Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
Architectural History Aotearoa
A number of moves in the seventies had meant that more women than ever before were in architecture schools and by the eighties they were flooding into the profession. Over the decade their numbers quadrupled (as measured by registration) as women moved from the exception to the norm. But their impact was variable. This paper will try to tease out that impact from women-only practices to support groups to what they published to moves away from the profession.
"A presentation-based paper that explores the current issues facing female architects and considers whether using legislation to ‘coerce’ to ‘positively discriminate,’ represents an after-thehorse- has-bolted approach to increasing diversity and instead considers progressive means, including the role of the school in enabling a fundamental system change in terms of diversity and representation in both practice & the profession."
This paper examines the recent status of Turkish women architects through the statistical data gathered from union of chamber of architects and schools of architecture. It also compares the figures of women architects in our country with selected countries from Europe as well as Canada, Australia and United States of America. Our study has demonstrated that despite of the fact that women are generally underrepresented in the all work force in Turkey, the condition of Turkish women architects display a considerably satisfactory level of representation in the profession, when compared with other countries. However, during the analysis it became also evident that the current statistical data in published and unpublished sources have various shortages and thus they are unable to provide a ground for more accurate evaluations. Based on this necessity, we would like to present our proposal for web based documentation and archiving of women architects in order to benefit from the fruitful milieu of the conference discussions. Our proposal for documentation is also reputable to other countries for further developments of this project. The fact that only a small percentage of the overall built environment is shaped by women architects clearly shows the existence of a gender-based crisis in the profession of architecture. Despite the growing number of female students in architectural education especially after the 1980s, male professionals are still shaping architectural practice. This dilemma has become a major area of interest for many scholars who have approached the problem from various viewpoints for the last twenty years. Even the proliferation in the number of books, articles and research reports on the issue of marginalization of women architects in the profession has not been able to change this situation yet (Graft, Greed, Manley, 2003). The patriarchal roots of the profession and its historical relations with craftsmanship are evidently one of the main reasons in the historically delayed entrance of women architects into the profession (Adams, Tancred 2000). The emphasis on the effect of the biological differences (Grosz E 2000) and/or socially constructed gender codes (Weismann 1994) is also another approach in current research, which focuses on the reasons for the marginalization of women architects. Some feminist theorists, on the other hand, have preferred to interpret the difference by acknowledging women's ways of knowing (Franck 2000). These viewpoints theorize the raison d'être of the secondary roles of women in the profession by criticizing the patriarchal hegemony in general. Despite the modest roles that women take in shaping the built environment, feminist criticism in the field of architecture has enabled recognition of the responsive approach of women architects for sustainability, diversity, and many other everyday matters, including innovative solutions for eliminating the dissatisfaction from standardized modern housing. Participation of women into the practice of architecture obviously can make a great contribution for equal representation in the workforce all over the world. Women are trying to resist against sexism in the economic arena for a long time. On the other hand, women' participation into architecture is not only vital for women architects, but also for many other people who are in demand of a better architectural service which would produce solutions for social problems such as poverty, homelessness, isolation, and extreme consumption of the sources all over the world. Typical male-centric view of architecture focused on the physical aspects and created a form-obsessed physical built environment. On the other hand, women architects do not take conventional star system embedded in the patriarchal roots of the profession into account. Instead, women architects generally prefer to contend with small commissions with a focus on family society issues such as housing and rehabilitation projects. Increasing the number of women in the discipline of architecture is one of the major concerns of national professional organizations in the new millennium. Action plans that were prepared after comprehensive researches include recommendations to educational institutions, professional organizations, employers and practices. The general points taken from a sample report is quoted below: Recommendations to educational institutions included these key points:
Architectural Theory Review, 1998
All occupations, of course, should be gender-neutral. Much as we hate to say it, we are led to conclude that women often get a raw deal in their education in architecture school, and in their careers in architectural practice" said in article on "Women in Architecture". As a student of architecture, I surveyed, that 13 of my classmates are quite unknown about female architects except 'Zaha Hadid'. Neither, they had any keen interest of knowing about them. Even, while searching "great architects of world" we get few female architects in the list. As we all know architecture is a profession of passion, dedication and hard work so why in this race women are lagging behind. Personally, I am not denying the fact that in 21 st century females in this profession are behind men's they are giving a level of competition to them. Why a woman gets distracted from architecture? Why women in architecture are in teaching profession only? With these questions and intentions I would like to explore the struggle, hard work and dedication of women in architecture and design profession .I would like to know the percentage of women in architecture industry with comparison to men's , heights of achievement by women, time to time variation in involvement of women."
