Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2019, Modern Languages Open
The study considers the Chinese-born artist Shen Yuan in the context of contemporary cultural production, particularly regarding debates about the mobility of people, objects and images, and investigates whether her installations incorporate the notion or action of movement at the levels of their functioning and/or reception. It is argued that Walter Moser's concept of "artmotion", as well as findings from recent mobility studies, are useful theories with which to explore this question. The transformational function of her installations is also examined in order to probe how the mobile, sensory and transitory aesthetic experiences felt by the viewer affect their perception and comprehension of objects in the world. An equal concern is how the viewer moves through or around the pieces, contributes to their meaning and thereby participates in wider discourses about Chinese traditions, politics and contemporary concerns. In addition, by considering how Shen's aesthetics are inspired by Chinese culture at the same time as drawing on the current, global art scene, it will be shown how the transcultural is at the heart of her artistic project and how it demands a constant negotiation between two parts of her self. Finally, the study proposes that mobility studies may be usefully applied to other contemporary artists in transit. Contemporary cultural production, whether in the East or West, is undoubtedly affected, inspired and characterized by processes of globalization, especially regarding the displacement of individuals and the circulation of capital, commodities, images and ideologies. 1 Numerous societies reflect a 'liquid modernity', to translate a term from Bauman: they are streams carrying migrants through porous borders, often transported on the crest of modern technology and spilling out malleable identities. The world has become a place of 'supermodern' mobility where, paradoxically, as Marc Augé stated, 'l'on peut théoriquement tout faire sans bouger et où l'on bouge pourtant' (8). Interest in both physical and virtual mobility has spread through the humanities and social sciences since the late 1980s, producing what John Urry in Mobilities calls the 'mobility turn'. Globalization is, after all, ' a world of motion' (Inda and Rosaldo 6). While David Harvey has conceptualized globalization in terms of the 1 Jonathan Xavier Inda and Renato Rosaldo define 'globalization', in its simplest terms, as 'the intensification of global interconnectedness, suggesting a world full of movement and mixture, contact and linkages, and persistent cultural interaction and exchange' (4).
MIgratory Politics. Technology, Time, Performativity, 2007
This text studies the way in which mobility politics operate within what is known as the international contemporary art system, that is, within the context of the economic, symbolic, and transcultural fabric devised by the new international biennials, the translocal net of galleries, new cultural institutions, museums, specialized foundations and boards of trustees, as well as through the internationalization process of contemporary art that took place over the past few decades. Our goal is to describe, on one hand, the most relevant consequences of the epistemological turn that mobility has taken in the process of production, circulation and reception of contemporary art on a global level and on the other, to criticize the multiculturalist and internationalist discourse of the global exhibition system.
‘Variations on Mobility’ is the joint edition of Creative Commissions (CC) 2019/2020 hosted by the Centre for Advanced Studies in Mobility & Humanities (MoHu) at the University of Padova and the Royal Holloway Centre for the GeoHumanities (CGH). The CC scheme is based on the idea that research-art collaborations contribute to the co-construction of scientific knowledge through ongoing dialogical exchange. This joint edition called for creative collaborations that were invited to explore the relationship between mobilities and the humanities experimenting with the potential of art and creative methodologies in the study, imagination and expression of mobility issues. This original work by Ciaj Rocchi, Matteo Demonte and Daniele Brigadoi Cologna is one of the unexpected surprises emerging from the ‘Variations on Mobility’ programme. By visualising, charting and telling patterns and spatial itineraries of Chinese migrations, and by skillfully embedding different temporalities and historical layers within the graphic narration, Rocchi and Demonte provide a sensitive and unique portrait of transnational desired and suffered mobilities.
