Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2012
Contemporary studies in the field of education cannot afford to neglect the ever present interrelationships between power and politics, economics and consumption, representation and identity. In studying a recent cultural phenomenon in government schools, it became clear that a methodological tool that made sense of these interlinked processes was required. The Circuit of Culture (the Circuit) was refined as a tool of cultural analysis by British cultural theorists in the late 1990s. This paper will provide a brief history of the Circuit, some of its applications and critique, and an overview of the way the Circuit has been utilised to explore a topical cultural phenomenon involving the commodification of international student programs in Australian government schools (Leve, 2011). This study draws on the Circuit to open the way for an exploration of the multiple interrelated processes involved in the construction and management of an education commodity. The Circuit emphasizes the moments of production, representation, consumption, regulation and identity, and the interrelated articulations of these moments. It is found to be a useful and flexible tool for exploring the contemporary significance of, and possibilities for, the increasingly complex multiple modes and relationships of each of these significant moments in the construction and maintenance of an education commodity. The Circuit of Culture as a generative tool of contemporary analysis: Examining the construction of an education commodity
2012
Contemporary studies in the field of education cannot afford to neglect the ever present interrelationships between power and politics, economics and consumption, representation and identity. In studying a recent cultural phenomenon in government schools, it became clear that a methodological tool that made sense of these interlinked processes was required. The Circuit of Culture (the Circuit) was refined as a tool of cultural analysis by British cultural theorists in the late 1990s. This paper will provide a brief history of the Circuit, some of its applications and critique, and an overview of the way the Circuit has been utilised to explore a topical cultural phenomenon involving the commodification of international student programs in Australian government schools (Leve, 2011). This study draws on the Circuit to open the way for an exploration of the multiple interrelated processes involved in the construction and management of an education commodity. The Circuit emphasizes the ...
"The Circuit of Culture (the Circuit) was refined as a tool of cultural analysis by British cultural theorists in the late 1990s. This article will provide a brief history of the Circuit, some of its applications and critique, and an overview of a recent study that utilizes the Circuit to explore a topical cultural phenomenon, international (full fee paying) student programs in Australian state schools (Leve, 2011a). This study draws on the Circuit to open the way for an exploration of the multiple interrelated processes involved in the construction and management of an education commodity. The Circuit emphasizes the moments of production, representation, consumption, regulation and identity, and the interrelated articulations of these moments, and is found to be a useful tool for exploring the contemporary significance of, and possibilities for, considering the increasingly complex multiple modes of each. Key Words: Methodology, Cultural Studies, Stuart Hall, Circuit of Culture, Representation, Commodification, International Education."
Educational Foundations, 1997
4th semester assignment in Educational Studies Texts of departure: Levinson, B. A., and Holland, D., (1996) The cultural production of the Educated person: critical ethnographies of Schooling and Local Practice, State University Press* Hager, P. and Hodkinson, p. (2009) Moving beyond the metaphor of transfer of learning, British Educational Research journal vol. 35 No. 4, August * About westernisation within the education sector and the damaging effects it can have on non-western countries if context is not explicitly taken into consideration.
Education, 2007
The aim of this paper is to suggest that the teaching of Cultural Theory (rather than Cultural Studies) has to be reconstructed from within a critical programme that rejects the teleological construction of culture. Also in response to the emergence of narratives like 'third way discourses' and 'new humanism' in the corollary of Cultural Studies, this paper dwells on how culture as a formative ground needs to yield to a 'space' where the very notions of logic (read: method, process, instruction, etc) and programme (read: knowledge, teaching, learning, etc.) are steered away from the quandaries that plagued the philosophical and pedagogical assumptions of Cultural Studies. A key issue related to this argument is the concept of struggle in critical pedagogy.
The SAGE Handbook of Curriculum, Pedagogy and Assessment (Vol 1), 2016
The chapter begins by locating the challenges faced by teachers across the world today by the domination of instrumentalist education policies that fail to connect their recommendations with cultural context as if they are independent. The search for the education equivalent of the oxymoronic smart bomb or silver bullet along with neo-liberal instrumentalism returns it seems almost inevitably to deficit discourses of ‘back to the basics’ in the curriculum. By offering contested understandings of pedagogy, I seek to problematize the concept of pedagogy, suggesting that pedagogy should mediate between the everyday world and the world of school that seeks to develop a deeper and more nuanced understanding of the term by exploring a range of its dimensions and how these impact on and work together with concepts of culture. The next section attempts to navigate the labyrinth of pedagogical practices that include pedagogies of indifference and poverty, to productive and culturally relevant pedagogies. Problematizing pedagogy as cultural politics in action, the chapter proceeds to critique the unproblematized assumptions beyond the polarization of pedagogy and culture using examples from non-Western research. Although I do not propose a ‘magic bullet’, no single pedagogy or pedagogical practice and no single definition of best practice, I do outline some pedagogies of possibility. Concluding that pedagogy is actually a risky business I offer a new and innovative framework that both empowers teachers and their students to the possibility of individual and social transformation.
