An introduction to project finance in emerging markets
Henrique Ghersi2000
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Abstract
The use of non-recourse project financing has grown steadily in emerging markets, especially in basic infrastructure, natural resources and the energy sector. Because of its cost and complexity, project finance is aimed at large-scale investments. The key is in the precise estimation of cash flows and risk analysis and allocation, which enables high leverage, and in ensuring that the project can be easily separated from the sponsors involved. Project finance is more difficult in emerging countries, which tend to pose unpredictable risks with unfavorably biased results. This imposes the need to introduce contractual, financing and structural elements that yield the maximum possible expatriation of operating flows.
Related papers
Role of Project Finance in Emerging Economies
The steady growth of funding projects with project finance to develop and provide infrastructural facilities in developed and emerging economies cannot be overemphasized. This study analysis and reviewed the immense contribution of project finance schemes in constructing numerous public projects. Central to the success of this scheme is the non-recourse financing of projects, allocation and shifting of project risk between the parties of the scheme. The study further found that in spite of the complexity associated with project finance in emerging economies, it is prudent to formulate a very solid and suitable legal framework, provide enabling environment for investors to reap their investments and a stable political atmosphere considering the number of years required to recoup the initial cost of investment. Keywords: Project finance, emerging economies, legal framework, investors, infrastructure.
Project Finance in Developing Countries
Project finance is a pervasive method of financing in developing countries. It has a significant advantage over traditional financing approaches. In the era of the globalization of business and investment, where the demand for energy has soared and many international oil companies and private and institutional investors ventured into the developing world, this method of finance has created a wealth of new opportunities to finance capital-incentive ventures, including development of oil production, gas transmission, and electric power generation facility. Beginning in the 1980s, the risk associated with the construction of large infrastructure were largely born by governments, which normally built and operated these projects through their own enterprises. However, most of these governments were in transition or post-conflict states-saddled with debt and unable to finance large expensive infrastructure projects. Through much of the mid-to-late twentieth century, these government came to adopt the view that the best way to boost economic growth would be to limit the government involvement and make room for private investments and innovation. The proposed solution was the private financing of large and capital-incentive infrastructure. The world's appetite for oil & gas is great and is steadily increasing. The consumption of oil & gas remains concentrated in wealthy nations, particularly the United States and China which has surpassed most of the industrialized countries to become the world's second-largest consumer of Energy. To satisfy this increasing high demand of energy, oil-producing countries have rushed to increase their productions. Thus, developing countries have been and continue to be a favored destination for international oil companies mainly because financial constraints have hindered these countries' ability to commit its financial resources to the development of their infrastructures. Project finance has developed in response to this critical need. It offers the prospect to appeal both domestic and international private investment, in addition, it allows the developing countries to harness private sector's skills, expertise, the necessary technology, and know
Project Finance, and Projects in the Energy Sector in Developing Countries
2013
The purpose of this study is to show the importance of using project finance in infrastructure investments in developing countries. The paper will be focused only on one infrastructure sector, which is energy. Structurally, power project finance has involved largely buildown-transfer (BOT) project structures and long-term contracts. The projects largely reflect a rational allocation of risks among public and private participants. Private sponsors and lenders generally assume risks for completion and performance. Governments assume substantial risks in nearly all projects, mostly in areas in which they have control, such as utility performance, currency convertibility, fuel costs, inflation, and political event. The aim of this research is to empirically examine a financing and governance structure called Project Finance that typically funds large scale, capital intensive, infrastructure investments in risky countries. The methodology used in this paper is literature review of the ma...
The Project Finance Markets
Principles of Project Finance, 2002
This chapter reviews the private-sector debt markets for project finance, in particular commercial banks (cf. §3.1) and bond investors (cf. §3.2). The uses of mezzanine or subordinated debt (cf. §3.3), leasing (cf. §3.4), and vendor finance (cf. §3.5) are also considered. Loans and guarantees provided by export credit agencies and multilateral and bilateral development banks, mainly for projects in developing countries where the private sector is not willing to assume the credit risk in the country concerned, are discussed in Chapter 11 (but cf. §3.6). Private-sector project finance debt is provided from two main sources-commercial banks and bond investors. Commercial banks provide long-term loans to project companies; bond holders (typically long-term investors such as insurance companies and pension funds) purchase long-term bonds (tradable debt instruments) issued by project companies. Although the legal structures, procedures, and markets are different, the criteria under which debt is raised in each of these markets are much the same. ("Lender" is used in this book to mean either a bank lender or a bond investor.