We want to convey the sense that a 'world' -an often fragmented and fragile set of material and non-material assumptions and resources -can itself be made mobile, seemingly translated from one […] location to another, even as it is transformed in the process"
Keywords of mobility: Critical engagements, 2016
As a concept, mobility captures the common impression that one's lifeworld is in fl ux, with not only people, but also cultures, objects, capital, businesses, services, diseases, media, images, information, and ideas circulating across (and even beyond) the planet. While history tells the story of human mobility, the scholarly literature is replete with metaphors attempting to describe (perceived) altered spatial and temporal movements: deterritorialization, reterritorialization, and scapes; time-space compression, distantiation, or punctuation; the network society and its space of fl ows; the death of distance and the acceleration of modern life; and nomadology. The academic interest in mobility goes hand in hand with theoretical approaches that reject a "sedentarist metaphysics" (Malkki 1992) in favor of a "nomadic metaphysics" (Cresswell 2006) and empirical studies on the most diverse kinds of mobilities (Adey et al. 2013), questioning earlier taken-for-granted correspondences between peoples, places, and cultures. The way the term is being used, mobility entails, in its coinage, much more than mere physical motion (Marzloff 2005). Rather, it is seen as movement infused with both self-ascribed and attributed meanings (Frello 2008). Put differently, "mobility can do little on its own until it is materialized through people, objects, words, and other embodied forms" (Chu 2010, 15). Importantly, mobility means different things to different people in differing social circumstances (Adey 2010).
InterArtive Issue #55, 2013
The primary purpose of this special issue on "Art and Mobility" is to reflect on the multiple aspects of cultural and artistic mobility and to open the way towards a transdisciplinary field of study that increasingly claims its place in the analysis and research of the social and cultural dynamics of the contemporary world.
2014
We usually associate contemporary urban life with movement and speed. But what about those instances when the forms of mobility associated with globalized cities - the flow of capital, people, labor and information - freeze, or decelerate? How can we assess the value of interruption in a city? What does valuing stillness mean in regards to the forward march of globalization? When does inertia presage decay - and when does it promise immanence and rebirth? Bringing together original contributions by international specialists from the fields of architecture, photography, film, sociology and cultural analysis, this cutting-edge book considers the poetics and politics of inertia in cities ranging from Amsterdam, Berlin, Beirut and Paris, to Beijing, New York, Sydney and Tokyo. Chapters explore what happens when photography, film, mixed media works, architecture and design intervene in public spaces and urban communities to disrupt speed and growth, both intellectually and/or practically...
Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 2011
In this introduction, we outline the general conceptual framework that ties the various contributions to this special issue together. We argue for the importance of anthropology to “take on” mobility and discuss the advantages of the ethnographic approach in doing so. What is the analytical purchase of mobility as one of the root metaphors in contemporary anthropological theorizing? What are the (dis)advantages of looking at the current human condition through the lens of mobility? There is a great risk that the fast-growing field of mobility studies neglects different interpretations of what is going on, or that only patterns that fit the mobilities paradigm will be considered, or that only extremes of (hyper)mobility or (im)mobility will be given attention. The ethnographic sensibilities of fieldworkers who learn about mobility while studying other processes and issues, and who can situate movement in the multiple contexts between which people move, can both extend the utility of the mobilities approach, and insist on attention to other dynamics that might not be considered if the focus is first and last on (im)mobility as such. In this special issue, we do not want to discuss human mobility as a brute fact but rather analyze how mobilities, as sociocultural constructs, are experienced and imagined.
Concentric: literary and cultural studies, 2005
In Anti-Oedipus (1972), Deleuze and Guattari make extensive use of the concept of flows to develop a global history of social, cultural and material relations, with the modern capitalist era being characterized by a ubiquitous decoding and recoding of flows. In A ...
Geographic Research Forum, 2018
Over the last two decades, mobility has gained new prominence within anthropology, particularly in theories of globalization, immigration, and subjectivity. At stake in all of the recent ethnographic and archaeological work on mobility is not just how anthropologists conceptualize mobility, but also how we conceptualize the political. Many discussions of mobile subjects have seemed to challenge traditional understandings of the political that are synonymous with a monolithic state and a stable, sedentary subject population. Yet, we maintain that there are still challenges to a coherent anthropological theory of mobility and its relation to the political. To address these challenges, we forward a conceptual framework of mobility that is grounded in the practices, perceptions, and conceptions of movement entwined with processes of emplacement. Illustrated by case studies from the Late Bronze Age (1500 – 1150 B.C.) South Caucasus and nineteenth-century Nova Scotia, the conceptual framework that we detail understands mobility as a mediator between political subjects and political institutions, thus making it possible to examine how subjects and institutions are continuously remade in relation to each other.