2008
from the Foreword: Intercultural education, the main research area of this work is not a new concept in educational studies. However, the domination of the discourse focused on multiculturalism, ethnicity and problems with immigrants' integration is criticised (Žižek, 2007; Bourdieu, 2001) as being a substitute for real problems, such as burdening democratic societies with costs of training employees for corporations. The notion of social change, previously regarded as one of the essential functions of education, is gradually being replaced by the socialisation to the capricious needs of the market economy. We do not ignore the perspective, that education nowadays might only be a preparation to the precarity of the labour market and that conflicts of interests are too often reduced to cultural problems. However, it would be hard to ignore the increasing migration all over the world. Living in the “age of migration” (Castles and Miller, 2003), we face significant demographic changes in our societies. Educational institutions handle with more and more students with different cultural backgrounds and our assumption is, that there is a need of coexisting peacefully at school and in the society with respect to each other's rights. Thus, talking about culture is not a political manipulation, it is the daily and widely experienced cultural shock - caused both by meeting the others and coming back to the previously known culture - that makes it more difficult to see other social strata.
Available via Springer; this book can be read as a report of a national study, or used as a textbook in sociology, education and related courses. Based on a comparative study from 2018, this book explores four different approaches to education according to 2,500 Australians’ experiences of them, on a range of topics. It shows that whilst the critical approach has strong research-based support across the board, sometimes a liberal, conservative or post-modern approach may have some merit for certain outcomes. This is a book about challenging our biases and calling on ourselves to aim higher for education, than what our own pre-conceived ideas might allow. What and who is valued in education, and the social roles and identity messages learned, differ wildly from school to school. Education is most impacted by the orientation of education dominant in that context – whether conservative, liberal, critical or post-modern. These terms are often used with little practical data on the real-life schooling they entail. Who learns what in which approach? Who learns best with which approach, on which topic and why? This book provides this previously missing information. It offers holistic, detailed descriptions of conservative, liberal, critical and post-modern approaches to education broadly. It provides statistics and stories from real students on how the four approaches work practically in schools in relation to: age, gender, sexuality, social class, race, news-media, popular culture and technology. Chapters offer background information to the four perspectives, data from student participants, tutorial questions and activities, and suggestions for further reading.
This paper begins by discussing reasons for the failure of important aspects of Conservative education policy in the United Kingdom and finds them in contemporary Conservatism's "fundamentalist" handling of questions of culture and tradition. The term "fundamentalist" refers to certain religious, cultural, and political ideologies that invoke a narrow and authority-centered account of tradition without attempting to enter into discourse about its value or premises. The paper then discusses the cultural meaning of teachers' opposition to Conservatism, as manifested in the national testing boycott of 1993-94. The paper suggests that aspects of social-movement theory can illuminate the achievements of this opposition. It concludes by considering what space for cultural action is offered by the educational policies of the new Labour Party. A problem with the Labour Party's agenda is that it discounts the intellectual work of teachers as well as the persis...
