ways in which historical events could complement computing studies. The article also explains how the author's earlier efforts in using history to teach computing led to a landmark publication and subsequent activities within IFIP leading to conferences and related publications.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.