2013
Processes resulting from and in turn (re-)shaping translocal connectivities and entanglements in economic, political and cultural contexts have significant impacts upon the social dynamics within and between the groups involved.1 Thus they also affect the everyday lives of people. While such processes undoubtedly have a long historical dimension, they have intensified since European colonial expansion and industrialisation and acquired new dimensions »globalisation« processes since the late decades of the 20th century.2 First steamers, railways, telegraph and telephone rapidly in creased the speed, quantity and quality of travel and communication; then a further shift accompanied the invention and mass production of aeroplanes, computers and mobile phones. Yet we must be cautious not to ascribe too mono-centric a position to overarching Western paradigms and narratives of (first) an expansive imperial agenda, i.e. seeking to extend one’s own markets and political terrains at the cos...
Journal of Transnational American Studies, 2012
America is founded on myths of mobility.. .. Yet the Asian American has been conspicuously absent in existing generalist formulations of a presumably universally applicable theory of American mobility.. .. What, in their works, are the spatial expressions of the Asian American's "place" in the overall social structure?-Sau-ling Cynthia Wong 1 The spread of border-crossing Internet technology highlights the vexed positioning of Asian Americans visà-vis the U.S. nation-state and their uncertain relationship to the notion of diaspora.-Rachel Lee and Sau-ling Cynthia Wong 2 In her 2003 introduction with Rachel Lee to their co-edited critical anthology, Asian America.Net: Ethnicity, Nationalism, and Cyberspace, Sau-ling Cynthia Wong draws critical attention to the implications of the formation of an Asian American "diasporic community" in cyberspace. "If diasporic community is not an oxymoron," propose Wong and Lee, "then we must consider how virtual media might be more seamlessly adopted by ethnically or racially defined communities whose geographical proximity
Tempo Social, 2018
As a concept, mobility captures the common impression that one’s lifeworld is in flux, with not only people, but also cultures, objects, capital, businesses, services, diseases, media, images, information, and ideas circulating across (and even beyond) the planet. The scholarly literature is replete with metaphors trying to describe (perceived) altered spatial and temporal movements: deterritorialization, reterritorialization, and scapes; time-space compression, distantiation, or punctuation; the network society and its space of flows; the death of distance and the acceleration of modern life; and nomadology. Scholars have used figures of mobile people, too, from nomads to pilgrims, to describe both self and other in the social sciences and humanities for a long time. Taking the societal implications of various forms of mobility seriously and not as a given, the critical discussion of mobility concepts and figures presented here helps us to assess the analytical purchase of the conceptual perspective of mobility studies to normalize movement within the single category of “mobility.”
Contemporaneity : Mobility and Exchange, 2021
2018
This short paper will just try and pick apart a couple of examples to reveal how mobilities are both differentiated and differentiate among people. That is they are both a function of social status but also help enact social status. Slightly against the implication above I will also show that it is not just that digital is fast and materials mo0ving are slow, but rather that all speeds depend upon material things that come to shape them, and that all forms of movment increasingly interact with forms of data and informational realms. For the sake of symmetry the paper will look at two flows of people each of around 220 persons per year: the movement of the ‘floating population’ of migrant workers in China, and the mass tourism market of the Mediterranean. In so doing with will ask about how we think about ‘dwelling’ in a mobile world – what changes with our senses of self and place as the world is on the move. It will look at the assemblage of materials, media and bodies that enables...