The presence and influence of women as architects and designers, has not yet been sufficiently explored in terms of social change. From the end of the 19th century we find very strong and innovative female influence in architecture, design and urban planning projects. The origins of the modern women's approach to architecture emerges mostly from the world fairs in America during that period, when the social influence of women determined occasions for a specific professional role in architecture. At the beginning of the 20th century, American experiences were exported to Europe through fairs and exhibitions, generating a model for the new generation. What did actually drive these women to choose this profession and what did they have in common? What were their aims and what concepts did they have of the new era? In a nutshell the Italian scenario of that historical era reveals how women –who had a profound impact on Modernist history even while working at the periphery of the profession– have changed the idea of living, working, learning, having fun, even if their works sometimes remains under the 'tradition of misattribution'. The case of Maria Teresa Parpagliolo Shepard is significant both as an instance of Italian pioneering innovative landscape architect and as a promoter of a new lifestyle.
2014
The history of women in architecture in Germany began more than a century ago. Although the earlier history of the pioneering women architects is well documented for Berlin, their contribution to the city's postwar rebuilding has so far received little appreciation. This is the case even though Berlin is the only city where the two German states' different social contexts and building cultures co-existed, and were in explicit competition. Asking why so little is known about women architects working at this time in West and East Berlin, this thesis provides an initial comprehensive picture of women's contribution to the rebuilding of Berlin, made by working freelance in the West and holding responsible positions in the East. At the same time, furnishing a second original contribution, the thesis explores obstacles limiting their design activity on both sides of the border. It explains to what extent similarities and differences in the women's education, role models, and conditions of professionalization determined design opportunities open to women architects. The research framework is a situational analysis, considering the different social contexts as natural environment, the culture of the architectural profession as social environment, and women architects' limited participation as problem situation. Feminist and gender sensitive theory and methods reveal the interplay of obstacles to women architects' participation. Bourdieu's theory of a State Nobility reinforces understanding of which aspects of the culture of the profession sustained the gender divisions in postwar architectural practice. Eight interview-based cases explain the different strategies of these women to succeed in the respective context. The analysis of their work and representation shows: women architects in the West remained marginalised during these two decades, and despite explicit political support for women in engineering professions, their more integrated colleagues in the East also failed to surpass the glass ceiling. Assembling detailed information about and from these eight women, the cases support equality-oriented documentation of a marginalized group in historical research. Given women architects' limited advancement until today, this thesis forms part of a Feminist Intervention into architectural history that needs to be continued.
2007
The architecture profession has historically been male dominated. Today, approximately 50% of architecture students are women. However only 18% of licensed architects are women. AIA Miami Women in Architecture Committee works to support women architects at all stages in their profession through networking, mentorship, and educational sessions. RIDING THE WAVE Since 2009, a national conversation for women in architecture and design has been held biannually, the AIA Women's Leadership Summit. AIA Miami's Women in Architecture Committee began extending that conversation locally with the 2018 Summit "The Wave of Change." We will continue the conversation towards a more inclusive profession with "Riding the Wave" in October 2020. "Riding the Wave" provides a platform to celebrate and share the work of women leaders in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction, while providing inspiration for professional and personal growth. It is a conversation on the challenges facing women of diverse backgrounds today in advancing their careers and achieving equity and inclusion in the A/E/C professions.
Architectural Theory Review, 2012
A special issue edited by Naomi Stead, containing a keynote by Bridget Fowler and Fiona M. Wilson, and new articles by Mary Shepard Spaeth and Katarzyna Kosmala, Karen Burns, Gill Matthewson, Norma Isa Figueroa, Sarah Treadwell and Nicole Allan, Jan Smitheram, Julie Willis, Hilde Heynen, Igea Troiani, Valerie Caven, Elena Navarro-Astor and Marie Drop, Amanda Roan and Naomi Stead, Ruth Morrow and Patricia Belford, and Henry W. Pickford; with a review by Bronwyn Hanna.
The meeting entitled "Women Architects have always been Here" is part of the series of scientific meetings "Docta Spes: The Future of Space is Now", which was launched in November 2022 by the Department of Architecture, University of Thessaly (UTh) and adopts its aim of “reflecting on the need to design a future that is habitable and socially inclusive.” It brings into dialogue distinguished architects, historians, theorists, researchers, and artists who have developed extensive interdisciplinary work at an international level. At the core of their studies and practices are feminist theories, methodologies, and practices as these take shape in diverse geographical contexts and intersect with different disciplines, from architectural historiography, art, curating, gender studies, geography, political ecology, architectural and urban design. The contributions and discussions in this meeting further draw on perspectives from archives, teaching, research, and social activism and will be a catalyst for reflection on the present and future of architectural education.
