Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
28 pages
1 file
AI-generated Abstract
This paper examines the methodologies of quantitative, qualitative, and action research within the social sciences. By comparing and contrasting these approaches, it provides insights into their strengths and weaknesses while arguing for a more pragmatic use of methods that best address social challenges. The historical context and development of these methods are discussed, with a particular focus on the unique attributes of action research and its integration with qualitative and quantitative approaches.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIPLE RESEARCH APPROACHES
First and foremost, I would like to present my deep sense of thanks and gratitude to my thesis supervisor Assoc. Prof. Dr. İlknur YÜKSEL-KAPTANOĞLU for suggesting this topic, her patience, enthusiasm, valuable ideas and support concerning the extended period of writing this thesis. I also would like to thank profusely to my professors, colleagues and the institute staff to provide such a teaching and learning environment. Undoubtedly, I am indebted to my father, my mother, and sister whose value to me improves with the years. Finally, I acknowledge my dear Sophie for her constant support and presence.
Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 2007
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1989
European Journal of Management Issues
Purpose: To explore the feasibility of using the multi-method and mixed-method in research studies by reviewing and comparing both methods. Design / Method / Approach: Using the literature, historical background on mixed-methods and multiple-methods design principles are collected and applied in this paper in a systematic review format. Findings: The major finding from this research is that incorporating quantitative and qualitative data in the form of a mixed or multi-method study has the potential to dramatically increase the accuracy and quality of any research's analysis and conclusions. Theoretical Implications: The study contributes to the theoretical understanding of how mixed and multi-method studies have distinct and distinguishable characteristics; it encourages researchers to conduct investigations appropriately to accomplish their research goals. The authors of this article introduce different designs (e.g., embedded design, explanatory design) which combine a mixed-...
Mixed methods (MM) involve combining qualitative (QUAL) and quantitative (QUAN) methods in program evaluation, primary research, and literature review . They are being increasingly used, specifically in health sciences. Over the years, several strategies to integrate QUAL and QUAN phases, results, and data have been proposed but rarely conceptualized and never tested in a comprehensive manner . For each MM researcher and teacher, one of the challenges is to plan, conduct, and report simply and clearly what are the applied specific MM strategies and their combinations. As a contribution for addressing this issue, the purpose of this article is to propose and test a conceptual framework of the combinations of strategies that are used in primary MM research.
Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality - TEEM'18, 2018
The objective of the qualitative and quantitative integration in research designs is the reconciliation between paradigms and methods in research in social science. The objective to specify the general epistemological formulations on which qualitative methods are based in more precise and current methodological proposals, since we are in an exciting moment in the qualitative research in which it is appreciated a clear tendency in the use of a mixed methods research. During the Twentieth-First Century that have favoured the rise of mixed methods researches that enhance the mutual invigoration of the two types of methods, and facilitate the triangulation through operations. The aim of this track is to provide a space for reflection and put into practice the foundation, operationalization, and fields of application of qualitative and mixed methods researches.
focusing on research questions that call for real-life contextual understandings, multi-level perspectives, and cultural influences;
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 2020
Mixed Methods Research for Improved Scientific Study, 2000
International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 2019
Theory and Society
CODS Journal of Dentistry
Online Journal of Cultural Competence in Nursing and Healthcare, 2011
Mixed-Methods Research Report , 2019
Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia ad Didacticam Biologiae Pertinentia, 2017
Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2007
Evaluation and Program Planning, 1995
Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 2013
An Introduction to Fully Integrated Mixed Methods Research, 2018
Journal of Engineering Education
Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences
Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 2022
Methodological approaches to community-based research., 2012