The Routledge handbook of mobilities, 2013
CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, 2019
This article examines how contemporary media art and popular culture, vernacular cultural practices, and digital technologies express and actualize aspirations for global mobility. This task is propelled by the need to question the limited scope of how we envision globalization. Here I explore how people use forms of visual media to “perform the global” through mediated experiences of mobility. I propose the concept of “virtual cosmopolitans” to describe those who participate in the experience of global citizenship through their use of photography, film, and digital media. Although they do not have access to conventional forms of cosmopolitan mobility, these virtual cosmopolitans find ways to envision or simulate cosmopolitan experiences by inserting themselves into the global imaginary via mediated networks of images. This article discusses how these virtual cosmopolitans participate in the discourse and experience of globalization, and considers ways to manifest and actualize cosmopolitan desires through vernacular forms of media. I focus on two documentary films that engage with the photographic medium to consider diverse forms of mediated mobility: Born into Brothels (Ross Kauffman and Zana Briski, 2004) and City of Photos (Nishtha Jain, 2005). Although both films illustrate how disadvantaged subjects in contemporary Indian society negotiate their desires of mobility, they propose different ways to assert their identity as a cosmopolitan, deploying varying levels of imagination. This discussion illustrates how marginalized subjects engage with global forces in local spaces by cultivating media literacy and demonstrating creative uses of visual media.
Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 2007
In his book On the Move, cultural geographer Tim Cresswell (2006) argues that mobility has become a powerful concept both in everyday life and in contemporary social thought. In daily life mobility is an embodied activity, and physical movement is obviously integral to the way in which the world is experienced. In an era of globalisation, however, contemporary conceptualisations of mobility have extended beyond the idea of movement as a literal, embodied activity. Cresswell argues that mobility should be recognised as a political concept that is informed by very specific world-views and ideological commitments. He argues that there are, broadly speaking, two interrelated ways of thinking about mobility. On the one hand, mobility is 'connected to civilisation, progress and freedom', a metaphor for social change and a symbol of subaltern power. On the other, mobility is associated with deviance, perceived as a threat to social cohesion and an impediment to the ideal of community and belonging (Cresswell, 2006, p. 37). However construed, mobility has become a metaphor and a contemporary structure of feeling that informs both thought and action. Discussions about drama that take place in educational and community settings frequently invoke the concept of mobility, however implicitly. Negotiating movement between belonging and dispossession, stability and flexibility, localism and internationalism, roots and routes, for example, has preoccupied many authors who have published in this journal. Following immediately after the special edition 'On Site and Place', I should like to suggest that the concept of mobility provides an interesting way of thinking about the debates included in this edition. The metaphor of mobility is related to the dynamic of social intervention, where traditional beliefs are unsettled and values are reconfigured. It also points to the possibility of personal change, where theatre's liveness and activity narrates shifting identities, as an embodied process of becoming. Both Kennedy C. Chinyowa and Asma Mundrawala are, in different ways, concerned with how theatre for development mobilises individuals and communities. The interventionist programmes they describe share an interest in harnessing theatre to social change. For Kennedy Chinyowa, analysing the creative methods of theatremakers in Southern Africa provides a way of reconceptualising community engagement and activity in programmes about sexual health. The contribution of development experts that Chinyowa identifies in this practice is explicitly orientated towards fostering partnerships with local communities and their use of popular forms of performance is designed to support the kind of critical dialogue that encourages individual and social change. Asma Mundrawala offers a critique of the work of travelling theatre companies in Pakistan that have addressed issues of honour killing and forced marriages in their work. Mundrawala raises questions about the
2007
This article takes point of departure in the challenges to understand the importance of contemporary mobility. The approach advocated is a cross-disciplinary one drawing on sociology, geography, urban planning and design, and cultural studies. As such the perspective is to be seen as a part of the so-called 'mobility turn' within social science. The perspective is illustrative for the research efforts at the Centre for Mobility and Urban Studies (C-MUS), Aalborg University. The article presents the contours of a theoretical perspective meeting the challenges to research into contemporary urban mobilities. In particular the article discusses 1) the physical city, its infrastructures and technological hardware/software, 2) policies and planning strategies for urban mobility and 3) the lived everyday life in the city and the region.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.