“Architecture is a process driven team of architects & interior designers in India in which women can deal each project with small interdisciplinary teams having the client as a design partner. “ Architecture Education is considered to be a catalyst for youth development of a nation which imparts in shaping the industry and nation. Women participation in architecture education plays an important role in the economic growth and development of the country. Lack of adequate studies about participation of women in architecture education has resulted in understanding the definite role played by women in the development process. To bridge this gap, I want to make a study that will envisage for women students of Degree and Diploma levels who are studying in Indian state and practicing in professional field. In addition, issues such as employment prospects and rate of absorption of women graduates are also probed. This thesis will highlight some of the important findings related to the participation of women in architecture education and practice.
Social History/Histoire Sociale, 2002
2021
Reference site: https://www.routledge.com/The-Routledge-Companion-to-Women-in-Architecture/Sokolina/p/book/9780367232344. Book preview (57 pages available): https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Routledge_Companion_to_Women_in_Arch/qhssEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&printsec=frontcover, https://routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9780429278891. Recognition: Top Ten Titles published by Routledge featured at 2022 CAA Annual Conference: Sokolina, Anna, ed. The Routledge Companion to Women in Architecture (2021) https://caa.confex.com/caa/2022/meetingapp.cgi/Session/10840; and The Nomination for the SAH 2023 Alice Davis Hitchcock Book Award Description: The Routledge Companion to Women in Architecture illuminates the names of pioneering women who over time continue to foster, shape, and build cultural, spiritual, and physical environments in diverse regions around the globe. It uncovers the remarkable evolution of women’s leadership, professional perspectives, craftsmanship, and scholarship in architecture from the preindustrial age to the present. The book is organized chronologically in five parts, outlining the stages of women’s expanding engagement, leadership, and contributions to architecture through the centuries. It contains twenty-nine chapters written by thirty-three recognized scholars committed to probing broader topographies across time and place and presenting portraits of practicing architects, leaders, teachers, writers, critics, and other kinds of professionals in the built environment. The intertwined research sets out debates, questions, and projects around women in architecture, stimulates broader studies and discussions in emerging areas, and becomes a catalyst for academic programs and future publications on the subject. The novelty of this volume is in presenting not only a collection of case studies but in broadening the discipline by advancing an incisive overview of the topic as a whole. It is an invaluable resource for architectural historians, academics, students, and professionals.
2016
Architecture and Design History have long ignored the achievements of women professionals in architecture and design fields with the consequences that women have been denied their own place in History. Considering that, since the end of the nineteenth century, specialised magazines have covered works by creative women, it is surprising that their contribution has still not been completely acknowledged by mainstream histories or ‘seminal histories'. It is a fact, that the History of Contemporary Architecture and Design has too frequently favoured men professionals' works simply omitting to mention works by their women colleagues. Despina Stratigakos's book entitled "Where Are the Women Architects?" proves yet again that in 2016 this subject is far from being completed and it is still worthy of close attention. This essay considers gender studies in the fields of History of contemporary Architecture and Design critically tracing an international bibliography on t...
Statistics on women in the architecture profession in Australia tell a story of women having truncated careers, limited longevity in the profession, and relative invisibility, despite significant and longstanding contributions. While Dana Cuff argues that the career path for all architects is fraught with uncertainty, gender appears to figure powerfully in making a career in architecture even more difficult for women. 1 The situation is not well understood, since previous research has tended to draw on simple statistical counts, surveys, and anecdotal reportage-methods that are not necessarily subtle enough to investigate gendered practices in depth. However, research from other fields, particularly those investigating gender and the professions more broadly, reveals that architecture, while perhaps an extreme case, is not alone in its patterns of women's participation. The fact that this has been rarely drawn upon within the field of architecture points to a significant gap in current knowledge regarding the impact of gender in the profession. Gaining a deeper understanding of this situation was a major impetus behind the Australian Research Council-funded Linkage Project: "Equity and Diversity in the Australian Architecture Profession: Women, Work and Leadership (2011-2014)," of which this dissertation forms a discrete part. This thesis contributes to knowledge by examining the complexity of gender in the Australian architecture profession through two main strategies, combining quantitative and qualitative methods in a complementary manner. The first strategy involves depicting the macro-scale patterns of women's participation in the profession in Australia more comprehensively than has been done before, by developing an analysis from a wider range of statistical data than are usually sourced. It finds that, although women are present in greater numbers than usually cited, the growth of women's participation is markedly slower than previously predicted, at a rate that lags behind other professions, and that is distorted by certain peculiarities in the architecture profession. This quantitative analysis strengthens the case that there are gendering processes shaping architectural careers, and indicates those points at which women tend to disappear over the course of a career in architecture. Building on the first research strategy, the second and larger part of the dissertation mobilises methods rarely deployed to investigate gender in architecture in Australia; specifically, interviews and workplace observation. Drawing upon seventy interviews held in three large commercial architecture practices, and observation in offices in Sydney and Brisbane, the dissertation seeks to illuminate the social construction of gender in the Australian architecture profession. It uses an
The information of this paper was delivered at the Conference of the International Federation for Research in Women’s History [In Association with the Bulgarian Women’s History Group, the Bulgarian Association of University Women and Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”], Women, Gender and the Cultural Production of Knowledge, St. Kliment Ohridski University of Sofia, 8-11 August 2007 Investigations on women architects from the 1980s until the present have pointed out worldwide pioneering figures, however, the analyses on their work are scarce. For the entire period between the two world wars, the number of architectural, urban and interior designs that Bulgarian women architects have worked on is over 200. Still, their names are rarely mentioned in publications on 20th century history of architecture and rather small part of their professional experience is familiar to the public. Numerous works and several sensational facts concerning the 20th century history of architecture in Bulgaria were discovered by a research project on the topic. This research underlines the necessity to popularize the pioneer women architects’ creativity in Bulgaria and worldwide through publications and exhibitions, and to introduce information about them into the architectural curriculum of universities. This will change the views on the 20th century development of architectural profession as well as of the Modern Movement culture in Bulgaria.
