Ribonuclease H evolution in retrotransposable elements

Genome Research, 2001

BMC Genomics, 2007

Background: LTR retrotransposons are a class of mobile genetic elements containing two similar long terminal repeats (LTRs). Currently, LTR retrotransposons are annotated in eukaryotic genomes mainly through the conventional homology searching approach. Hence, it is limited to annotating known elements.

Molecular Biology and Evolution, 1991

The retroid family consists of all genetic elements that encode a potential reverse transcriptase (RT). Members of this family include a diversity of eukaryotic genetic elements (viruses, transposable elements, organelle introns, and plasmids) and the retrons of prokaryotes. Some retroid elements have, in addition to the RT gene, other genes in common with the retroviruses. On the basis of RT sequence similarity, the retroposon group is defined as the eukaryotic long interspersed nuclear elements, the transposable elements of (1) Drosophila mekznogaster (I and F factors), (2) Trypunosoma brucei (ingi element), (3) Zeu mays (Cin4), (4) Bombyx mori (R2Bm), and members of the group II introns and plasmids of yeast mitochondria. The data presented here elucidate the extent of the relationships between the retroposons and other retroid-family members. Protein-sequence alignment data demonstrate that subsets of the retroposons contain different assortments of retroviral-like genes. Sequence similarities can be detected between the capsid, protease, ribonuclease H, and integrase proteins of retroviruses and several retroposon sequences. The relationships among the retroposon capsid-like sequences are congruent with the RT sequence phylogeny. In contrast, the similarity between ribonuclease H sequences varies in different subbranchs of the retroposon lineage. These data suggest that xenologous recombination (i.e., the replacement of a homologous resident gene by a homologous foreign gene) and/or independent gene assortment have played a role in the evolution of the retroposons.

A comprehensive phylogenetic analysis was conducted of non-long-terminal-repeat (non-LTR) retrotransposons based on an extended sequence alignment of their reverse transcriptase (RT) domain. The 440 amino acid positions used included a region proposed to be similar to the ''thumb'' of the right-handed RT structure found in retroviruses. All identified non-LTR elements could be grouped into 11 distinct clades. Using the rates of sequence change derived from studies of the vertical inheritance of R1 and R2 elements in arthropods as a comparison, we found no evidence for the horizontal transmission of non-LTR elements. Assuming vertical descent, the phylogeny suggested that non-LTR elements are as old as eukaryotes, with each of the 11 clades dating back to the Precambrian era. The analysis enabled us to propose a simple chronology for the acquisition of different enzymatic domains in the evolution of the non-LTR class of retrotransposons. The first non-LTR elements were sequence specific by virtue of a restriction-enzyme-like endonuclease located downstream of the RT domain. Evolving from this original group were elements (eight clades) that acquired an apurinic-apyrimidic endonuclease-like domain upstream of the RT domain. Finally, four of these clades have inherited an RNase H domain downstream of the RT domain. The phylogenies of the AP endonuclease and RNase H domains were also determined for this report and are consistent with the monophyletic acquisition of these domains. These studies represent the most comprehensive effort to date to trace the evolution of a major class of transposable elements.

International journal of biological sciences

Non-LTR retrotransposons are common in vertebrate genomes and although present in invertebrates they appear at a much lower frequency. The cephalochordate amphioxus is the closest living relative to vertebrates and has been considered a good model for comparative analyses of genome expansions during vertebrate evolution. With the aim to assess the involvement of transposable elements in these events, we have analysed the non-LTR retrotransposons of Branchiostoma floridae. In silico searches have allowed to reconstruct non-LTR elements of six different clades (CR1, I, L1, L2, NeSL and RTE) and assess their structural features. According to the estimated copy number of these elements they account for less than 1% of the haploid genome, which reminds of the low abundance also encountered in the urochordate Ciona intestinalis. Amphioxus (B. floridae) and Ciona share a pre-vertebrate-like organization for the non-LTR retrotransposons (<150 copies, < 1% of the genome) versus the com...