Educational Theory, 1999
What shouldbe the ultimate purposes of education in a democratic society? This seems like a simple question, yet when posed to educators, numerous, varied, and often contradictory responses are given. These range from gaining knowledge to developing skills, from finding a job to making a life, from social consciousness to social control, and from cultural transmission to critical citizenship. Certainly how we respond to this question influences what we do in the name of education, including how we design public schools and curricula. Surprisingly, however, this is a question not often asked by educators, nor one seriously addressed in schools of education. Asking about ultimate purposes is a metaphysical question, one that requires us to consider the reasons we do somethingthe why, or the end goal. Yet too often in education we neglect metaphysical questions and focus instead on engineering ones.' Such questions are about means, about how we can best do something or how we can more efficiently reach some predetermined goal. Engineering questions are commonplace in education. Should students be able to choose their schools? How can we efficiently implement an educational strategy such as cooperative learning? What is the best way to teach biology? How can we better assess students? Some of these types of questions are more compelling than others, but "what they have in common is that they evade the issue of what schools are for. It is as if we are a nation of technicians, consumed by our expertise of how something should be done, afraid or incapable of thinking about why."2
Human Affairs, 2012
The aim of this article is to problematize the concept of school culture both as a concept and as a subject of investigation. It deals with the historical roots of this concept and the fact that it is shrinkinga consequence of the managerial imperatives of effectiveness and accountability in education. School culture, in relation to the quality of schools and the quality of education, has become the subject of audits, arrived at through a developed network of standardisation in education, testing and evaluation. The methodology of evaluation currently lending particular substance to school culture, however, generates different methodological perspectives on investigating school culture and thus research is becoming an instrument of political power. In the research it is then necessary to either abandon the concept of school culture or to free it from spinning round the cycle of evaluation/self-evaluation-a change in school culture-improving the "quality of the school"-a new evaluation/self-evaluation. One way to do this is to employ ethnographic approaches in research into schools and to understand school culture as a system of texts. Key words: school culture; school quality; managerial accountability; research and evaluation; textuality of school culture; singular and plural interpretations of school culture An umbrella concept-a cover-up manoeuvre The culture of a school, the culture of a company, the culture of living, the culture of eating, the culture of waging conflict, the culture of strawberries? Is it meaningful to rely on such as a hackneyed concept as culture?... Don't we expect dishonourable intentions from those that combine with culture apparently at will? Perhaps so. And that is why we might ask, 'What is the intention behind it? What motivates us to link something with culture?' (Markowitz 1998, 101). A discursive obsession with "culture" has engulfed schools. In schools today the concept of "culture" is experiencing a similar conjuncture (Gogolin 1998) as did the concept of "process" twenty or thirty years ago (Huber 2009). Just as in those days concepts such as debate, communication, consultancy, development or mediation could not exist without being linked to the concept of process-even though these terms already contain within them the notion of process (Huber 2009, 14-15)-neither can today's school avoid its evaluation culture, teaching culture, learning culture, organisational culture, teacher culture, pupil
Paedagogica Historica, 2017
Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document. When citing, please reference the published version. Take down policy While the University of Birmingham exercises care and attention in making items available there are rare occasions when an item has been uploaded in error or has been deemed to be commercially or otherwise sensitive.
1992
This document examines the contribution of education to cultural development and the relationship between the contemporary cultural scene and educational processes. The first of five sections discusses the existing tensions between the role of the school culture and contemporary culture. The second section describes the demands of tradition and modernity of cultures. The third section presents culture as an element in democratization. The fourth section considers the question of linguistics by educational authorities. The final section suggests the ambiguous roles of multicultural societies and intercultural education. A 22-item bibliography is included.
Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 2008
Transgressions: Cultural Studies and Education. Vol. 17, 2010
Cultural studies provides an analytical toolbox for both making sense of educational practice and extending the insights of educational professionals into their labors. In this context Transgressions: Cultural Studies and Education provides a collection of books in the domain that specify this assertion. Crafted for an audience of teachers, teacher educators, scholars and students of cultural studies and others interested in cultural studies and pedagogy, the series documents both the possibilities of and the controversies surrounding the intersection of cultural studies and education. The editors and the authors of this series do not assume that the interaction of cultural studies and education devalues other types of knowledge and analytical forms. Rather the intersection of these knowledge disciplines offers a rejuvenating, optimistic, and positive perspective on education and educational institutions. Some might describe its contribution as democratic, emancipatory, and transformative. The editors and authors maintain that cultural studies helps free educators from sterile, monolithic analyses that have for too long undermined efforts to think of educational practices by providing other words, new languages, and fresh metaphors. Operating in an interdisciplinary cosmos, Transgressions: Cultural Studies and Education is dedicated to exploring the ways cultural studies enhances the study and practice of education. With this in mind the series focuses in a non-exclusive way on popular culture as well as other dimensions of cultural studies including social theory, social justice and positionality, cultural dimensions of technological innovation, new media and media literacy, new forms of oppression emerging in an electronic hyperreality, and postcolonial global concerns. With these concerns in mind cultural studies scholars often argue that the realm of popular culture is the most powerful educational force in contemporary culture. Indeed, in the twenty-first century this pedagogical dynamic is sweeping through the entire world. Educators, they believe, must understand these emerging realities in order to gain an important voice in the pedagogical conversation.
Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies
Educational Theory, 2015
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.