Analysis of the impact of announcing a Project Finance deal to the Government Bonds of the host country
2020
Project financing is an innovative technique to provide long term funding that due to the contractual arrangements can mitigate risks otherwise would stop a project from being realized. Over the past decade more than 2.5 Trillion USD have been invested through project finance deals all over the world; about 56% of these were in infrastructure projects. The importance of these infrastructure projects, particularly in developing countries, has been identified through the literature to be significant for the local economy and project finance is the tool to provide the needed quality funds that can drive economic growth. This project assesses the relationship between the announcement of a project finance deal with the reaction of the government bonds of the project’s host country and identifies the factors that significantly affect the result. Secondary data that included some project deal parameters, the financing syndicate structure but also some of the host country’s financial information and government indicators were analyzed to identify relevant patterns that support our argument. The analysis show that the announcement of an infrastructure project finance deal can positively affect the performance of government’s bonds, as long as the project is of significant size in relation to the host country’s GDP, a development bank is participating in the syndicate and the government effectiveness of the project’s host country has significantly improved over the years up to the announcement of the project.
The Emerging Project Bond Market: Covenant Provisions and Credit Spreads
The World Bank eBooks, 2003
The emergence in the 1990s of a nascent project bond Much of the recent work relating to the role of market to fund long-term infrastructure projects in contractual covenants to the determination of bond developing countries merits attention. Dailami and prices has focused on the U.S. corporate bond market Hauswald compile .tailed information on a sample of with its unique bankruptcy code (Chapter 11) and well 105 bonds issued between January 1993 and March developed legal framework, recognizing the bond 2002 for financing infr-'lcrr.. projects in developing contract as the sole instrument of defining the rights and countries, document their contractual covenants, and duties of various parties. In circumstances in which the analyze their pricing determinants. They find that on underpinning legal and institutional frameworks average, project bonds are issued at approximately 300 governing contract formation and enforcement are not basis points above U.S. Treasury securities, have a well developed, the link between bond pricing and legal surprisingly high issue size of US$278 million, a maturity framework becomes important. This finding is confirmed of slightly under 12 years, and are rated slightly below by the authors' econometric analysis of project bond investment grade. In terms of geographic origin, projects pricing model. So, investors take into account the quality in Asia and Latin America have issued more bonds than of the host country's legal framework and reward those located in other regions. projects located in countries that adhere to the rule of law with tighter credit spreads and lower funding costs. This paper-a product of the Development Prospects Group-is part of a larger effort in the group to promote a healthy flow of investment capital to developing countries' infrastructure. Copies of the paper are available free from the World Bank,
The Management of Finances in International Projects: Optimizing Costs and Ensuring Success Through Global Investments and Financial Management
Ad alta, 2024
In the course of writing the scientific article, an in-depth study of aspects of financial management in the context of international projects was conducted. The focus was on analyzing cost optimization strategies and achieving success in a global investment and financial management environment. The conducted research shows that in the modern world of globalization, it is important to understand and effectively implement financial management strategies that take into account the unique aspects of international business. Particular attention is paid to the identification of risks related to the external environment, such as currency fluctuations, political and economic risks, which affect the effectiveness of financial decisions. Particular attention is paid to the use of specialized financial instruments to reduce risks, such as risk management and multi-currency settlements. The article analyzes in detail the influence of financial decisions on the effectiveness of international projects, emphasizing the strategic context of profit maximization and ensuring the stability of the financial position. The study of the interaction of financial mechanisms in international transactions takes place in the context of the unique challenges of the global business environment, including currency fluctuations and political and economic risk. In addition, the article summarizes recommendations and strategies aimed at achieving maximum efficiency and sustainability for international projects through careful strategic planning and cost optimization. A detailed analysis of various mechanisms of financial management in the context of global investments has revealed key principles that can serve as a basis for solving complex financial management tasks in international business.
Critical Factors and Major Criteria in Succesfull Projects Based on Foreign Financing
Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, 2017
This paper is dedicated to the critical factors and major criteria in projects defined as succesfull, based on foreign financing. Almost five decades of existence of such an important organization as Project Management Institute (PMI) were based on project management used simultaneously in scientific and educational area, economic and social support, demographic and humanitarian impact, but more and more professional and multicultural essence of global development of the world. The enthusiasm and dedication of a group of project managers, ingineers, statisticians, economists, sociologists, mathematicians, etc., during two decades, between 1960 and 1980 led to the foundation of the theory of critical factors and major criteria for a success project. The voice of some giants like Dennis P. Slevin, and Jeffrey K. Pinto, deduced from their papers and from their activities and views, as well as from the instrumental, methodological and project manangement education works, have provided, ...