Smith, shortlisted for The Architect"s Journal"s Emerging Woman Architect of the Year, has just published an article in The Architectural Review titled "Why do Women Really Leave Architecture?"an article that, like many over the last year, attempts to tackle the tricky question of why women (who make up over 40% of architecture students in the US but only 23% of the profession) leave architecture.
Journal of Architecture, 2023
Today, while there is a pressing need to rethink architectural practices in the face of societal, climatic, and ecological crises, a better understanding of how architects in the past have rethought their role and contribution seem increasingly relevant. This article examines projects from the 1960s and 70s by two Danish women architects, Susanne Ussing and Anne Marie Rubin, and the people with whom they worked. These architects actively wanted to create living environments to stimulate a better society and they did so by practicing architecture differently. Starting from the significant contributions that Ussing and Rubin made for the exhibition ‘Alternative Architecture’ at the Louisiana Museum of Modern Art in 1977, I discuss what strategies they used and what alternative architecture meant for them. Ussing and Rubin’s works have only been scarcely discussed by architectural historians, yet they contributed to developing participatory approaches to architecture, shifting epistemologies in design and planning, foregrounding women’s experiences, and, in one project, addressing anti-racist agendas. Methodologically, I propose ways of working in the face of scant material in official architectural archives and ways of storying architecture as collaboration rather than as individual creation. This article builds on research carried out in the project Women in Danish Architecture 1925–1975 (www.womenindanisharchitecture.dk).
Originaly, in Dutch, in: Lisl Edhoffer/ Heidi de Mare/ Anna Vos, VROUWEN EN DE STAD [Women and the City]: 3-59. February 1986. Faculty of Architecture, Department 1: History, Media and Theory, Section Women’s Studies, Delft University of Technology, 1986
The topic of building and dwelling has been in the spotlight of the women’s movement and women’s studies for a number of years. In the Department of Architecture, Technical University Delft, that history dates back to 1978. This introduction, from 1986, aims to describe the specific position of Women's Studies in Architecture and hence our possibilities and responsibilities for and towards the women's movement on the one hand, and Architecture on the other.
How can we challenge the fundamental male dominance in the building industry (that is, as the architecture profession becomes more gender balanced, the building industry at large is characterised by inertia and nontransparent structures), and what could be the result of a balanced field of practice and production? How is a feminist architecture to develop responsible and caring approaches to transforming/making the world in such a way that it will welcome and host all living beings and all existing, imaginable and still-to-beinvented forms of life? Is a nomadic feminist practice that actually affirms different notions of spatiality and subjectivities possible within architectural practice? There is an urgent need for “rethinking the social in architecture” in late modernistic housing areas. In relationship to that I’m interested in posing the question of how feministic city planning could develop a method not only involving the citizens in social pre-studies, but bringing the process further into the design- and conventional planning phase? There is a need for new types of social places that could change the public sphere, that in many examples are dominated by men – but certainly not are attractive to women. Women do not have time to spend in public; they are occupied in domestic life. Is it possible to create ‘hybrid’ spaces with another type of necessary actives, taking more important roles in everyday life in comparison to cafés, shops etc.? One example is Stepwells in India. Could we mix playgrounds with restaurants, laundry with cafés? Or could we take this spatial challenge even further? Could a method be developed to give a strong motif that collaboration between feminism and architecture generates an important tool for “rethinking the social in architecture”?
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.