Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2001, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations
AI
The integration of environmental concerns into international relations has had significant implications for both theory and practice. The paper explores whether existing frameworks are sufficient to address these issues or if they necessitate a fundamental transformation in international policy. It evaluates various scholarly works on the relationship between sovereignty and environmental challenges and discusses the concept of global governance in light of ecological issues. Ultimately, it concludes that despite incremental approaches, the discipline of international relations may need to adapt more comprehensively to incorporate environmental factors.
With a view to providing contextual background for the Special Issue, this opening article analyses several dimensions of 'The end of International Relations theory?' It opens with a consideration of the status of different types of theory. Thereafter, we look at the proliferation of theories that has taken place since the emergence of the third/fourth debate. The coexistence and competition between an ever-greater number of theories begs the question: what kind of theoretical pluralism should IR scholars embrace? We offer a particular account of theoretical engagement that is preferable to the alternatives currently being practised: integrative pluralism. The article ends on a cautiously optimistic note: given the disciplinary competition that now exists in relation to explaining and understanding global social forces, International Relations may find resilience because it has become theory-led, theory-literate and theory-concerned.
This course emphasizes a critical approach toward different grand/major theories of international relations (IR)/ international politics. The course is designed with two convictions. First, all major theories (sometimes called schools, paradigms, or "isms") of IR are defective, one way or the other, in light of the fundamental paradigms of social sciences. Thus, we must keep a critical but open mind toward these big theories. Second, despite these defects, however, major theories are indispensable for understanding international politics: all of us use some (crude) form of these major theories as analytical tools when trying to make sense of international politics. Thus, a critical understanding of these major theories (or macro-tools) helps us taking a more critical view toward our own understanding of international politics.
This fifth edition has benefitted from helpful comments made by the readers of the first four editions. We were encouraged to stay with the basic aim and format of the book: a succinct and readable introduction to the major IR theories and approaches. We also followed suggestions for expanded coverage of post-positivism (new Chapter 9) and clarifications in the chapter on key issues in IR (Chapter 11). All chapters are brought up to date in the light of current international events and ongoing debates in the discipline. The book now has clearer structure, with chapters organized in four parts: (1) Studying IR; (2) Classical Theories; (3) Contemporary Approaches and Debates; (4) Policy and Issues. The supporting website has been revised and expanded; web links include references to theoretical debates as well as to information on world situations in specific geographical locations, thus giving students a perspective on how theory can speak to the real world. A glossary with key terms is included at the end of the book. We are grateful for support and encouragement from a large number of people. Tim Barton of Oxford University Press warmly supported the project from the very start. Several anonymous readers made constructive suggestions for revisions and clarifications. Many colleagues
The new edition of International Relations Theory: A critical introduction introduces students to the main theories in international relations. It explains and analyzes each theory, allowing students to understand and critically engage with the myths and assumptions behind each theory.
1997
The Future of International Relations presents the state of the art of international relations theory through an analysis of the work of twelve key contemporary thinkers. The authors break with the procedure in the field which juxtaposes aspects of the work of contemporary theorists with others, presenting them as part of a disembodied school of thought or paradigm. A more individual focus can demonstrate instead, the well-rounded character of some of the leading oeuvres and can thus offer a more representative view of the discipline.
International Affairs, 2020
The making of global International Relations: origins and evolution of IR at its centenary. By Amitav Acharya and Barry Buzan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2019. 396pp. £74.99. isbn 978 1 10848 017 8. Available as e-book.
Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica, 2015
Introduzione The discipline of International Relations (IR) for a long time of its history has developed in the form of Great Debates that involved competing paradigms and schools. More recently, it has been described as a cacophony of voices unable to communicate among themselves, but also incapable to provide keys to understand an ever more complex reality. This collection aims at evaluating the heuristic value of a selection of traditional paradigms (realism and liberalism), schools (constructivism), and subdisciplines (security studies and international political economy) so as to assess the challenges before IR theory today and the ability of the discipline to provide tools to make the changed world still intelligible.
This chapter is about the relationship between globalization and international politics. The first section makes a presentation of the reciprocal influence that characterizes this relationship. The second section concentrates on the extension of the number and kinds of the international actors and on the appearance of non-state actors, like NGOs, in world politics. This change, caused by the process of globalization, is extremely important in the definition of the global political system and the agenda of the sustainable development. The third section analyses the agenda of the global system and the institutions and procedures supplied by the state system to the global system in order to deliver political regulation to the global problems. The last section informs about the reaction of the International Relations theorists to the challenge posed to the knowledge of international politics by the globalization process. It reviews two great groups of theories: the pluralist school, which has been the most responsive school to the perception of the change of the international life, and the school of international democracy, which covers the analysis of a wide spectrum of problems and answers to important transformations which are affecting politics at the state and inter-state level.
2020
It is always discussed whether international relations is a discipline or only a part of political science. International Relations, as an independent discipline, still requires efforts to prove its quality in the eyes of scholars, politicians and with a great importance, the students. Although it is easier to accept it as a discipline, it is still necessary to tell and keep the story of its evolution on the scene as it is now one of most required area of study in this era. Now, the assumptions of IR theories are much more needed, its future prospects have more potential to analyse the world politics since the nature of international politics is evolving. The aim of this study is to tell a short history of international relations and the sources of IR as a discipline including how much IR owes to its Great Debates. As a part of the story, it is argued that the nature of international relations is cyclical which is now turning back to the starting point, to the times when international relations did not even exist, in a different form.
2013
This article offers a critical and wide extant theories of International Relations (IR). It despite the ubiquity of the field and the abundance of research that has been undertaken over the past century, there remains a need for IR to accept and integrate new ways of thinking if it is to grapple successfully with emerging global ch relevant to practitioners. In this spirit, some components of a more holistic way of understanding IR are suggested, and this in turn hints at a new agenda for research and practice with broader relevance.
This section discusses the meaning and scope of international relations. It defines international relations from a number of angles. The reasons for increased subject matter of international relations and the meaning of key concepts such as intermestic politics and foreign policy are also examined in this section.
The Age of Reflections, 2022
The English version of my interview on the prospects of post-Western and Global International Relations theory, published in an Iranian journal "The Age of Reflections".
The general objective of this course is to examine key theoretical schools of thought in International Relations (IR) and their main debates around certain specific themes. The course is designed around multiple discussion sessions based on carefully selected IR theory texts, dealing with contemporary, highly-relevant topics (like unipolarity, humanitarian intervention, voluntary political union, and the future of sovereignty, the balance of power and U.S. hegemony).
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.