Related papers
The nature of credit risk in project finance
In project finance, credit risk tends to be relatively high at project inception and to diminish over the life of the project. Hence, longer-maturity loans would be cheaper than shorter-term credits. JEL classification: F34, G12, G28, G32. For decades, project finance has been the preferred form of financing for largescale infrastructure projects worldwide. Several studies have emphasised its critical importance, especially for emerging economies, focusing on the link between infrastructure investment and economic growth. Over the last few years, however, episodes of financial turmoil in emerging markets, the difficulties encountered by the telecommunications and energy sectors and the financial failure of several high-profile projects 2 have led many to rethink the risks involved in project financing.
Infrastructure project finance and capital flows: A new perspective
World Development, 1998
The success with which middle income indebted developing countries have gained access to private international finance in the 1990s is a tribute to their own domestic economic performance, international policy in dealing with the debt crisis of the 1980s, and innovations in international financial markets. This paper emphasizes the role of private infrastructure investment as a vehicle for attracting foreign capital to developing countries in the 1990s. The paper examines the determination of credit risk premium on infrastructure projects in the country risk environment of developing countries, and provides tentative quantitative evidence of the importance of macroeconomic and project-specific attributes of project risk. The key finding is that the market seems to impose a high risk premium on loans to countries with high inflation, and to projects in the road sector.
Project Financing in Developing Countries, New Corporate Social Responsibility, Human Rights, and Multinationals
Essex Human Rights Review, 2008
Economic development requires substantial investment in industry and infrastructure, much of which comes from outside the developing world. The outsiders can include international financial institutions and foreign governments, as well as private companies. These agents have different interests and run different risks in financing or operating infrastructure. To reduce or minimise the economic risks in particular, private companies often make use of project finance. 1 In a project finance scheme, a legally-independent project company, usually one that builds, or builds and operates, an industrial plant or a piece of infrastructure, is established by other pre-existing and usually very large multinational companies in commercial sectors related to that of the project company. These enterprises invest as shareholders in the project company and are called sponsors of the project company. Crucially, the project company also relies heavily on loans from banks to get established. These loans supply the bulk of the capital for the project company, 2 are often for extremely large amounts even by the standards of big business, and are secured against the future revenues of the finished project, not against the assets of the sponsors. 3 For example, the oil multinational BP, sometimes with partners, is a sponsor of certain pipeline projects in various parts of the world. If the project company runs into difficulty servicing its debt, lenders have no claims on BP's assets -project funding is 'nonrecourse' -but BP's shareholding will decline in value. So while BP and sponsors in general run risks in project finance, the risks arising from unpaid debt are mainly borne by private and public sector banks. Since project companies are largely financed from bank loans, the risks of unpaid debts can be significant. Private banks run these risks on the condition that they are senior lenders: they are first in the queue for project revenues, and also for the proceeds of asset sales for project companies that default on loans. * My interest in Project Finance was sparked by an Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) funded project, 'Global Project Finance, Rights and Sustainable Development', carried out by Sheldon Leader and colleagues in the Human Rights Centre from 2005 to 2007. An earlier version of this paper was read to a conference on issues in globalization held in Dubrovnik in September 2007. Some of this paper overlaps with a longer one under a slightly different title published in the conference proceedings.
The Role of Project Finance in Contemporary Financing: "Theoretical Perspective
2014
Funding projects through Project Finance arrangements in contemporary Economic and Corporate and economic governance has become the catalyst for developing capital intensive projects in most Organizations and Nations. Unlike corporate finance, project finance is a non-recourse debt that is financed through cash generated from the project. This paper examined the increasing reliance on project finance in recent times by assessing its merits over traditional corporate financing and described the operation of a typical Project Finance Scheme. Using a Descriptive Analysis, the theoretical underpinnings of this subject matter were assessed. Historical data on project costs using project financing were evaluated. The study revealed that the successful completion of most capital intensive projects were initiated and completed through project finance schemes. However, the ultimate key to projects finance is the accurate estimation and evaluation of project viability.
Project Finance and Corporate Finance: Comparative Analysis as means of financing for infrastructure projects
2008
Recent worldwide developments in financing and offering of public infrastructure along with the strong presence of concession contracts in Greece for the construction of important projects like toll roads, international airports and bridges call for further study of the similarities and differences of project finance and corporate finance. Significant boost was given to project financing in Greece due to adoption by law of the Public Private Partnerships initiative for the construction of public infrastructure. Large number of construction and engineering projects was mainly based in this practice. Despite the extended practical use literature about this topic, worldwide, remains rather poor while in Greece is still in infancy. Further more, confusion still exists in reference to the above mentioned two ways of financing and structure finance. Motives for and benefits derived from using project financing remain still unexplored. The purpose of this study is to discuss differences an...