Mobile elements that use reverse transcriptase to make new copies of themselves are found in all major lineages of eukaryotes. The non-long terminal repeat (non-LTR) retrotransposons have been suggested to be the oldest of these eukaryotic elements. Phylogenetic analysis of non-LTR elements suggests that they have predominantly undergone vertical transmission, as opposed to the frequent horizontal transmissions found for other mobile elements. One prediction of this vertical model of inheritance is that the oldest lineages of eukaryotes should exclusively harbor the oldest lineages of non-LTR retrotransposons. Here we characterize the non-LTR retrotransposons present in one of the most primitive eukaryotes, the diplomonad Giardia lamblia. Two families of elements were detected in the WB isolate of G. lamblia currently being used for the genome sequencing project. These elements are clearly distinct from all other previously described non-LTR lineages. Phylogenetic analysis indicates that these Genie elements (for Giardia early non-LTR insertion element) are among the oldest known lineages of non-LTR elements consistent with strict vertical descent. Genie elements encode a single open reading frame with a carboxyl terminal endonuclease domain. Genie 1 is site specific, as seven to eight copies are present in a single tandem array of a 771-bp repeat near the telomere of one chromosome. The function of this repeat is not known. One additional, highly divergent, element within the Genie 1 lineage is not located in this tandem array but is near a second telomere. Four different telomere addition sites could be identified within or near the Genie elements on each of these chromosomes. The second lineage of non-LTR elements, Genie 2, is composed of about 10 degenerate copies. Genie 2 elements do not appear to be site specific in their insertion. An unusual aspect of Genie 2 is that all copies contain inverted repeats up to 172 bp in length.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1999

Israel Journal of Ecology & Evolution, 2006

Transposable elements comprise the bulk of higher plant genomes. The majority of these elements are the Class I LTR retrotransposons, which transpose via an RNA intermediate in a "Copy-and-Paste" mechanism. because retrotransposons use cellular resources and their own enzymes to replicate independently of the genome as a whole, and have thereby become in many cases more predominant than the cellular genes, they have been considered "selfish DNA" and nuclear parasites. They are thought to share many features of the internal life cycle of retroviruses such as HIV (lentiviruses). However, whereas at least some of the retroviruses arriving in an organism during an infection must be functional in order for the infection to proceed, some LTR retrotransposon families appear to completely lack active members even though they remain mobile. Furthermore, the process of retrotransposition is inherently error-prone and mutagenic, giving rise to "pseudospecies," or clusters of imperfect copies. The non-autonomous retrotransposons are able to cis-and trans-parasitize host retrotransposons to gain mobility, much as do defective interfering particles of RNA viruses. Hence, a complex dynamic is set up, whereby the impact of retrotransposons on genomes can be under selection on the organismal level; the impact of non-autonomous retrotransposons on autonomous ones can likewise be under selection if there is selection on the autonomous elements themselves. We are exploring the retrotransposon life cycle and the causes and possible consequences of non-autonomy at each stage regarding genome evolution.

Virus Genes, 1990

Contemporary Issues in Genetics and Evolution, 1997

The integrases of retrotransposons (class I) and retroviruses and the transposases of bacterial type elements (class II) were compared. The DDE signature that is crucial for the integration of these elements is present in most of them, except for the non-LTR retrotransposons and members of the hAT and P super-families. Alignment of this region was used to infer the relationships between class II elements, retrotransposons, and retroviruses. The mariner-Tc1 and the Pogo-Fot1 super-families were found to be closely related and probably monophyletic, as were LTR retrotransposons and retroviruses. The IS elements of bacteria were clustered in several families, some of them being closely related to the transposase of the mariner-Tc1 super-family or to the LTR retrotransposon and retrovirus integrases. These results plus that of were used to develop an evolutionary history suggesting a common ancestral origin(s) for the integrases and transposases containing the DDE signature. The position of the telomeric elements (Het-A and TART) was assessed by comparing their gag and reverse transcriptase domains (when present) to those of group II introns and non-LTR retrotransposons. This preliminary analysis suggests that telomeric elements may be derived from non-LTR retrotransposons.