Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Steps towards a minimalist account of numbers [Mind]

2021, Mind

https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzab060

Abstract

NOTE. In the originally published version of this manuscript, all occurrences of the character ‘#’ were omitted from the pdf version of the article, by an error of the publisher. These errors are not present in the html version of the article. The publisher has since published a correction which, unfortunately, still contains this error. I strongly recommend to read the html version only! This paper outlines an account of number based on the numerical equivalence schema (NES), which consists of all sentences of the form #x.F x = n iff ∃ n x F x, where # is the number-of operator and ∃ n is defined in standard Russellian fashion. In the first part of the paper I point out some analogies between the NES and the T-schema for truth. In light of these analogies, I formulate a minimalist account of numbers, based on the NES, that strongly parallels the minimalist (deflationary) account of truth. One may be tempted to develop the minimalist account in a fictionalist direction, according to which arithmetic is useful but untrue, if taken at face value. In the second part I argue that this suggestion is not as attractive as it may appear at first. The NES suffers from a similar problem as the T-schema: it is deductively weak and does not enable the derivation of any non-trivial generalisations. In the third part of the paper I explore some strategies to deal with the generalisation problem, drawing again inspiration from the literature on truth. In closing this paper, I briefly compare the minimalist to some other accounts of number.