Financing infrastructure projects based on risk sharing model: Istisna sukuk
One of the basic needs of developing countries is the economic infrastructure that is the basis of growth and development in other sectors of the economy. The lack of proper response to financing needs in this sector will result in economic development that faces major challenges anddifficulties. Designing an optimal solution to financing these types of projects is thus, a fundamental need. These projects have two main characteristics that should be considered in the financing method. The first is long-term period to constructing and the second is the high cost of implementation. The use of Islamic financial innovations based on Islamic contracts can meet many of these needs.States in developing countries have so far preferred to raise fund based on debt, ignoring the fact that this kind of financing and choice of method will cause many problems for the economy. Financial crises and economic stability, creating a leverage in the economy, budget deficit, inflation and the distribution of risk among economic agents are the issues that affect the structures and models of financing. IstisnaSukukhas the potential to be used for infrastructure project financing and can be combined with other contracts, including Ijarah and Musharakah, for these types of projects. In this paper, various models are presented and examined to show that by adapting the financial flows of state-owned projects with real economy, especially in the field of infrastructure, the macroeconomic imbalances can be avoided. This is most relevant in the "Istisna-Musharakah-Stock" model.
How can ECAs help solve funding challenges for capital intensive projects in emerging market economies?
Applied Economics: Systematic Research, 2014
Many emerging countries in the world remain middle income. All those countries are striving to achieve high income status in the future. Among the key challenges that middle income countries face is the modernization of their export sector, which can help increase the value added of their production. To modernize their export industries, companies in emerging middle income countries often need Trung Quang DINh, hilmar Þór hIlmARSSON how can Ecas help solve funding challenges for capital intensive Projects in Emerging market Economies? This article discusses challenges faced by companies in emerging markets when funding capital intensive projects and purchasing equipment from companies in advanced economies. The article analyses the funding and risk mitigation instruments of Export Credit Agencies to show how they work and how they can provide a solution both for the buyers of equipment in emerging markets and the sellers in advanced economies.
Risk and capital structure in Asian project finance
Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2008
We develop and test hypotheses derived from a multi-level theoretical framework for understanding factors shaping the credit risk and capital structure of a quintessentially Asian form of investment known as project finance. It differs from other corporate financing approaches. A project company is separate and bankruptcy remote from the investing firm sponsors that create it. The project company relies extensively on debt capital provided by creditors to fund project operations. Creditors provide more (less) debt as a percentage of overall project capital when there is less (more) risk of project failure and non-repayment. We define a target risk framework identifying country-, industry-, syndicate-, firm-, and project-related factors shaping Asian project finance company credit risk and thus, project debt. In a sample of 238 project finance companies announced in 13 Asian countries from 1995-2004, we observe substantial effects on project capital structure with respect to country-level factors linked to institutional and macroeconomic theories, syndicate structure factors linked to agency theory, and lead sponsor experience and project size factors linked to learning and transaction cost theories. We argue that these and other determinants of project finance company credit risk and capital structure in Asia since the mid-1990s anticipate similar relationships now emerging elsewhere around the globe. Asia Pacific J Manage
What is Project Finance?
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2013
Project finance is the process of financing a specific economic unit that the sponsors create, in which creditors share much of the venture's business risk and funding is obtained strictly for the project itself. Project finance creates value by reducing the costs of funding, maintaining the sponsors financial flexibility, increasing the leverage ratios, avoiding contamination risk, reducing corporate taxes, improving risk management, and reducing the costs associated with market imperfections. However, project finance transactions are complex undertakings, they have higher costs of borrowing when compared to conventional financing and the negotiation of the financing and operating agreements is time-consuming. In addition to describing the economic motivation for the use of project finance, this paper provides details on project finance characteristics and players, presents the recent trends of the project finance market and provides some statistics in relation to project finance lending activity between 2000 and 2014. Statistical analysis shows that project finance loans arranged for U.S. borrowers have higher credit spreads and upfront fees, and have higher loan size to deal size ratios when compared with loans arranged for borrowers located in W.E. On the contrary, loans closed in the U.S. have a much shorter average maturity and are much less likely to be subject to currency risk and to be closed as term loans.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.