Monitoring the Italian Home Palliative Care Services

Healthcare

In order to plan the right palliative care for patients and their families, it is essential to have detailed information about patients’ needs. To gain insight into these needs, we analyzed five Italian local palliative care networks and assessed the clinical care conditions of patients facing the complexities of advanced and chronic disease. A longitudinal, observational, noninterventional study was carried out in five Italian regions from May 2017 to November 2018. Patients who accessed the palliative care networks were monitored for 12 months. Sociodemographic, clinical, and symptom information was collected with several tools, including the Necesidades Paliativas CCOMS-ICO (NECPAL) tool, the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS), and interRAI Palliative Care (interRAI-PC). There were 1013 patients in the study. The majority (51.7%) were recruited at home palliative care units. Cancer was the most frequent diagnosis (85.4%), and most patients had at least one comorbidity (58....

Supportive Care in Cancer, 2012

Purpose In recent years, the number of palliative service providers has increased significantly. This expansion necessitates an evaluation in order to provide the basis for quality improvement of the care. Policymakers, managers of palliative care programs, and others committed to the improvement of end-of-life care need methods and criteria to measure and evaluate the care delivered. As quality measurement is expensive and difficult to undertake, it is fundamental that quality measures evaluate the right things. Quality evaluation in Italy is supported by health authorities who have developed some indicators of palliative care. The aims of this study were to give an overview of these indicators. Methods We analyzed all palliative care indicators developed by Italian national authorities from 2000 to the present. These indicators have been divided into three different levels of analysis (structure, process, and outcome). Subsequently, two reviewers have independently compared their degree of concordance with domains, and guidelines developed by the NCP for palliative care and after careful discussion an expert panel has elaborated a final consensus document. Results Most of the quality indicators analyzed deal with the structure and process of palliative care, however they miss outcomes and do not cover domains mainly concerned with spiritual, ethical, cultural, or existential aspects of care. Conclusions More attention should be paid to the development of outcome indicators of palliative care. The attempt to identify a group of indicators which cover every domain of palliative care represents a challenge for the future in terms of finding new cognitive models more oriented toward subjectivity.

Cancer Causes & Control, 2000

Objective: To estimate the reduction of time spent in hospital obtained through palliative home care. Methods: Retrospective analysis of the hospital admissions occurred during the last year of life. Cancer patients who were resident in the province of Florence, were registered at the Tuscan Cancer Registry, and died during the year 1997 were included in the study. Three palliative home care services were operating in the study area in 1997. Main results: 3423 cancer patients died in the study area during 1997. 9.2% of them received palliative home care. Palliative home care was effective in reducing the utilization of hospital care during the last three months of life. A 25% reduction of the relative risk (CI: 34-14%) to have in-patient admissions and a 49% reduction of relative risk (CI: 52-47%) of spending days in the hospital during the last 3 months of life were estimated through multivariable regression models. Conclusions: Palliative home care was effective in reducing time spent in hospital during the last 3 months of life.

Healthcare, 2022

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY

Journal of Palliative Medicine, 2016

Background: Hospital admissions at the end of life (EOL) represent an established indicator of poor quality of care. Objective: To examine the impact of intensity of integrated primary and specialist home-based palliative care for chronic diseases (HPCCD) plans of care on EOL hospital access. Methods: Retrospective population-based study using linked mortality, hospitalization, and home care data. Intensity of HPCCD was measured 90-31 days before death; outcomes were hospital death and prolonged hospital stay for medical reasons in the last month of life. Outcomes were modeled through Poisson and quartile regressions. Adults aged 65-84 years with at least an ordinary hospitalization and a drug treatment in the year before death, who died from nononcological chronic diseases in the Veneto Region, January 2012-December 2013, were included. Results: Among 2087 patients, 1016 (48.7%) did not receive any HPCCD homecare visit; 860 (41.2%), 152 (7.3%), and 59 (2.8%) had <2, 2-4, and 4-7 homecare visits/week, respectively. Hospital death occurred for 1310 patients (62.8%) and the median hospital stay in the last month of life was five days (interquartile range 0-14). In multivariate analysis, a higher intensity of HPCCD was associated with lower rates of prolonged (‡14 days) EOL hospitalization and hospital death with a dose-response relationship. When no access to HPCCD was compared with 2-4 visits/week, adjusted percentage of hospital death decreased by-18.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]-5.4% to-29.7%) and the length of hospital stay decreased by 37.9% (95% CI 16.7%-56.0%). Conclusions: The intensity of integrated HPCCD plans of care was associated with a reduction in EOL hospital stay and in hospital death.

Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 1997

The complexity of assessing the impact of palliative care is much greater than in other fields of medicine, due to the shortcomings of traditional outcome indicators. We conducted a prospective study to describe the patient's quality of life at the outset and during palliative care at home and to define some potential indicators of palliative care outcomes with the aim of assessing the quality of home care as provided by a palliative care unit. Seventy-three patients who received care at home were assessed. The median survival in palliative home care was 29 days. To evaluate the degree of symptom distress, we used an Italian version of the Symptom Distress Scale. Assessing the quality-oflife pattern over time, we observed that palliative care was effective in mitigating pain and, at least in part, in stimulating appetite, curbing nausea, and controlling psychological aspects. The subscales referring to social and functional aspects steadily worsened. The difficulties encountered (the high percentage of missing data, the considerable number of patients treated for less than 10 days, etc.) should be a warning against using only one assessment instrument. It is worthwhile defining the various potential outcomes of palliative care even though all results will not always be measurable in every patient. Only a global assessment, a "multiple outcomes approach," based on different indicators, would allow for evaluation of the outcome of the care process.

Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2016

Although a growing number of older people are dying in care homes, palliative care has developed in these settings only recently. Cross-country representative comparative research hardly exists in this area. As part of a large EU-funded project, we aim to undertake representative comparative research in care homes in Europe, to describe and compare 6 countries in terms of (1) resident outcomes, quality and costs of palliative and end-of-life care; and (2) palliative care structures and staff knowledge and attitudes toward palliative care. We also aim to explore country, facility, staff, patient, and care characteristics related to better outcomes at resident level. To obtain a representative nationwide sample, we will conduct a large-scale cross-sectional study of deceased residents in care homes in Belgium, Finland, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, and the United Kingdom, using proportional stratified random sampling (taking into account region, facility type and bed capacity). In e...

PLOS ONE, 2022

Background Individuals receiving palliative care (PC) are generally thought to prefer to receive care and die in their homes, yet little research has assessed the quality of home-and communitybased PC. This project developed a set of valid and reliable quality indicators (QIs) that can be generated using data that are already gathered with interRAI assessments-an internationally validated set of tools commonly used in North America for home care clients. The QIs can serve as decision-support measures to assist providers and decision makers in delivering optimal care to individuals and their families. Methods The development efforts took part in multiple stages, between 2017-2021, including a workshop with clinicians and decision-makers working in PC, qualitative interviews with

2021

Background: A special survey carried out between April and September 2021 in Italy involving 600 respondents forms the basis of the present contribution. This survey focused on mapping and acquiring a deeper understanding of the possibilities of promoting a long-term vision for the development of future care for people in the pre-terminal and terminal stages of the disease and for the dying. Conclusion: Similar surveys may provide relevant and inspiring stimuli for additional and novel specific surveys, studies and analyses, as well as scientific and professional discourses regarding the importance of establishing inspiring long-term visions for the development of future care for the dying.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

BMC Palliative Care

Background Difficulties in identifying patients at risk of clinical deterioration or death represent one of the main barriers to Palliative Care (PC) development in the community. Currently, no specific Italian tools aimed at identifying patients with PC needs are available. Of the different European tools available, the SPICT™ can be used easily in any kind of setting and does not include the Surprise Question. The purpose of the study was to translate, cross-culturally adapt and pre-test the Italian version of the SPICT™. Methods The Beaton recommendations for the cross-cultural adaptation of instruments were followed. Content validity was assessed using the Lynn method. A sample of Italian General Practitioners (GPs) assessed the SPICT-IT™ for feasibility and tested it. Results During the cross-cultural adaptation, some issues regarding semantic, experiential, idiomatic and conceptual equivalences were raised and resolved. The Scale-Content Validity Index/Ave was 0.86. Of the 907...